I want to make property read-only. When I am creating Vertex in DB i want to set property value and do not allow update in future. Is there any possible solutions on DB side? Or I have to do it in my scala Back-end? What is the best practise? Thx Lot.
My back end solution:
/Schem
mgmt.makePropertyKey("guid").dataType(classOf[java.lang.String]).make()
mgmt.makePropertyKey("propFoo1").dataType(classOf[java.lang.Long]).make()
mgmt.makePropertyKey("propFoo2").dataType(classOf[java.lang.Long]).make()
mgmt.makePropertyKey("propFoo3").dataType(classOf[java.lang.Long]).make()
mgmt.makePropertyKey("propFoo4").dataType(classOf[java.lang.Long]).make()
mgmt.makePropertyKey("propFoo5").dataType(classOf[java.lang.Long]).make()
In controller for Update method:
// Map of no changeable atb
val vertexEntityOld = EntityController.findByGuid(newEntity.guid.toString())
newEntity.propFoo1 = oldEntity.propFoo1
newEntity.propFoo2 = oldEntity.propFoo2
Titan has the notion of static vertices; that's the only thing that comes close to what you want. But read-only properties are not supported out of the box, that's something your application code has to take care of.
Related
I am looking to create a feature whereby a User can download any available documents related to the item from a tab on the PDP.
So far I have created a custom record called Documentation (customrecord_documentation) containing the following fields:
Related item : custrecord_documentation_related_item
Type : custrecord_documentation_type
Document : custrecord_documentation_document
Description : custrecord_documentation_description
Related Item ID : custrecord_documentation_related_item_id
The functionality works fine on the backend of NetSuite where I can assign documents to an Inventory item. The stumbling block is trying to fetch the data to the front end of the SCA webstore.
Any help on the above would be much appreciated.
I've come at this a number of ways.
One way is to create a Suitelet that returns JSON of the document names and urls. The urls can be the real Netsuite urls or they can be the urls of your suitelet where you set up the suitelet to return the doc when accessed with action=doc&id=_docid_ query params.
Add a target <div id="relatedDocs"></div> to the item_details.tpl
In your ItemDetailsView's init_Plugins add
$.getJSON('app/site/hosting/scriptlet.nl...?action=availabledoc').
then(function(data){
var asHtml = format(data); //however you like
$("#relatedDocs").html(asHtml);
});
You can also go the whole module route. If you created a third party module DocsView then you would add DocsView as a child view to ItemDetailsView.
That's a little more involved so try the option above first to see if it fits your needs. The nice thing is you can just about ignore Backbone with this approach. You can make this a little more portable by using a service.ss instead of the suitelet. You can create your own ssp app for the function so you don't have to deal with SCAs url structure.
It's been a while, but you should be able to access the JSON data from within the related Backbone View class. From there, within the return context, output the value you're wanting to the PDP. Hopefully you're extending the original class and not overwriting / altering the core code :P.
The model associated with the PDP should hold all the JSON data you're looking for. Model.get('...') sort of syntax.
I'd recommend against Suitelets for this, as that's extra execution time, and is a bit slower.
I'm sure you know, but you need to set the documents to be available as public as well.
Hope this helps, thanks.
I'm coding my first GAE web app in Python. I need to collect ~30 properties and instantiate a Client object (I'm using Model.db). I'd like to accomplish this on 4 separate sequential forms. If I use a separate page handler for each form, what is the best way to extract and reference the key or id on each form and put data into the same data entity? How do I avoid a global variable?
Not sure I follow... You may need to explain the issue a little more clearly.
First, do not use a global variable.
You can have 4 forms on the same template, all with the same handler. Give each a separate hidden attribute. Or, depending on your templating package, you should be able to access the form by ID.
In your handler:
entity = MyModel.get_by_key_name('my_key_name')
if request.method == 'POST':
if request.POST['hidden_field'] == 'firstform':
entity['prop_1'] = form.prop_1.data
...
if request.POST['hidden_field'] == 'secondform':
...
