Is it possible to assign two variables the same data from an array in a Perl foreach loop?
I am using Perl 5, I think I came across something in Perl 6.
Something like this:
my $var1;
my $var2;
foreach $var1,$var2 (#array){...}
It's not in the Perl 5 core language, but List::Util has a pairs function which should be close enough (and a number of other pair... functions which may be more convenient, depending on what you're doing inside the loop):
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use 5.010;
use List::Util 'pairs';
my #list = qw(a 1 b 2 c 3);
for my $pair (pairs #list) {
my ($first, $second) = #$pair;
say "$first => $second";
}
Output:
a => 1
b => 2
c => 3
The easiest way to use this is with a while loop that calls splice on the first two elements of the array each time,
while (my($var1, $var2) = splice(#array, 0, 2)) {
...
}
However, unlike foreach, this continually does a double-shift on the original array, so when you’re done, the array is empty. Also, the variables assigned are copies, not aliases as with foreach.
If you don’t like that, you can use a C-style for loop:
for (my $i = 0; $i < #array; $i += 2) {
my($var1, $var2) = #array[$i, $i+1];
...
}
That leaves the array in place but does not allow you to update it the way foreach does. To do that, you need to address the array directly.
my #pairlist = (
fee => 1,
fie => 2,
foe => 3,
fum => 4,
);
for (my $i = 0; $i < #pairlist; $i += 2) {
$pairlist[ $i + 0 ] x= 2;
$pairlist[ $i + 1 ] *= 2;
}
print "Array is #pairlist\n";
That prints out:
Array is feefee 2 fiefie 4 foefoe 6 fumfum 8
You can get those into aliased variables if you try hard enough, but it’s probably not worth it:
my #kvlist = (
fee => 1,
fie => 2,
foe => 3,
fum => 4,
);
for (my $i = 0; $i < #kvlist; $i += 2) {
our ($key, $value);
local(*key, $value) = \#kvlist[ $i, $i + 1 ];
$key x= 2;
$value *= 2;
}
print "Array is #kvlist\n";
Which prints out the expected changed array:
Array is feefee 2 fiefie 4 foefoe 6 fumfum 8
Note that the pairs offered by the List::Pairwise module, which were but very recently added to the core List::Util module (and so you probably cannot use it), are still not giving you aliases:
use List::Util 1.29 qw(pairs);
my #pairlist = (
fee => 1,
fie => 2,
foe => 3,
fum => 4,
);
for my $pref (pairs(#pairlist)) {
$pref->[0] x= 2;
$pref->[1] *= 2;
}
print "Array is #pairlist\n";
That prints out only:
Array is fee 1 fie 2 foe 3 fum 4
So it didn’t change the array at all. Oops. :(
Of course, if this were a real hash, you could double the values trivially:
for my $value (values %hash) { $value *= 2 }
The reasons that works is because those are aliases into the actual hash values.
You cannot change the keys, since they’re immutable. However, you can make a new hash that’s an updated copy of the old one easily enough:
my %old_hash = (
fee => 1,
fie => 2,
foe => 3,
fum => 4,
);
my %new_hash;
#new_hash{ map { $_ x 2 } keys %old_hash } =
map { $_ * 2 } values %old_hash;
print "Old hash is: ", join(" " => %old_hash), "\n";
print "New hash is: ", join(" " => %new_hash), "\n";
That outputs
Old hash is: foe 3 fee 1 fum 4 fie 2
New hash is: foefoe 6 fiefie 4 fumfum 8 feefee 2
A general algorithm for more than 2 variables:
while( #array ){
my $var1 = shift #array;
my $var2 = shift #array;
my $var3 = shift #array;
# other variables from #array
# do things with $var1, $var2, $var3, ...
}
PS: Using a working copy of the array to that it is preserved for use later:
if( my #working_copy = #array ){
while( #working_copy ){
my $var1 = shift #working_copy;
my $var2 = shift #working_copy;
my $var3 = shift #working_copy;
# other variables from #working_copy
# do things with $var1, $var2, $var3, ...
}
}
PPS: another way is to use indexing. Of course, that is a sure sign that the data structure is wrong. It should be an array of arrays (AoA) or an array of hashes (AoH). See perldoc perldsc and perldoc perllol.
