I want to parse Swagger data from the JSON I get from {service}/swagger/docs/v1 into dynamically generated .NET class.
The problem I am facing is that different APIs can have different number of parameters and operations. How do I dynamically parse Swagger JSON data for different services?
My end result should be list of all APIs and it's operations in a variable on which I can perform search easily.
Did you ever find an answer for this? Today I wanted to do the same thing, so I used the AutoRest open source project from MSFT, https://github.com/Azure/autorest. While it looks like it's designed for generating client code (code to consume the API documented by your swagger document), at some point on the way producing this code it had to of done exactly what you asked in your question - parse the Swagger file and understand the operations, inputs and outputs the API supports.
In fact we can get at this information - AutoRest publically exposes this information.
So use nuget to install AutoRest. Then add a reference to AutoRest.core and AutoRest.Model.Swagger. So far I've just simply gone for:
using Microsoft.Rest.Generator;
using Microsoft.Rest.Generator.Utilities;
using System.IO;
...
var settings = new Settings();
settings.Modeler = "Swagger";
var mfs = new MemoryFileSystem();
mfs.WriteFile("AutoRest.json", File.ReadAllText("AutoRest.json"));
mfs.WriteFile("Swagger.json", File.ReadAllText("Swagger.json"));
settings.FileSystem = mfs;
var b = System.IO.File.Exists("AutoRest.json");
settings.Input = "Swagger.json";
Modeler modeler = Microsoft.Rest.Generator.Extensibility.ExtensionsLoader.GetModeler(settings);
Microsoft.Rest.Generator.ClientModel.ServiceClient serviceClient;
try
{
serviceClient = modeler.Build();
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
throw new Exception(String.Format("Something nasty hit the fan: {0}", exception.Message));
}
The swagger document you want to parse is called Swagger.json and is in your bin directory. The AutoRest.json file you can grab from their GitHub (https://github.com/Azure/autorest/tree/master/AutoRest/AutoRest.Core.Tests/Resource). I'm not 100% sure how it's used, but it seems it's needed to inform the tool about what is supports. Both JSON files need to be in your bin.
The serviceClient object is what you want. It will contain information about the methods, model types, method groups
Let me know if this works. You can try it with their resource files. I used their ExtensionLoaderTests for reference when I was playing around(https://github.com/Azure/autorest/blob/master/AutoRest/AutoRest.Core.Tests/ExtensionsLoaderTests.cs).
(Also thank you to the Denis, an author of AutoRest)
If still a question you can use Swagger Parser library:
https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-parser
as simple as:
// parse a swagger description from the petstore and get the result
SwaggerParseResult result = new OpenAPIParser().readLocation("https://petstore3.swagger.io/api/v3/openapi.json", null, null);
Related
I don't see a solution to this using the available api documentation.
It is also not available on the web console.
Is it possible to get the file url using the Watson Discovery Service?
If you need to store the original source/file URL, you can include it as a field within your documents in the Discovery service, then you will be able to query that field back out when needed.
I also struggled with this request but ultimately got it working using Python bindings into Watson Discovery. The online documentation and API reference is very poor; here's what I used to get it working:
(Assume you have a Watson Discovery service and have a created collection):
# Programmatic upload and retrieval of documents and metadata with Watson Discovery
from watson_developer_cloud import DiscoveryV1
import os
import json
discovery = DiscoveryV1(
version='2017-11-07',
iam_apikey='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx',
url='https://gateway-syd.watsonplatform.net/discovery/api'
)
environments = discovery.list_environments().get_result()
print(json.dumps(environments, indent=2))
This gives you your environment ID. Now append to your code:
collections = discovery.list_collections('{environment-id}').get_result()
print(json.dumps(collections, indent=2))
This will show you the collection ID for uploading documents into programmatically. You should have a document to upload (in my case, an MS Word document), and its accompanying URL from your own source document system. I'll use a trivial fictitious example.
NOTE: the documentation DOES NOT tell you to append , 'rb' to the end of the open statement, but it is required when uploading a Word document, as in my example below. Raw text / HTML documents can be uploaded without the 'rb' parameter.
url = {"source_url":"http://mysite/dis030.docx"}
with open(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), '{path to your document folder with trailing / }', 'dis030.docx'), 'rb') as fileinfo:
add_doc = discovery.add_document('{environment-id}', '{collections-id}', metadata=json.dumps(url), file=fileinfo).get_result()
print(json.dumps(add_doc, indent=2))
print(add_doc["document_id"])
Note the setting up of the metadata as a JSON dictionary, and then encoding it using json.dumps within the parameters. So far I've only wanted to store the original source URL but you could extend this with other parameters as your own use case requires.
