How to implement adaptive subdivision algorithm for curve in C - c

My homework is to write a C program with openGL/Glut which, after getting groups of 4 points by mouse click (points with 3 coordinates), should draw a bezier curve with adaptive algorithm. At a theoretical level it's clear how the algorithm works but I don't know how to put that in C code. I mean that at lesson we saw that the 4 control points could have a shape similar to a "trapeze" and then the algorithm calculates the two "heights" and then checks if they satisfy a tollerance. The problem is that the user might click everywhere in the screen and the points might not have trapeze-like shape...so, where can I start from? This is all I have
This is the cole I have written, which is called each time a control point is added:
if (bezierMode == CASTELJAU_ADAPTIVE) {
glColor3f (0.0f, 0.8f, 0.4f); /* draw adaptive casteljau curve in green */
for(i=0; i+3<numCV; i += 3)
adaptiveDeCasteljau3(CV, i, 0.01);
}
void adaptiveDeCasteljau3(float CV[MAX_CV][3], int position, float tolerance) {
float x01 = (CV[position][0] + CV[position+1][0]) / 2;
float y01 = (CV[position][1] + CV[position+1][1]) / 2;
float x12 = (CV[position+1][0] + CV[position+2][0]) / 2;
float y12 = (CV[position+1][1] + CV[position+2][1]) / 2;
float x23 = (CV[position+2][0] + CV[position+3][0]) / 2;
float y23 = (CV[position+2][1] + CV[position+3][1]) / 2;
float x012 = (x01 + x12) / 2;
float y012 = (y01 + y12) / 2;
float x123 = (x12 + x23) / 2;
float y123 = (y12 + y23) / 2;
float x0123 = (x012 + x123) / 2;
float y0123 = (y012 + y123) / 2;
float dx = CV[3][0] - CV[0][0];
float dy = CV[3][1] - CV[0][1];
float d2 = fabs(((CV[1][0] - CV[3][0]) * dy - (CV[1][1] - CV[3][1]) * dx));
float d3 = fabs(((CV[2][0] - CV[3][0]) * dy - (CV[2][1] - CV[3][1]) * dx));
if((d2 + d3)*(d2 + d3) < tolerance * (dx*dx + dy*dy)) {
glBegin(GL_LINE_STRIP);
glVertex2f(x0123, y0123);
glEnd();
return;
}
float tmpLEFT[4][3];
float tmpRIGHT[4][3];
tmpLEFT[0][0] = CV[0][0];
tmpLEFT[0][1] = CV[0][1];
tmpLEFT[1][0] = x01;
tmpLEFT[1][1] = y01;
tmpLEFT[2][0] = x012;
tmpLEFT[2][1] = y012;
tmpLEFT[3][0] = x0123;
tmpLEFT[3][1] = y0123;
tmpRIGHT[0][0] = x0123;
tmpRIGHT[0][1] = y0123;
tmpRIGHT[1][0] = x123;
tmpRIGHT[1][1] = y123;
tmpRIGHT[2][0] = x23;
tmpRIGHT[2][1] = y23;
tmpRIGHT[3][0] = CV[3][0];
tmpRIGHT[3][1] = CV[3][1];
adaptiveDeCasteljau3(tmpLEFT, 0, tolerance);
adaptiveDeCasteljau3(tmpRIGHT, 0, tolerance);
}
and obviously nothing is drawn. Do you have any idea?

the Begin / End should engulf your whole loop, not being inside for each isolated vertex !

Related

Ray Tracing calculation in C

I'm new to ray tracing and trying to program one in C. But My program keep on showing a dot (around 1-3 pixel) of the sphere in the wrong places and now I'm confused. This feels like a very stupid question, but I'm confused about exactly how big is 1 radius of a sphere? What I mean by that is if the radius is 1, the circle is 2 pixels?
