Dart web-webui vs angularjs [closed] - angularjs

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Still did not get. Why use angularjs 2.0 with dart if dart comes with dart-webui with binding and templates and you can annotate whatever you want to be either service (classes), component or whatever.
This is a question.

Because, you are in the middle of a big explosion of technology.
There are many many frameworks and languages being born right now, each of them with their own view of what you need. None of them will have everything you need and must of them will overlap in what they offer. Even technologies from the same vendor.
This is happening in the world of:
Cloud Infrastructure (Azure, Amazon, etc)
UI (Angular, Polymer, Dart, etc)
Storage (SQL, NoSql, Big Data, etc)
and many more ...
It will be up to you to decide what to leverage from what tool if you are using multiples tools that offer the same thing.

I don't see a good reason to use Angular.js 2.0 with Dart because there is also Angular.dart 2.0 which is a better fit if you want to use Dart.
Dart web-ui was the predecessor of Polymer.dart. Polymers primary intent is to create reusable web components (build your own HTML tags). Angular is for building complex web applications. Angular has it's own way of building components but it is designed to support Polymer elements or plain web components as well.

Related

Is there a benefit to using Swift or Java over NativeScript? [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
From my understanding, if you want to develop a multi-platform app, it makes more sense to just use NativeScript or some other hybrid language. So would there be a point in using swift, objective-c, java, etc over something like NativeScript?
In the long run, I would love to choose swift/java over cross-platform framework. Even though with NativeScript, React Native or Xamarin, they all render the real UI Component from native API but I think there is still a gap between performances of swift/java and cross-platform.
Cross-platform is perfect for small or medium apps, or companies who have limited human resources as cost for developing and maintaining native apps is quite high. However, the cross-platform apps won't be as stable as native apps, so if you want to have a feature-rich apps, swift/java would be better. Moreover, I don't know much about React Native but you have full access to native API in NativeScript with JavaScript.
Technically, you can do everything swift/java can do in NativeScript. However, there are something in native API (e.g UI components, native function, etc.) that might take lots of efforts to access as it's quite tricky to translate swift/obj-C/java to javascript. Fortunately, there are many plugins or code snippets made by community that might be helpful.
That's my personal idea.

Web development which is best Angular Js or Wordpress [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am developing 1 project but I am little bit confused to choose which technology I should use
I go for AngularJs, but why AngularJs?
I go for WordPress, but why WordPress?
Can anyone suggest me the best option?
The answer is not so simple, because there are many types of fields on which selected technologies can be used and as #steur36 said before, it depends on your project requirements.
Basically, Wordpress is a CMS and its prime functionality is to provide all functionality to run and display a simple webpage (its a mix of frontend and backend). Wordpress could be used with success for small websites or blogs (where the main feature is to provide and/or display basic content, like: text, images/media/gallery, files ect.)
In the other side, there is the AngularJS, a javascript frontend framework where you can focus on visual side of your project and how the content is present to the audience. With AngularJS (or any other javascript frontend framework, like: Ember, Backbone, ect.) you can build the appearance of any webpage or web application, but to store the content, you may also need some RESTful backend server as well (to create queries to the server).
As small summary, Wordpress is great for small and medium websites/blogs (for bigger projects, it might not be adequate). With AngularJS (and probably with some RESTful backend server, because it depends if you really need it) you may create almost any complex projects, but the time of creation will definitely increase relative to Wordpress.

Why should I use Angular 2? What are it's advantages over Angular 1? [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Angular 1 excels in data binding and provided a structued MVC MVW framework.
It fails in providing built-in modularity.
What are the core selling points of Angular 2? Im not looking for opinion, just plain simple bullet point facts and Im only interested in core selling points.
Also what other libraries such as bootstrap / polymer gel well with angular 2?
For me? Just off the top of my head:
Support for Functional Reactive Programming using RxJS Observables.
Built from the ground up with Typescript, meaning Types are a first class construct.
Unidirectional data flow.
Native ES6 Modules, no more endless script tags.
Fully component based.
Better template syntax.
An even better Router.
Much better Dependency Injection.
Support for sped up initial loads thanks to server-side prerendering.
ZoneJS Support, no more digest loop!
Of those my favorite feature is definitely the FRP support. We can drastically enhance performance by using Immutable Objects or Observables for our change detection.
The Formbuilder API as well as the HTTP API is fully compatible with RxJS making it very very powerful.
As for libraries, Angular-Material is obviously a big one. Another favorite of mine is NativeScript, which aims to create fully native mobile applications from your Angular 2 App. I'm sure there'll be tons more once it actually releases.

Is AngularJS a good option for building a catalog page of E-Commerce site based on CakePHP [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am considering to use AngularJS for building my catalog on my E-Commerce platform based on CakePHP. I plan to query database using Slim REST API in CakePHP. This is what the catalog would look like.
I am not sure if I should use AngularJS. If I should can someone please help me to know why I should use it and how it shall be a benefit to use AngularJS in building such catalog page?
I personally have used AngularJS, EmberJS, HandlebarsJS and dabbled in some other things. In my humble opinion AngularJS is one of the best frameworks to use. It is backed by Google and heavily used in the web development community. After getting stuck once on a bug in Angular, I emailed one of the AngularJS creators, and received a response from him within a couple days. I've found that although the learning curve isn't the easiest, its easier to learn than many of the other frameworks I've played with.
I quote angular's website:
HTML is great for declaring static documents, but it falters when we try to use it for declaring dynamic views in web-applications. AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.
Personally I have found that using angular has drastically reduced the amount of code that I've had to write to get a web-application to work in JavaScript. The current company I work at uses Angular to run one of their e-commerce sites. Mobile integration is excellent.
Just looking at your link quickly, that is a very doable application in angular. You'll need a RESTful webservice to get the data, but everything else can be rather easily handled using Angular on the front end. Here is a robust tutorial making a full featured app in angular, I think it should give you a good idea of what is possible with angular.

Do i need a JSframework? [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to add some JS functionality to our site. (wishlist, inquiry, ect) I think it would be nice for the UX that it is going to be build with some JS code
Do i need a JSframework like Angular, ember ect ? Or are JSframeworks only make sense for SPA like editing/backend tools?
That decision is up to you. AngularJS is awesome, but it's not really meant to be used for little pieces of a project. For my taste, I'd write everything with AngularJS. You probably want to check out Backbone if you want to only use it here and there.
From Backbonejs.org:
Philosophically, Backbone is an attempt to discover the minimal set of
data-structuring (models and collections) and user interface (views
and URLs) primitives that are generally useful when building web
applications with JavaScript. In an ecosystem where overarching,
decides-everything-for-you frameworks are commonplace, and many
libraries require your site to be reorganized to suit their look,
feel, and default behavior — Backbone should continue to be a tool
that gives you the freedom to design the full experience of your web
application.
Angular is more like the "overarching, decides-everything-for-you frameworks" it mentions.

Resources