Float and double precision in C - c

In C, double has more precision than float, and according to "C primerplus sixth edition" book (page 80), a float can represent at least 6 significant figures and a double can represent at least 13 significant figures. So I tried to verify that with this simple example:
#include<stdio.h>
int main(void){
float a = 3.3333333; // 7 significant digits
double b = 3.33333333333333;// 14 significant digits
printf("\nFloat: %f\n", a);
printf("Double: %f\n", b);
return 0;
}
And this is the output of this program:
Float : 3.333333
Double: 3.333333
Why does the double value have the same precision as the float value, instead of displaying more significant digits?

Most questions like this can be answered by consulting the C standard:
Each conversion specification is introduced by the '%' character ... after which the following appear in sequence:
...
An optional precision that gives ... the number of digits to appear after the radix character for the a, A, e, E, f, and F conversion specifiers.
Describing the f specifier:
The double argument shall be converted to decimal notation in the style "[-]ddd.ddd", where the number of digits after the radix character is equal to the precision specification. If the precision is missing, it shall be taken as 6.
So, by simply using %f, you are instructing printf to print six digits after the .. If you want to see more digits, you need to specify the precision: %.15f, for example.

You need to show more significant digits. If you do this:
printf("\nFloat: %.20f\n", a);
printf("Double: %.20f\n", b);
You'll get this:
Float: 3.33333325386047363281
Double: 3.33333333333332992865

Related

How do I print in double precision?

I'm completely new to C and I'm trying to complete an assignment. The exercise is to print tan(x) with x incrementing from 0 to pi/2.
We need to print this in float and double. I wrote a program that seems to work, but I only printed floats, while I expected double.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <math.h>
int main()
{
double x;
double pi;
pi = M_PI;
for (x = 0; x<=pi/2; x+= pi/20)
{
printf("x = %lf, tan = %lf\n",x, tan(x));
}
exit(0);
}
My question is:
Why do I get floats, while I defined the variables as double and used %lf in the printf function?
What do I need to change to get doubles as output?
"...but I only printed floats, while I expected double"
You are actually outputting double values.
float arguments to variadic functions (including printf()) are implicitly promoted to double in general. reference.
So even if your statement
printf("x = %lf, tan = %lf\n",x, tan(x));
were changed to:
printf("x = %f, tan = %f\n",x, tan(x));
It would still output double as both "%f" and "%lf" are used as double format specifiers for printf() (and other variadic functions).
Edit to address following statement/questions in comments:
"I know that a double notation has 15 digits of [precision]."
Yes. But there is a difference between the actual IEEE 754 specified characteristics of the float/double data types, and the way that they can be _made to appear using format specifiers in the printf() function.
In simplest terms:
double has double (2x) the precision of a float.
float is a 32 bit IEEE 754 single precision Floating Point Number with 1 bit for the sign, 8 bits for the exponent, and 24* for the value, resulting in 7 decimal digits of precision.
double is a 64 bit IEEE 754 double precision Floating Point Number with 1 bit for the sign, 11 bits for the exponent, and 53* bits for the value resulting in 15 decimal digits of precision.
* - including the implicit bit (which always equals 1 for normal numbers, and 0 for subnormal numbers. This implicit bit is not stored in memory), but not the sign bit.
"...But with %.20f I was able to print more digits, how is that possible and where do the digits come from?"
The extra digits are inaccuracies caused by binary representation of analog numbers, coupled with using a width specifier to force more information to display than what is actually represented by the stored value.
Although width specifiers have there rightful place, they can also result in providing misleading results.
Why do I get floats, while I defined the variables as double and used %lf in the printf function?
Code is not getting "floats", output is simply text. Even if the argument coded is a float or a double, the output is the text translation of the floating point number - often rounded.
printf() simply follows the behavior of "%lf": print a floating point value with 6 places after the decimal point. With printf(), "%lf" performs exactly like "%f".
printf("%lf\n%lf\n%f\n%f\n", 123.45, 123.45f, 123.45, 123.45f);
// 123.450000
// 123.449997
// 123.450000
// 123.449997
What do I need to change to get doubles as output?
Nothing, the output is text, not double. To see more digits, print with greater precision.
printf("%.50f\n%.25f\n", 123.45, 123.45f);
// 123.45000000000000284217094304040074348449710000000000
// 123.4499969482421875000000000
how do I manipulate the code so that my output is in float notation?
Try "%e", "%a" for exponential notation. For a better idea of how many digits to print: Printf width specifier to maintain precision of floating-point value.
printf("%.50e\n%.25e\n", 123.45, 123.45f);
printf("%a\n%a\n", 123.45, 123.45f);
// 1.23450000000000002842170943040400743484497100000000e+02
// 1.2344999694824218750000000e+02
// 0x1.edccccccccccdp+6
// 0x1.edccccp+6
printf("%.*e\n%.*e\n", DBL_DECIMAL_DIG-1, 123.45, FLT_DECIMAL_DIG-1,123.45f);
// 1.2345000000000000e+02
// 1.23449997e+02

Why doesn't 'double' store/print more precision values than 'float' in this C program?

