I have a select statement That I need to turn into an Update.
I need to update a particular unix time field to January 1, 2016.
I have to select the records using a compound select statement.
Update archive_queue set archive_time = 1451606400
FROM
select recordings.(star), archive_queue.(star)
from
recordings, archive_queue
where
recordings.device_alias = '70285' and recordings.keepdays = 120
and recordings.ident = archive_queue.rec_ident
The above gives me a syntax error. The select gives me the records that I need to update. I looked at some examples here, but can't figure out the proper syntax based on my needs. Thanks everyone !
You should remove the select and only have one FROM statement:
Update archive_queue set archive_time = 1451606400
from recordings, archive_queue
where recordings.device_alias = '70285' and recordings.keepdays = 120
and recordings.ident = archive_queue.rec_ident
Related
Recently I ran into an issue where we have multiple concurrent client requests causing performance issue in db. I tried the test scenario and as it turned out, when I run SELECT queries (same query) 6 to 7 times (gets worse with more), It degrades the performance and execution takes a lot of time. However I tried this one
SELECT TOP (100) COUNT(DISTINCT([Doc_Number])) AS "Expression"
FROM (
SELECT *
FROM "dbo"."Dummy_Table" "table_alias"
WHERE ((CAST("table_alias"."ID" AS NVARCHAR)) NOT IN
(
SELECT "PrimaryKey" AS ExceptionKey
FROM dbo.exceptions inner_exceptionStatus
LEFT JOIN dbo.Workflow inner_workflowStates ON
(inner_exceptionStatus."Status"= inner_workflowStates."UUID" AND
inner_exceptionStatus."UUID"= 'CA1662D6-73A2-4692-A765-E7E3EDB66062')
WHERE ("inner_workflowStates"."RemoveFromRecordSet" = 1 AND
"inner_workflowStates"."IsDeleted" = 0) AND
("inner_exceptionStatus"."IsArchived" IS NULL OR
"inner_exceptionStatus"."IsArchived" = 0)))) wrapperQuery
The query when runs alone takes around 1sec execution time. But If we runs it in parallel, for each query it takes up a wried amount of time of leads to timeout.
The only thing bothers me here is that SELECT query should be non-blocking and even with shared lock, then need to get along easily.
I am not sure if there is anything wrong in the query that adds up the situation.
Any help is deeply appreciated !!
Try this way
SELECT Count(DISTINCT( [Doc_Number] )) AS Expression
FROM dbo.Dummy_Table table_alias
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM dbo.exceptions inner_exceptionStatus
INNER JOIN dbo.Workflow inner_workflowStates
ON ( inner_exceptionStatus.Status = inner_workflowStates.UUID
AND inner_exceptionStatus.UUID = 'CA1662D6-73A2-4692-A765-E7E3EDB66062' )
WHERE inner_workflowStates.RemoveFromRecordSet = 1
AND inner_workflowStates.IsDeleted = 0
AND ( inner_exceptionStatus.IsArchived IS NULL
OR inner_exceptionStatus.IsArchived = 0 )
AND table_alias.ID = PrimaryKey)
Made couple of changes.
Changed NOT IN to NOT EXISTS
Removed the convert in "table_alias"."ID" because it will avoid using any index present in "table_alias"."ID" column. If the conversion is really required then add it.
Removed Top (100) since there is no Group By it will return a single record as result.
Still if the query is running slow then you need to post the execution plan and make sure the statistics are up-to-date
You can simplyfy your query like this :
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(Doc_Number)) AS Expression
FROM dbo.Dummy_Table dmy
WHERE not exists
(
SELECT *
FROM dbo.exceptions ies
INNER JOIN dbo.Workflow iws ON ies.Status= iws.UUID AND ies.UUID= 'CA1662D6-73A2-4692-A765-E7E3EDB66062'
WHERE iws.RemoveFromRecordSet = 1 AND iws.IsDeleted = 0 AND (ies.IsArchived IS NULL OR ies.IsArchived = 0)
and dmy.ID=PrimaryKey
)
Like prdp say :
Changed NOT IN to NOT EXISTS
Removed the convert in "table_alias"."ID" because it will avoid using any index present in "table_alias"."ID" column. If the conversion is really required then add it.
Removed Top (100) since there is no Group By it will return a single record as result.
I add :
Remove you temporary table wrapperQuery
You can use INNER JOIN because into where you test RemoveFromRecordSet = 1 then you remove null values.
Remove not utils quotes ,brackets and parenthèses into where clause
I'm coming to the end of setting up my first Python script which involves querying my SQL Server (which I've removed credentials for privacy reasons).
