Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am planning to use Jasper server. But its not decided whether i will go with community or proffesional version.
See Licensing
I have few question about AGPL license(for JS community edition) and Commercial license(for JS professional version)
As of now most of the requirements are fullfilled with community edition except that i want to change theme and logo of
default jasper community edition. But i am not sure whether i am allowed to do this in which version(community or commercial
or both ) if required as i am layman in this field ?
For information :- My product is similar to e-retailing product where users can purchase product online. I sell this product to different companies where company deploys it and then end users access the application. Reporting functionality will be used by company administrators not the end users.
You can definitely do it with the commercial edition as it is extensively described in the documentation (using themes) and embedding jasper within your application is done using iFrames, visualize.js, and the REST_V2 webservices.
Check out the theme stuff in the documentation but essentially you can customize the css of the server as well as any images displayed.
See JasperReports-Server-Admin-Guide
https://community.jaspersoft.com/documentation?version=13758
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I ordered a FirefoxOS smartphone yesterday and inspected the Firefox marketplace for apps.
I was wondering where i can find the licenses for each APP.
Is there a standard license (MIT, BSD, GPL)?
I also searched the MDN but i found no information about licensing models.
Neither open, nor closed source.
For example at F-Droid (which i used in past for Android) solitaire the license is Apache2.
The solitaire at firefox' marketplace has which license?
Only "Open Web Apps" are mentioned here but nothing in detail about licensing.
Does anyone knows about?
I asked this in the SUMO forums at mozilla.org and got my answer:
It appears that this feature is not available. To find the licensing
type of specific applications, you should contact the developer
directly.
This tracking bug has more information, including discussions on this
feature:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805073
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am investigating source control systems and considering migrating from SVN to either GIT or PlasticSCM. However to consider the costs, I'd like to know how much PlasticSCM will cost for us.
On their website they mention the community edition is free for up to 15 persons per team. However the definition of team is unclear for me: Is it usual in PlasticSCM to create a new repository per project? Or is the 15-person limit valid for all projects that use the same server?
Or in short: Can the community edition be used for two different repositories with 10 people using each?
The license model of PlasticSCM is per-user and per-server.
When a user performs a writable operation in the PlasticSCM server, a license (site) is used. The community edition can be used up to 15 users.
You can have all repositories you want, but you must manage less that 15 users, for each server.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I currently have an Microsoft Action Pack but I don't see a license for TFS included in it. What would be the best way of getting TFS 2012 Server installed and access for 6 devs and 2 Web access users.
I've read the Microsoft Licensing White Papers and they are next to useless. Does anyone have any concrete examples of the best way to get this done? Do I just purchase a Server License and 6/8 CALS, it seems I should be able to reuse some part of the Action Pack to reduce this cost, no?
Thanks in advance.
Try contacting the Microsoft partners support (they have live chat):
https://mspartner.microsoft.com/en/uk/Pages/Support/partner-network-support.aspx?Page=CustomerServiceControlJsonP
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I might need to use iTextSharp for a project I'm working on. I'd prefer to use the latest version so I'm trying to understand what the full implications of the GNU Affero General Public License is. I've read though the FSF documents but still have questions. I'm not going to modify it in any way, just call it from a component (windows service) that I've written. This component references other modules from the product I work on.
Currently the component is deployed on a server which runs website instances of the product for our clients. The component does work for all of the sites. We don't plan on distributing the product to clients yet, but it is on our roadmap for the future.
Would the component come under the GNU Affero General Public License when I use iTextSharp and therefore need to be made available for download? Would the other modules from the product referenced by my component come under the license as well?
Basically for the situation I've outlined above what would I need to do to keep within the licence agreement?
Thanks
K
i was also looking into using iTextSharp in a web application.
However the following paragraph from http://itextpdf.com/terms-of-use/ clarified the licensing implications:
Buying such a license is mandatory as soon as you develop commercial activities involving the iText software without disclosing the source code of your own applications. These activities include: offering paid services to customers as an ASP, serving PDFs on the fly in a web application, shipping iText with a closed source product.
Regards.
iTextSharp uses the LGPL license agreement and not the Affero model, http://www.java2s.com/Open-Source/CSharp/PDF/iTextSharp/CatalogiTextSharp.htm , License: GNU Library or Lesser General Public License (LGPL) says it right there.
iText is different from iTextSharp and both have separate licenses
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
This is more of a licencing issue than a code question. I really like the ckeditor editor and would like to use it in my freelance projects which I do for clients. However upon reading the license page it has me in a bit of a confusion. DO I have to buy licences if I intend to use this in cms websites that I build myself and hand over to clients?
If so then what are my alternate options which don't cost anything?
Its should be ok, if you don't change anything of its source, IMHO.
Integrating CKEditor in commercial
software, taking care of satisfying
the Open Source licenses terms, while
not able or interested on supporting
CKEditor and its development.
I am not a lawyer, but the dual licensing model would appear to not prevent you from using the open source licensed CKEditor in your cms / client projects, as long as the terms of the chosen license are met.
What you cannot do is sell, give away or otherwise distribute the editor to third parties without providing them with access to the source code and the license attached to the product.