If I run this code:
float a=1.123456789;
printf("The float value is %f\n",a);
double b=1.123456789876543
printf("The double value is %lf",b);
It prints:
The float value is 1.123457
The double value is 1.123457
The first line is understandable since the precision of float is ~6 decimal digits. But shouldn't the 2nd line be displaying more digits? I am using Turbo C++ 4.0 for Windows, if that helps.
The %f format specifier prints 6 digits of precision by default. If you want to print more digits, you need to add a precision to the format specifier:
float a=1.123456789;
printf("The float value is %.15f\n",a);
double b=1.123456789876543;
printf("The double value is %.15lf",b);
Output:
The float value is 1.123456835746765
The double value is 1.123456789876543
For the value you see for both the case is same because, in case the precision is omitted, its is taken as 6.
Also, according to default argument promotion, any floating point type, will get promoted to double , and that is the requirement for the %f conversion specification, too.
Quoting C11, chapter §7.21.6.1, for f format specifier, (emphasis mine)
The double argument shall be converted to decimal notation in the style "[-]ddd.ddd", where the number of digits after the radix character is equal to the precision specification. If the precision is missing, it shall be taken as 6.
If you want more digits after the decimal point (more precision), you need to explicitly mention a value for precision, greater than 6.

From when format specifier '%g' for double starts printing in exponential format

I would like to understand from when format specifier %g for double starts printing values in exponential format.
myTest.c
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
double val = 384615.38462;
double val2 = 9999999;
printf ("val = %g\n",val);
printf ("val2 = %g\n",val2);
return 0;
}
Compiled using gcc :
gcc version 4.5.2 (GCC)
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11
Output :
val = 384615
val2 = 1e+07
Question:
Why val is printed as integer and why val2 has been converted to exponential format even when I have not used %lf in printf.
Is there a range from when it will start print values using exponential format? If yes, Is there any way we can guess what could be the value range ?
Thanks in Advance.
According to the man 3 printf:
g, G
The double argument is converted in style f or e (or F or E for G conversions). The precision specifies the number of significant digits. If the precision is missing, 6 digits are given; if the precision is zero, it is treated as 1. Style e is used if the exponent from its conversion is less than -4 or greater than or equal to the precision. Trailing zeros are removed from the fractional part of the result; a decimal point appears only if it is followed by at least one digit.
And the C11 – ISO/IEC 9899:2011 standard draft N1570 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf):
g,G
A double argument representing a floating-point number is converted in
style f or e (or in style F or E in the case of a G conversion specifier),
depending on the value converted and the precision. Let P equal the
precision if nonzero, 6 if the precision is omitted, or 1 if the precision is zero.
Then, if a conversion with style E would have an exponent of X:
— if P > X ≥ −4, the conversion is with style f (or F) and precision
P − (X + 1).
— otherwise, the conversion is with style e (or E) and precision P − 1.
Finally, unless the # flag is used, any trailing zeros are removed from the
fractional portion of the result and the decimal-point character is removed if
there is no fractional portion remaining.
A double argument representing an infinity or NaN is converted in the style
of an f or F conversion specifier.
The man says
g, G
The double argument is converted in style f or e (or F or E for G conversions). The precision specifies the number of significant digits. If the precision is missing, 6 digits are given; if the precision is zero, it is treated as 1. Style e is used if the exponent from its conversion is less than -4 or greater than or equal to the precision. Trailing zeros are removed from the fractional part of the result; a decimal point appears only if it is followed by at least one digit.

How to control the number of digits to appear after the decimal-point character for a double variable?

I want to print n number of digits after decimal while printing a number of datatype double. However, integer n must be obtained from user using scanf().
double pi = acos(-1);
int n;
printf("\nEnter the number of decimal digits required : ");
scanf("%d",&n);
Now, how to use printf() to print n number of decimal digits of pi?
Quoting C11, chapter §7.21.6.1/p4, for the precision option,
Each conversion specification is introduced by the character %. After the %, the following
appear in sequence:
An optional precision that gives [...] the number of digits to appear after the decimal-point
character for a, A, e, E, f, and F conversions, [...] The precision takes the form of a period (.) followed either by an
asterisk * (described later) or by an optional decimal integer; [...]
and, in paragraph 5,
As noted above, a field width, or precision, or both, may be indicated by an asterisk. In
this case, an int argument supplies the field width or precision. The arguments
specifying field width, or precision, or both, shall appear (in that order) before the
argument (if any) to be converted. [...]
So, you can use the format
printf("%.*f", precision, variable);
like
printf("%.*f", n, pi);
to use the precision n taken from user.

What is the difference between %g and %f in C?

