Printing strings in Assembly, calling that function in C [duplicate] - c

Question

This question already has an answer here:
What happens if you use the 32-bit int 0x80 Linux ABI in 64-bit code?
(1 answer)
Closed 2 years ago.
all. I was trying to get into programming with NASM, and I also wanted to learn how to make those functions callable in C. I am fairly certain the code that I have so far is correct, in that I need to set up a stack frame, and then undo that stack frame before I return from the routine. I also know I need to return a zero to ensure that there were no errors. I am using debian linux as well, in case I need to adjust for my OS.
The code:
global hello
section .data
message: db "Hello, world!",0 ; A C string needs the null terminator.
section .text
hello:
push rbp ; C calling convention demands that a
mov rbp,rsp ; stack frame be set up like so.
;THIS IS WHERE THE MAGIC (DOESN'T) HAPPEN
pop rbp ; Restore the stack
mov rax,0 ; normal, no error, return value
ret ; return
I feel as if I should point out that I ask this because all of the programs I found made external calls to printf. I do not wish to do this, I would really like to learn how to print things in assembly. So I suppose my questions are: What are the calling conventions for C functions in NASM? How do I print a string in NASM 64bit assembly?
Also, to make sure I have this part right, is this the proper way to call the assembly function in C?
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
hello();
return 0;
}
EDIT: Okay, I was able to work this out. Here's the assembly code. I assembled the .asm file along with the .c file using nasm -f elf64 -l hello.lst hello.asm && gcc -o hello hello.c hello.o
section .text
global hello
hello:
push rbp ; C calling convention demands that a
mov rbp,rsp ; stack frame be set up like so.
mov rdx,len ; Message length
mov rcx,message ; Message to be written
mov rax,4 ; System call number (sys_write)
int 0x80 ; Call kernel
pop rbp ; Restore the stack
mov rax,0 ; normal, no error, return value
ret
section .data
message: db "Hello, world!",0xa ; 0xa represents the newline char.
len: equ $ - message
The relevant C code (hello.c) looked like this:
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
hello();
return 0;
}
Some explanations include the lack of an #include, due to the I/O being done in the assembly file. Another thing that I needed to see to believe was that all the work was not done in assembly, as I did not have a _start identifier, or whatever that's called. Definitely need to learn more about system calls. Thank you so much to everyone who pointed me in the right direction.

Answer 1

As was cleared up in comments, any interaction between the world outside and your code is done through system calls. C stdio functions format text into an output buffer, then write it with write(2). Or read(2) into an input buffer, and scanf or read lines from that.
Writing in asm doesn't mean you should avoid libc functions when they're useful, e.g. printf/scanf. Usually it only makes sense to write small parts of a program in asm for speed. e.g. write one function that has a hot loop in asm, and call it from C or whatever other language. Doing the I/O with all the necessary error-checking of system call return values would not be very fun in asm. If you're curious what happens under the hood, read the compiler output and/or single-step the asm. You'll sometimes learn nice tricks from the compiler, and sometimes you'll see it generate less efficient code than you could have written by hand.
This is a problem:
mov rax,4 ; System call number (sys_write)
int 0x80 ; Call kernel
Although 64bit processes can use the i386 int 0x80 system call ABI, it is the 32bit ABI, with only 32bit pointers and so on. You will have a problem as soon as you go to write(2) a char array that's on the stack (since amd64 Linux processes start with a stack pointer that has the high bits set. Heap memory, and .data and .rodata memory mapped from the executable are mapped into the lower 32b of address space.)
The native amd64 ABI uses syscall, and the system call numbers aren't the same as the i386 ABI. I found this table of syscalls listing the number and which parameter goes in which register. sys/syscall.h eventually includes /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm/unistd_64.h to get the actual #define __NR_write 1 macros, and so on. There are standard rules for mapping arguments in order to registers. (Given in the ABI doc, IIRC).