my $i = 0;
while( $i < #array ){
my $var1 = $array[ $i++ ];
my $var2 = $array[ $i++ ];
my $var3 = $array[ $i++ ];
# other variables from #array
# do things with $var1, $var2, $var3, ...
}
PPPS: I've been asked to clarify why the data structure is wrong. It is a flatten set of tuples (aka records aka datasets). The tuples are recreated by counting of the number of data for each. But what is the reader constructing the set has a bug and doesn't always get the number right? If, for a missing value, it just skips adding anything? Then all the remaining tuples are shifted by one, causing the following tuples to be grouped incorrectly and therefore, invalid. That is why an AoA is better; only the tuple with the missing data would be invalid.
But an better structure would be an AoH. Each datum would access by a key. Then new or optional data can be added without breaking the code downstream.
While I'm at it, I'll add some code examples:
# example code for AoA
for my $tuple ( #aoa ){
my $var1 = $tuple->[0];
my $var2 = $tuple->[1];
my $var3 = $tuple->[2];
# etc
}
# example code for AoH
for my $tuple ( #aoh ){
my $var1 = $tuple->{keyname1};
my $var2 = $tuple->{key_name_2};
my $var3 = $tuple->{'key name with spaces'};
my $var4 = $tuple->{$key_name_in_scalar_variable};
# etc
}
Here is a module-less way to "loop" by an arbitrary value ($by) and output the resulting group of elements using an array slice:
#!perl -l
#array = "1".."6";
$by = 3; $by--;
for (my $i = 0 ; $i < #array ; $i += $by ) {
print "#array[$i..$i+$by]";
$i++ ;
}
As a one-liner to test (cut and paste to a Unix shell):
perl -E '#array = "1".."6"; $by = 3; $by--;
for (my $i = 0 ; $i < #array ; $i += $by ) {
say "#array[$i..$i+$by]"; $i++ }'
Output:
1 2 3
4 5 6
If you make $by = 2; it will print pairs of numbers. To get at specific elements of the resulting slice access it as an anonymous array: (e.g. [#array[$i..$i+$by]]->[1]).
See also:
How do I read two items at a time in a Perl foreach loop?
Perl way of iterating over 2 arrays in parallel
Some good responses there, including reference to natatime which is quite easy to use. It's easy to implement too - it is essentially a wrapper around the splice solutions mentioned in the responses here.
The following is not the nicest example, but I've been using autobox::Core and made an #array->natatime() "method" ;-) like this:
use autobox::Core ;
sub autobox::Core::ARRAY::natatime {
my ($self, $by) = #_;
my #copy = #$self ;
my #array ;
push #array, [splice (#copy, 0, $by) ] while #copy ;
if ( not defined wantarray ) {
print "#{ $_ } \n" for #array ;
}
return wantarray ? #array : \#array;
}
The #copy array is spliced destructively, but $self (which is how the #array in front of the autobox method -> arrow gets passed to the function) is still there. So I can do:
my #dozen = "1" .. "12" ; # cakes to eat
#dozen->natatime(4) ; # eat 4 at time
my $arr_ref = #dozen->natatime(4) ; # make a reference
say "Group 3: #{ $arr_ref->[2] }" ; # prints a group of elements
say scalar #dozen , " cakes left" ; # eat cake; still have it
Output:
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Group 3: 9 10 11 12
12 cakes left
One other approach that also uses a CPAN module (I gave this answer elsewhere but it is worth repeating). This can also be done non-destructively, with Eric Strom's excellent List::Gen module:
perl -MList::Gen=":all" -E '#n = "1".."6"; say "#$_" for every 2 => #n'
1 2
3 4
5 6
Each group of elements you grab is returned in an anonymous array so the individual values are in: $_->[0] $_->[1] ... etc.
