I am creating a library, which require some assembly level code.
I am using using NASM to write and integrate my .asm file.
Now the problem is, I already have a project created in VS13. Now I want to add and integrate an assembly level code to my project.
I have already added a .asm file in my source directory, but when I am trying to run my test case, the compiler is unable to find my assembly code.
I want to know how can I link my .asm file with my .c file.
Structure of my project:
->Project1(Generates a Library)
--->Source
----->File1.c
----->File2.c
----->nasm.asm
->Project2 (Test case to use the library and generate .exe)
-->Source
---->main.c
Now, nasm.asm binaries should get attached with the .lib generated by project1
and Project2 should able to access project1.lib
Apologize if question is bit unclear, its a bit complex for me to make it clear in written. Please let me know if you want any clarification or extra information.
Thanks a lot
For each of you assembly files:
Right click it in the Solution Explorer and choose Properties
Make sure the selected Configuration is either All Configurations or the configuration you are using (this bites me every time!)
In the Configuration Properties>General change the Item type to Custom Build Tool
From the Configuration Properties>Custom Build Tool>General set the following items:
Command Line. Use this as an example: nasm -fwin32 "%(FullPath)" -o %(Filename).obj
Outputs. This is necessary, VS check for this files. I usually use %(Filename).obj.
Link Objects. Yes. If you name your output files with obj extension they are automatically included in the link phase.
To check that you set everything right, select your assembly file, right click and choose Compile.
Related
I have an existing .so library (libgit2), and I would like to use this within a C program (the build system is Scons). I read through the entirety of the Scons documentation for "Chapter 4. Building and Linking with Libraries", but there is no mention of how to use an existing .so library. The only mention of .so in the entirety of chapter 4 is on the first page, and it is only about Scons using a .so file for output. How do I use an existing compiled .so library in Scons?
If you are using an sconscript then you should add a LIBS= arguments and a LIBS_PATH=.
if you want to directly add it to the build line, use -L for lib path and -l to link a lib.
You can find further information here: https://scons.org/doc/0.97/HTML/scons-user/x628.html
With help from the SCons Discord server and other places, I've gotten farther than when I first posted this question. I haven't solved my specific problem of using .so libraries with GDNative, but I think I've figured out the SCons side.
As of me posting this question, the SConstruct file was able to compile working code if I didn't use libgit2 and instead just printed out the text. With only the header included, my test call to git_libgit2_version compiled but didn't run, as Godot said undefined symbol: git_libgit2_version.
First of all, you need to add the named parameter for LIBS to your env.SharedLibrary or env.Program line. The lib prefix and .so suffix seem to be added automatically, I still haven't figured out how to make it point to libgit2.so.1.0.1 (so for now I have the library copied and named as libgit2.so, but I would like to have it point to libgit2.so.1.0.1 eventually instead). Also, the SCons team suggested adding LIBPATH, but this doesn't seem to actually do anything.
library = env.SharedLibrary(target=env["target_path"] + env["target_name"] , source=sources, LIBS=['git2'])
Then, the SConstruct file needs to have this magic line:
env['STATIC_AND_SHARED_OBJECTS_ARE_THE_SAME'] = 1
With the above code, ldd will report not found, and Godot will say Error: libgit2.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory (I have no idea why it's asking for .so.1.0 instead of the .so or .so.1.0.1 file, and yes I tried copying and naming as libgit2.so.1.0 and that doesn't change anything either).
