I have HTML code that is returned from AJAX:
<div ng-controller="CounterPostsController">
<span ng-click="Do();"></span>
</div>
So, event ng-click does not work
In your CounterPostsController, do you have the Do() method defined and associated to the $scope variable?
i.e. $scope.Do() = function () {} or $scope.Do() = myCustomFunction;
You will need to associate your function to $scope in order the code above to work.
Hope this helps
Related
In the ma-resource-text-watch Directive I make an api call to get a list of resource texts.
I want to be able to hide the alert-component if the api doesn't return any resource texts.
Does anyone know how I might be able to do this?
<div ng-controller="IntroductionCntrl" class="hidden-print">
<div class="container-fluid" ng-if="introductionResourceKey">
<alert-component type="guidance">
<span ma-resource-text-watch="{{introductionResourceKey}}"></span>
</alert-component>
</div>
</div>
You can have your directive take in a callback (or expression), which it will fire when the data is loaded. For example, in the directive definition, the scope property can have:
scope: {
onTextsLoaded: '&'
}
The directive can then call:
scope.onTextsLoaded({ texts: yourTexts })
And the parent controller can pass in an expression as a callback, and use ng-show to hide the alert-component:
<alert-component ng-show="dataIsLoaded && texts.length">
<span ma-resource-text-watch="{{introductionResourceKey}}" on-texts-loaded="onTextsLoaded(texts)"></span>
</alert-component>
With the function defined like:
$scope.onTextsLoaded = function(texts) {
$scope.dataIsLoaded = true;
$scope.texts = texts;
}
Trying to make a rating directive but I'm stuck at getting rating2 to work. The first rating worked because the rating1 is hardcoded within the controller. But normally I have to get the saved rating from the db, which I'm trying to do with rating2, as u can see the value is fetched but the directive is not appearing.
https://codepen.io/eldyvoon/pen/MbBNLP
<div star-rating ng-model="rating.rating1" max="10" on-rating-select="rating.rateFunction(rating)"></div>
<br>but rating2 is actually there:
{{rating.rating2}}
<star-rating ng-model="rating.rating2" readonly="rating.isReadonly"></star-rating>
Need expert of directive to help.
Initiate rating2 :
function RatingController($http) {
this.rating1 = 5;
this.rating2 = 0; //ADD THIS LINE
var self = this;
it works for me
check here
First of all, I'm not a directive expert but i'm trying to help. I think that when html is first load, the values from db not finish execute and bind into html. The best way is not using directive instead using controller to fetch data from db.
You pass a model without rating2 into your directive and the changes from the parent controller won't affect it, because variable is created afterwards. Adding a watcher in your linker on parent scope will solve the problem;
scope.$parent.$watch('', function(rating){
updateStars();
});
Other solution would be to define a starting value in your controller.
this.rating2 = 1;
Notice that it is bad design to have a scope variable for each rating. It is cleaner to have an array of ratings and you actually do not need the watcher by doing so.
https://codepen.io/hoschnok/pen/LbJPqL
angular controller
function RatingController($http) {
this.ratings = [4];
var self = this;
$http.get('https://api.myjson.com/bins/o0r69').then(function(res){
self.ratings.push(res.data.rating2);
});
}
HTML
<div ng-app="app" ng-controller="RatingController as rating" class="container">
<div ng-repeat="r in rating.ratings">
<div star-rating ng-model="r" max="10" on-rating-select="rating.rateFunction(rating)"></div>
</div>
</div>
The watcher change handler function has parameters reversed:
//INCORRECT parameters
//scope.$watch('ratingValue', function(oldValue, newValue) {
//CORRECT parameters
scope.$watch('ratingValue', function(newValue, oldValue) {
if (newValue) {
updateStars();
}
});
The first argument of the listening function should be newValue.
The DEMO on CodePen
ALSO
The ng- prefix is reserved for core directives. See AngularJS Wiki -- Best Practices
JS
scope: {
//Avoid using ng- prefix
//ratingValue: '=ngModel',
ratingValue: '=myModel',
max: '=?', // optional (default is 5)
onRatingSelect: '&?',
readonly: '=?'