I know all the calculations and I triple checked if I had any errors in my codes. but just incase, here is part of my codes:
Directions:
//size: 1024x768, view point (512 384 1), screen (0 0 0) to (1024 768 0)
ray[0] = x - start_x;
ray[1] = y - start_y;
ray[2] = 0 - start_z;
//normalize
double length;
length = (sqrt((ray[0]*ray[0]) + (ray[1]*ray[1]) + (ray[2]*ray[2])));
ray[0] = ray[0]/length;
ray[1] = ray[1]/length;
ray[2] = ray[2]/length;
Intersection:
temp = top; //my struct with sphere data, _x, _y, _z, _r, _red, _green, _blue
//x and y is the current pixel value
while (temp != NULL) {
x_diff = start_x - temp->_x + 0.0;
y_diff = start_y - temp->_y + 0.0;
z_diff = start_z - temp->_z + 0.0;
//a = 1 because my direction is a normalized
b = 2.0 * ((rayVector[0] * x_diff) + (rayVector[1] * y_diff) + (rayVector[2] * z_diff));
c = (x_diff * x_diff * 1.0) + (y_diff * y_diff) + (z_diff * z_diff) - (temp->_r * temp->_r);
check = (b * b) - (4.0 * c);
if (check < 0) { //0
pixels[width][height][0] = 0.0;
pixels[width][height][1] = 0.0;
pixels[width][height][2] = 0.0;
}
else if (check == 0) { //1
r1 = (b * -1.0) /2.0;
if (r1 < nearest_z) {
nearest_z = r1;
pixels[width][height][0] = temp->_red;
pixels[width][height][1] = temp->_green;
pixels[width][height][2] = temp->_blue;
}
}
else { //2
r1 = ((b * -1.0) + sqrt(check))/2.0;
r2 = ((b * -1.0) - sqrt(check))/2.0;
if ((r1 < r2) && (r1 < nearest_z)) {
nearest_z = r1;
pixels[width][height][0] = 255.0;
pixels[width][height][1] = 0;
pixels[width][height][2] = 0;
}
else if ((r2 < r1) && (r2 < nearest_z)) {
nearest_z = r2;
pixels[width][height][0] = temp->_red;
pixels[width][height][1] = temp->_green;
pixels[width][height][2] = temp->_blue;
}
}
temp = temp->next;
}
I haven't done any lightings yet since the flat colouring it doesn't work. I'm new to openGL so expect me to miss some common functions in the codes. Thanks in advance.
Edit:
I only have one sphere currently, but my output looks like: img1
I was expecting a bigger circle? Also, I had a printf for each intersection (if there is) and when I manually plot in a paper, it is a 4x5 pixel square. But there are 4 dots in the output.
Edit 2: I change the size of the sphere to: x = 512 y = 384 z = -21 r = 30, it gave me this:
img2
Again, I only have one sphere and there are 4 in the image. Also, there are holds between the lines?
If I change the z value to -20, now my output is all white (colour of sphere).
I use glDrawPixels(1024,768,GL_RGB,GL_FLOAT,pixels); to draw
I had a RBG output file, everything seems to be in the right place. but when I draw on the program, it is off.

Function to rotate bitmap in degrees works pretty fast, but repositions output image

I've built a good function for rotating bitmaps in degrees.
The problem that occurred after some optimizations is that the output image is getting slightly re-positioned during the rotation.
I've recorded a 360o rotating video for you to see what do I mean.
And the code as follows:
#define OFFSET_OF_ID (0x0)
#define OFFSET_OF_SIZE (0x2)
#define OFFSET_OF_PIXELS (0xA)
#define OFFSET_OF_NDIB (0xE)
#define OFFSET_OF_WIDTH (0x12)
#define OFFSET_OF_HEIGHT (0x16)
#define OFFSET_OF_BPP (0x1C)
#define OFFSET_OF_NRAW (0x22)
typedef unsigned char byte, pixel[3];
typedef unsigned short word;
typedef unsigned long dword;
typedef unsigned long long ddword;
byte*
bmp_rotate
(byte *buffer, float angle)
{
const dword src_width = *( (dword*)&buffer[OFFSET_OF_WIDTH]);
const dword src_height = *( (dword*)&buffer[OFFSET_OF_HEIGHT]);
const dword src_nraw = *( (dword*)&buffer[OFFSET_OF_NRAW]);
const dword src_pixels = *( (dword*)&buffer[OFFSET_OF_PIXELS]);
const dword src_bpp = *( (dword*)&buffer[OFFSET_OF_BPP]);
const dword single = src_bpp / 8;
const dword row = src_width * single;
dword rowsize = (row % 4) ? (row + 4 - row % 4) : (row);
byte *dest = calloc( src_pixels + src_nraw, sizeof(byte) );
double midX, midY;
int i, j;
double sin_angle = sin(angle);
double cos_angle = cos(angle);
midX = src_width / 2.0f;
midY = src_height / 2.0f;
memcpy(dest, buffer, src_pixels);
for(j = 0; j < src_height; j++)
{
dword dest_offset = src_pixels + j * rowsize;
double deltaY = j - midY;
double deltaX = 0 - midX;
double x_computation, y_computation;
x_computation = midX + deltaX * cos_angle + deltaY * sin_angle + 0.5f;
y_computation = midY - deltaX * sin_angle + deltaY * cos_angle + 0.5f;
for(i = 0; i < src_width; i++)
{
ddword rotX = x_computation;
ddword rotY = y_computation;
if(rotX >= 0 && rotX < src_width && rotY >= 0 && rotY < src_height)
{
ddword src_offset = src_pixels + rotY * rowsize + rotX * single;
memcpy(&dest[dest_offset], &buffer[src_offset], sizeof(pixel));
}
x_computation += cos_angle;
y_computation -= sin_angle;
dest_offset += single;
}
}
return dest;
}
What causes this indecent behavior?
