I am trying to UPDATE usernames to our database, but I have problem with UQ.
In our schema we have corporate admin users and contacts in the same table. Every corporate has 1 admin user which where composed by taking 6 characters from their name and adding running number (if there were 6 character duplicates).
For example:
CompanyName: Test Company
UserName: testco-1
Running number with admin users (with the same 6 character start) varies from 1 to 15(ish).
Our contact table has column CorporateAdminId which is set to NULL with Admin users, but contacts are referred to admin user with this field. So the table has a relationship to itself.
NOTE: Before contacts did not have usernames
Because software upgrades our contacts need to have username also. Usernames to contacts are created with the same rule (6 char+running number) and the first 6 characters are defined by AdminUserId reference (not the contacts own corporate name)
For example:
AdminUserId: GUID (Refers to Test Company)
CompanyName: Data miner
UserName: testco-2
My problem here is that how can I count how many usernames there are in the database at the moment that start f.e with 'testco' and add this number to the running number that I use to create contact usernames (so there will be no collissions with UQ)
EDIT: Current query used in update
SELECT LEFT(LOWER(REPLACE(A.CorporateName, ' ','')), 10)+'-
'+CAST(COUNT(*) OVER(PARTITION BY
SUBSTRING(A.Username,1,CHARINDEX('0',A.Username)))+(ROW_NUMBER()
OVER(PARTITION BY B.AdminUserId ORDER BY
LEFT(LOWER(REPLACE(A.CompanyName, ' ','')),10))) as nvarchar(255)) FROM
Contact B INNER JOIN Contact A ON a.Id = B.AdminUserId
Problem with this is that It adds the number of rows that are going to be updated instead of rows that have username as 'xxxxxx' in db.
select username, left(username, 6)
, row_number() (partition by left(username, 6) order by username) rn
from table
Related
I have situation where I need to create a view which will be used by end user who may have PII and NON-PII permission clearance controlled by AD groups.
Say i have dim_customer which contains four columns ID, Name, DoB, Country. When PII user runs
Select ID, Name, DoB, Country FROM dim_customer
the pii user should get
ID NAME DoB Country
1 John 1999-10-10 US
If the same query is run by NON-PII user then they should get
ID NAME DoB Country
1 PII DATA PII DATA US
So basically same view object is used but data is displayed according to the pii clearance.
I dont want to create two views with pii and non-pii suffix.
I tried column level permission but that means when end user try the above
query they get error "no select permission on Name and DoB Columns"
I have tried Data Masking but that shows "XXXX" and i would prefer "PII
Data".
I am looking for a solution where the query runs successfully and show results as above.
Is this possible in SQL Server ?
thanks in advance
Create two roles, one that allows PII data, and one that doesn't. Put each user into one role or the other. Than write your view
Select
ID,
Name,
CASE
WHEN IS_ROLEMEMBER ('pii_role') = 1 THEN DoB
ELSE 'PII Data'
END as DoB,
Country
FROM dim_customer
I have been searching all day but could not find answer to this:
I have a table on SQL Server:
dbo.Program
with fields:
Program.id...PK autoincrement
Program.user...varchar
Program.program...varchar
Program.installed...boolean
Program.department...varchar
Program.wheninstalled...date
Now, I want to insert a new record for every distinct user and copy the department from his latest(Program.wheninstalled) record with other values the same for every user:
Program.user...every unique user
Program.program...MyMostAwesomeProgram
Program.installed...false
Program.department...department of the record with the latest program.wheninstalled field of all the records of the unique user in program.user
Program.wheninstalled...null
I know how to do it in an ugly way:
select the latest records for every user and their department in that record
extract values from 1) and make it into insert into
(field1, field2...fieldX) values
(1records_value1, 1records_value2...1records_valueX),
(2records_value1, 2records_value2...2records_valueX),
...
(Nrecords_value1, Nrecords_value2...Nrecords_valueX)
but I would like to know how to do it in a better way. Oh I cannot use some proper HR databse to make my life easier so this is what I got to work with now.