},
HTML
<!-- AVOID using the ng- prefix
<star-rating ng-if='rating' ng-model="rating.rating2"
max="10" on-rating-select="rating.rateFunction(rating)">
</star-rating>
-->
<!-- INSTEAD -->
<star-rating ng-if='rating' my-model="rating.rating2"
max="10" on-rating-select="rating.rateFunction(rating)">
</star-rating>
When a custom directve uses the name ng-model for an attribute, the AngularJS framework instantiates an ngModelController. If the directive doesn't use the services of that controller, it is best not to instantiate it.
I am new to Angular getting stuck after making ajax call. How do I render/compile the html content once you inject in DOM so that I can still use the AngularJs functions.
Due to the way my backend is set up I have to get content via ajax ($http). And I am making the app without jQuery. I tried $compile and $apply but didn't work. What am I missing here.
I have the code set up at http://jsfiddle.net/rexonms/RB7FQ/3/ . I want the second div content to have the same properties as the first div.
HTML
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl" class="section">
<input ng-model="contentA">
<div>
And the input is: {{contentA}}
</div>
</div>
<div ng-controller="MyAjax" class="section">
<div id="dumpAjax">
{{ajaxData}}
</div>
<button ng-click=getajax()> Get Ajax</button>
</div>
SCRIPT
var myApp = angular.module('myApp',[]);
//myApp.directive('myDirective', function() {});
//myApp.factory('myService', function() {});
function MyCtrl($scope) {
}
function MyAjax($scope){
var data = '<input ng-model="contentB">{{contentB}}';
$scope.getajax = function(){
$scope.ajaxData = data;
}
}
Thanks in advance.
ng-bind-html-unsafe is not available 1.2 and later verison of angular...
so you should use ng-bind-html which creates a binding that will innerHTML the result of evaluating the expression into the current element in a secure way.
using $scope variable in your string make it unsafe, so you should use $sce.trustAsHtml but this time variables in your string cannot be bind because they will be not compiled...
basically you should compile your string in order to bind your variables. Here comes custom directives you can create a directive which can replace with ng-html-bind...
Writing a custom directive which extends ng-bind-html with some extra functions can be a solution...
here is my PLUNKER
and here is your updated JSFIDDLE with my solution...
Instead of {{ajaxData}}, you should use something like:
<div ng-bind-html-unsafe="ajaxData"></div>
However, you'd still need to set the proper model to bind the contentB and get it working.
I am using bootstrap-ui more specifically modal windows. And I have a form in a modal, what I want is to instantiate form validation object. So basically I am doing this:
<form name="form">
<div class="form-group">
<label for="answer_rows">Answer rows:</label>
<textarea name="answer_rows" ng-model="question.answer_rows"></textarea>
</div>
</form>
<pre>
{{form | json}}
</pre
I can see form object in the html file without no problem, however if I want to access the form validation object from controller. It just outputs me empty object. Here is controller example:
.controller('EditQuestionCtrl', function ($scope, $modalInstance) {
$scope.question = {};
$scope.form = {};
$scope.update = function () {
console.log($scope.form); //empty object
console.log($scope.question); // can see form input
};
});
What might be the reasons that I can't access $scope.form from controller ?
Just for those who are not using $scope, but rather this, in their controller, you'll have to add the controller alias preceding the name of the form. For example:
<div ng-controller="ClientsController as clients">
<form name="clients.something">
</form>
</div>
and then on the controller:
app.controller('ClientsController', function() {
// setting $setPristine()
this.something.$setPristine();
};
Hope it also contributes to the overall set of answers.
The normal way if ng-controller is a parent of the form element:
please remove this line:
$scope.form = {};
If angular sets the form to your controllers $scope you overwrite it with an empty object.
As the OP stated that is not the case here. He is using $modal.open, so the controller is not the parent of the form. I don't know a nice solution. But this problem can be hacked:
<form name="form" ng-init="setFormScope(this)">
...
and in your controller:
$scope.setFormScope= function(scope){
this.formScope = scope;
}
and later in your update function:
$scope.update = function () {
console.log(this.formScope.form);
};
Look at the source code of the 'modal' of angular ui bootstrap, you will see the directive has
transclude: true
This means the modal window will create a new child scope whose parent here is the controller $scope, as the sibling of the directive scope. Then the 'form' can only be access by the newly created child scope.
One solution is define a var in the controller scope like
$scope.forms = {};
Then for the form name, we use something like forms.formName1. This way we could still access it from our controller by just call $scope.forms.formName1.
