I have this xaml on a project that uses Caliburn micro :
<Window x:Class="Myproject.MainWindowView"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:cal="http://www.caliburnproject.org"
mc:Ignorable="d" d:DesignHeight="800" d:DesignWidth="1024" WindowStyle="None" Background="Black" >
</Window>
but when I run the application, I have a white line at the top of window :
How can I remove the line at the top?
I need a window that has no title bar, but should be resizable.
Well for the sake of easy points I suppose, the window chrome is built into the style templates and still inherited when you define WindowStyle="None" but still allow re-sizing to allow a hit spot for the manipulation event to occur. So like described in another answer you can take control of the base template and edit it to your requirements while still retaining the ability for the user to have point to invoke the re-sizing ability but with the frame thickness set to 0.
Hope this helps, cheers!
Related
This concerns WPF. The problem is that my MediaElement (actually a GIF) doesn't show up at runtime (so I only get an empty screen), even though it shows perfectly in the design mode. Before citing the code I note the following:
The GIF-file in question has been added to the solution.
Its BuildAction property is set to Resource (I've checked).
When I replace the MediaElement by an Image element (and either use the same GIF-file or replace that source-file by a .png file), the image/GIF does display at runtime. Just not when it's used as a MediaElement.
Closing and re-starting Visual Studio doesn't help.
As I said (and just to emphasize, if I may), the GIF image does display in the design mode part of the screen - just not at runtime.
And here's the code:
<Window x:Class="Testing.TestWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:Testing"
mc:Ignorable="d"
Title="TestWindow" WindowState="Maximized">
<StackPanel>
<MediaElement Source="pack://application:,,,/Images/untitled.gif" Stretch="Fill" Visibility="Visible" />
</StackPanel>
</Window>
Thanks.
I want to create a metro style application, I did some researches and I found lots of articles and tutorials about that.
But I still need a clear comparison between Modern UI for WPF , Elysium and MahApps.
Testing all of them takes too much time ! I need to learn bout each one's features to decide with which one to start.
Thanks,
first : Download the WPF Shell Integration Library Here
then use this XML Code :
<Window x:Class="MyLibrary.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:shell="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation/shell"
Title="MainWindow"
WindowStyle="SingleBorderWindow"
ResizeMode="CanResizeWithGrip"
mc:Ignorable="d"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
d:DesignHeight="449"
d:DesignWidth="677"
Foreground="White"
removed="Black">
<shell:WindowChrome.WindowChrome>
<shell:WindowChrome CaptionHeight="35"
GlassFrameThickness="0,0,0,1"
ResizeBorderThickness="5" />
</shell:WindowChrome.WindowChrome>
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot">
</Grid>
</Window>
(note, you need to have referenced Microsoft.Windows.Shell)
This is really the Best way to do that.. It will work on all windows versions.
Edit:
if you want to add Caption Buttons on the top of the window add this XAML code to any control at the top: (button as example)
<button shell:WindowChrome.IsHitTestVisibleInChrome="True"/>
I have Usercontrol.I want to disable its resizing.
The usercontrol is:
<UserControl x:Class="DocumentUpload"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:telerikGrid="clr-namespace:Telerik.Windows.Controls;assembly=Telerik.Windows.Controls.GridView"
xmlns:telerikGrid1="clr-namespace:Telerik.Windows.Controls.GridView;assembly=Telerik.Windows.Controls.GridView"
xmlns:telerikInp="clr-namespace:Telerik.Windows.Controls;assembly=Telerik.Windows.Controls.Input"
xmlns:telerikNav="clr-namespace:Telerik.Windows.Controls;assembly=Telerik.Windows.Controls.Navigation"
xmlns:telerikData="clr-namespace:Telerik.Windows.Data;assembly=Telerik.Windows.Data"
xmlns:telerik="clr-namespace:Telerik.Windows.Controls;assembly=Telerik.Windows.Controls" mc:Ignorable="d" xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008" xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
Height="auto" Width="auto" MaxWidth="520">
I got to know that there is property called
ResizeMode="NoResize"
.But it is not available in UserControl.Any suugestion?
You have Width and Height set to Auto, so I guess you want to allow the control to take as much space as needed but not more.
Also, UserControl is not resizing by itself, but depends upon the layout that it's part of.
So, the quickest way to fix your issue would be to set HorizontalAlignment="Left" and VerticalAlignment="Top". But you should consider the whole layout of your application and how the UC is affected by-/affects on other components of the UI.
Then the Parent property of your UserControl is holding the Window instance. Most of times, it will be NavigationWindow. Try the below code in loaded event of your UserControl and it will work.
((NavigationWindow)this.Parent).ResizeMode = ResizeMode.NoResize
I am converting some Silverlight XAML into WPF. I currently have a user control (MyControl) that is trying to include a couple of other controls that are custom buttons (MyButton1) that are within the same assembly. I have the following XAML that compiles and works in SL:
MyButton1
<UserControl
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
mc:Ignorable="d"
x:Class="MyCompany.MyNamespace.MySubnamespace.MyButton1"
d:DesignWidth="640" d:DesignHeight="480">
...
