I have a date cell array which is read from a csv file. The format is below:
date =
'2008.12.01'
'2008.12.02'
'2008.12.03'
'2008.12.04'
'2008.12.05'
... ...
And I want to:
turn the cell array to a string array,
use the strread() to read its "yyyy","mm" and "dd" value into 3 double array [year,mm,dd],
use the datenummx() to turn [year,mm,dd] into date seriel num.
After i use
date = char(date);
the date array become like this:
date =
2008.12.01
2008.12.02
2008.12.03
2008.12.04
2008.12.05
... ...
which I think the result is what i want...
But after I use the strread(), it gives me odd result.
[year,month,day]=strread(date,'%d%d%d','delimiter','.');
year =
-1
0
0
0
0
... ...
BUT if I use the code below, the strread() can give me the right answer:
s = sprintf('2008.12.01')
s =
2008.12.01
[year,month,day]=strread(s,'%d%d%d','delimiter','.')
year =
2008
month =
12
day =
1
And I checked in the matlab that both the "date" and "s" is a char array.(by using function 'ischar' and simply display both)...
But why do the strread() give differnt results?
Can anyone answer?
by the way, I use the MatLab v6.5.(for my own reason, so please don't comment by asking "why not use a higher version")....
Your problem is this line:
date = char(date);
It does not create an array of strings, there is no array of strings in matlab. It creates an array of chars. As you already noticed, your strread-line is fine if you input a single date, so input each date form your original cell array individually:
for idx=1:numel(date)
[year(idx),month(idx),day(idx)]=strread(date{idx},'%d%d%d','delimiter','.');
end
Preallocation of year, month and day improves the performance.
Related
I have an array that contains multiple dates in the format yyyymmdd, stored as a 50x1 double. I am trying to pull out the year,month, and day so I can use datenum to assign each date a serial number.
Indexing an individual date, converting the using str2num, then indexing and pulling the appropriate values works fine, but when I try to loop through the list of dates it doesn't work- only variations of the number 2 are returned.
dates = [20180910; 20180920; 20181012; 20181027; 20181103; 20181130; 20181225];
% version1
datesnums=num2str(dates); % dates is a list of dates stored as
integers
for i=1:length(datesnums)
pullyy=str2num(datesnums(1:4));
pullmm=str2num(datesnums(5:6));
pulldd=str2num(datesnums(7:8));
end
As well as
%version2
datesnums=num2str(dates,'%d')
for i = 1:length(datesnums)
dd=datenum(str2num(datesnums(i(1:4))),str2num(datesnums(i(5:6))),
str2num(datesnums(i(7:8))));
end
I'm trying to generate a new array that is just the serial numbers of the input dates. In the examples shown, I am only getting single integer values, which I know is because the loop is incorrect and I get errors that say "Index exceeds the number of array elements (1)." for version 1. When I've gotten it to successfully loop through everything, the outputs are just '2222','22,'22' for every single date which is incorrect. What am I doing wrong? Do I need to incorporate a cell array?
To get all the years, month, and days in a loop:
datesnums=num2str(dates);
for i=1:size(datesnums, 1)
pullyy(i) = str2num(datesnums(i,1:4));
pullmm(i) = str2num(datesnums(i,5:6));
pulldd(i) = str2num(datesnums(i,7:8));
end
Actually, you can do this without a loop:
pullyy = str2num(datesnums(:,1:4));
pullmm = str2num(datesnums(:,5:6));
pulldd = str2num(datesnums(:,7:8));
Explanation:
If for example the dates vector is a [6x1] array:
dates =[...
20190901
20170124
20191215
20130609
20141104
20190328];
Than datesnums=num2str(dates); creates a char matrix of size [6x8] where each row corresponds to one element in dates:
datesnums =
6×8 char array
'20190901'
'20170124'
'20191215'
'20160609'
'20191104'
'20190328'
So in the loop you need to refer to the row index for each date and and the column indices to extract the years, month, and days.
The easiest solution I can think of is:
SN = datenum(num2str(dates),'yyyymmdd')
You only have to specify the date format which is 'yyyymmdd'
I have a cell array of dates as strings (format: 'mm/dd/yyyy'), where the string length varies by cell entry from 8 to 10, depending on the date (e.g., n = 8 for '1/1/2015' and n = 10 for '10/10/2015'). I want to convert each cell array entry to its corresponding double as a datenum quantity. I've tried:
id = find(~cellfun( #isempty, regexp( dateList, '/', 'tokenExtents' ) ) );
and
id = find(~cellfun( #isempty, strfind( dateList, '/' ) ) );
but this isn't right. A snippet of the cell array is provided:
dateList = {'9/9/2016';
'9/10/2016';
'10/10/2016';
'10/11/2016'};
All you have to use is datenum, since it will accept a cell array of strings:
dateList = {'9/9/2016'; '9/10/2016'; '10/10/2016'; '10/11/2016'};
id = datenum(dateList);
And to confirm it worked:
>> datestr(id)
ans =
09-Sep-2016
10-Sep-2016
10-Oct-2016
11-Oct-2016
1) Extract each cell to 3 different blocks with strsplit: day,month and year
2) Use pad to make each block the same length (2 for day and month and 4 for year)
3) Join the string together with [D,'/',M,'/',Y] and you are able to run datenum without problem.