You mentioned Perl6, which handles multiple looping values nicely:
my #qarr = 1 .. 6;
my ($x, $y, $z) ;
for #qarr -> $x , $y , $z { say $x/$y ; say "z = " ~ $z }
Output:
0.5
z = 3
0.8
z = 6
For more on the Perl6 approach see: Looping for Fun and Profit from the 2009 Perl6 Advent Calendar, or the Blocks and Statements Synopsis for details. Perhaps Perl 5 will have a similar "loop by multliple values" construct one day - à la perl5i's foreach :-)
Related
I have an array, say #array1 = qw(abc def ghi jkl).
Now, I want to use this array in a way that elements are shifted 1 by 1, but that shifting takes place virtually, and not in the array.
Like, "shift" will shift the elements and remove them from the array. But, I don't want those elements to be removed.
Short Code Snippet:
while (my $rName = shift #array1) {
my $bName = shift #array1 ;
## Do something now with the value
}
##And now, I want that I can use #array1 again with the original elements residing
How can it be implemented?
In Perl 5.36 you'll be able to do this:
for my ($rName, $bName) (#array1) { ... }
Use a C-style for loop and increment by two. $#foo is the index of the last element.
my #foo = 0 .. 5;
for (my $i = 0; $i <= $#foo; $i += 2){
my $r_name = $foo[$i];
my $b_name = $foo[$i+1];
}
If you wanted fancier-looking code, you could use natatime from List::MoreUtils on CPAN, which gives you an iterator that you can use in a while loop.
use List::MoreUtils 'natatime';
my #foo = 0 .. 5;
my $it = natatime 2, #foo;
while ( my ($r_name, $b_name) = $it->() ) {
print "$r_name $b_name\n";
}
You can also use pairs from the core List::Util module:
A convenient shortcut to operating on even-sized lists of pairs, this function returns a list of ARRAY references, each containing two items from the given list.
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use feature qw/say/;
use List::Util qw/pairs/;
my #array1 = qw/a 1 b 2 c 3/;
for my $pair (pairs #array1) {
my ($rName, $bName) = #$pair;
say "$rName => $bName";
}
say "#array1";
# Require Perl 5.36
for my ( $rName, $bName ) ( #array1 ) {
...
}
my #array2 = #array1;
while ( #array2 ) {
my $rName = shift #array2;
my $bName = shift #array2;
...
}
for my $i ( 0 .. $#array1/2 ) {
my $rName = $array1[ $i * 2 + 0 ];
my $bName = $array1[ $i * 2 + 1 ];
...
}
for ( my $i = 0; $i < #array1; ) {
my $rName = $array1[ $i++ ];
my $bName = $array1[ $i++ ];
...
}
use List::Util qw( pairs );
for ( pairs #array1 ) {
my ( $rName, $bName ) = #$_;
...
}
I tried to organize them from fastest to slowest, but I didn't actually benchmark anything.
Three of the solutions were previously mentioned, but noone mentioned what I think is the fastest solution that doesn't require 5.36 (which hasn't been released yet).
Creating a matrix of products for three element arrays. I understand Perl does not have multi-dimensional arrays and are flattened. I have been using refs but I can't seem to get past the for loop issue in getting three products into a single array and pushing that array into a different single array. And I could be way off too. Be nice, but I've spent too many hours on this.
I have moved values inside and out of various places i.e. { }, printed out variables until I'm blue and used $last all over for debugging. I'm likely fried at this point.
use strict;
use warnings;
my #array1 = (1, 2, 3);
my #array2 = (2, 4, 6);
my #matrixArray = ();
my $matrixArray;
my #row;
my #finalArray = maths(\#array1, \#array2);
print #finalArray;
sub maths{
my $array1ref = shift;
my $array2ref = shift;
my $value1;
my $value2;
my $maths;
my #row = ();
my #array1 = #{$array1ref};
my #array2 = #{$array2ref};
my $len1 = #array1;
my $len2 = #array2;
for my $x (0 ..($len1 -1)){
#iterate through first array at each value
$value1 = $array1[$x];
#print $value1, " value1 \n";
for my $y (0 .. ($len2 -1)){
#iterate through second array at each value
$value2 = $array2[$y];
#print $value2, " value2 \n";
#calculate new values
$maths = $value1 * $value2;
#exactly right here
#print $maths, " maths \n" ;
push #row, $maths;
}
}
#and exactly right here but not set of arrays
#print #row, "\n";
return #row;
}
Currently I'm able to get this: 246481261218. Which is the correct dumb math but...
