I have been looking for a component set for a start-up project which would be based on AngularJS.
After some research, I have found three common component sets which can be applicable.
The first is AngularJS Bootstrap UI. It seems clear, but there are no enough examples and documentation.
The second is angular-strap. I have seen that it is a simple implementation of bootstrap.js with some additional features, but it seem very simple.
And the last one is QuantumUI. I have seen that it is amazing, but it seems very new.
What is the experience with these frameworks? Can you list pros cons for them?
I am owner of QuantumUI and is is not truth to say anything about other's projects.
However I can say that in short;
ui-bootstrap: is pure angular based, but it is old and not compatiable with new angular versions. Also it's plugins are very simple.
Also angular-strap is a implementation of bootstrap.js. Namely, it isn't a project of angular thinking.
However QuantumUI is a compact angular solution. It's components are powerful, server and developer friendly and also there is no Jquery dependency. All components are results of angular thinking.
Related
I need to migrate an site from one framework to another because I need to use Angular JS.
I found zurb-foundation very interesting. It happens that it seems to use jQuery.
According to this website https://scotch.io/tutorials/how-to-correctly-use-bootstrapjs-and-angularjs-together
When building out Angular projects, you should not add on the full jQuery library. jQlite is already included in Angular and this should be all the jQuery that is necessary.
I had a bad experience running Bootstrap and Angular together and I don't want to repeat the same mistake.
It happens that I found the following line at zurb-foundation index.html
<script src="js/vendor/jquery.js"></script>
A quick search has shown that it seems to be a "simplified" version of jQuery (am I wrong?).
I've seem many people questioning things related to Angular in Foundation apps.
My question is: Is Angular compatible with Foundation?
While you'll read in many places that you should stay away from jQuery when using Angular, you'll also notice a subtle "at first" here and there. Angular is quite opinionated, and employs a declarative way of doing things, whereas jQuery is imperative. Check this out for more on the topic.
To answer your question:
Scotch.io's tutorial about Angular and Bootstrap involves UI Bootstrap, a library of directives written in Angular to be able to integrate common Bootstrap functionalities easier.
The equivalent of UI Bootstrap for Foundation is Angular Foundation. I recommend giving this thread a look-over as well, as it contains information that may be relevant to your use case.
So yes, Angular is compatible with Foundation. Happy hacking :)
a quick answer is of course they are compitable with each other. check this out from Zurb. However if you do not want to use JQuery, then the easiest way is to use pineconellc for foundation 5. foundation 6 does not have a port yet as far as I know.
I want to apply angular-material in my recent project, but I am afraid that it will be very difficult to find other components which are not available currently. Like treeview, date/time picker, carousel and so on...
How can I deal with these things? any opinions?
I've just tried to use Angular-Material in a site with an existing style, and found a number of issues that I wasn't able to resolve:
- Site UI was feeling very sluggish
- There was a paralax script that became extremely slow and lagged when there was a quick scroll.
- Odd behavior with fonts when it loaded (when I re-sized the screen and back again it was working again) in chrome.
This became a real issue - for the most part it doesn't feel complete. I was really hoping for something like Material-UI, which appears to rely on React.
However, I have come across this https://fezvrasta.github.io/bootstrap-material-design/bootstrap-elements.html which appears to be suitable and works with bootstrap.
There's a really good answer : Using Bootstrap for Angular and Material design for Angular together for some of the issues you will face when using Material with bootstrap.
Also, I tested on a mobile phone and the site was terrible (in performance), you'd never want to get site up with that type of performance.
Also, there's lumx if you want angularjs support (e.g directives etc...). My other issue with lumx and angularjs material is that swapping over libraries is not an easy task. I'm not sure whether this is the norm, and heading this way in the future - but I'm from the Jquery days where my markup remained consistent and I can activate features. However, both lumx and angularjs material require specific tags which means that swapping over libraries requires me to edit my mark-up.
Maybe here is another view of using Angular Material.
I have been using Angular Material as the only web component for my work projects. Angular Material is still in beta version, and like you said, many components such as table, color picker, and sidenav are still missing. If you have to use those components in your projects and not able to implement yours, Angular Material may not be a right choice. Something like Angular-UI or Polymer is probably what you are looking for.
The reason we choose Angular Material at work rather than other nearly complete web component library/collection is because it is being very actively maintained. Currently there are 900+ open issues and lots of pull requests are still going on. For me, a complete version will be more guaranteed. Treeview, date/time/color picker, table these kinds of components are already in the open issues. Here you can search for it.
https://github.com/angular/material/issues
Currently we will find workaround or overwrite the material to solve problems. Or we will open issues if there is no solution. And again, it is still in beta version, you should decide whether you want to use it in your project. But you can definitely look at their available components to determine if Angular Material is a right choice for you.
https://material.angularjs.org/latest/#/
I m still new to client side MVC and at this point exploring my options.
Angular.js, Ember.js both are highly recommended frameworks, backbone.js is a library but most of the implementation user has to do.
Need a opinion from someone who has been working in client side MVC, as to how should one decide which one to go for?
Plus I need the UI to be media responsive, for which twitter Bootstrap looks ideal.
Is it possible to use one of these framework along with Twitter Bootstrap? In which framework is it easier to integrate Bootstrap?
Thanks.
AngularJs and Bootstrap are the two which I would start with.
AngularJS is opinionated, this means it will help you structure your code well. If you just want binding then don't forget knockoutjs. This is in the mvc package by default in VS.
Bootstrap is just html and css markup so should work with everything.
If you start a MVC5 project now in VS2013 you will by standard have bootstrap.