This works because the inheritance mechanism in JS is prototype chain. When child scope tries to create the forms.formName1, it first tries to find the forms object in its own scope which definitely does not have it since it is created on the fly. Then it will try to find it from the parent(up to the prototype chain) and here since we have it defined in the controller scope, it uses this 'forms' object we created to define the variable formName1. As a result we could still use it in our controller to do our stuff like:
if($scope.forms.formName1.$valid){
//if form is valid
}
More about transclusion, look at the below Misco's video from 45 min. (this is probably the most accurate explanation of what transcluded scopes are that I've ever found !!!)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqmeI5fZcho
No need for the ng-init trickery, because the issue is that $scope.form is not set when the controller code is run. Remove the form = {} initialization and get access to the form using a watch:
$scope.$watch('form', function(form) {
...
});
I use the documented approach.
https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/forms
so, user the form name, on "save" click for example just pass the formName as a parameter and hey presto form available in save method (where formScopeObject is greated based upon the ng-models specifications you set in your form OR if you are editing this would be the object storing the item being edited i.e. a user account)
<form name="formExample" novalidate>
<!-- some form stuff here -->
Name
<input type="text" name="aField" ng-model="aField" required="" />
<br /><br />
<input type="button" ng-click="Save(formExample,formScopeObject)" />
</form>
To expand on the answer by user1338062: A solution I have used multiple times to initialize something in my controller but had to wait until it was actually available to use:
var myVarWatch = $scope.$watch("myVar", function(){
if(myVar){
//do whatever init you need to
myVarWatch(); //make sure you call this to remove the watch
}
});
For those using Angular 1.5, my solution was $watching the form on the $postlink stage:
$postLink() {
this.$scope.$watch(() => this.$scope.form.$valid, () => {
});
}
Angular partial - HTML.
BaseCtrl
<div ng-controller="SelectTagCtrl">
<input type="text" ng-init="setTags(viewData['users'])" ui-select2="tagAllOptions" ng-model="tagsSelection" name="users" />
{{viewData['users']}} ECHOES CORRECTLY.
But undefined when passed inside ng-init callback.
</div>
<input type="text" class="span12" placeholder="Brief Description" name="description" value="{{viewData['description']}}">
ECHOES CORRECTLY.
Controller.js
function SelectTagCtrl(){
$scope.setTags = function(data){
// data is undfined when viewData['users'] is used. <-- PROBLEM
// correct when I pass some static string.
}
}
//POPULATING viewData to be used inside view partial.
function BaseCtrl(){
$http.get(url).success(function(data){
$scope.viewData = data.data || [];
$scope.view_type = $scope.viewData['view_type'];
$scope.fields = data.data.fields;
console.log($scope);
}).error();
}
Using timeout would be a workaround, instead I would take a $scope variable inside the controller to know if the ajax call has completed.
The problem is ng-init might get called before ajax completion.
I already had ui-if directive configured in my angular project, so I used it with the combination of $scope variable to get the things working.
<div ng-controller="SelectTagCtrl" ui-if="ajax_done">
<input type="text" ng-init="setTags(viewData['users'])" ui-select2="tagAllOptions" ng-model="tagsSelection" name="users" />
</div>
And inside controller,
$http.get(gurl + '.json').success(function(data,status){
// some stuff
$scope.ajax_done = true;
}).error();
Because of angular's magical two-way binding, the element will get updated. Now it sees that ajax request is completed, ui-if will get a truthy value and ng-init directive of the element will get a chance to execute its callback.
EDIT: ui-if was removed from Angular UI in favour of ng-if which is now built in.
Here are two different changes to your fiddle that appear to work.
Fiddle 1 - this version uses $scope.$apply(exp) as described in the documentation here and is useful when you are modifying angular bound data outside of the angular framework. In this example setTimeout is the culprit.
setTimeout(function(){
console.log("updateVal" );
$scope.$apply(function() {
$scope.updateVal2();
});
console.log($scope.tagsSelection);
},5000);
Fiddle 2 - this version uses angular's wrapper for setTimeout called the $timeout service.
$timeout(function(){
console.log("updateVal" );
$scope.updateVal2();
console.log($scope.tagsSelection);
},5000);