it should appear as a matrix:
2 4 6
4 8 12
6 12 18
I am not passing three arrays so it seems my issue is up in the sub routine before I can get on with anything else. This seems to be a theme that I often miss. So sorry if I sound inept.
EDIT***
This was working but I couldn't unpack it
use strict;
use warnings;
my #array1 = (1, 2, 3);
my #array2 = (2, 4, 6);
my #matrixArray = ();
maths(\#array1, \#array2);
foreach my $x (#matrixArray){
print "$x \n";
}
sub maths{
my $array1ref = shift;
my $array2ref = shift;
my $value1;
my $value2;
my $maths;
my #row = ();
my $row;
my #array1 = #{$array1ref};
my #array2 = #{$array2ref};
my $len1 = #array1;
my $len2 = #array2;
for my $x (0 ..($len1 -1)){
#iterate through first array at each value
$value1 = $array1[$x];
for my $y (0 .. ($len2 -1)){
#iterate through second array at each value
$value2 = $array2[$y];
#calculate new values
$maths = $value1 * $value2;
push #row, $maths;
$row = \#row;
}
push #matrixArray, $row;
}
return #matrixArray;
}
The output right after the function call is this:
ARRAY(0x55bbe2c667b0)
ARRAY(0x55bbe2c667b0)
ARRAY(0x55bbe2c667b0)
which would be the (line 10) print of $x.
****EDIT
This Works (almost):
print join(" ", #{$_}), "\n" for #matrixArray;
Output is a bit wrong...
2 4 6 4 8 12 6 12 18
2 4 6 4 8 12 6 12 18
2 4 6 4 8 12 6 12 18
And of note: I knew $x was an array but I seemed to run into trouble trying to unpack it correctly. And I'm no longer a fan of Perl. I'm pining for the fjords of Python.
And *****EDIT
This is working great and I get three arrays out of it:
sub maths{
my ($array1, $array2) = #_;
my #res;
for my $x (#$array1) {
my #row;
for my $y (#$array2) {
push #row, $x * $y;
}
push #res, \#row;
}
#This is the correct structure on print #res!
return #res;
}
But, though it's putting it together correctly, I have no output after the call
maths(\#array1, \#array2);
NOTHING HERE...
print #res;
print join(" ", #{$_}), "\n" for #res;
foreach my $x (#res){
print join(" ", #{$x}), "\n";
}
And of course a million thanks! I regret taking this stupid course and fear my grade will eventually do me in. Still pining for Python!
It appears that you need a matrix with rows obtained by multiplying an array by elements of another.
One way
use warnings;
use strict;
use Data::Dump qw(dd);
my #ary = (2, 4, 6);
my #factors = (1, 2, 3);
my #matrix = map {
my $factor = $_;
[ map { $_ * $factor } #ary ]
} #factors;
dd #matrix;
The array #matrix, formed by the outer map, has array references for each element and is thus (at least) a two-dimensional structure (a "matrix"). Those arrayrefs are built with [ ], which creates an anonymous array out of a list inside. That list is generated by map over the #ary.
I use Data::Dump to nicely print complex data. In the core there is Data::Dumper.