This is a excerpt of the code for which I can successfully login and query my SQL Server db.
I know my 2 SELECT queries work independently as I've tested already. But I've come unstuck setting the first SELECT query as a variable which I wish to pass into the 2nd Select queries where clause.
In SQL terms, I wish to set the adjusted date as the variable StartDate (from my first SELECT) and pass this to the Where statement in my 2nd SELECT statement. I think I'm failing on setting the variable properly. To reconfirm, I've verified the SELECT statements work from Python.
Is there something I need to add? Any suggestions appreciated.
import csv
import os
import urllib.request
import pymssql
conn = pymssql.connect(server='', user='', password='', database='')
StartDate = conn.cursor()
StartDate.execute('SELECT Dateadd(dd, -19, MAX(LastDateValue)) FROM tbl_Date')
ASXCodes = conn.cursor()
ASXCodes.execute('SELECT ASXCode FROM tbl_Company WHERE (ASX200 = 1 OR
MarketIndex =1 OR SegmentIndex = 1) AND Delisted = 0 AND LastTraded
>= StartDate ORDER BY ASXCode')
Just guessing - couldn't you do everything in one single query?
SELECT ASXCode FROM tbl_Company WHERE (ASX200 = 1 OR MarketIndex =1 OR SegmentIndex = 1) AND Delisted = 0 AND LastTraded >= (SELECT Dateadd(dd, -19, MAX(LastDateValue)) FROM tbl_Date) ORDER BY ASXCode
Also, I would imagine that tbl_Date.LastDateValue is indexed? If you get many records, that could be rather expensive...
SQL - How can I return a value from a different table base on a parameter
First time poster, long time reader:
I am using a custom Excel function that allows be to pass parameters and build a SQL string that returns a value. This is working fine. However, I would like to choose among various tables based on the parameters that are passed.
At the moment I have two working functions with SQL statements look like this:
_______FUNCTION ONE________
<SQLText>
SELECT PRODDTA.TABLE1.T1DESC as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.TABLE1
WHERE PRODDTA.TABLE1.T1KEY = '&PARM02'</SQLText>
_______FUNCTION TWO________
<SQLText>
SELECT PRODDTA.TABLE2.T2DESC as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.TABLE2
WHERE PRODDTA.TABLE2.T2KEY = '&PARM02'</SQLText>
So I am using IF logic in Excel to check the first parameter and decide which function to use.
It would be much better if I could do a single SQL statement that could pick the right table based on the 1st parameter. Logically something like this:
_______FUNCTIONS COMBINED________
IF '&PARM02' = “A” THEN
SELECT PRODDTA.TABLE1.T1DESC as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.TABLE1
WHERE PRODDTA.TABLE1.T1KEY = '&PARM02'
ELSE IF '&PARM02' = “B” THEN
SELECT PRODDTA.TABLE2.T2DESC as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.TABLE2
WHERE PRODDTA.TABLE2.T2KEY = '&PARM02'
ELSE
DESCRIPTION = “”
Based on another post Querying different table based on a parameter I tried this exact syntax with no success
<SQLText>
IF'&PARM02'= "A"
BEGIN
SELECT PRODDTA.F0101.ABALPH as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.F0101
WHERE PRODDTA.F0101.ABAN8 = '&PARM02'
END ELSE
BEGIN
SELECT PRODDTA.F4801.WADL01 as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.F4801
WHERE PRODDTA.F4801.WADOCO = '&PARM02'
END</SQLText>
You could try using a JOIN statement.
http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!9/23461d/1
Here is a fiddle showing two tables.
The following code snip will give you the values from both tables, using the Key as the matching logic.
SELECT Table1.description, Table1.key, Table2.description
from Table1
Join Table2 on Table1.key = Table2.key
Here's one way to do it. If PARM03='Use Table1' then the top half of the union will return records and vice versa. This won't necessarily product good performance though. You should consider why you are storing data in this way. It looks like you are partitioning data across different tables which is a bad idea.
SELECT PRODDTA.TABLE1.T1DESC as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.TABLE1
WHERE PRODDTA.TABLE1.T1KEY = '&PARM02'
AND &PARM03='Use Table1'
UNION ALL
SELECT PRODDTA.TABLE2.T2DESC as DESCRIPTION
FROM PRODDTA.TABLE2
WHERE PRODDTA.TABLE2.T2KEY = '&PARM02'</SQLText>
AND &PARM03='Use Table2'
I want to update on a linked server the result of a query as well from a linked server.
