I have a basic SQL Server delete script that goes:
Delete from tableX
where colA = ? and colB = ?;
In tableX, I do not have any columns indicating sequential IDs or timestamp; just varchar. I want to delete the latest entry that was inserted, and I do not have access to the row number from the insert script. TOP is not an option because it's random. Also, this particular table does not have a primary key, and it's not a matter of poor design. Is there any way I can do this? I recall mysql being able to call something like max(row_number) and also something along the lines of limit one.
ROW_NUMBER exists in SQL Server, too, but it must be used with an OVER (order_by_clause). So... in your case it's impossible for you unless you come up with another sorting algo.
MSDN
Edit: (Examples for George from MSDN ... I'm afraid his company has a Firewall rule that blocks MSDN)
SQL-Code
USE AdventureWorks2012;
GO
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY SalesYTD DESC) AS Row,
FirstName, LastName, ROUND(SalesYTD,2,1) AS "Sales YTD"
FROM Sales.vSalesPerson
WHERE TerritoryName IS NOT NULL AND SalesYTD <> 0;
Output
Row FirstName LastName SalesYTD
--- ----------- ---------------------- -----------------
1 Linda Mitchell 4251368.54
2 Jae Pak 4116871.22
3 Michael Blythe 3763178.17
4 Jillian Carson 3189418.36
5 Ranjit Varkey Chudukatil 3121616.32
6 José Saraiva 2604540.71
7 Shu Ito 2458535.61
8 Tsvi Reiter 2315185.61
9 Rachel Valdez 1827066.71
10 Tete Mensa-Annan 1576562.19
11 David Campbell 1573012.93
12 Garrett Vargas 1453719.46
13 Lynn Tsoflias 1421810.92
14 Pamela Ansman-Wolfe 1352577.13
Returning a subset of rows
USE AdventureWorks2012;
GO
WITH OrderedOrders AS
(
SELECT SalesOrderID, OrderDate,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderDate) AS RowNumber
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
)
SELECT SalesOrderID, OrderDate, RowNumber
FROM OrderedOrders
WHERE RowNumber BETWEEN 50 AND 60;
Using ROW_NUMBER() with PARTITION
USE AdventureWorks2012;
GO
SELECT FirstName, LastName, TerritoryName, ROUND(SalesYTD,2,1),
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY TerritoryName ORDER BY SalesYTD DESC) AS Row
FROM Sales.vSalesPerson
WHERE TerritoryName IS NOT NULL AND SalesYTD <> 0
ORDER BY TerritoryName;
Output
FirstName LastName TerritoryName SalesYTD Row
--------- -------------------- ------------------ ------------ ---
Lynn Tsoflias Australia 1421810.92 1
José Saraiva Canada 2604540.71 1
Garrett Vargas Canada 1453719.46 2
Jillian Carson Central 3189418.36 1
Ranjit Varkey Chudukatil France 3121616.32 1
Rachel Valdez Germany 1827066.71 1
Michael Blythe Northeast 3763178.17 1
Tete Mensa-Annan Northwest 1576562.19 1
David Campbell Northwest 1573012.93 2
Pamela Ansman-Wolfe Northwest 1352577.13 3
Tsvi Reiter Southeast 2315185.61 1
Linda Mitchell Southwest 4251368.54 1
Shu Ito Southwest 2458535.61 2
Jae Pak United Kingdom 4116871.22 1
Your current table design does not allow you to determine the latest entry. YOu have no field to sort on to indicate which record was added last.
You need to redesign or pull that information from the audit tables. If you have a database without audit tables, you might have to find a tool to read the transaction logs and it will be a very time-consuming and expensive process. Or if you know the date the records you want to remove were added, you could possibly use a backup from just before this happened to find the records that were added. Just be awwre that you might be looking at records changed after this date that you want to keep.
If you need to do this on a regular basis instead of one-time to fix some bad data, then you need to properly design your database to include an identity field and possibly a dateupdated field (maintained through a trigger) or audit tables. (In my opinion no database containing information your company is depending on should be without audit tables, one of the many reasons why you should never allow an ORM to desgn a database, but I digress.) If you need to know the order records were added to a table, it is your responsiblity as the developer to create that structure. Databases only store what is deisnged for tehm to store, if you didn't design it in, then it is not available easily or at all
If (colA +'_'+ colB) can not be dublicate try this.