I'm a postgres guy, but something akin to the below should work:
insert into Program (user, program, installed, department, wheninstalled)
select user,
'MyMostAwesomeProgram',
false,
(select department from someTable where u.user = ...),
null
from users as u;
from https://stackoverflow.com/a/23905173/3430807
you said you know how to do the select
insert into Program (user, program, installed, department, wheninstalled)
select user, 'MyMostAwesomeProgram', 'false' , department, null
from ...
This should do it:
insert into Program (user, program, installed, department, whenInstalled)
select user, program, installed, department, whenInstalled
from
(
select User
, 'MyMostAwesomeProgram' program
, 0 installed
, department
, null whenInstalled
, row_number() over (partition by user order by whenInstalled desc, id desc) r
from Program
) p
where p.r = 1
The interesting bit is the row_number() over (partition by user order by whenInstalled desc, id desc) r.
This says to return a column, r, which holds values 1..n for each user, counting up according to the order by clause (i.e. starting with the most recent whenInstalled and working backwards).
I also included the id field in the order by clause in case there were two installs for the same user on the same date; in such a case the most recently added (the one with the higher id is used first).
We then put this in a subquery, and select only the first record; thus we have 1 record per user, and it's the most recent.
The only values we use from this record are the user and department fields; all else is defined per your defaults.
So I am gonna answer this for some other people who might google this:
To get a records from a table to another table you need to use Select into statement
I like using With XXX as ( some select) to specify, say, "virtual" table with which you can work during the query
As JohnLBevan meantioned a very useful function Row_number, over, partition by and what i missed is a rank
So once you read on these you should be able to understand how to do what I wanted to do.
there are two tables 1) participant and 2) logindatetime.
for first time login datetime value along with other user data like,Name, location, contact number, email gets inserted into participant table having datatime column...for any subsequent login of the same user we insert datetime value into logindatetime column to keep the records of how many times the user logged in....now i have to show all the login time (first login time and subsequent login time) in a single column along with name, location, contact I number, email of the same user.
(I do have an identity in participant table).
Have tried following query:
select a.firstname as 'Name', a.Email as 'Email', a.Address1 as 'Location',
a.MobileNo as 'Contact', COALESCE(a.datetime, b.datetime) as DateTime
from eventonline.participant a, eventonline.logindatetime b
where a.Id = b.Rid";
but it show first login time multiple times.
You need to do something like this to fetch the first and then the other logons separately:
select a.firstname as Name, a.Email, a.Address1 as Location,
a.MobileNo as Contact, a.datetime
from eventonline.participant a
union all
select a.firstname as Name, a.Email, a.Address1 as Location,
a.MobileNo as Contact, b.datetime
from eventonline.participant a
join eventonline.logindatetime b on a.Id = b.Rid
It might be easier just to add the first logon to logindatetime
JamesZ's answer gives the solution but a further note on why your approach isn't working. You're joining the two tables and using coalesce(a.DateTime, b.DateTime) to display login time. If the user has logged in before, a.DateTime has a non-null value. coalesce(x,y) only uses y if x is null. But that's not the real problem. The first login-time needs a record of its own in the logindatetime table. If the users logs in 5 times, your logindatetime will have 4 rows and that's all you'll see when joining the two tables. You need to either save the first login time as a row in logindatetime, or use a UNION to force that first login time to be added as an extra row.
I faced the same issue but according to James Z's answer I solved my problem:
select a.start_date as start, a.end_date as end, a.rooms_id as roomid from maintenance a UNION ALL SELECT b.check_in as start, b.check_out as end, b.room_id AS roomid from reservations b
The result of the query from both tables are here:
You could use joins in your sql statement, i just learnt them 3 days ago and they are very useful!
it would look something like this:
SELECT * FROM table1
LEFT JOIN table2 ON table1.column1 = table2.column1
WHERE table1.column1 = '$yourVar';
table1.column1 could be the id, and the corresponding id in the second table can be the id that links it to the first table (Foreign key), it will retrieve the data of the first table and bring all the data of the second table as well that would match the on the ON criteria
I am trying to mass update a table column with values but I need to get the query to check whether this value already exists. If it does then to make the relevant changes before checking again and updating the table.