I can't really see your problem in the video, but I assume that the full 360° rotation is achieved in various partial rotations.
If we look at a 180° rotation, the offset becomes clear: The sine is 0 and the cosine is −1. The rotated coordinates of the top left corner (0,0) is then:
x' = xm + (x - xm) * cosa + (y - ym) * sina = xm + xm = w
y' = ym - (x - xm) * sina + (y - ym) * cosa = ym + ym = h
The coordinates (w, h) are the exclusive right and bottom borders.
Your working coordinates are real numbers. The integer values describe the left and top coordinates. Converting the (positive) real coords to integers will truncate the fractional part and yield the zero-based pixel indices.
You add 0.5 to your working coordinates in the target space once to enforce proper index calculation. Instead, you should treat the real coordinates of all pixels as the middle of that pixel:
x(i) = i + 0.5
y(j) = j + 0.5
All your calculations remain correct, except:
double deltaY = j + 0.5 - midY;
double deltaX = 0 + 0.5 - midX;
x_computation = midX + deltaX * cos_angle + deltaY * sin_angle;
y_computation = midY - deltaX * sin_angle + deltaY * cos_angle;
The idea is to treat pixel coordinates as pixel centres in both source and target space. The correct representation in target space is achieved automatically by rounding towards zero when convering to integer.
It may be a rounding-related problem. I have also faced this kind of problem in my projects in the past. Please check the lines where "integer to other types" or "other types to integer" conversions occur.

Cheap way of calculating cubic bezier length

An analytical solution for cubic bezier length
seems not to exist, but it does not mean that
coding a cheap solution does not exist. By cheap I mean something like in the range of 50-100 ns (or less).
Does someone know anything like that? Maybe in two categories:
1) less error like 1% but more slow code.
2) more error like 20% but faster?
I scanned through google a bit but it doesn't
find anything which looks like a nice solution. Only something like divide on N line segments
and sum the N sqrt - too slow for more precision,
and probably too inaccurate for 2 or 3 segments.
Is there anything better?
Another option is to estimate the arc length as the average between the chord and the control net. In practice:
Bezier bezier = Bezier (p0, p1, p2, p3);
chord = (p3-p0).Length;
cont_net = (p0 - p1).Length + (p2 - p1).Length + (p3 - p2).Length;
app_arc_length = (cont_net + chord) / 2;
You can then recursively split your spline segment into two segments and calculate the arc length up to convergence. I tested myself and it actually converges pretty fast. I got the idea from this forum.
Simplest algorithm: flatten the curve and tally euclidean distance. As long as you want an approximate arc length, this solution is fast and cheap. Given your curve's coordinate LUT—you're talking about speed, so I'm assuming you use those, and don't constantly recompute the coordinates—it's a simple for loop with a tally. In generic code, with a dist function that computes the euclidean distance between two points:
var arclength = 0,
last=LUT.length-1,
i;
for (i=0; i<last; i++) {
arclength += dist(LUT[i], LUT[i+1]);
}
Done. arclength is now the approximate arc length based on the maximum number of segments you can form in the curve based on your LUT. Need things faster with a larger potential error? Control the segment count.
var arclength = 0,
segCount = ...,
last=LUT.length-2,
step = last/segCount,
s, i;
for (s=0; s<=segCount; s++) {
i = (s*step/last)|0;
arclength += dist(LUT[i], LUT[i+1]);
}
This is pretty much the simplest possible algorithm that still generates values that come even close to the true arc length. For anything better, you're going to have to use more expensive numerical approaches (like the Legendre-Gauss quadrature technique).