declare #delColumn nvarchar(250)
set #delColumn = (select top 1 DeleteColumn from (
select (colA +'_'+ colB) as DeleteColumn ,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY colA DESC) as Id from tableX
)b
order by Id desc
)
delete from tableX where (colA +'_'+ colB) =#delColumn
Related
How to query to accumulate two datetime columns in two tables in SQL Server 2014? This is an example for your reference:
Check-In table
InID UserID CheckInTime
---------------------------------
IN-001 1 2018-11-10 08:00:00
IN-002 2 2018-11-15 07:00:00
Check-Out table
OutID UserID CheckOutTime
----------------------------------
OUT-001 1 2018-11-10 12:00:00
OUT-002 2 2018-11-15 14:00:00
Result set (expected)
ResultID UserID InID OutID WorkTimeinHour
--------------------------------------------------------
1 1 IN-001 OUT-001 4
2 2 IN-002 OUT-002 7
Similar to #PSK, I used STUFF function to replace "IN-" and "OUT-" characters
But since these are in JOIN conditions, those operations will cause performance loss
It is better to use a numeric column in both tables instead of useless "IN-" and "OUT-" containing string columns
select
i.UserId, i.InID, CheckInTime, o.OutID, CheckOutTime,
dbo.fn_CreateTimeFromSeconds(DATEDIFF(ss, CheckInTime, CheckOutTime)) as TotalTime
from CheckIn i
inner join CheckOut o
on i.UserId = o.UserId and
STUFF (i.InID,1,3,'') = STUFF (o.OutID,1,4,'')
Additionally, I used a custom user-defined fn_CreateTimeFromSeconds function to format time for HH:MI:SS format
Hope it helps
For your current scenario, you can try like following.
Assuming that IN and OUT id after the "-" will be same as one entry.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER()
OVER(
ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) AS ResultIt,
T1.inid,
T2.outid,
DATEDIFF(hh, T2.checkouttime, T1.checkintime)
FROM checkin T1
INNER JOIN checkout T2
ON REPLACE(T1.inid, 'IN-', '') = REPLACE(T2.outid, 'OUT-', '')
This query will not perform good for huge data as REPLACE is being used in the JOIN. Ideally you should have a single identifier to identify the IN and OUT transaction.
I have a table that i use to figure out what sites/shops are due a visit, based on the date of the last visit to it.
There's a quick process to get your head around to understand one of the requirements;
A visit is documented by the value: Task Type = CASH. A review of a visit is shown as: Task Type = SALE.
What i need is:
The most recent row in the table related to a Asset ID for either the most recent SALE or CASH line. (Sometimes CASH lines do not occur, but a SALE line is manually populated on the table instead).
I've included all the columns i would like visible on the final table.
Here's a mock up of the data - i'm still learning how to use SQLFiddle - and all the links from this site i take to it end up in an error! :(
TASK_TYPE AVERAGE_REVENUE ASSET_ID POSTING_DATE
SALE 25 A001 01/05/2017
CASH 20 A002 27/04/2017
SALE 20 A003 25/04/2017
TESTING 0 A002 28/04/2017
REPAIR 0 A002 27/04/2017
SALE 22 A004 30/04/2017
CASH 25 A001 22/04/2017
CASH 22 A004 01/05/2017
Here's what i would be expecting from the above example:
TASK_TYPE AVERAGE_REVENUE ASSET_ID POSTING_DATE
SALE 25 A001 01/05/2017
CASH 20 A002 27/04/2017
SALE 20 A003 25/04/2017
CASH 22 A004 01/05/2017
Any examples ive found on stackoverflow seem to solve part of the problem, but not all of it, and my knowledge isnt strong enough to fill in the gaps.
Any help is much appreciated.
In SQL server, you can team up row_number with top 1 with ties to find latest rows:
select top 1
with ties *
from your_table
where task_type in ('SALE', 'CASH')
order by row_number() over (
partition by asset_id order by posting_date desc
)
Demo
One solution is a LEFT JOIN on the table itself. What this query does is join all relevant rows with all other relevant rows (same ASSET_ID and type cash/sale) if the date of the latter is newer. Then we only retrieve those rows which do not have a row which is newer.
SELECT
A.*
FROM
mytable A LEFT JOIN mytable B ON (A.ASSET_ID = B.ASSET_ID AND
B.TASK_TYPE IN ('SALE','CASH') AND
A.POSTING_DATE < B.POSTING_DATE)
WHERE
A.TASK_TYPE IN ('SALE','CASH') AND
B.ASSET_ID IS NULL
You might try the following:
SELECT task_type,
average_revenue,
asset_id,
posting_date
FROM my_table first
WHERE task_type IN ('SALE', 'CASH')
AND posting_date = (SELECT MAX(posting_date)
FROM my_table second
WHERE second.task_type = first.task_type
AND second.asset_id = first.asset_id)
ORDER BY asset_id;
I have 2 tables on SQL Server 2008, each one has a single column and the same rows count number:
USERS OPERATION
Name Operation
----------- -----------
John W383
William R823
Karen X933
Peter M954
Alex S744
I need to perform every week a random draw between the 2 tables to get something like the follow and save it into a 3rd. table:
DRAW_RESULT:
Name Operation_Assigned Week_Number
----------------------------------------------
Peter M954 2
William W383 2
John S744 2
Alex X933 2
Karen R823 2
Name Operation_Assigned Week_Number
----------------------------------------------
William R823 3
Alex M954 3
Karen X933 3
John S744 3
Peter W383 3
How can I do this using T-SQL?
