What does this weird function pointer declaration in C mean? [duplicate] - c

This question already has answers here:
Writing a function pointer in c
(3 answers)
How do you read C declarations?
(10 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
Can anyone please explain what int ((*foo(int)))(int) in this does?
int (*fooptr)(int);
int ((*foo(int)))(int); // Can't understand what this does.
int main()
{
fooptr = foo(0);
fooptr(10);
}
.

int ((*foo(int)))(int);
This declares foo as a function that expects an int type argument and returns a pointer to a function that expects an int type argument and return an int.
To be more clear:
foo -- foo
foo( ) -- is a function
foo(int) -- taking an int argument
*foo(int) -- returning a pointer
(*foo(int))( ) -- to a function that
(*foo(int))(int) -- takes an int argument
int (*foo(int))(int) -- and returning an int
Here is a good explanation for the same.

foo
is what we declare.
foo(int)
It is a function that takes a single int argument
*foo(int)
and returns a pointer
((*foo(int)))(int)
to a function that takes a single int argument
int ((*foo(int)))(int)
and returns an int.
One pair of () is redundant. The same thing can be expressed as
int (*foo(int))(int)

There already answers to this, but I wanted to approach it in the opposite way.
A function declaration looks the same as a variable declaration, except that the variable name is replaced by the function name and parameters.
So this declares bar as a pointer to a function that takes an int and returns an int:
int (*bar)(int);
If, instead of a variable bar, it's a function foo(int) with that return value, you replace bar with foo(int) and get:
int (*foo(int))(int);
// ^^^^^^^^
// this was "bar" before
Add an unnecessary pair of parentheses and you get:
int ((*foo(int)))(int);
// ^ ^
// extra parentheses

According to cdecl, foo is:
declare foo as function (int) returning pointer to function (int) returning int

Related

Function Pointer, what is the difference between (*f) and f [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How do both of these function pointer calling syntax variations work?
(4 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I have a an array of int and I need to assign a function pointer,
f(tab[i]) and (*f)(tab[i])
What is the difference between those 2 syntax ??
Your code looks as if you are invoking a function via a function pointer, and you're seeking to pass one element of an array to that function. The pointer might be defined as:
void (*f)(int); // Function pointer — guessed argument and return types
The difference between the invocations (*f)(tab[i]) and f(tab[i]) is spelling and history — the result is the same.
The (*f)(tab[i]) notation was mandatory before the C90 standard; the f(tab[i]) notation was allowed by C90. The advantage of (*f)(tab[i]) is that you don't accidentally head off looking for a function f — you can see it's a function pointer immediately. (Of course, that assumes you don't have a colleague who delights in writing (*sqrt)((*sin)(x)*(*cos)(x)) or other similar valid but unconscionably obscure absurdities.)
If tab is an array of integer, then this below statement
(*f)(tab[i])
is invoking a function using function pointer, where f is a function pointer which can points to a function which takes argument as tab[i]. for e.g In below code block
void print_arr(int arr_ele_value) {
printf("%d\t",arr_ele_value);
}
int main(void) {
int arr[] = {1,2,3,4,5},ele;
ele = sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]);
void (*f)(int); /* function pointer declaration */
f = print_arr; /* fun-ptr initialization */
for(int row = 0; row < ele; row++) {
(*f)(arr[row]); /* calling a function through function pointer */
}
return 0;
}
This
void (*f)(int);
is function pointer declaration which says, f is a function pointer which can points to a function which takes input argument as int and returns void.
And here
f = function;
f is assigned with function which satisfies above condition of function-pointer declaration.
And this is how you can call a function using function pointer
(*f)(arr[row]);
There is no difference nowadays for the compiler; there is only a difference for the humans.

Do I understand correctly the C syntax? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How do you read C declarations?
(10 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I have this syntax:
double (*(f(double (*)(int))))(int);
Do I understand correctly syntax above that f is function that gets pointer to function that receive int and return a double?
No; it's actually even more complicated than that.
cdecl.org glosses this type definition as:
declare f as function (pointer to function (int) returning double) returning pointer to function (int) returning double
In other words, the function pointed to by f takes a function pointer as an argument, and returns a function pointer. Both of those function pointers must be to functions which take an int as an argument and return a double.
You could simplify this definition a bit using an intermediate typedef as follows:
typedef double (*int_to_double_function)(int);
int_to_double_function (*f)(int_to_double_function);

What does an asterisk in empty parentheses mean? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How do function pointers in C work?
(12 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
What does this c code do?
{
int (*func)();
func = (int (*)()) code;
(int)(*func)();
}
Especially I confused about subj.
It's a cast to a function pointer.
The sequence int (*)() is for a function pointer that takes an indeterminate number of arguments, and returns an int. Wrapping it in parentheses like (int (*)()), when combined with an expression, is casting the result of the expression.
The code you present, with comments:
// Declare a variable `func` which is a pointer to a function
int (*func)();
// Cast the result of the expression `code` and assign it to the variable `func`
func = (int (*)()) code;
// Use the variable `func` to call the code, cast the result to `int` (redundant)
// The returned value is also discarded
(int)(*func)();
Remember to do a typecast, we use the following:
(type_to_cast) value;
when you want to cast some value to a certain type.
Also remember you define a function pointer as
return_type (*pointer_name) (data_types_of_parameters);
And the type of a function pointer is
return_type (*) (data_types_of_parameters)
Finally, you can call a function with its pointer as
(*func_pointer)(arguments);
So, with those 4 points in mind, you see that your C code:
First defines a funciton pointer func.
Second, casts code as a function pointer and assign its value to func
Third, calls the function pointed by func, and casts the value reutrned to int.
int (*func)(); declares func as a pointer to a function that takes any number of parameters and and return int.
In statement func = (int (*)()) code;, a cast is applied to code and then assign it to the function pointer func.
(int)(*func)(); doesn't make much sense. Cast is not needed and it discards the return value. The call should be simply like
int var = func();
or
int var = (*func)();

What does - int *p() - mean in c?

What does this definition mean in C language? A pointer to what?
int *a();
int *a();
is the declaration of a function that takes an unspecified (but fixed) number of arguments and returns an int *.
It is different than:
int *a(void);
which is the declaration of a function that takes no argument and returns an int *.
The former declaration is an obsolescent feature, use the second form to declare a function with no parameter.
you can use the cdecl command by typing
explain int *a()
and you will get
cdecl> explain int *a()
declare a as function returning pointer to int

What does the prototype "const int* foo(int)" mean,especially in contrast to "int* foo(int)"?I understand the second only [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
What is the difference between const int*, const int * const, and int const *?
(23 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I know that int* foo(int) prototype means that foo is a function that takes an integer argument and returns a pointer to an integer.But what does the following mean?
const int* foo(int);
I tried to reason but failed.My book doesn't say anything about this but I see stuff like this in library function prototypes.So please tell me what it means.
So that value pointed by returned address can't be change via address (useful when foo() returns address of const).
const int* p2c = foo(int);
*p2c=10; <-- "error"
from cdecl:
this means
declare foo as function (int) returning pointer to const int
const int* foo(int);
foo is a function that takes an integer argument and returns a pointer to an const integer.It means you are allowed to change pointer but not it's value.

Resources