If you want to know why, hit up the arc length section of "A Primer on Bézier Curves".
in my case a fast and valid approach is this. (Rewritten in c# for Unity3d)
public static float BezierSingleLength(Vector3[] points){
var p0 = points[0] - points[1];
var p1 = points[2] - points[1];
var p2 = new Vector3();
var p3 = points[3]-points[2];
var l0 = p0.magnitude;
var l1 = p1.magnitude;
var l3 = p3.magnitude;
if(l0 > 0) p0 /= l0;
if(l1 > 0) p1 /= l1;
if(l3 > 0) p3 /= l3;
p2 = -p1;
var a = Mathf.Abs(Vector3.Dot(p0,p1)) + Mathf.Abs(Vector3.Dot(p2,p3));
if(a > 1.98f || l0 + l1 + l3 < (4 - a)*8) return l0+l1+l3;
var bl = new Vector3[4];
var br = new Vector3[4];
bl[0] = points[0];
bl[1] = (points[0]+points[1]) * 0.5f;
var mid = (points[1]+points[2]) * 0.5f;
bl[2] = (bl[1]+mid) * 0.5f;
br[3] = points[3];
br[2] = (points[2]+points[3]) * 0.5f;
br[1] = (br[2]+mid) * 0.5f;
br[0] = (br[1]+bl[2]) * 0.5f;
bl[3] = br[0];
return BezierSingleLength(bl) + BezierSingleLength(br);
}
I worked out the closed form expression of length for a 3 point Bezier (below). I've not attempted to work out a closed form for 4+ points. This would most likely be difficult or complicated to represent and handle. However, a numerical approximation technique such as a Runge-Kutta integration algorithm (see my Q&A here for details) would work quite well by integrating using the arc length formula.
Here is some Java code for the arc length of a 3 point Bezier, with points a,b, and c.
v.x = 2*(b.x - a.x);
v.y = 2*(b.y - a.y);
w.x = c.x - 2*b.x + a.x;
w.y = c.y - 2*b.y + a.y;
uu = 4*(w.x*w.x + w.y*w.y);
if(uu < 0.00001)
{
return (float) Math.sqrt((c.x - a.x)*(c.x - a.x) + (c.y - a.y)*(c.y - a.y));
}
vv = 4*(v.x*w.x + v.y*w.y);
ww = v.x*v.x + v.y*v.y;
t1 = (float) (2*Math.sqrt(uu*(uu + vv + ww)));
t2 = 2*uu+vv;
t3 = vv*vv - 4*uu*ww;
t4 = (float) (2*Math.sqrt(uu*ww));
return (float) ((t1*t2 - t3*Math.log(t2+t1) -(vv*t4 - t3*Math.log(vv+t4))) / (8*Math.pow(uu, 1.5)));
public float FastArcLength()
{
float arcLength = 0.0f;
ArcLengthUtil(cp0.position, cp1.position, cp2.position, cp3.position, 5, ref arcLength);
return arcLength;
}
private void ArcLengthUtil(Vector3 A, Vector3 B, Vector3 C, Vector3 D, uint subdiv, ref float L)
{
if (subdiv > 0)
{
Vector3 a = A + (B - A) * 0.5f;
Vector3 b = B + (C - B) * 0.5f;
Vector3 c = C + (D - C) * 0.5f;
Vector3 d = a + (b - a) * 0.5f;
Vector3 e = b + (c - b) * 0.5f;
Vector3 f = d + (e - d) * 0.5f;
// left branch
ArcLengthUtil(A, a, d, f, subdiv - 1, ref L);
// right branch
ArcLengthUtil(f, e, c, D, subdiv - 1, ref L);
}
else
{
float controlNetLength = (B-A).magnitude + (C - B).magnitude + (D - C).magnitude;
float chordLength = (D - A).magnitude;
L += (chordLength + controlNetLength) / 2.0f;
}
}
first of first you should Understand the algorithm use in Bezier,
When i was coding a program by c# Which was full of graphic material I used beziers and many time I had to find a point cordinate in bezier , whic it seem imposisble in the first look. so the thing i do was to write Cubic bezier function in my costume math class which was in my project. so I will share the code with you first.