...
entity.put()
else:
return <template>
You will need to modify the syntax above to suit your templating pkg.
I'm creating some custom queries and need to figure out the relation between Member Groups and Document Groups.
My ultimate goal is to display the resources belonging to a particular User Group when a user log in. I am able to get their User ID from Sessions and so the relations I have figured out so far are:
User ID -> Member Groups Table -> ??Unknown table that pairs Member Groups with Document Groups?? -> Document Groups Table- > Resources Table
I just cant find that missing table(s)!
If any one can help me out that would be awesome!
Thanks
(ps: using Revo)
EDIT: added image for assitance
You could use some of the built-in MODX methods to achieve this.
This is not tested and might not work, but this might be a way to do it:
// userGroups = membergroups
$userGroups = $user->getUserGroups();
foreach ($userGroups as $userGroup) {
$resGroups = $userGroup->getResourceGroups();
foreach ($resGroups as $resGroup) {
$resources = $resGroup->getResources();
// merge resources into an array or something
}
}
Check out moduser.class.php, modusergroup.class.php, and modresourcegroup.class.php to see the queries behind these methods. You might be able to adapt them to one more efficient query.
Also, if I haven't misunderstood what you want to achieve then your results should be similar to what a user would see in the resource tree in the manager when logged in?
That uses the resource/getnodes.class.php processor, which retrieves all possible resources for each context using getCollection, then loops through each and decides whether to display or not by using $resource->checkPolicy('list'). That might be another approach to consider.
I usually work with custom data rather than MODX resources so would be keen to hear how you get on with this.
I know this is really, really old, but I came across this question looking for the answer myself. After a bit more digging I've found that it's the access_resource_groups table that links document_groups and member_groups
document_groups.id = access_resource_groups.target
member_groups.id = access_resource_groups.principal
I am moderately new to SmartGWT and am trying to figure out how to have a RecordList where each record has the ability to have a SwitchItem attached to it. So basically create a list of selectable items, but those items also will have a SwitchItem on them to enable/disable some behavior.
Any thoughts on how I can accomplish this?
Looking at Record and RecordList it appears that Record extends HashMap and does nothing fancy like what I am wanting...but i wondered if it was possible to set the "description" property with perhaps some html string that creates the SwitchItem...is this way off? And if so...how is the best way to do this?
Use setShowRecordComponents() and createRecordComponent(). Documentation for how these work can be found in the core SmartGWT docs:
http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/javadoc/com/smartgwt/client/widgets/grid/ListGrid.html#setShowRecordComponents%28java.lang.Boolean%29
There's no support for "recycle" mode yet. A sample is being created.
For example I have a wpf window bound to an customer Entity (let suppose it's cus1). Then I load another entity from context :
customer cus2 = context.customers.where(x=>x.id=10).FirstOrDefault();
Now I want cus1 = cus2 ? I can do this way :
cus1.name = cus2.name;
cus1.address = cus2.address;
...
...
This way meets my case (the content of textboxs in the form change immediately into values of cus2) but I wonder if there is anyway to make it shorter since cus1=cus2 doesn't work ?
Thanks
You can use the memberwise Clone method to make a shallowcopy of a business object:
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/system.object.memberwiseclone.aspx
You could also use Serialization or Reflection, to do it on your own. However both oof the methods are slower then writing it directly.
Take a look at this article. Maybe you will find it helpful:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/CloningLINQ2Entities.aspx
Edit:
Btw. Remember, using using MemberwiseClone, in case of ReferenceTypes will effect in copying the references, not objects.
If you want to update the values of a Customer entity in memory with the newest values in the datastore you can use the Refresh method on your ObjectContext.
Here is the documentation.
In your case it would look like:
context.Refresh(RefreshMode.StoreWins, cus1);
If you really want to map two entities you could have a look at AutoMapper. AutoMapper will help you by automatically mapping entities to each other with a default setup that you can tweak to your needs.