__lll_lock_wait_private () when using malloc/free - c

Question

I have a user level thread library and I changed a benchmark program to use mythreads instead of pthreads, but it always gets stuck somewhere in the code where there is a malloc or free function.
this is output of gdb:
^C
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
__lll_lock_wait_private ()
at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:95
95 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) where
#0 __lll_lock_wait_private ()
at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:95
#1 0x00007ffff7569bb3 in _int_free (av=0x7ffff78adc00 <main_arena>,
p=0x6f1f40, have_lock=0) at malloc.c:3929
#2 0x00007ffff756d89c in __GI___libc_free (mem=<optimized out>)
at malloc.c:2950
#3 0x000000000040812d in mbuffer_free (m=m#entry=0x6a7660) at mbuffer.c:209
#4 0x00000000004038a8 in write_chunk_to_file (chunk=0x6a7610,
fd=<optimized out>) at encoder.c:279
#5 Reorder (targs=0x7fffffffab60,
targs#entry=<error reading variable: value has been optimized out>)
at encoder.c:1292
#6 0x000000000040b069 in wrapper_function (func=<optimized out>,
arg=<optimized out>) at gtthread.c:75
#7 0x00007ffff7532620 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#8 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
and here is some code
mbuffer.c
208 if(ref==0) {
209 pausee();
210 free(m->mcb->ptr);
211 resume();
212 m->mcb->ptr=NULL;
213 free(m->mcb);
214 m->mcb=NULL;
215 }
pausee and resume functions
void pausee(){
//printf("pauseeing\n");
sigemptyset(&mask);
sigaddset(&mask, SIGPROF); // block SIGPROF...
if (sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &mask, &orig_mask) < 0) {
perror ("sigprocmask");
exit(1);
}
}
void resume(){
//printf("restarting\n");
sigemptyset(&mask);
sigaddset(&mask, SIGPROF); // unblock SIGPROF...
if (sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &orig_mask, NULL) < 0) {
perror ("sigprocmask");
exit(1);
}
}
I'm not sure if it's related to my problem or not, but for scheduling of the threads I use SIGPROF signal and a handler function. I tried blocking SIGPROF before every malloc/free function but It had no effect.
I don't have any concurrent threads, only one thread runs at a time.
any help or idea would be very much appreciated.

Answer 1

as your code mbuffer.c, there is no mistake.I suggest you get a test of mbuffer.c for except your guess.