Attention Everyone,
I am now trying to solve collection fetch odd problem.
What I want is to fetch Tabs collection and speaking of DB, Tabs Table has an association with Record Table.
So if the record table decides which tabs are enable while other tabs are disable, how can fetch only enabled tabs?
To clarify everything, now I add two table structures.
Tab
id:integer title:string, content:string
Record
id: integer, ... , tabs_value:integer
here, the binary expression of tabs_value decides which tabs are enable while other tabs are disable.
I hope to know it soon.
PS: You know record id already, namely, you know which record is using for this fetch.
Related
I have a problem with one of my forms in my MS Access database, and strangely it's the only form that has this problem.
The form has a typical Master/Detail structure, with the subform tied to a table. The subform record source includes a foreign key that pulls information from another table and populates the rest of the fields based on the key value. This foreign key is a Material number that defines a specific object in an inventory, and the other fields in the subform show details of this object.
Example from Signs table:
Material number: 116063175
StorageBin: A116
Material Description: Stop Sign
Dimensions: 48x48
All of this information is contained in the same table, but the form is for a table that is used to fill in what signs are on a particular road (stops, speed limits, etc.)
On all my other forms, when I type in the material number and shift focus anywhere else, the rest of the forms will fill in automatically. This process works here too, but for some reason Access wants to try to fill in the rest of the field data before I have finished typing the material number. I'll type "1" and access will throw an error that it cannot find a matching record in the Signs table in the foreign key's table. After rejecting the error twice, the data entry can resume as normal, which is also strange.
I hope I've been clear enough, this is my first time asking a question here.
Thanks in advance!
Edit: Tried re-building the form, same issue. Built another form similar but without my multiple comboboxes, didn't have the issue! Could this be due to underlying requery code in the Afterupdate event of my comboboxes? I have a cascading combobox setup on the form, could data entry be triggering a requery?
Edit2: for the time being, a fix that I am using is to make the material number and quantity (the two important fields for this form) into text boxes outside the subform, that the user can edit then place in the subform with a button click, which is coded as so:
Private Sub Command1_Click()
If Me!PrimaryRoadInventorySubform.Form.Dirty Then
Me!PrimaryRoadInventorySubform.Form.Dirty = False
End If
Me!PrimaryRoadInventorySubform.SetFocus
DoCmd.GoToRecord , , acNewRec
Me!PrimaryRoadInventorySubform.Form!MaterialNumber = MaterialNumtxt
Me!PrimaryRoadInventorySubform.Form!Quantity = Quantitytxt
End Sub
React router has very cool feature: if you have a list of items (Instagram for example) and if you click on one item, content opens in modal/overlay but if you copy-paste the link to new tab/window or share the link with a friend for example, it opens in its own page.
I would love to use this feature but I need to find a custom solution..
My posts are very data heavy
I've split posts data into 2 tables in database
1st is very lightweight containing essential data: 4-5 columns
2nd table is very heave, ~30 columns
When user uses search filter, list updates only with data from 1st table
If user clicks on post, it will open in a modal/overlay
I will recycle the data I already have (from 1st table) and also get rest of the data from 2nd table
However, when user shares the link or opens it in new tab/page, data from 1st table is not present. I would need to integrate a conditional logic:
If post opens in list view (modal/overlay), only get additinal 2nd table data
If it's opened in a new tab/window in its own page, get all the data, 1st table included
How could I integrate this with React router? Has anyone already tried it? This would also allow to use different layout/components when user opens item in page view. Is there a way to check it?
Or is there a flaw in my logic? I imagine list would update very fast because it doesn't require huge amount of data and also would modal/overlay because it recycles some of the data.
I read all the docs, also searched online - didn't find anything.
Modals in react router are great. I've used the pinterest example and adapted it to my own needs.
Ensure you do your check on state.modal===true in a master layout component to give you the modal styling.
you'll need to check if table 1 stuff is present in your state and dispatch an action to trigger the async call in componentDidMount. You should be fetching table 2 in all scenarios.
I have an app with multiple columns (about 3 columns as least), each column is a more detailed view of an item in a column on its left. This type of layout is similar to Asana's.
Lets take an example from 1 of the page I currently have:
Column 1 list all current users, clicking on 1 user will open a list of all sales orders of that user on column 2.
Column 2 show list of all orders of 1 selected user on column 1. Clicking on 1 order will show the details of that order
Column 3 show all details of an order selected on column 2. Clicking on a shipment in that order details will show the details of the shipment
Column 4 show all the details of a shipment selected on column 3
So on a so forth. Now there is another twist:
Column 2,3,4 show these details in a form, which mean they can be edited and submitted. Once they are submitted, it makes sense to reload all the column on the left of that edited column to refresh the info. However, for performance purpose I would like to reload them all in a single request and send them back in one json array hen update each column that has newly returned view code (lets assume the backend code is smart enough to handle all this)
I believe someone must have had this issue before, what is your solution to get around this?
Since you are loading different set of data. Its good not load them all at once. You can use ng-include and the the content of the ng-include can be triggered based on the clicks.
ng-inclue="<<scope variable>>"
For ex. In your controller,
Chnage the value of salesurl based on user action
<div class="slide-animate" ng-include="salesurl"></div>
The scope variable can be an URL, which renders the result set based on the parameters posted after user action.
Hope this help.
I am trying to create a incident log in safesfore. The key aspect is that everything can be added on the same page reducing the amount of clicks that have to be made. There are 6 fields i have created:
Date Opened, Date closed, incident, reported to, reported by and notes.
I was wondering if there is a way to create an "add new" button that will create another row of the fields i have just lised. The idea being that the page does not refresh it is all done in real time.
Many thanks
You'll need a custom Visualforce page implementation.
There are 2 ways to do it
1) Building a list of records on apex and iterate over that list displaying the fields on the front end (vf page apex:repeat)-- Then when the button "add new" is clicked you'll append an empty record to the list and re-render the apex:repeat to reflect the changes.
This is good because you don't need a lot of boilerplate code since the records with be binded with the backend. However, the rerendering can lead to some performance issues in my experience.
2) Build a custom Javascript implementation, where you have an in memory collection and using DOM manipulation add/remove rows of the list. When the user saves the data from memory must be sent using JSON and a VF Remoting method can perform the JSON parsing and saving the rows.
Both are valid, the first is good to avoid boilerplate but the second is much faster (but you need to write some boilerplate).
I have a Quickbase app with a form for adding records. On an intranet page, I have a link to the add record form. When a user clicks on that link, Quickbase opens the add record form. However, I would like to supply values for some of the fields on the form as parameters in the URL.
I am aware of API_AddRecord, but as I understand it, that can only be used for completely filling in all required fields and saving the record. The disprec parameter can be used to see the record, but doesn't keep the record in add mode without committing the record.
What I need to do, is to fill in a couple of the fields, but keep the record in add mode, allowing the user to fill in a couple more fields. The URLs on the intranet page are actually generated in a grid, so there are some fields that are already known then the user clicks on the link, and I don't want the user to have to type them in again.
Can this be done? Thanks for your input.
Sure. Folks do this all the time. Use a=API_GenAddRecordForm&_fid_1="foo"&_fid_2="bar" where the number are the Field IDs of the fields you want to fill out, and "foo" and "bar" are the values you want to fill in.