//--------------- My Costum Power Method ------------------\\
public static float FloatPowerX(float number, int power)
{
float temp = number;
for (int i = 0; i < power - 1; i++)
{
temp *= number;
}
return temp;
}
//--------------- Bezier Drawer Code Bellow ------------------\\
public static void CubicBezierDrawer(Graphics graphics, Pen pen, float[] startPointPixel, float[] firstControlPointPixel
, float[] secondControlPointPixel, float[] endPointPixel)
{
float[] px = new float[1111], py = new float[1111];
float[] x = new float[4] { startPointPixel[0], firstControlPointPixel[0], secondControlPointPixel[0], endPointPixel[0] };
float[] y = new float[4] { startPointPixel[1], firstControlPointPixel[1], secondControlPointPixel[1], endPointPixel[1] };
int i = 0;
for (float t = 0; t <= 1F; t += 0.001F)
{
px[i] = FloatPowerX((1F - t), 3) * x[0] + 3 * t * FloatPowerX((1F - t), 2) * x[1] + 3 * FloatPowerX(t, 2) * (1F - t) * x[2] + FloatPowerX(t, 3) * x[3];
py[i] = FloatPowerX((1F - t), 3) * y[0] + 3 * t * FloatPowerX((1F - t), 2) * y[1] + 3 * FloatPowerX(t, 2) * (1F - t) * y[2] + FloatPowerX(t, 3) * y[3];
graphics.DrawLine(pen, px[i - 1], py[i - 1], px[i], py[i]);
i++;
}
}
as you see above, this is the way a bezier Function work and it draw the same Bezier as Microsoft Bezier Function do( I've test it). you can make it even more accurate by incrementing array size and counter size or draw elipse instead of line& ... . All of them depend on you need and level of accuracy you need and ... .
Returning to main goal ,the Question is how to calc the lenght???
well The answer is we Have tons of point and each of them has an x coorinat and y coordinate which remember us a triangle shape & especially A RightTriabgle Shape. so if we have point p1 & p2 , we can calculate the distance of them as a RightTriangle Chord. as we remeber from our math class in school, in ABC Triangle of type RightTriangle, chord Lenght is -> Sqrt(Angle's FrontCostalLenght ^ 2 + Angle's SideCostalLeghth ^ 2);
and there is this relation betwen all points we calc the lenght betwen current point and the last point before current point(exmp p[i - 1] & p[i]) and store sum of them all in a variable. lets show it in code bellow
//--------------- My Costum Power Method ------------------\\
public static float FloatPower2(float number)
{
return number * number;
}
//--------------- My Bezier Lenght Calculator Method ------------------\\
public static float CubicBezierLenghtCalculator(float[] startPointPixel
, float[] firstControlPointPixel, float[] secondControlPointPixel, float[] endPointPixel)
{
float[] tmp = new float[2];
float lenght = 0;
float[] px = new float[1111], py = new float[1111];
float[] x = new float[4] { startPointPixel[0], firstControlPointPixel[0]
, secondControlPointPixel[0], endPointPixel[0] };
float[] y = new float[4] { startPointPixel[1], firstControlPointPixel[1]
, secondControlPointPixel[1], endPointPixel[1] };
int i = 0;
for (float t = 0; t <= 1.0; t += 0.001F)
{
px[i] = FloatPowerX((1.0F - t), 3) * x[0] + 3 * t * FloatPowerX((1.0F - t), 2) * x[1] + 3F * FloatPowerX(t, 2) * (1.0F - t) * x[2] + FloatPowerX(t, 3) * x[3];
py[i] = FloatPowerX((1.0F - t), 3) * y[0] + 3 * t * FloatPowerX((1.0F - t), 2) * y[1] + 3F * FloatPowerX(t, 2) * (1.0F - t) * y[2] + FloatPowerX(t, 3) * y[3];
if (i > 0)
{
tmp[0] = Math.Abs(px[i - 1] - px[i]);// calculating costal lenght
tmp[1] = Math.Abs(py[i - 1] - py[i]);// calculating costal lenght
lenght += (float)Math.Sqrt(FloatPower2(tmp[0]) + FloatPower2(tmp[1]));// calculating the lenght of current RightTriangle Chord & add it each time to variable
}
i++;
}
return lenght;
}
if you wish to have faster calculation just need to reduce px & py array lenght and loob count.
We also can decrease memory need by reducing px and py to array lenght to 1 or make a simple double variable but becuase of Conditional situation Happend which Increase Our Big O I didn't do that.
Hope it helped you so much. if have another question just ask.
With Best regards, Heydar - Islamic Republic of Iran.

Grainy looking sphere in my ray tracer

I am trying to write a simple ray tracer. The final image should like this: I have read stuff about it and below is what I am doing:
create an empty image (to fill each pixel, via ray tracing)
for each pixel [for each row, each column]
create the equation of the ray emanating from our pixel
trace() ray:
if ray intersects SPHERE
compute local shading (including shadow determination)
return color;
Now, the scene data is like: It sets a gray sphere of radius 1 at (0,0,-3). It sets a white light source at the origin.
