I'm trying to build a 3D earth with Wpf Viewport3D. I have created the earth and it works pretty good. Then I want to add a halo effect around the earth like this attached image:
.
Some recommend to use diffuse material for the globe model. Then build a slight larger globe model with emissive material and little opacity. But the effect is not very good. It affects the color of diffusion material like this:
How can I implement the effect like the first screenshot?
I've done exactly this by creating a ring, inner radius the same radius as the planet and an outer radius to relect the atmospheric depth. Oriented to 'face me'. Using texture coordinates into a LinearGradientBrush to have the atmosphere fade from sky blue to transparent black.
Alternatively, there are some fairly good PNGs around of semi-transparent cloud layers you could use on the slightly larger sphere.
Related
Is it possible to add a red tint to a given camera in SceneKit? I would like to accomplish this without the (what I consider to be) hacky solution of just trying to shove a red object with < 1 opacity in front of the camera. That could be a solution but I haven't had great success in SceneKit showing an object right in front of the camera.
Also, ideally, I could fade the red tint in and out using SCNAction or some other way.
Finally, a perfect solution would work in ARKit, and give a red tint to the whole world around you. So it would have to be something more than a red scenekit light.
SCNCamera's colorGrading property can do that (that would be the most efficient option).
Using a SCNTechnique to apply a custom post process would work too but it requires an additional pass.
Both options would be faster than a blended node in front of the camera, or a red-ish spritekit overlay or a UIView on top of the SCNView.
Instead of adding a red-tinted SCNNode into the scene, you could just add a tinted UIView in front of the ARSCNView in the storyboard. With an outlet to that view fading it in and out would be easy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZNdfVwkttM - you can see all of the problem described on this video if you can't see pictures.
All of walls in all images below have a semitransparent PNG texture. Each square wall, floor and ceiling tile is a separate GeometryModel3D (I know that is no good for performance but...). The floor and the ceiling of the central cube have no any geometry and textures - so they have a color the same as Window.Background (black). But the effect considered appears in any way of transparency obtaining: texture for ImageBrush with transparency, Material.Color (for example DiffuseMAterial.Color) where Color has alpha channel, ImageBrush as material where ImageBrush has Opacity - all the way I have the same problem.
All of walls consists of two triangles. Where are no explicit normals , because I define triangle indices so normals culculated automatically by WPF.
http://imagepost.ru/images/i/ma/image00001.png
It also haven't any back material or extra triangles from the back side.
As you can see there is no problem if you look only from +Z to -Z (standing on the blue square and looking to the red square - that is the second picture).
But if you look backward (from red to blue - the first picture) there is no transparency!
Well, I desided to look from the yellow square (third picture).
And then I walked nearer - you can see what was happening (pictures from 4 to 6).
There are no geometry construction error or texture mapping error or lighting error! It is some kind of clipping, I guessed! In addition there are some interested pictures 7 and 8 to prove my guess.
The last picture shows the white background of the window that hosted Viewport3D (previous was black), and my guess about clipping confirmed - WPF just not painted this part of the scene and we can see the window background!
BUT! If this happens from various looks, why the look from +Z to -Z (second picture) seems well?!
You need to sort the triangles based on their distances from the viewpoint. Only then, wpf will be able to blend the transparent textures.
DirectX is able to blend triangles on top of each other but only when drawing them back to front
http://www.ericsink.com/wpf3d/2_Transparency.html
Lets say I have a Canvas with one Image centered on the screen. When I move the image away from the center, lets say to the upper right corner, I want it to be skewed as if the Canvas was a perspective 3d-camera with a certain FOV. Can this be done somehow? Im playing around with the Perspective-property in Silverlight for WP7 but I cant get the effect Im after.
I believe this may be what you're looking for: How to Set this Kind of Perspective Transform in Matrix3D?
What i'm trying to do is making a "light projector" with visible ray(like with fog) also called volumetric light;
and which project a image (bitmap) ;
Because i would like to keep this project connected with a wpf application ( to get brush, position, rotation from data), i've choose to use WPF 3D
But it seem that WPF can't handle light projection or render ray.
So to do that, i have extruded each pixel of my source bitmap into a polygon colored by a solidColorBrush of the pixel color.
and keep the pixel order with (x,y) position.
For performance issue, i've set all the bitmaps to 32x32 px ( 1024 polygon for only one light !!)
But the result is too pixelated as you can see on the picture.
Moreover, it probably take much memory for nothing ...
my question is, how can i make it smooth or even rethink the extrusion system to optimize performance ...
Is any other tehnology that can be integrated into a wpf application and do that better or easier ?
Thanks, and sorry my English is pretty bad ...
alt text http://www.visualdmx.fr/pic_example.png
I have a few 3d rectangles on my screen that I want to pivot around the Y axis.
I want to press down with the mouse, and rotate the 3d object to a max rotation, but when the user moves their mouse, I want to slightly rotate it so that it looks like a see-saw (rotating from a range of -13 to 13 degrees on the Y-Axis).
At the moment, I can do this, but my frame rate really really suffers when I move the mouse quickly. So for example, when I click the left side of the rectangle, I generate a storyboard and animation objects, then rotate the 3d object to -13 degrees. Then when I slightly move the mouse to the right, I want to rotate it to -12.5, and so on...
Again, I can do all of this, its just that the performance suffers greatly! It goes down to 5-FPS in some cases... which is not acceptable.
My question is am I doing this the best way? How else could you animate a rotation base on the users position on the screen?
Thanks for any help you can provide!
Mark
I assume you are doing the following:
Using a separate Model3D for the object you are rotating & including it in a Model3DGroup
Giving it a RotateTransform3D containing an AxisAngleRotation3D
Animating the AxisAngle3D's Axis property in the Storyboard
If my assumptions are correct I think we can conclude the problem is efficiency in rendering, since the CPU required to update a single Axis value, recompute the Transform, and update MILCore is negligible.
I can think of several ways that could improve the rendering performance:
If your Model3D being rotated is a GeometryModel3D backed by a MeshGeometry3D, do as much as you can to simplify the mesh and the materials used. It can also help to substitute a different mesh for closeups.
If the Model3D being rotated is a GeometryModel3D that uses VisualBrush brushes, during animation temporarily replace the VisualBrush with an ImageBrush containing a BitmapImage that is a snapshot of the Visual underlying the VisualBrush as of the instant the animation starts. When the animation ends, put backthe VisualBrush. The user probably won't notice that the contents of the object freeze temporarily when it rotates. (Note that this same technique can be used if your Visual3D is a Viewport2DVisual3D.)
If the Model3D being rotated is combined into a Model3DGroup with other objects but lies entirely in front of or behind the other groups, separate the model into its own separate Viewport3DVisual, appropriately layered to get the effect you want.
Simplify lighting or Material types
Monitor the actual frame rate and if it is going too low when using the storyboard, rotate the object immediately to where the mouse indicates without using an animation.
MSDN presents some tips on what impacts in WPF 3D performance. If you didn't stumble on it yet, check the items on "Performance Impact: High" list.
Edit: In march 2009, Josh Smith published an article on CodeProject that involves rotating 3D objetcs. Maybe you want to check his solution.