Many people will have different opinions on this so you could wait for an answer for a long time.
I understand your confusion when it comes to selecting the right JavaScript framework. There are many deciding factors that you must evaluate before dedicating your time and money. I noticed that you mentioned a MVC in your questions title. The first thing that you will want to understand is exactly which MV* architecture that you want to have for your app and why. Once you have that nailed down then selecting the framework will be much easier since you will have eliminated a few of the frameworks. The four architectures are MVC, MVVM, MVP and MV*. Another major factor that you will want to look at is the binding mechanism used for the framework. Some frameworks only allow one way bindings while others support 2-way bindings.
To answer your question, based on what you have explained, I would say that Ember is going to be your best bet. Ember will work with Bootstrap
http://ember-addons.github.io/bootstrap-for-ember/dist/
If your still researching the facts then you will really want to check out this helpful link to a page that goes over the pros and cons of the most popular JS frameworks.
Check it out here: http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2012/07/27/journey-through-the-javascript-mvc-jungle/
We're about to start a project using mentioned libraries. We have already used jQM in another project, but coupled with Backbone. Now we're thinking about using AngularJS with jQM. Do you think it's a good idea? And if not, why?
To elaborate, the question is whether it is advisable/recommended/easy/beneficial to use these libraries together, or maybe there is something that should prevent us from using them both in one project. We don't want to spend half of project's time on making them work together just on principle.
AngularJS and JQM do different things. AngularJS is MVC + Lot More. JQM on the other hand is for direct UI manipulation (lower level than Angular). The good news is AngularJS is flexible and will let you work with any other Javascript framework including JQM. The recommended way of using them together is use the adapter as mentioned above or create your own reusable directives that will add "JQM nature" to your views. For e.g. you can create a directive that will convert a standard UL to a fancier JQM list. The good thing about doing this in directives and not within your view is that your UI code is separated in separate modules and not intermingled with business logic.
I'm really enjoying learning to use AngularJS. Now I'm looking for components I can use with it. I've been looking at Angular-UI components but I'd like to know if it's possible to use the nice, supercharged components in ExtJS. Does anyone have experience with this? Any hints or tips or Angular directive libraries?
The company I work for is making a similar move. We currently rely heavily on an older version (3.x) of ExtJS, and the effort to upgrade to the current (5.0) version is at least equal to the effort required to move to angular.
To answer the question (to the best of my limited knowledge):
They can exist together in the same JS application.
Can you use UI elements of ExtJs with Angular?
You can put angular in control of markup via HTML templates in Ext.
Is this a wise idea?
Probably not.
Why would I consider doing this?
I need absolute control over the markup and don't care about possible page load issues
I need to serialize or de-serialize in some special way that Ext doesn't innately provide
I need to do something special like pub/sub (still totally possible with Ext)
In our case, it is a proof of concept for a few modals. If I am biased, I am biased in the direction of ExtJs (which is a huge statement given my background). The more exposure I have to ExtJS, the more I personally like it. I've used several frameworks in the past like Ember, Backbone, KnockoutJs and AngularJs and they are excellent tools that are reaching a level of maturity that makes them excellent choices. That said, they don't follow the same development model/pattern that ExtJs does, and I don't think a direct compare is fair to either side.
It would be almost like comparing Ext to Node (silly, I know).
If your project requires some special functionality that you don't believe is possible in Ext, you are probably like me and have limited experience with it. If you have a lot of experience with Ext, and want to try what we are trying, I say go for it. The single downfall of Ext is the size of the built package that is delivered. Another small framework isn't going to help that, but it also isn't going to cause more pain.
In the end, for me, I just love JS and expanding my knowledge of how things work now and in the future.
For the post above asking about the lack of traction for Ext: the answer is simple... it's not free, and thus not an option for many of us who aren't writing commercial software that fits well with the license.
In our AngularJS app at work, we have integrated a 3rd party ExtJS app with it, not for its UI components though. We open certain popups of that app based on user input and when the user commits data in the popup, we respond to ExtJs events to refresh our app. AngularJS is flexible enough to integrate with any other Javascript code/libraries as long as the library has public events to respond to. I would recommend going through the Directive and scope documentation on how to effectively create directives and respond to scope events.
Personally I do not feel ExtJS and AngularJS would be needed together, unless you are forced to use it like me. There is http://angular-ui.github.io/ that brings in a lot to the table. Again any given JQuery plugin can be integrated using directives, filters etc in AngularJS. So you may want to investigate into that before trying to bother with ExtJS.
Why do you need AngularJS anyway if you have ExtJS? I agree learning Ext can be somewhat difficult though once you've bitten through it there is nothing better at the moment. The only disadvantage is the heavier footprint but who cares? It's not like it's causing any problems... We use nothing but ExtJS at work and the progress in our apps is amazing. It integrates seamlessly with Spring MVC. We don't need to hack in HTML directly which I consider more of an advantage than a disadvantage: no more writing tags, no more open/close tag issues, you can still use css and Ext handles any browser incompatibilities so what else do you need more?? Angular is just the new kid on the block but in total it can not (yet) compete with ExtJS. It doesn't even com close. Just my 2$.
Sencha is planning to add support in the framework. Please find the link at the bottom for reference:
At SenchaCon in Las Vegas on November 7-9 2016, Sencha will be introducing the ability to use Ext JS components, layouts, and themes within an Angular 2 application, which we are currently calling the Ext JS Bridge to Angular 2 (also known as ‘The Bridge’).
https://www.sencha.com/blog/first-look-ext-js-bridge-to-angular-2/