2
amb: 0.3 0.3 0.3
sphere
pos: 0.0 0.0 -3.0
rad: 1
dif: 0.3 0.3 0.3
spe: 0.5 0.5 0.5
shi: 1
light
pos: 0 0 0
col: 1 1 1
Mine looks very weird :
//check ray intersection with the sphere
boolean intersectsWithSphere(struct point rayPosition, struct point rayDirection, Sphere sp,float* t){
//float a = (rayDirection.x * rayDirection.x) + (rayDirection.y * rayDirection.y) +(rayDirection.z * rayDirection.z);
// value for a is 1 since rayDirection vector is normalized
double radius = sp.radius;
double xc = sp.position[0];
double yc =sp.position[1];
double zc =sp.position[2];
double xo = rayPosition.x;
double yo = rayPosition.y;
double zo = rayPosition.z;
double xd = rayDirection.x;
double yd = rayDirection.y;
double zd = rayDirection.z;
double b = 2 * ((xd*(xo-xc))+(yd*(yo-yc))+(zd*(zo-zc)));
double c = (xo-xc)*(xo-xc) + (yo-yc)*(yo-yc) + (zo-zc)*(zo-zc) - (radius * radius);
float D = b*b + (-4.0f)*c;
//ray does not intersect the sphere
if(D < 0 ){
return false;
}
D = sqrt(D);
float t0 = (-b - D)/2 ;
float t1 = (-b + D)/2;
//printf("D=%f",D);
//printf(" t0=%f",t0);
//printf(" t1=%f\n",t1);
if((t0 > 0) && (t1 > 0)){
*t = min(t0,t1);
return true;
}
else {
*t = 0;
return false;
}
}
Below is the trace() function:
unsigned char* trace(struct point rayPosition, struct point rayDirection, Sphere * totalspheres) {
struct point tempRayPosition = rayPosition;
struct point tempRayDirection = rayDirection;
float f=0;
float tnear = INFINITY;
boolean sphereIntersectionFound = false;
int sphereIndex = -1;
for(int i=0; i < num_spheres ; i++){
float t = INFINITY;
if(intersectsWithSphere(tempRayPosition,tempRayDirection,totalspheres[i],&t)){
if(t < tnear){
tnear = t;
sphereIntersectionFound = true;
sphereIndex = i;
}
}
}
if(sphereIndex < 0){
//printf("No interesection found\n");
mycolor[0] = 1;
mycolor[1] = 1;
mycolor[2] = 1;
return mycolor;
}
else {
Sphere sp = totalspheres[sphereIndex];
//intersection point
hitPoint[0].x = tempRayPosition.x + tempRayDirection.x * tnear;
hitPoint[0].y = tempRayPosition.y + tempRayDirection.y * tnear;
hitPoint[0].z = tempRayPosition.z + tempRayDirection.z * tnear;
//normal at the intersection point
normalAtHitPoint[0].x = (hitPoint[0].x - totalspheres[sphereIndex].position[0])/ totalspheres[sphereIndex].radius;
normalAtHitPoint[0].y = (hitPoint[0].y - totalspheres[sphereIndex].position[1])/ totalspheres[sphereIndex].radius;
normalAtHitPoint[0].z = (hitPoint[0].z - totalspheres[sphereIndex].position[2])/ totalspheres[sphereIndex].radius;
normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0] = normalize(normalAtHitPoint[0]);
for(int j=0; j < num_lights ; j++) {
for(int k=0; k < num_spheres ; k++){
shadowRay[0].x = lights[j].position[0] - hitPoint[0].x;
shadowRay[0].y = lights[j].position[1] - hitPoint[0].y;
shadowRay[0].z = lights[j].position[2] - hitPoint[0].z;
normalizedShadowRay[0] = normalize(shadowRay[0]);
//R = 2 * ( N dot L) * N - L
reflectionRay[0].x = - 2 * dot(normalizedShadowRay[0],normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0]) * normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0].x +normalizedShadowRay[0].x;
reflectionRay[0].y = - 2 * dot(normalizedShadowRay[0],normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0]) * normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0].y +normalizedShadowRay[0].y;
reflectionRay[0].z = - 2 * dot(normalizedShadowRay[0],normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0]) * normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0].z +normalizedShadowRay[0].z;
normalizeReflectionRay[0] = normalize(reflectionRay[0]);
struct point temp;
temp.x = hitPoint[0].x + (shadowRay[0].x * 0.0001 );
temp.y = hitPoint[0].y + (shadowRay[0].y * 0.0001);
temp.z = hitPoint[0].z + (shadowRay[0].z * 0.0001);
struct point ntemp = normalize(temp);
float f=0;
struct point tempHitPoint;
tempHitPoint.x = hitPoint[0].x + 0.001;
tempHitPoint.y = hitPoint[0].y + 0.001;
tempHitPoint.z = hitPoint[0].z + 0.001;
if(intersectsWithSphere(hitPoint[0],ntemp,totalspheres[k],&f)){
// if(intersectsWithSphere(tempHitPoint,ntemp,totalspheres[k],&f)){
printf("In shadow\n");
float r = lights[j].color[0];
float g = lights[j].color[1];
float b = lights[j].color[2];
mycolor[0] = ambient_light[0] + r;
mycolor[1] = ambient_light[1] + g;
mycolor[2] = ambient_light[2] + b;
return mycolor;
} else {
// point is not is shadow , use Phong shading to determine the color of the point.