With a lot of work like this, and with large data, efficiency may matter. The common wisdom would have it that direct iteration should be a bit faster than map, but here is a benchmark. This also serves to show more basic ways as well.
use warnings;
use strict;
use feature 'say';
use Benchmark qw(cmpthese);
my $runfor = shift // 5; # run each case for these many seconds
sub outer_map {
my ($ary, $fact) = #_;
my #matrix = map {
my $factor = $_;
[ map { $_ * $factor } #$ary ]
} #$fact;
return \#matrix;
}
sub outer {
my ($ary, $fact) = #_;
my #matrix;
foreach my $factor (#$fact) {
push #matrix, [];
foreach my $elem (#$ary) {
push #{$matrix[-1]}, $elem * $factor;
}
}
return \#matrix;
}
sub outer_tmp {
my ($ary, $fact) = #_;
my #matrix;
foreach my $factor (#$fact) {
my #tmp;
foreach my $elem (#$ary) {
push #tmp, $elem * $factor;
}
push #matrix, \#tmp;
}
return \#matrix;
}
my #a1 = map { 2*$_ } 1..1_000; # worth comparing only for large data
my #f1 = 1..1_000;
cmpthese( -$runfor, {
direct => sub { my $r1 = outer(\#a1, \#f1) },
w_tmp => sub { my $r2 = outer_tmp(\#a1, \#f1) },
w_map => sub { my $r3 = outer_map(\#a1, \#f1) },
});
On a nice machine with v5.16 this prints
Rate direct w_map w_tmp
direct 11.0/s -- -3% -20%
w_map 11.4/s 3% -- -17%
w_tmp 13.8/s 25% 21% --
The results are rather similar on v5.29.2, and on an oldish laptop.
So map is a touch faster than building a matrix directly, and 15-20% slower than the method using a temporary array for rows, which I'd also consider clearest. The explicit loops can be improved a little by avoiding scopes and scalars, and the "direct" method can perhaps be sped up some by using indices. But these are dreaded micro-optimizations, and for fringe benefits at best.
Note that timings such as these make sense only with truly large amounts of data, what the above isn't. (I did test with both dimensions ten times as large, with very similar results.)
The second program is mostly correct.
The problem is that you didn't unpack the second level of the array.
foreach my $x (#matrixArray){
print "$x \n";
}
should be something like:
foreach my $x (#matrixArray) {
print join(" ", #{$x}), "\n";
}
# or just:
print join(" ", #{$_}), "\n" for #matrixArray;
Your maths function can be made shorter without losing legibility (it may actually make it more legible) by cutting out unnecessary temporary variables and indexing. For example:
sub maths {
my #array1 = #{ $_[0] };
my #array2 = #{ $_[1] }; # or: ... = #{ (shift) };
my #res = ();
for my $x (#array1) {
my #row = (); # <-- bugfix of original code
for my $y (#array2) {
my $maths = $x * $y;
push #row, $maths;
}
push #res, \#row;
}
return #res;
}
I have a list of names:
#names = qw(John Peter Michael);
I want to take 2 values from it, so I get John and Peter. If I want to take 2 more - I get Michael and John. 1 more - Peter. 3 more - Michael John and Peter, and so on.
I've started writing a subroutine where a global index ID would be set and remembered, and would reset itself to zero once it reaches scalar limit of an array, but then I read somewhere that Perl arrays "remember" the position they were looped.
Is that true or am I misunderstanding something? Is there a way to do my task an easy way?
It's not that hard to roll your own iterator, but perlfaq4 has your need covered:
How do I handle circular lists?