This call to Discovery gives you the document ID.
You can now query the collection and extract the metadata using something like a Discovery query:
my_query = discovery.query('{environment-id}', '{collection-id}', natural_language_query="chlorine safety")
print(json.dumps(my_query.result["results"][0]["metadata"], indent=2))
Note - I'm extracting just the stored metadata here from within the overall returned results - if you instead just had:
print(my_query) you'll get the full response from Discovery ... but ... there's a lot to go through to identify just your own custom metadata.
I come here because I am searching (like the title mentionned) to do a query from geotools (through geoserver) to get feature from a solr index.
To be more precise :
I saw on geoserver user manual that i can do query on solr like this in http :
http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature
&typeName=mySolrLayer
&format="xxx"
&viewparams=q:"mySolrQuery"
The important part on this URL is the viewparams that I want to use directly from geotools.
I have already test this case (this is a part of my code):
url = new URL(
"http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs?request=GetCapabilities&VERSION=1.1.0";
);
Map<String, String> param = new HashMap();
params.put(WFSDataStoreFactory.URL.key, url);
param.put("viewparams","q:myquery");
Hints hints = new Hints();
hints.put(Hints.VIRTUAL_TABLE_PARAMETERS, viewParams);
query.setHints(hints);
...
featureSource.getFeatures(query);
But here, it seems to doesn't work, the url send to geoserver is a normal "GET FEATURE" request without the viewparams parameter.
I tried this with geotools-12.2 ; geotools-13.2 and geotools-15-SNAPSHOT but I didn't succeed to pass the query, geoserver send me all the feature in my database and doesn't take "viewparams" as a param.
I need to do it like this because actually the query come from another program and I would easily communicate this query to another part of the project...
If someone can help me ?
There doesn't currently seem to be a way to do this in the GeoTool's WFSDatastore implementations as the GetFeature request is constructed from the URL provided by the getCapabilities document. This is as the standard requires but it may be worth making a feature enhancement request to allow clients to override this string (as QGIS does for example) which would let you specify the additional parameter in your base URL which would then be passed to the server as you need.
Unfortunately the WFS module lives in Unsupported land at present so unless you have resources to work on this issue yourself and can provide a PR to implement it there is not a great chance of it being implemented.
I want to build my endpoint, which accept JSON array of below format:
[
{
"test":"Math",
"result":"Pass"
},
{
"test":"Science",
"result":"FirstClass"
}
]
It will be a POST call with the above JSON to my endpoint.
I tried it with servlet too but did not get the required result, and also tried to with list and inserting in a new class and posting to that class. Thanks in advance.
Is that an accurate representation of the JSON object which is being sent over? Because one does not simply send a a POST request with a JSON object of their param object to a cloud endpoint. See here for a thorough guide to Endpoint API interaction from a javascript perspective - notice how the client library exposes an object "gapi" through which calls are made. If you're sending this JSON from an iOS or Android app, there are similar client libraries which can be generated for you by a cloud endpoints build tool.
After much frustration, I resorted to reading the docs more carefully. In that quest, I found an important note in the doc:
https://cloud.google.com/endpoints/docs/frameworks/java/parameter-and-return-types
"Any type except a parameter or injected type is considered an entity type. ... Entity types cannot be annotated with #Named"
With all examples showing named parameters, I was stumped as the docs don't explain further, but then found a solution. It ends up that if you do not have named parameters, everything is just passed in as a LinkedHashMap. Usually, you can do any work you need to with just that data structure, but if you HAVE to have it in JSON, you can convert it. Here are some examples:
#ApiMethod(name = "endpointIterfaceName.createItems", httpMethod = "post", path = "test/items")
public WhateverReturnType createItems(LinkedHashMap<String, Object> itemsMap) {
// Do Stuff with map values
return whateverReturnValue;
}
With this, you need to be sure that you post your data with the Content-Type of json (i.e. Content-Type:application/json; charset=UTF-8). So, for example, when testing, with a jquery ajax call you would need to set dataType to "json" or with Postman, you would select "Raw" then JSON (application/json).