//I = lightColor * (kd * (L dot N) + ks * (R dot V) ^ sh)
//(for each color channel separately; note that if L dot N < 0, you should clamp L dot N to zero; same for R dot V)
float x = dot(normalizedShadowRay[0],normalizedNormalAtHitPoint[0]);
if(x < 0)
x = 0;
V[0].x = - rayDirection.x;
V[0].x = - rayDirection.y;
V[0].x = - rayDirection.z;
normalizedV[0] = normalize(V[0]);
float y = dot(normalizeReflectionRay[0],normalizedV[0]);
if(y < 0)
y = 0;
float ar = totalspheres[sphereIndex].color_diffuse[0] * x;
float br = totalspheres[sphereIndex].color_specular[0] * pow(y,totalspheres[sphereIndex].shininess);
float r = lights[j].color[0] * (ar+br);
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
float bg = totalspheres[sphereIndex].color_specular[1] * pow(y,totalspheres[sphereIndex].shininess);
float ag = totalspheres[sphereIndex].color_diffuse[1] * x;
float g = lights[j].color[1] * (ag+bg);
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
float bb = totalspheres[sphereIndex].color_specular[2] * pow(y,totalspheres[sphereIndex].shininess);
float ab = totalspheres[sphereIndex].color_diffuse[2] * x;
float b = lights[j].color[2] * (ab+bb);
mycolor[0] = r + ambient_light[0];
mycolor[1] = g + ambient_light[1];
mycolor[2] = b+ ambient_light[2];
return mycolor;
}
}
}
}
}
The code calling trace() looks like :
void draw_scene()
{
//Aspect Ratio
double a = WIDTH / HEIGHT;
double angel = tan(M_PI * 0.5 * fov/ 180);
ray[0].x = 0.0;
ray[0].y = 0.0;
ray[0].z = 0.0;
glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT);
unsigned int x,y;
float sx, sy;
for(x=0;x < WIDTH;x++)
{
glPointSize(2.0);
glBegin(GL_POINTS);
for(y=0;y < HEIGHT;y++)
{
sx = (((x + 0.5) / WIDTH) * 2.0 ) - 1;
sy = (((y + 0.5) / HEIGHT) * 2.0 ) - 1;;
sx = sx * angel * a;
sy = sy * angel;
//set ray direction
ray[1].x = sx;
ray[1].y = sy;
ray[1].z = -1;
normalizedRayDirection[0] = normalize(ray[1]);
unsigned char* color = trace(ray[0],normalizedRayDirection[0],spheres);
unsigned char x1 = color[0] * 255;
unsigned char y1 = color[1] * 255;
unsigned char z1 = color[2] * 255;
plot_pixel(x,y,x1 %256,y1%256,z1%256);
}
glEnd();
glFlush();
}
}
There could be many, many problems with the code/understanding.
I haven't taken the time to understand all your code, and I'm definitely not a graphics expert, but I believe the problem you have is called "surface acne". In this case it's probably happening because your shadow rays are intersecting with the object itself. What I did in my code to fix this is add epsilon * hitPoint.normal to the shadow ray origin. This effectively moves the ray away from your object a bit, so they don't intersect.
The value I'm using for epsilon is the square root of 1.19209290 * 10^-7, as that is the square root of a constant called EPSILON that is defined in the particular language I'm using.
What possible reason do you have for doing this (in the non-shadow branch of trace (...)):
V[0].x = - rayDirection.x;
V[0].x = - rayDirection.y;
V[0].x = - rayDirection.z;
You might as well comment out the first two computations since you write the results of each to the same component. I think you probably meant to do this instead:
V[0].x = - rayDirection.x;
V[0].y = - rayDirection.y;
V[0].z = - rayDirection.z;
That said, you should also avoid using GL_POINT primitives to cover a 2x2 pixel quad. Point primitives are not guaranteed to be square, and OpenGL implementations are not required to support any size other than 1.0. In practice, most support 1.0 - ~64.0 but glDrawPixels (...) is a much better way of writing 2x2 pixels, since it skips primitive assembly and the above mentioned limitations. You are using immediate mode in this example anyway, so glRasterPos (...) and glDrawPixels (...) are still a valid approach.