(contributed by brian d foy)
If you want to cycle through an array endlessly, you can increment the
index modulo the number of elements in the array:
my #array = qw( a b c );
my $i = 0;
while( 1 ) {
print $array[ $i++ % #array ], "\n";
last if $i > 20;
}
You can also use Tie::Cycle to use a scalar that always has the next element of the circular array:
use Tie::Cycle;
tie my $cycle, 'Tie::Cycle', [ qw( FFFFFF 000000 FFFF00 ) ];
print $cycle; # FFFFFF
print $cycle; # 000000
print $cycle; # FFFF00
The Array::Iterator::Circular creates an iterator object for circular arrays:
use Array::Iterator::Circular;
my $color_iterator = Array::Iterator::Circular->new(
qw(red green blue orange)
);
foreach ( 1 .. 20 ) {
print $color_iterator->next, "\n";
}
The roll-your-own variety
The subroutine is really quite simple (implemented as circularize in the code below). The value of $i is retained in $colors's scope, so no need for state variables:
sub circularize {
my #array = #_;
my $i = 0;
return sub { $array[ $i++ % #array ] }
}
my $colors = circularize( qw( red blue orange purple ) ); # Initialize
print $colors->(), "\n" for 1 .. 14; # Use
I never fully understood that mechanism (is it only on foreach?). I would just use state values, e.g.:
my #names = qw(John Peter Michael);
sub GetNames($) {
my $count = shift;
my #result = ();
state $index = 0;
state $length = scalar(#names);
while($count--) {
push(#result, $names[($index++ % $length)]);
}
return #result;
}
print join(", ", GetNames(2)), "\n\n";
print join(", ", GetNames(4)), "\n";
Outputs:
John, Peter
Michael, John, Peter, Michael
I have the following code which reads in a 6x6 array from STDIN and saves it as an array of anonymous arrays. I am trying to print out each element with $arr[i][j], but the code below isn't working. It just prints out the first element over and over. How am I not accessing the element correctly?
#!/user/bin/perl
my $arr_i = 0;
my #arr = ();
while ($arr_i < 6){
my $arr_temp = <STDIN>;
my #arr_t = split / /, $arr_temp;
chomp #arr_t;
push #arr,\#arr_t;
$arr_i++;
}
foreach my $i (0..5){
foreach my $j (0..5){
print $arr[i][j] . "\n";
}
}
i and j are not the same as the variables you declared in the foreach lines. Change:
print $arr[i][j] . "\n";
to:
print $arr[$i][$j] . "\n";
warnings alerted me to this issue. You should add these lines to all your Perl code:
use warnings;
use strict;
To demonstrate the Perlish mantra that there's "more than one way to do it":
use 5.10.0; # so can use "say"
use strict;
use warnings qw(all);
sub get_data {
my ($cols, $rows) = #_;
my ($line, #rows);
my $i;
for ($i = 1; $i <= $rows and $line = <DATA>; $i++) {
chomp $line;
my $cells = [ split ' ', $line ];
die "Row $i had ", scalar(#$cells), " instead of $cols" if #$cells != $cols;
push #rows, $cells;
}
die "Not enough rows, got ", $i - 1, "\n" if $i != $rows + 1;
\#rows;
}
sub print_data {
my ($cols, $rows, $data) = #_;
for (my $i = 0; $i < $rows; $i++) {
for (my $j = 0; $j < $cols; $j++) {
say $data->[$i][$j];
}
}
}
my $data = get_data(6, 6);
print_data(6, 6, $data);
__DATA__
1 2 3 4 5 6
a b c d e f
6 5 4 3 2 1
f e d c b a
A B C D E F
7 8 9 10 11 12
Explanation:
if we use say, that avoids unsightly print ..., "\n"
get_data is a function that can be called and/or reused, instead of just being part of the main script
get_data knows what data-shape it expects and throws an error if it doesn't get it
[ ... ] creates an anonymous array and returns a reference to it
get_data returns an array-reference so data isn't copied
print_data is a function too
both functions use a conventional for loop instead of making lists of numbers, which in Perl 5 needs to allocate memory
There is also a two-line version of the program (with surrounding bits, and test data):
use 5.10.0; # so can use "say"
my #lines = map { [ split ' ', <DATA> ] } (1..6);
map { say join ' ', map qq{"$_"}, #$_ } #lines;
__DATA__
1 2 3 4 5 6
a b c d e f
6 5 4 3 2 1
f e d c b a
A B C D E F
7 8 9 10 11 12
Explanation:
using map is the premier way to iterate over lists of things where you don't need to know how many you've seen (otherwise, a for loop is needed)
the adding of " around the cell contents is only to prove they've been processed. Otherwise the second line could just be: map { say join ' ', #$_ } #lines;
I've been trying and trying with this one, but it just doesn't seem to click.
If I have an array with let's say 6 numbers:
#a = (1,2,3,4,5,6)
How do I get every second index ( 2, 4, 6) in this case?
how do I compute the difference of every two elements, so
the output here would be:
1 1 1 (because 2-1 =1 and 4-3 =1 and so on..)
