This plunk is taken from the Angular developer guide, but it doesn't make sense to me. It's just supposed to be showing the basic functionality of transclude, which I understand, but in the rendered output you'll see there's suddenly a span tag. Where did that come from? It's not part of the template.
Since your transclusion is just a text (in fact an implicit span), it needs to be added while compiling the HTML.
To avoid that, you can manually wrap your text around any tag, for instance a <div>, so that it will be inserted as is.
If you really want to not have any tag in between, you could write your own compile method in your directive, and set the text to the element directly, using elem.text(content) instead of elem.html(content)
Related
Some (advanced?) angular is making my head hurt.
The goal is to extend a WYSIWYG HTML editor to allow users to insert certain angular directives into arbitrary HTML content. I have chosen medium-editor and its angular-medium-editor wrapper (but I'm not wedded to that if there are better solutions).
This Plunk shows how the editor directive is instantiated and activated (using an editable attribute). The toolbar is customised to include a button which adds a custom directive around selected text: <my-custom-directive class="bg-info"> ... </my-custom-directive>. (For demonstration, the custom directive wraps (transcludes) its contents in a button which triggers an alert when clicked).
I'm having problems with (re-)compiling the editor's content so that the directives inside the editor compile. Using $compile(element.contents())(scope) throws ngTransclusion:orphan errors for directives which uses transclusion. (I understand this is due to angular already having made the transclusion by the time the editor's link function is called.)
I cannot refactor all potential custom directives to not use transclusion.
What pattern can I use to successfully compile arbitrary editor content (which may include many different directives), ideally whenever that content changes, or at least when the editing is finished? Is this one of the "fringe cases" where the use of $compile is justified? If so, how do I use it?
This question and answer made me realise that the way to do this is to $compile only the inserted element when it is inserted, rather than recompiling the whole section.
Handily, rangy's classApplier module allows for an onElementCreate callback which can be used to compile the custom directive as it is added.
Here's the working plunker.
Is there a way to tell Angular to not compile contents of certain elements?
Use case:
Angular CMS contains textarea elements that have CKEditor attached. The CKEditor is using the divarea plugin instead of the default iframe plugin. The textareas contain HTML templates. These templates are exported on demand and fed to a Angular webapp.
The templates are simple enough: plain text, ordered lists, the occasional predefined class attribute applied on the plain text; but the plain text can contain placeholders for the Angular webapp to interpolate. I do not want to let the Angular in the CMS interpolate these at all.
Currently my problem is that the Angular in the CMS interpolates these placeholders and, since they don't refer to anything, removes them. I would rather not just change the delimiters to '{[', ']}', as while this might fix this in the short term, the chance of directive and text copy collision increases as the project goes on, and I'd like to avoid it.
Is there any directive or other way to tell Angular to keep away from the content of specially marked elements?
Use ng-non-bindable directive on the element:
The ngNonBindable directive tells Angular not to compile or bind the
contents of the current DOM element. This is useful if the element
contains what appears to be Angular directives and bindings but which
should be ignored by Angular.
Or use your own directive with terminal: true property to match the layout better, because it is the only thing that ng-non-bindable directive does.
I'm in need of some pointers in my landingPage-builder project. (i'm currently stuck!).
The main issue is as follows:
Each element in the template (like the h1 and the paragraph) has attached a directive. What I need to get the directive to do is: create a template of HTML with some other directives attached like ng-click, ng-options etc, keep the bindings to the model intact (currently far away from working), update the model when changed.
I'm not trying to append to, or replace the element the directive is on, but make a html-template and inserting it into the DOM (almost like another view) so that the model on the left can be updated from the "settings" box on the right.
The project can be viewed here: http://193.107.29.196/~stian123/landingPageV3/app/#/pagebuilder/2
You may need Allow-Control-Allow-Origin for Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/allow-control-allow-origi/nlfbmbojpeacfghkpbjhddihlkkiljbi/related
I'm a bit confused about $compile and doesn't really know when I need to use this part of the directives api.
Any suggestions?
Thank you!
If I understood your question correctly, you want to dynamically create templates, some of which have Angular attributes in them, then attach them to the DOM.
First, to (hopefully) answer your question, about when to call $compile:
Whenever you load in HTML from outside Angular's template system (like trying to set $(element).html(myHtmlString)), you need to let Angular compile it before you attach it to the DOM. In other words:
elem.append($compile(yourHTMLString)(scope));
This lets Angular traverse the DOM and parse any directives and bindings and attach them to the provided scope. If you don't $compile, Angular has no idea about those intended bindings at all, the HTML is never read by Angular.
Second, I don't know how flexible you want your templates to be, but if they're relatively fixed, but with some fixed customizable options (text, color, font-size etc), you might be better off creating a directive for each 'view', with the view options bound to the scope of the directive. Then you can just change the fields on the scope of the directive in the panel on the right side, and the view will update directly. You wouldn't even have to use $compile in this case.
If you want the user to be able to manually add the template HTML code, you will have to compile the HTML as described above.
I am using a directive "slideable" which creates a slideout area and has a toggle. This code that was not written by me but it demonstrates a larger issue for me. When I changing views (most commonly /user/:id type), slideable is a directive used on the template. The directive searches for an element during its link function and binds a click event. The issue is that when I am changing routes and the new view ( same type but different id ) is being loaded the directive is re-binding to the old view. If I stop the browser in chrome during the link then I will see two ng-views on the dom and the issue is it binds to the one that is leaving.
I also have other issues that appear to be related to this phenomenon. Is it normal that the old view would still be on the dom while the new view is being formulated?? Why wouldnt the old-view be destroyed before the new one is rendered? How do I get around this issue in a directive like this?
Thanks.
I am looking to understand conceptually what is happening. I already modified the directive to select the latest view and to appropriately search and bind to the correct element. But I am a bit perplexed as to why there would be a state where both co-exist on the dom.
One definitive reason why the old HTML fragment is briefly present along with the new one is to support animation of transitions from the old to the new. Take a look at the ngView documentation and you'll see an example of an animated transition, and it'll be clear that this is not a bug or a design flaw.
Usually when someone has problems with binding to the right element or element's event, it's because they are selecting the element without limiting the scope of the selector to the HTML fragment being added or updated, or trying to target parts of the DOM outside of the directive. So that's the first place to check, that the directive is doing things right, but like I said we'll need code to check on that.
I have an angular multi-step form in a modal window. It has a few different views and works great but at the end of it I just want to display a tiny snippet of HTML along the lines of 'Thank you, we will be in touch shortly'
However, I thought about creating a view for this with a partial but it seems incredibly over-engineered for what it is. Is there any way in angular of just replacing the view with that sentence without creating a whole new view? This will be called from a function in the final controller
Use ng-show and ng-hide to do this in your view. Suppose if your view is no longer needed you can hide it and show the Thank you snippet at its place by using ng-show.
ng-switch is what you are looking for.
From the docs:
"The directive itself works similar to ngInclude, however, instead of
downloading template code (or loading it from the template cache),
ngSwitch simply choses one of the nested elements and makes it visible
based on which element matches the value obtained from the evaluated
expression."
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngSwitch
you can this code, if you have one area of content
<ng-view></ng-view>
good method you can find in LINK