</UserControl>
MyControl
<UserControl
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:somename="clr-namespace:MyCompany.MyNamespace.MySubnamespace;assembly=MyCompany.MyAssemblyName"
mc:Ignorable="d"
x:Class="MyCompany.MyNamespace.MySubnamespace.MyControl"
d:DesignWidth="640" d:DesignHeight="480">
<somename:MyButton1 />
</UserControl>
When I try to compile this code in WPF, I get the following error:
The tag 'MyButton1' does not exist in XML namespace 'clr-namespace:MyCompany.MyNamespace.MySubnamespace;assembly=MyCompany.MyAssemblyName.'
The weird thing is, if I comment out the <somename:MyButton1 /> line of code and compile and then type in <somename: IntelliSense gives me the option to autocomplete MyButton1. Which suggests that the control itself is in the assembly but for some reason it is not being seen when the MyControl XAML is being compiled.
For some context, I took the SL csproj file and made some modifications to it manually to make it a WPF csproj file. If there is a possibility that this caused this funkiness to happen, I'd be glad to share relevant portions of the project file.
Found the answer on an MSDN forum. Turns out that the assembly=MyCompany.MyAssemblyName line in my xmlns was screwing things up. Once I removed that line, I was able to reference the controls.
Related Link: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/wpf/thread/807c9b80-81c7-4f75-aa2f-8427e17b1a90
To reference the current assembly you must not type its name but leave it blank, i.e. assembly=, the other option is of course to drop it completely. (MSDN -> Mapping to Current Assemblies)
I have the following XAML below for the main window in my WPF application, I am trying to set the design time d:DataContext below, which I can successfully do for all my various UserControls, but it gives me this error when I try to do it on the window...
Error 1 The property 'DataContext' must be in the default namespace or in the element namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation'. Line 8 Position 9. C:\dev\bplus\PMT\src\UI\MainWindow.xaml 8 9 UI
<Window x:Class="BenchmarkPlus.PMT.UI.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:UI="clr-namespace:BenchmarkPlus.PMT.UI"
xmlns:Controls="clr-namespace:BenchmarkPlus.PMT.UI.Controls"
d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=UI:MainViewModel, IsDesignTimeCreatable=True}"
Title="MainWindow" Height="1000" Width="1600" Background="#FF7A7C82">
<Grid>
<!-- Content Here -->
</grid>
</Window>
I needed to add the mc:Ignorable="d" attribute to the Window tag. Essentially I learned something new. The d: namespace prefix that Expression Blend/Visual Studio designer acknowledges is actually ignored/"commented out" by the real compiler/xaml parser!
<Window
...
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
mc:Ignorable="d"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
...
/>
The following was taken from
Nathan, Adam (2010-06-04). WPF 4 Unleashed (Kindle Locations 1799-1811). Sams. Kindle Edition.
Markup Compatibility
The markup compatibility XML namespace (http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006, typically used with an mc prefix) contains an Ignorable attribute that instructs XAML processors to ignore all elements/attributes in specified namespaces if they can’t be resolved to their .NET types/members. (The namespace also has a ProcessContent attribute that overrides Ignorable for specific types inside the ignored namespaces.)
Expression Blend takes advantage of this feature to do things like add design-time properties to XAML content that can be ignored at runtime.
mc:Ignorable can be given a space-delimited list of namespaces, and mc:ProcessContent can be given a space-delimited list of elements. When XamlXmlReader encounters ignorable content that can’t be resolved, it doesn’t report any nodes for it. If the ignorable content can be resolved, it will be reported normally. So consumers don’t need to do anything special to handle markup compatibility correctly.
Wow, what a pain! Let's hope MS puts in some VS design-time support for x:Bind.
We to be able to use the VS designer but also be able to switch easily to x:Bind instead of Binding. Here's what I did:
In my View, I added a property to get my ViewModel. This makes sense because x:Bind paths are relative to the Page (i.e. the View object).
In my Page XAML, I added the following to the <Page ... > at the top of the XAML:
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=local:MyView, IsDesignTimeCreatable=False}"
DataContext="{x:Bind}"
This way, the Page's actual data context is set to the Page itself due to the {x:Bind}. That's because x:Bind is relative to the Page and there is no path given.
At the same time, due to the d:DataContext line, the VS designer reflects on the MyView class (without creating an instance) for the purpose of the VS designer interaction. This lets VS design from MyView, where you can then scroll down to the ViewModel property, expand it and select the item that you want to bind to.
When you do all that, the VS designer will create a Binding statement whose path is relative to the View, i.e. it happens to be exactly the same as the path that x:Bind expects. So, if you want to switch to x:Bind later on, you can just search and replace all "{Binding" with "{x:Bind".
Why do we even need the d:DataContext line to tell VS what class to look at? Good question, since you would think that VS could figure out the very next line sets the DataContext to the Page, using DataContext={x:Bind}. Go ahead and try it, it does not work and neither does it work if you change x:Bind to Binding relative to self.
Hopefully this situation will get cleaned up by MS !!
If you are not tooo fussy on the data have a look at the sample data found in xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
You use it like this...
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Report.Audit.Data}" d:ItemsSource="{d:SampleData}" Grid.Row="1">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
it then renders the items control with a few rows of data
I've solved the problem adding d:DataContext="{d:SampleData}" in the component definition (UserControl or Window).
<UserControl x:Class="TestControl"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:TestApp.Views"
DataContext="{Binding TestViewModel}"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="450" d:DesignWidth="800"
d:DataContext="{d:SampleData}"
>