It seems you are implementing the formula here, but you deviate at the end from the direction the article takes.
First the article warns that D & b can be very close in value, so that -b + D gets you a very limited number. They suggest an alternative.
Also, you are testing that both t0 & t1 > 0. This doesn't have to be true for you to hit the sphere, you could be inside of it (though you obviously should not be in your test scene).
Finally, I would add a test at the beginning to confirm that the direction vector is normalized. I've messed that up more than once in my renderers.

Dealing with underflow in C " if " condition - using boolean

I've a problem, i'm stuck with some underflow problem for my algorithm.
I'm basically dseisgning a path from a Bezier curve and to deal with this I had to work with some vector multiplication (cross and dot product) in order to have the angle between two vectors and the clock-counterclock direction from one to another one.
The problem is that when the path is a straight line one of the control variable has problem of underflow, basically blocking the execution and causing errors.
Here is the code:
void BezierInterp() {
NumOfSetpoints = 10;
float seqTH[11];
float orient[10];
float divider;
math.MatrixMult((float*) BCoeff, (float*) waypointX, 11, 4, 1,
(float*) setpoint0);
math.MatrixMult((float*) BCoeff, (float*) waypointY, 11, 4, 1,
(float*) setpoint1);
float dx1, dy1, dx2, dy2, dxy1, dxy2, dir;
dx1 = cos(state[2]);
dy1 = sin(state[2]);
dx2 = setpoint0[1] - setpoint0[0];
dy2 = setpoint1[1] - setpoint1[0];
dxy2 = sqrt(sq(dx2) + sq(dy2));
dir = dx1 * dy2 - dx2 * dy1;
if (dxy2<0.0001 && dxy2>-0.0001) {
seqTH[0] = 0.0;
}
else{
if (dir >= 0) {
seqTH[0] = acos((dx1 * dx2 + dy1 * dy2) / (dxy2));
} else {
seqTH[0] = -acos((dx1 * dx2 + dy1 * dy2) / (dxy2));
}}
for (uint8_t i = 1; i <= 9; i = i + 1) {
dx2 = setpoint0[i + 1] - setpoint0[i];
dy2 = setpoint1[i + 1] - setpoint1[i];
dxy2 = sqrt(sq(dx2) + sq(dy2));
dx1 = setpoint0[i] - setpoint0[i - 1];
dy1 = setpoint1[i] - setpoint1[i - 1];
dxy1 = sqrt(sq(dx1) + sq(dy1));
dir = dx1 * dy2 - dx2 * dy1;
divider= dxy1 * dxy2;
if (divider<0.0001 && divider>-0.0001) {
seqTH[0] = 0.0;
}
else {
if (dir >= 0) {
seqTH[i] = acos((dx1 * dx2 + dy1 * dy2) / (divider));
} else {
seqTH[i] = -acos((dx1 * dx2 + dy1 * dy2) / (divider));
}}
}
print_array("seqTh", seqTH, 11, 6);
orient[0] = state[2] + seqTH[0];
if (orient[0]<0.0001 && orient[0]>-0.0001){orient[0]=0.0001;}
for (uint8_t i = 1; i <= 9; i = i + 1) {
orient[i] = orient[i - 1] + seqTH[i];
if (orient[i]<0.0001 && orient[i]>-0.0001){orient[i]=0.0001;}
}
print_array("orient", orient, 10, 6);
for (uint8_t i = 1; i <= 9; i = i + 1) {
setpoint2[i] = orient[i - 1];
setpoint3[i] = Vref * cos(orient[i - 1]);
setpoint4[i] = Vref * sin(orient[i - 1]);
}
setpoint2[10] = orient[9];
setpoint3[10] = 0;
setpoint4[10] = 0;
setpoint5[10] = 0;
}
}
As you see in the attempt to avoid error I put several if conditions, but was not enough.
Actually the problem come probably from dir=dx1 * dy2 - dx2 * dy1;. that's when moving along x or y axis is too small to be a float.
A friend suggested to use a boolean value but I'm not sure how.
Maybe defining boolean dir; and then if the value is too small will be a 0 otherwise will be considered a 1 and in that case I could use the same procedure i'm using now for the detection of the direction.
Do you have any suggestion or maybe a different solution?
Thanks in advance
Ned
I'm not familiar with the method you're using, but when I've done this in the past I've detected the degenerate case of the Bezier (where the two end points and two control points fall on a straight line) as a special case.
This is also much faster to draw of course.

Resources