The first sql snippet gives me the value to be updated:
SELECT mmdb_vessel.IMONo, mmdb_vessel.DeathDate
From OPENQUERY(MMDB, 'SELECT FunctionalLocation, IMONo, VesselStatus, CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DeathDate, 102) AS DeathDate
FROM VESSEL
WHERE VESSEL.VesselStatusID <> 42 AND VESSEL.DeathDate is not null') as mmdb_vessel
, eb_all_v
WHERE
eb_all_v.IMO_No = mmdb_vessel.IMONo
AND eb_all_v.status = 'in service'
the second is actually what I'm not able to implement, it should show what I want to achieve:
UPDATE EPI2..EPI.PLANT
SET KIND_OF_LIQUIDATION_NO = 1
, LIQUIDATION_DATE = [result from snippet above].DeathDate
Where EPI2..EPI.PLANT.IMONo = [result from snippet above].IMONo
I'm not so sure if my explanation is sufficient, please feel free to ask for additional information!
Thanks, already in advance,
Werner
I would recommend to select the data from the remote server first and store the required data e.g. in a temptable, because LinkedServer and updates can have some sideeffects (e.g. performing a tablescan on the remote table, altough you would not expect it if an updaet is involved, etc) - but this depends on your exact usage/scenario.
Select data you need to update
SELECT * INTO #tmpTable FROM LINKEDSERVER.EPI.dbo.PLANT WHERE ....
Perform the update on local server
UPDATE EPI2..EPI.PLANT SET KIND_OF_LIQUIDATION_NO = 1, LIQUIDATION_DATE = t.DeathDate FROM #tmpTable t INNER JOIN EPI2..EPI.PLANT p on t.IMONo = p.IMONo
I have this sql:
UPDATE JOBMAKE SET WIP_STATUS='10sched1'
WHERE JBT_TYPE IN (SELECT JBT_TYPE FROM JOBVISIT WHERE JVST_ID = 21)
AND JOB_NUMBER IN (SELECT JOB_NUMBER FROM JOBVISIT WHERE JVST_ID = 21)
It works until I turn it into a parameterised query:
UPDATE JOBMAKE SET WIP_STATUS='10sched1'
WHERE JBT_TYPE IN (SELECT JBT_TYPE FROM JOBVISIT WHERE JVST_ID = #jvst_id)
AND JOB_NUMBER IN (SELECT JOB_NUMBER FROM JOBVISIT WHERE JVST_ID = #jvst_id)
Duplicated parameter names are not allowed. [ Parameter name = #jvst_id ]
I tried this (which i think would work in SQL SERVER 2005 - although I haven't tried it):
UPDATE JOBMAKE
SET WIP_STATUS='10sched1'
FROM JOBMAKE JM,JOBVISIT JV
WHERE JM.JOB_NUMBER = JV.JOB_NUMBER
AND JM.JBT_TYPE = JV.JBT_TYPE
AND JV.JVST_ID = 21
There was an error parsing the query. [ Token line number = 3,Token line offset = 1,Token in error = FROM ]
So, I can write dynamic sql instead of using parameters, or I can pass in 2 parameters with the same value, but does someone know how to do this a better way?
Colin
Your second attempt doesn't work because, based on the Books On-Line entry for UPDATE, SQL CE does't allow a FROM clause in an update statement.
I don't have SQL Compact Edition to test it on, but this might work:
UPDATE JOBMAKE
SET WIP_STATUS = '10sched1'
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM JOBVISIT AS JV
WHERE JV.JBT_TYPE = JOBMAKE.JBT_TYPE
AND JV.JOB_NUMBER = JOBMAKE.JOB_NUMBER
AND JV.JVST_ID = #jvst_id
)
It may be that you can alias JOBMAKE as JM to make the query slightly shorter.
EDIT
I'm not 100% sure of the limitations of SQL CE as they relate to the question raised in the comments (how to update a value in JOBMAKE using a value from JOBVISIT). Attempting to refer to the contents of the EXISTS clause in the outer query is unsupported in any SQL dialect I've come across, but there is another method you can try. This is untested but may work, since it looks like SQL CE supports correlated subqueries:
UPDATE JOBMAKE
SET WIP_STATUS = (SELECT JV.RES_CODE
FROM JOBVISIT AS JV
WHERE JV.JBT_TYPE = JOBMAKE.JBT_TYPE
AND JV.JOB_NUMBER = JOBMAKE.JOB_NUMBER
AND JV.JVST_ID = 20
)
There is a limitation, however. This query will fail if more than one row in JOBVISIT is retuned for each row in JOBMAKE.
If this doesn't work (or you cannot straightforwardly limit the inner query to a single row per outer row), it would be possible to carry out a row-by-row update using a cursor.