I also added this, which was suggested by another GDNative user.
env.Append(LINKFLAGS=[
'-Wl,-rpath,addons/git_for_godot/gdnative/linuxbsd'
])
With all of the above code, this seems to allow ldd and Godot to find the library just fine with a relative path (when running ldd you have to be cd'd into the project folder). I can run the project fine without any errors, but the project crashes immediately after opening, with no error messages printed. If I comment out the call to git_libgit2_version but keep the header included, the file does compile and run. Any time I try to call anything from libgit2 it causes Godot to crash without printing any errors. At this point I'm stuck and I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
I did try adding libgit2 to the Dependencies section of the .gdnlib file, but this doesn't seem to affect anything. Another thing I tried which didn't work is this line (+ variants on the extension) which append to the sources list passed as the named source parameter. I'll post it here for completeness, but for the moment I have this line commented out because it doesn't work:
sources.append(File("project/addons/git_for_godot/gdnative/linuxbsd/libgit2.so"))
Preface: I am very new to c and CLion, so apologies in advance if my phrasing is very wrong.
Essentially, I have an assignment that involves two c files (a "main", and one performing a conversion between imperial and metric units). The main c file simply #include-s the conversion file, performs a function within the conversion file, and prints the resulting value to the user. Simple enough, but I keep getting a message every time I try to run it:
"undefined reference to 'conversion'"
I have tried to suss out the problem, and my only idea relates to the banner at the top of conversion.c which says "This file does not belong to any project target, code insight features may not work properly.". I do not understand why I receive this message, because conversion.c and main.c are both within the main project directory, and this setup worked perfectly fine in my previous assignment.
I have searched for solutions online, and the only one that seemed to make sense was to update my CMakeLists.txt file to include add_executable(project conversion.c). This is what my CMakeLists.txt file looks like before I add this line:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.12)
project(project C)
set(CMAKE_C_STANDARD 11)
add_executable(project main.c)
However, when I add it, I get the error:
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:7 (add_executable):
add_executable cannot create target "directory" because another
target with the same name already exists. The existing target is an
executable created in source directory
"/home/john_s/CLionProjects/project". See documentation for
policy CMP0002 for more details.
Presumably this is because the previous line I have (add_executable(project main.c)) is linking to the same directory, but I have no idea how to resolve this. Any suggestions?
From cmake manual:
add_executable(< name> [WIN32] [MACOSX_BUNDLE]
[EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL]
[source1] [source2 ...])
Adds an executable target called to be built from the source files listed in the command invocation. (The source files can be omitted here if they are added later using target_sources().)
So to combile a single executable using two source files, you just use:
add_executable(target_name source1.c source2.c)
I've got a tool that generates files that contain definitions and declarations. These files need to be included from other source files or headers - they aren't usable standalone.
The obvious thing to do is have a custom command to generate them. My CMakeLists.txt that does this is as follows. I'm currently using this with the GNU makefile generator.
project(test_didl)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0)
add_custom_command(
OUTPUT test_didl_structs.h test_didl_structs.c
COMMAND python ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/didl.py --decls=test_didl_structs.h --defs=test_didl_structs.c ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test_didl_structs.py
DEPENDS ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/didl.py ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test_didl_structs.py
MAIN_DEPENDENCY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test_didl_structs.py)
add_executable(test_didl test_didl.c)
target_include_directories(test_didl PRIVATE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR})
target_link_libraries(test_didl shared_lib)
test_didl.c is very simple:
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "test_didl_structs.h"
#include "test_didl_structs.c"
int main(void) {
}
But on the first build, make tries to build test_didl.c, which of course fails, because test_didl_structs.* haven't been generated yet. Naturally, before the first successful build of test_didl.c, the dependency information isn't known, so make doesn't know to run the python command first.
I tried a custom target, but that's no good, because custom targets are assumed to be always dirty. This means the C file is recompiled on every build and the EXE is linked. This approach won't scale.
My eventual solution was to make the output .h file an input to the executable:
add_executable(test_didl test_didl.c test_didl_structs.h)
.h file inputs are treated as dependencies, but don't otherwise do anything interesting for makefile generators. (I am not currently interested in other generators.)
So that works, but it feels a bit ugly. It doesn't actually state explicitly that the custom commands need to be run first, though in practice this seems to happen. I'm not quite sure how, though (but I'm not up to speed on reading the CMake-generated Makefiles just yet).