The database primarily holds staff information and I need to create a unique username, the script to create the username is :
select upper(LEFT(first_name,1))+LEFT(surname,3)+'1'
from staff_test
If this was used for an example user it would generate a username of ABit1 for user Andrew Bithell. What I need it to do is check to see if there already is a ABit1 username in the STAFF_TEST table and if so change Andrews username to ABit2 as the usernames have to be unique before it moves onto the next user.
I have created another table which lists all the current usernames splitting the existing usernames into 2 columns, so they display in this table as
column1 | column2
------------------
ABit |1
I have experimented with a function and I am now thinking a Merge statement might be the way to go.
Any suggestions are welcomed.
Use row_number can generate all the unique names at once:
select
upper(LEFT(first_name,1))+LEFT(surname,3)+
rtrim(row_number() over (partition by upper(LEFT(first_name,1))+LEFT(surname,3) ))
,first_name
,surname
from staff_test
Perform an up front check to see if there are any clashes:
SELECT UPPER(LEFT(first_name, 1)) + LEFT(surname, 3) + '1' AS username ,
COUNT(1) counter
FROM staff_test
GROUP BY UPPER(LEFT(first_name, 1)) + LEFT(surname, 3) + '1'
HAVING COUNT(1) > 1
ORDER BY COUNT(1) DESC
This will return each username on your staff table, grouped by the username, along with a count of how many occurrences there are of each.
You can either sanitize the data if that's what you're looking to do, otherwise I would suggest, appending an Id column value or some other unique value per record instead of 1 on the end.
I have a scenario where multiple loopings are causing the system resource error.
I need some help with map of map syntax or coding sample for this requirement.
Requirement is:
Account has 1 or more ReportCard records.
ReportCard has Account and Contact.
Now i need to get the list of ReportCards and filter by 1 per contact and recently created records only.
If ReportCard has 2 records with same contact, include only recently created.
// get list of unique accounts from the set
list<Account> accList = new list<Account >([SELECT Id,Average_of_Pulse_Check_Recommend_Score_N__c,Average_of_Recommend_Score_Lanyon_N__c,Average_of_Touchpoint_Recommend_Score_N__c,Average_of_Touch_Point_Satisfaction_N__c FROM Account WHERE Id in:AccIds]);
list<ReportCard__c> allRCList = new list<ReportCard__c>([SELECT Id,Net_Promoter_text__c,CreatedDate, Contact__c, Account__c, RecordTypeID, Touchpoint_Satisfaction_text__c FROM ReportCard__c WHERE Account__c in:accList Order By Account__c, CreatedDate Desc]);
List<ReportCard__c> rcListbyAccounts = new List<ReportCard__c>();
for(Account acc:accList)
{
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
I'm not sure I understand your situation correctly. You've skipped the for loop - I strongly suspect any issues you have there sit in the loop rather than in the queries.
Looks like you should read about using relationship queries (salesforce versions of JOIN in regular database): http://www.salesforce.com/us/developer/docs/soql_sosl/Content/sforce_api_calls_soql_relationships.htm
Pay special attention to subqueries (which behave similar to how a related list behaves on record's detail page).
From what I see I'd say you don't need to query for Accounts at all, or at least not like that. This will work equally well:
SELECT Id,Net_Promoter_text__c,CreatedDate, Contact__c, Account__c, ...
FROM ReportCard__c
WHERE Account__c in:accIds
ORDER BY Account__c, CreatedDate Desc
Now lets attack this:
List of ReportCards and filter by 1 per contact and recently created
records only. If ReportCard has 2 records with same contact, include
only recently created.
I'd reverse it - I'd start the query from Contact level, go down to the related list of Report Cards and pick the latest one. That way it eliminates the issue with duplicate contacts for you. Something like this:
SELECT Id, Name, Email,
(SELECT Id, Net_Promoter_text__c, CreatedDate, Account__c, Account__r.Name, Account__r.Average_of_Pulse_Check_Recommend_Score_N__c
FROM ReportCards__r
WHERE Account__c IN :accIds
ORDER BY CreatedDate DESC
LIMIT 1)
FROM Contact
WHERE AccountId IN :accIds
This goes from Contact "down" to Report Cards (via the relationship name ReportCards__r) and then "up" from Card to Account via Account__r.Name, Account__r.Average_of_Pulse_Check_Recommend_Score_N__c...