If I understood correctly what you're doing, something like this should work:
select name, operation from (
select
row_number() over (order by (select null)) as RN,
name
from
users
) U join (
select
row_number() over (order by newid()) as RN,
operation
from
operation
) O on U.RN = O.RN
Edit: row_number with newid() works, so removed the extra derived table.
Here's also SQL Fiddle to test this.
Assume the table of records below
ID Name AppointmentDate
-- -------- ---------------
1 Bob 1/1/2010
1 Bob 5/1/2010
2 Henry 5/1/2010
2 Henry 8/1/2011
3 John 8/1/2011
3 John 12/1/2011
I want to retrieve the most recent appointment date by person. So I need a query that will give the following result set.
1 Bob 5/1/2010 (5/1/2010 is most recent)
2 Henry 8/1/2011 (8/1/2011 is most recent)
3 John 8/1/2011 (has 2 future dates but 8/1/2011 is most recent)
Thanks!
Assuming that where you say "most recent" you mean "closest", as in "stored date is the fewest days away from the current date and we don't care if it's before or after the current date", then this should do it (trivial debugging might be required):
SELECT ID, Name, AppointmentDate
from (select
ID
,Name
,AppointmentDate
,row_number() over (partition by ID order by abs(datediff(dd, AppointmentDate, getdate()))) Ranking
from MyTable) xx
where Ranking = 1
This usese the row_number() function from SQL 2005 and up. The subquery "orders" the data as per the specifications, and the main query picks the best fit.
Note also that:
The search is based on the current date
We're only calculating difference in days, time (hours, minutes, etc.) is ignored
If two days are equidistant (say, 2 before and 2 after), we pick one randomly
All of which could be adjusted based on your final requirements.
(Phillip beat me to the punch, and windowing functions are an excellent choice. Here's an alternative approach:)
Assuming I correctly understand your requirement as getting the date closest to the present date, whether in the past or future, consider this query:
SELECT t.Name, t.AppointmentDate
FROM
(
SELECT Name, AppointmentDate, ABS(DATEDIFF(d, GETDATE(), AppointmentDate)) AS Distance
FROM Table
) t
JOIN
(
SELECT Name, MIN(ABS(DATEDIFF(d, GETDATE(), AppointmentDate))) AS MinDistance
FROM Table
GROUP BY Name
) d ON t.Name = d.Name AND t.Distance = d.MinDistance
I have a couple of rows in a database table (lets call it Customer). Each row is numbered by SNo, which gets automatically incremented by the identity property inherent in MS SQLServer. But when I delete a particular row that particular row number is left blank, but I want the table to auto correct itself.
To give you a example:
I have a sample Customer Table with following rows:
SNo CustomerName Age
1 Dani 28
2 Alex 29
3 Duran 21
4 Mark 24
And suppose I delete 3rd row the table looks like this:
SNo CustomerName Age
1 Dani 28
2 Alex 29
4 Mark 24
But I want the table to look like this:
SNo CustomerName Age
1 Dani 28
2 Alex 29
3 Mark 24
How can I achieve that?
Please help me out
Thanks in anticipation
As has been pointed out doing that would break anything in a relationship with SNo, however if your doing this because you need ordinal numbers in you presentation layer for example, you can pull off a [1..n] row number with;
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY SNo ASC), SNo, CustomerName, Age FROM Customer
Obviously in this case the row number is just an incrementing number, its meaningless in relation to anything else.
I don't think you want to do that. Imagine the scenario where you have another table CustomerOrder that stores all customer orders. The structure for that table might look something like this:
CustomerOrder
-------------
OrderID INT
SNo INT
OrderDate DATETIME
...
In this case, the SNo field is a foreign key into the CustomerOrder table, and we use it to relate orders to a customer. If you delete a record from your Customer table (say with SNo = 1), are you going to go back and update the SNo values in the entire CustomerOrder table? It's best to just let the ID's autoincrement and not worry about spaces in the IDs due to deletions.
Why not create a view?
CREATE VIEW <ViewName>
AS
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY SNo ASC) AS SNo
,CustomerName
,Age
FROM Customers
GO
Then access the data in customers table by selecting from the view.
Of course the SNo shown by the view has no meaning in the context of relationships, but the data returned will look exactly like you want it to look.
Using transactions when inserting records in the Database with C#
You have to use DBCC CHECKIDENT(table_name, RESEED, next_val_less_1);
As have been pointed out in other answers, this is a bad idea, and if the reason is for a presentation there are other solutions.
-- Add data to temp table
select SNo, CustomerName, Age
into #Customer
from Customer
-- Truncate Customer
-- Resets identity to seed value for column
truncate table Customer
-- Add rows back to Customer
insert into Customer(CustomerName, Age)
select CustomerName, Age
from #Customer
order by SNo
drop table #Customer