Is this how it's supposed to work? Or is there something neater I'm supposed to be doing instead?
(What I'm imagining, I suppose, is something like a Visual Studio pre-build step, in that it's considered for running on every build, before the normal dependency checking. But I want this pre-build step to have dependency checking, so that it's skipped if its inputs are older than its outputs.)
My eventual solution was to make the output .h file an input to the executable.
This way is correct.
It actually states, that building executable depends on given file, and, if that file is OUTPUT for some add_custom_command(), this command will be executed before building executable.
Another way is to generate needed headers at configuration stage using execute_process(). In that case there is no need to add header files as sources for add_executable(): CMake has notion of autodetecting dependencies for compiling, so test_didl will be rebuilt after regeneration of test_didl_structs.h.
execute_process(COMMAND python ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/didl.py --decls=test_didl_structs.h --defs=test_didl_structs.c ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test_didl_structs.py)
# ...
add_executable(test_didl test_didl.c)
Drawback of this approach is that you need manually rerun configuration stage after changing your .py files. See also that question and answer to it.
Another problem is that header file will be updated every time configuration is run.
You can try tell cmake that you are using an external source, see docs about set_source_files_properties, see this past post
I would like to compile the following C file on an embedded platform:
https://github.com/openwsn-berkeley/openwsn-fw/blob/develop/firmware/openos/bsp/chips/at86rf231/radio.c
However, as you can see, on lines 20-26 of radio.c it references "radiotimer_capture_cbt":
typedef struct {
radiotimer_capture_cbt startFrame_cb;
radiotimer_capture_cbt endFrame_cb;
radio_state_t state;
} radio_vars_t;
radio_vars_t radio_vars;
So now I need to hunt down where it is defined and make sure I include the right header.
I have cloned the entire GIT repository here: https://github.com/openwsn-berkeley/openwsn-fw, and I'm looking for a way to compile this easily.
Is there a better way to get this compiled other than going through the brutal dependency nightmare?
My ultimate goal is only to get radio.c compiled and anything it needs. I do not see any makefiles in this project so I'm expecting they want us to use an IDE.
The project seems to use scons as a build system. So the simplest way is to dive into the scons files.
There's a small scons file in the directory containing the linked file and two main script in the top directory.
But if you want to play, first remove headers include, try to compile (using -c) to know which one are really needed. Once you get an object file (.o) you can use nm to identify missing symbols (marked with U.) Good luck …
I'm trying to adjust 3rd person code to my needs. This code is provided with CMake config files used to build and install it. There is possibility to choose one of libraries. And in code is often used #ifdef USE_FTD2XX directive. I saw that this is defined in CMamkeFiles.txt file like here:
option(USE_FTD2XX "Use FTDI libFTD2XX instead of free libftdi" ON)
if(USE_FTD2XX)
find_package(libFTD2XX)
endif(USE_FTD2XX)
if(LIBFTD2XX_FOUND)
include_directories(${LIBFTD2XX_INCLUDE_DIR})
add_definitions( -DUSE_FTD2XX )
else(LIBFTD2XX_FOUND)
set(LIBFTD2XX_LIBRARIES "")
endif(LIBFTD2XX_FOUND)
But if I simply use *.c and *.cpp files and I analyse and run it simply from IDE (Codeblocks), how could I set using this library in C++ code instead of in CMake? I'm also sure that I want use always this one so it can be fixed.
Should I simply #define USE_FTD2XX in main file?
You cannot simply #define USE_FTD2XX because you also need specific linker options for this to work (i.e. the library to link with). If the option is OFF in cmake, the specific link options won't be present in the Makefile and most likely you'll have linker errors.
So CMake takes care of everything automatically for you, but you need to re-generate your makefiles each time you want to toggle options on/off.
If only headers were involved and no library to link with (like some parts of the Boost framework), then yeah, defining USE_FTD2XX in your should be enough.