If you really want to convert this to a JSON object in Java because for whatever reason you can not use a hash map, you can do the following in your method:
// Use gson library to convert the map to a string
Gson gson = new Gson();
String mapAsJsonString = gson.toJson(itemsMap);
// create a JSON object from the new string representation
JSONObject obj = new JSONObject(mapAsJsonString);
As a side note, if this is passed as Content-Type:text then the whole body will be in the map as the first key of the map. You could do some inadvisable things here and just get that key and avoid converting the map to a string and then to a json object, but, like I said, that is inadvisable. :)
I want to rerieve list of Metadata Component's like ApexClass using Salesforce Metadata API's.
I'm getting list of all the Apex Classes(total no is 2246) that are on the Salesforce using the following Code and its taking too much time to retrieve these file names:
ListMetadataQuery query = new ListMetadataQuery();
query.type = "ApexClass";
double asOfVersion = 23.0;
// Assume that the SOAP binding has already been established.
FileProperties[] lmr = metadataService.listMetadata(
new ListMetadataQuery[] { query }, asOfVersion);
if (lmr != null)
{
foreach(FileProperties n in lmr)
{
string filename = n.fileName;
}
}
My requirement is to get list of Metadata Components(Apex Classes) which are developed by my organizasion only so that i can get the Salesforce Metadata Components which are relevant to me and possibly can save my time by not getting all the classes.
How can I Achieve this?
Reply as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance.
I've not used the meta-data API directly, but I'd suggest either trying to filter on the created by field, or use a prefixed name on your classes so you can filter on that.
Not sure if filters are possible though! As for speed, my experience of using the Meta-Data API via Eclipse is that it's always pretty slow and there's not much you can do about it!
Most of the solutions I've come across for Sharepoint doc library uploads use the HTTP "PUT" method, but I'm having trouble finding a way to do this in Silverlight because it has restrictions on the HTTP Methods. I visited this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd920295(VS.95).aspx to see how to allow PUT in my code, but I can't find how that helps you use an HTTP "PUT".
I am using client web-services, so that limits some of the Sharepoint functions available.
That leaves me with these questions:
Can I do an http PUT in Silverlight?
If I can't or there is another better way to upload a file, what is it?
Thanks
Figured it out!! works like a charm
public void UploadFile(String fileName, byte[] file)
{
// format the destination URL
string[] destinationUrls = {"http://qa.sp.dca/sites/silverlight/Answers/"+fileName};
// fill out the metadata
// remark: don't set the Name field, because this is the name of the document
SharepointCopy.FieldInformation titleInformation = new SharepointCopy.FieldInformation
{DisplayName =fileName,
InternalName =fileName,
Type = SharepointCopy.FieldType.Text,
Value =fileName};
// to specify the content type
SharepointCopy.FieldInformation ctInformation = new SharepointCopy.FieldInformation
{DisplayName ="XML Answer Doc",
InternalName ="ContentType",
Type = SharepointCopy.
FieldType.Text,
Value ="xml"};
SharepointCopy.FieldInformation[] metadata = { titleInformation };
// initialize the web service
SharepointCopy.CopySoapClient copyws = new SharepointCopy.CopySoapClient();
// execute the CopyIntoItems method
copyws.CopyIntoItemsCompleted += copyws_CopyIntoItemsCompleted;
copyws.CopyIntoItemsAsync("http://null", destinationUrls, metadata, file);
}
Many Thanks to Karine Bosch for the solution here: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/sharepointdevelopment/thread/f135aaa2-3345-483f-ade4-e4fd597d50d4
What type of SharePoint deployment and what version of silverlight? If say it is an intranet deployment you could use UNC paths to access your document library in sharepoint and the savefiledialog/openfiledialog available in Silverlight 3.
http://progproblems.blogspot.com/2009/11/saveread-file-from-silverlight-30-in.html
or
http://www.kirupa.com/blend_silverlight/saving_file_locally_pg1.htm
Silverlight has restrictions on what it can do with local files, though I've read that silverlight 4 has some changes.
http://www.wintellect.com/CS/blogs/jprosise/archive/2009/12/16/silverlight-4-s-new-local-file-system-support.aspx