Sorry. I think this question would be very easy to you guys.
I have two c files and one h file, I put those two .c files stack.c and main.c and one .h file stack.h inside a folder named "test" at Desktop.
So they are in C:\Users\user\Desktop\test
However when i try to test this code by writing
gcc -c stack.c sq_main.c -l stack.h
It continuously shows "unkown type name ..."
I think the header file is not included into those two .c files.
Actually I wrote the code
#include "stack.h"
Inside stack.c and main.c
Can anyone tell me how to include header file properly?
You are using GCC wrongly. I guess you are on Linux (or on something emulating it like MinGW ...)
If you insist on giving several commands in a terminal, you'll need to run
gcc -Wall -Wextra -g -c stack.c
gcc -Wall -Wextra -g -c sq_main.c
these two commands are building object files stack.o & sq_main.o (from stack.c & the #include-d stack.h, and sq_main.c & the #include-d stack.h, respectively). The options -Wall -Wextra are asking for all warnings and some extra warnings. The -g option asks for debugging information. The -c option asks for compiling only. Assuming that they are enough for your program, you need to link these object files to make an executable:
gcc -g stack.o sq_main.o -o myprogram
You might need to add -Iinclude-directory options to the compiling commands (the first two), and you might need to add -Llibrary-directory and -llibrary-name to the linking command. Order of arguments to gcc matters a lot. You could also add -H to ask the compiler to show which files are included. And GCC has a lot of other options. Read the Invoking GCC chapter of its documentation.
The .o suffix might be .obj on most Windows systems. You might also need myprogram.exe instead of myprogram. I never used Windows so I cannot help more.
In practice, you should use GNU make and write some Makefile; this answer might inspire you.
Related
I have reinstalled mingw in my system and downloaded the gcc compiler.
I was shocked after compiling the first file which was "subject.c" but the name of the compiled file which gcc returned was "a.exe". It should be "subject.exe" but do not know why this happened.
Can anyone please explain the reason behind this ?
expected:
gcc subject.c
ls
subject.c subject.exe
tried:
gcc subject.c
ls
subject.c a.exe
-o can be used to give the name of the output file.
For example,
gcc -Wall -Wextra -pedantic subject.c -o subject.exe
(Do enable your compiler's warnings!)
gcc names its output files, in the absence of other instructions, a.out or a.exe depending on system environment because that is what it's supposed to do.
To override this default behavior, you can use the -o flag which tells gcc that the next argument is the desired name for the output file. For instance:
gcc -o subject.exe subject.c
There is no automatic functionality built into gcc to strip a source file of its file extension and add .exe to the end but this can be done manually with Makefiles or other similar scripts, for instance you can write a Makefile with the following contents:
%.exe: %.c
gcc -o $# $<
Then a command like make subject.exe would be translated to gcc -o subject.exe subject.c, which may be what you're looking for.
There is functionality built into gcc to strip source files of their extensions during different parts of the compilation process, which may have been what confused you. For instance a call like gcc -c subject.c can be expected to produce an object file called subject.o, likewise gcc -S subject.c can be expected to produce an assembly language file called subject.s, however this does not apply to executable files not only for historical reasons, but because programs can be compiled from multiple source files and there is not always a clear way to choose a name for the executable output.
I am new to C and using GCC. How do I compile multiple C files and then run them? I have multiple miles and each has different functions and they are supposed to run through the main.c file. My friend showed me through Windows but I am having issues figuring out how to do it on Mac.
What I was told:
Compile both files individually first:
gcc -Wall -c .\main.c
gcc -Wall -c .\file.c
Then compile both together into an executable:
gcc -o program file.o main.o
Then run executable with .\program.exe
You should probably investigate makefiles, but this is quite easy. The following should do the trick.
gcc -o program file.c main.c
Feel free to add in whichever -W warning flags you want.
Note also that Macs do not use \ as a directory separator but rather /, and executable files do not typically end in .exe.
I found a useful library on github for my project, after building this later I tried to use some predefined function on it. I couldn't compile my project because there is some header file missing like this one :
In file included from main.c:2:0:
ptask.h:11:19: fatal error: ptime.h: No such file or directory
I compiled my project using this command :
gcc main.c -L. -lptask
This is all the files in project folder :
libptask.a main.c ptask.h
This is the library content:
$ ar -t libptask.a
pbarrier.c.o
pmutex.c.o
ptask.c.o
ptime.c.o
rtmode.c.o
tstat.c.o
libdl.c.o
dle_timer.c.o
calibrate.c.o
Do I need to add all the headers of this files or just link the lib when compiling ?
Your main.c #include-s ptask.h which in turn #include-s ptime.h. Having compiled static libs alone is not enough (that's the linker's job), you still need to have all used header files (which is the compiler's job), both the ones you use and their dependencies, recursively applicable.
Normally you need to be sure that the header files are in your "include path", something that a lot of compilers define with -I as a command-line option. You'll need to include the source directory of that library, or if it has a make install option, then the place where they got installed.
regarding:
gcc main.c -L. -lptask
this is performing the compile step and the link step in one command.
It is also not enabling the warnings, which should always be enabled during the compile step.
Suggest something similar to the following to compile
gcc -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -pedantic -std=gnu11 -g -c main.c -o main.o -I.
and when you have fixed all the warnings, then use something similar to the following to link
gcc main.o -o main -L. -lptask
I'm trying to compile my C code but I need to tell the GCC compiler where two file are.
The two files are located here
/usr/local/ssl/include/
/usr/local/ssl/lib/
I want to add this to my gcc -o file file.c so that my program can work.
In gcc, the -I option is used for adding a directory to the set of directories to search for header files, and the -L option is used for adding a directory to the set of directories to search for libraries. Since you're not explicitly linking in any libraries, you shouldn't need the -L option in this case.
gcc -I/usr/local/ssl/include -o file file.c
If you were linking in libraries, something like the following format should work, assuming that file.c calls a function in libmyLib.a:
gcc -I/usr/local/ssl/include -o file file.c -L/path/to/my/library -lmyLib
See this question for more details regarding library linking order.
I want to compile a small program which has a pretty straight forward makefile, but I seem unable to get it working. Maybe you can help me. The makefile has the following targets:
visca-cli: visca-cli.c libvisca_hl.o
gcc -Wall -o visca-cli visca-cli.c /usr/local/lib/libvisca.so libvisca_hl.o
libvisca_hl.o: libvisca_hl.c
gcc -Wall -c libvisca_hl.c
I can 'make libvisca_hl.o' successfully and create the .o file. But 'make visca-cli' fails with error messages like
libvisca_hl.c:(.text+0x468a): undefined reference to
`VISCA_get_md_disptime'
for every single function defined in libvisca.h (here it's VISCA_get_md_disptime)
Here are the include sections from the various files (ommitting standard libraries):
In visca-cli.c:
#include "libvisca.h"
#include "libvisca_hl.h"
In libvisca_hl.c:
#include "libvisca_hl.h"
In libvisca_hl.h:
#include "libvisca.h"
All includes quoted with "" are present in the local directory where I run make and where all the sourcefiles are. There are no subfolders. So I guess the problem lies with the makefile? Any help appreciated!
The order of libraries and objects on your compilation/link command line matters. In your case, you just need to put the shared object at the end:
gcc -Wall -o visca-cli visca-cli.c libvisca_hl.o /usr/local/lib/libvisca.so
On most systems /usr/local/lib is already part of the standard library search path, so you could simplify further:
gcc -Wall -o visca-cli visca-cli.c libvisca_hl.o -lvisca