Note: don't ever use $a or $b, they're special (sort uses them) ... it's generally better to give your variables a descriptive name, name it as to what's in there rather than what type of variable it is.
for ( my $index = 0; $index < scalar( #pairs ); $index += 2 ) {
my $first = $pairs[ $index + 0 ];
my $second = $pairs[ $index + 1 ];
my $pair = $index / 2;
my $difference = $second - $first;
print "the difference of pair $pair is $difference\n";
}
I think you should post your earlier attempts. In my opinion, the best way to learn is to learn from your mistakes, not being presented a correct solution.
For this problem, I think I would use a C-style for-loop for the first part, simply because it is straightforward, and can easily be tweaked if some new requirement comes up.
The second problem can easily be solved using a regular Perl-style for-loop.
use strict;
use warnings; # always use these two pragmas
my #nums = 1..6;
my #idx;
for (my $n = 0; $n <= $#nums; $n += 2) { # loop from 0 to max index, step 2
push #idx, $n; # store number in #idx
}
print "Indexes: #idx\n";
my #diff;
for my $n (0 .. $#nums - 1) { # loop from 0 to max index minus 1
push #diff, $nums[$n + 1] - $nums[$n]; # store diff in #diff
}
print "Diff: #diff\n";
Output:
Indexes: 0 2 4
Diff: 1 1 1 1 1
Try this:
use strict;
use warnings;
my $index = 1;
my #a = (1,2,3,4,5,6);
for (#a) {
if ($index % 2 == 0) {
my $diff = $_ - $a[$index-2];
print $diff;
}
$index++;
}
You likely want to use the new List::Util pair functions.
For your first question:
use List::Util 'pairvalues';
my #seconds = pairvalues #list; # yields (2, 4, 6)
For your second question:
use List::Util 'pairmap';
my #diffs = pairmap { $b-$a } #list; # yields (1, 1, 1)
You can use map:
my #a = 1 .. 6;
print join ' ', 'Every second:', map $a[ 1 + $_ * 2 ], 0 .. $#a / 2;
print "\n";
print join ' ', 'Differences:', map $a[ 1 + $_ * 2 ] - $a[ $_ * 2 ], 0 .. $#a / 2;
print "\n";
First: Don't use variables a and b. $a and $b are special variables used in sorting. Just be a bit more descriptive of your variables (even if it's merely #my_array) and you should be fine.
You can loop through your array any which way you like. However, I prefer to use a while loop instead of the thee part for because the three part for loop is a bit misleading. It is a while loop in disguise and the promised indexing of the loop can be misleading.
#! /usr/bin/env perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use feature qw(say);
my #array = qw( 1 2 3 4 5 6 );
my $index = 1; # Remember Perl indexes start at zero!
while ( $index <= $#array ) {
say "Item is $array[$index]";
say "The difference is " . ($array[$index] - $array[$index-1]);
$index += 2;
}
You said every second element. Indexes of arrays start at 0, so you want the odd number elements. Most of the answers use map which is a very nice little command, but does an awful lot in a single line which can make it confusing for a beginner. Plus, I don't think the Perldoc on it is very clear. There should be more simple examples.
The say is a newer version of print. However say always adds a \n at the end. You should always use strict; and use warnings;. These will catch about 90% of your programming bugs.
The qw( ... ) is a quick way to make an array. Each word becomes an array element. You don't need quotes or commas.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my #ar = (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
# 1. How do I get every second index ( 2, 4, 6) in this case?
my #even = map { $_ & 1 ? $ar[$_] : () } 0 .. $#ar;
# 2. how do I compute the difference of every two elements?
my (#c, #diff) = #ar;
push #diff, -1 * (shift(#c) - shift(#c)) while #c;
use Data::Dumper;
print Dumper \#even;
print Dumper \#diff;
1;
__END__
$VAR1 = [
2,
4,
6
];
$VAR1 = [
1,
1,
1
];