I was going through The C programming Language by K&R. Here in a statement to print a double variable it is written
printf("\t%g\n", sum += atof(line));
where sum is declared as double. Can anybody please help me out when to use %g in case of double or in case of float and whats the difference between %g and %f.
They are both examples of floating point input/output.
%g and %G are simplifiers of the scientific notation floats %e and %E.
%g will take a number that could be represented as %f (a simple float or double) or %e (scientific notation) and return it as the shorter of the two.
The output of your print statement will depend on the value of sum.
See any reference manual, such as the man page:
f,F
The double argument is rounded and converted to decimal notation in the style [-]ddd.ddd, where the number of digits after the decimal-point character is equal to the precision specification. If the precision is missing, it is taken as 6; if the precision is explicitly zero, no decimal-point character appears. If a decimal point appears, at least one digit appears before it.
(The SUSv2 does not know about F and says that character string representations for infinity and NaN may be made available. The C99 standard specifies '[-]inf' or '[-]infinity' for infinity, and a string starting with 'nan' for NaN, in the case of f conversion, and '[-]INF' or '[-]INFINITY' or 'NAN*' in the case of F conversion.)
g,G
The double argument is converted in style f or e (or F or E for G conversions). The precision specifies the number of significant digits. If the precision is missing, 6 digits are given; if the precision is zero, it is treated as 1. Style e is used if the exponent from its conversion is less than -4 or greater than or equal to the precision. Trailing zeros are removed from the fractional part of the result; a decimal point appears only if it is followed by at least one digit.
E = exponent expression, simply means power(10, n) or 10 ^ n
F = fraction expression, default 6 digits precision
G = gerneral expression, somehow smart to show the number in a concise way (but
really?)
See the below example,
The code
void main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
double a = 4.5;
printf("=>>>> below is the example for printf 4.5\n");
printf("%%e %e\n",a);
printf("%%f %f\n",a);
printf("%%g %g\n",a);
printf("%%E %E\n",a);
printf("%%F %F\n",a);
printf("%%G %G\n",a);
double b = 1.79e308;
printf("=>>>> below is the exbmple for printf 1.79*10^308\n");
printf("%%e %e\n",b);
printf("%%f %f\n",b);
printf("%%g %g\n",b);
printf("%%E %E\n",b);
printf("%%F %F\n",b);
printf("%%G %G\n",b);
double d = 2.25074e-308;
printf("=>>>> below is the example for printf 2.25074*10^-308\n");
printf("%%e %e\n",d);
printf("%%f %f\n",d);
printf("%%g %g\n",d);
printf("%%E %E\n",d);
printf("%%F %F\n",d);
printf("%%G %G\n",d);
}
The output
=>>>> below is the example for printf 4.5
%e 4.500000e+00
%f 4.500000
%g 4.5
%E 4.500000E+00
%F 4.500000
%G 4.5
=>>>> below is the exbmple for printf 1.79*10^308
%e 1.790000e+308
%f 178999999999999996376899522972626047077637637819240219954027593177370961667659291027329061638406108931437333529420935752785895444161234074984843178962619172326295244262722141766382622299223626438470088150218987997954747866198184686628013966119769261150988554952970462018533787926725176560021258785656871583744.000000
%g 1.79e+308
%E 1.790000E+308
%F 178999999999999996376899522972626047077637637819240219954027593177370961667659291027329061638406108931437333529420935752785895444161234074984843178962619172326295244262722141766382622299223626438470088150218987997954747866198184686628013966119769261150988554952970462018533787926725176560021258785656871583744.000000
%G 1.79E+308
=>>>> below is the example for printf 2.25074*10^-308
%e 2.250740e-308
%f 0.000000
%g 2.25074e-308
%E 2.250740E-308
%F 0.000000
%G 2.25074E-308
As Unwind points out f and g provide different default outputs.
Roughly speaking if you care more about the details of what comes after the decimal point I would do with f and if you want to scale for large numbers go with g. From some dusty memories f is very nice with small values if your printing tables of numbers as everything stays lined up but something like g is needed if you stand a change of your numbers getting large and your layout matters. e is more useful when your numbers tend to be very small or very large but never near ten.
An alternative is to specify the output format so that you get the same number of characters representing your number every time.
Sorry for the woolly answer but it is a subjective out put thing that only gets hard answers if the number of characters generated is important or the precision of the represented value.
%g removes trailing zeros in floats,
prints (integer) upto 10**6 , after that in e+ upto precision 6
123456 gives 123456
1234567 gives 1.23457e+06
prints (float > 10** -4 ) upto precision 6 , after that rounds off to pre. 6
1.23456 gives 1.23456
1.234567 gives 1.23457
print (float < 10** -4 ) upto precision 4 , else in ne-0p
0.0001 gives 0.0001
0.000001 gives 1e-06
0.12345678 gives 0.123457
%G does the same , but exp(e) becomes exp(E)
%f and %g does the same thing. Only difference is that %g is the shorter form of %f. That is the precision after decimal point is larger in %f compared to %g

Resources