Edit 1: I think the other answer is far more easy, I didn't know datenum can take strings with slightly different foramt.
I have a cell array called BodyData in MATLAB that has around 139 columns and 3500 odd rows of skeletal tracking data.
I need to extract all rows between two string values (these are timestamps when an event happened) that I have
e.g.
BodyData{}=
Column 1 2 3
'10:15:15.332' 'BASE05' ...
...
'10:17:33:230' 'BASE05' ...
The two timestamps should match a value in the array but might also be within a few ms of those in the array e.g.
TimeStamp1 = '10:15:15.560'
TimeStamp2 = '10:17:33.233'
I have several questions!
How can I return an array for all the data between the two string values plus or minus a small threshold of say .100ms?
Also can I also add another condition to say that all str values in column2 must also be the same, otherwise ignore? For example, only return the timestamps between A and B only if 'BASE02'
Many thanks,
The best approach to the first part of your problem is probably to change from strings to numeric date values. In Matlab this can be done quite painlessly with datenum.
For the second part you can just use logical indexing... this is were you put a condition (i.e. that second columns is BASE02) within the indexing expression.
A self-contained example:
% some example data:
BodyData = {'10:15:15.332', 'BASE05', 'foo';...
'10:15:16.332', 'BASE02', 'bar';...
'10:15:17.332', 'BASE05', 'foo';...
'10:15:18.332', 'BASE02', 'foo';...
'10:15:19.332', 'BASE05', 'bar'};
% create column vector of numeric times, and define start/end times
dateValues = datenum(BodyData(:, 1), 'HH:MM:SS.FFF');
startTime = datenum('10:15:16.100', 'HH:MM:SS.FFF');
endTime = datenum('10:15:18.500', 'HH:MM:SS.FFF');
% select data in range, and where second column is 'BASE02'
BodyData(dateValues > startTime & dateValues < endTime & strcmp(BodyData(:, 2), 'BASE02'), :)
Returns:
ans =
'10:15:16.332' 'BASE02' 'bar'
'10:15:18.332' 'BASE02' 'foo'
References: datenum manual page, matlab help page on logical indexing.
I need to concatenate all characters from a date/time string into a single 1x1 array.
If I do
K>> datestr(now, 'mmm dd yyyy - HH:MM')
ans =
Jan 04 2014 - 11:58
K>> size(datestr(now, 'mmm dd yyyy - HH:MM'))
ans =
1 19
I end up with a 1x19 array for my date. It needs to be 1x1 as it will be the first of many other comma separated values exported to a single CSV file.
values =[
software_version; date_time; % <===== date_time should be 1x1 to fit
P_total; P_total_SD; P_total_CV; % in single cell
t1;
con_int1; con_int2; ...
];
Do you have any suggestions on how to accomplish this?
My question is only partially addressed here, so I believe this is not a duplicate.
They suggest dlmwrite but that will not work for my case in which there are many other values being output to a single file.
The string has 19 characters, so as a character array it is necessarily of size 1x19. How to write this to a CSV file depends on the method you use; if the respective function supports to output strings to the file, I would expect it to accept a cell array as input. In that case, your 1x19 character array would be contained in one cell of the cell array:
values ={
software_version; date_time;
P_total; P_total_SD; P_total_CV;
t1;
con_int1; con_int2; ...
};
The difference from your code is to replace [] by {}.
When trying the following concatenation:
for i=1:1:length(Open)
data(i,1) = Open(i);
data(i,2) = Close(i);
data(i,3) = High(i);
data(i,4) = Low(i);
data(i,5) = Volume(i);
data(i,6) = Adj_Close(i);
data(i,7) = cell2mat(dates(1,i));
end
Where all matrices but dates contain double values, and dates is a cell array with dates in the format '2001-01-01'. Running the code above, I get the following error:
??? Subscripted assignment dimension mismatch.
Error in ==> Test_Trades_part2 at 81
data(i,7) = cell2mat(dates(1,i));
The code above is tied to a master code which takes data from Yahoo Finance and then puts it in my SQL database.
A convenient way to store dates in completely numeric format is with datenum:
>> data(i,7) = datenum('2001-01-01');
>> disp(data(i,:))
0 0 0 0 0 0 730852
Whether this is useful to you depends on what you intend to do with the SQL database. Howeer, converting back to a string with MATLAB is straightforward with the datestr command:
>> datestr(730852,'yyyy-mm-dd')
ans =
2001-01-01
APPENDIX:
A serial date number represents a calendar date as the number of days that has passed since a fixed base date. In MATLAB, serial date number 1 is January 1, 0000.
Thank you all for the help!
I solved this issue using the following methodlogy (incorporating structs, should have thought of that .. stupid me):
data = [open, close_price, high, low, volume, closeadj];
s = struct('OpenPrice', data(:,1), 'ClosePrice', data(:,2), 'High', data(:,3), 'Low', data(:,4), 'Volume', data(:,5), 'Adj_Close', data(:,6), 'Dates', {dates});
This way, I enter all the values contained in the struct, circumventing the need to concatenate numeric and string matrices. Odd though, that is not allowed to have such matrices in on matrix; I would suppose that is the reason they created structs.