I stuck at point i have one website for example (http://newtours.demoaut.com/) and for that i have created multiple classes likes:
App_Login(),
App_Dashboard(),
App_FliReservation(),
Cancel_Flight();
So want to call above all classes into single class .
can someone guide me on these.
Script sample
App_Login() class
public class App_login {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
WebDriver driver= new FirefoxDriver();
driver.get("http://newtours.demoaut.com/");
}
}
and i want to call above class into following class
public class Mercurywebapp {
#Test
public void supp_onboarding() throws Exception {
App_Login();
}
public void App_Login() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
}
when i run above class (i.e.Mercurywebapp) then getting blank screen
Create another instances of all the Classes in the MercuryWebapp
Depends on the access modifiers for the classes
e.g
App_Login testObject = new App_Login();
Related
I am trying to create a generic router whose processor and other attributes are populated from a static class. Here is sample code.
public class GenericRouter extends RouteBuilder( {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from("direct:generic-route")
.process(Util.getProcesss(“${exchangeProperty[processKey]"))
.ToD(Util.getUrl(“${exchangeProperty[urlKey]"));
}
}
Public class Util{
Map<String,Object> routerResources;
static {
//load routerResources
}
public static Processor getProcessor(String processorKey){
return (Processor)routerResources.get(processorKey);
}
public static Processor getUrl(String urlKey){
return (String)routerResources.get(urlKey);
}
}
The generic router is expected to post a rest call. the properties "urlKey" and "processorUrl" are already available in exchange. I finding it difficult to pass exchange properties to static Util class methods.
If you want to access properties of an exchange in plain java you can use .process or .exchange. If you need to access body or headers you can use e.getMessage().getBody() and e.getMessage().getHeader()
from("direct:generic-route")
.process( e -> {
String processKey = e.getProperty("processKey", String.class);
Processor processor = Util.getProcessor(processKey);
processor.process(e);
})
.setProperty("targetURL").exchange( e -> {
String urlKey = e.getProperty("urlKey", String.class);
return Util.getUrl(urlKey);
})
.toD("${exchangeProperty.targetURL}");
Also make sure you fix the return type of this method:
public static Processor getUrl(String urlKey){
return (String)routerResources.get(urlKey);
}
As a side note, you can actually use map stored in body, header or property through simple language.
public class ExampleTest extends CamelTestSupport {
#Test
public void example(){
template.sendBodyAndHeader("direct:example", null, "urlKey", "urlA");
}
#Override
protected RoutesBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
return new RouteBuilder() {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
Map<String, String> urlMap = new HashMap<>();
urlMap.put("urlA", "direct:pointA");
urlMap.put("urlB", "direct:pointB");
from("direct:example")
.setProperty("urlMap").constant(urlMap)
.log("url: ${exchangeProperty.urlMap['${headers.urlKey}']}");
}
};
}
}
Strange case: using Powermock to mock out UUID.getRandom(). This works within the JUnit test class but when the class under test (a Filter, if that matters) calls UUID.getRandom, a unique UUID is produced.
Simple test case
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest({UUID.class})
public class MyTest {
private MyFilter filter;
#Before
public void setup() {
//The most convenient way to get a UUID, have also tried creating one manually
UUID uuid = UUID.randomUUID();
mockStatic(UUID.class);
PowerMockito.when(UUID.randomUUID()).thenReturn(uuid);
filter = new MyFilter();
}
#Test
public void testMyUUID() {
//This test works
assertEquals(UUID.randomUUID(), UUID.randomUUID());
}
#Test
public void testFilterUUID() {
//This test fails
assertEquals(UUID.randomUUID(), filter.getUUID());
}
}
Simple class being tested
public class MyFilter implements Filter {
public UUID getUUID() {
return UUID.randomUUID();
}
}
Pretty simple stuff, have done mocking like this before, just can't figure out why this case doesn't work.
Using Powermock version 1.5.
I believe UUID falls under the "system classes" category, so you need to prepare for test the class calling UUID.randomUUID()(related github issue)., thus changing to #PrepareForTest({MyFilter.class}) should fix things. The following works as expected with JUnit 4.4 & Powermock 1.5, as well as JUnit 4.12 and Powermock 1.7.3:
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest(MyFilter.class)
public class MyTest {
private MyFilter filter;
#Before
public void setup() {
//The most convenient way to get a UUID, have also tried creating one manually
UUID uuid = UUID.randomUUID();
mockStatic(UUID.class);
PowerMockito.when(UUID.randomUUID()).thenReturn(uuid);
filter = new MyFilter();
}
#Test
public void testMyUUID() {
//This test works
assertEquals(UUID.randomUUID(), UUID.randomUUID());
}
#Test
public void testFilterUUID() {
//This test fails
assertEquals(UUID.randomUUID(), filter.getUUID());
}
}
The accepted solution that is mentioned here won't work if you have multiple tests that tries to mockStatic before the tests, since mockStatic method from Mockito does not automatically close after the test.
I wrote the below solution which handles multiple tests by using PowerMockito.mockStatic instead of Mockito.mockStatic:
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest({MyFilter.class, UUID.class})
#PowerMockIgnore({"com.sun.org.apache.xerces.*", "javax.xml.*", "org.xml.*", "javax.management.*"})
public class MyTest {
#Before
public void setup() {
UUID uuid = UUID.randomUUID();
PowerMockito.mockStatic(UUID.class);
PowerMockito.when(UUID.randomUUID()).thenAnswer((invocation) -> uuid);
filter = new MyFilter();
}
#Test
public void testMyUUID() {
//This test works
assertEquals(UUID.randomUUID(), UUID.randomUUID());
}
#Test
public void testFilterUUID() {
//This test fails
assertEquals(UUID.randomUUID(), filter.getUUID());
}
}
NOTE to how mockStatic is used from PowerMockito library not the Mockito.
Before I setup a test class like the code below:
1. the Factory and test Dataprovider both used excel as the dataprovider.
2. In the Factory dataprovider table, it has a list of url
3. Each time, it will find one of the url in the factory dataprovider table, and run the test in each test methods..
public class Test {
WebDriver driver;
private String hostName;
private String url;
#Factory(dataProvider = "xxxx global variables", dataProviderClass = xxxx.class)
public GetVariables(String hostName, String url) {
this.hostName = hostName;
this.url = url;
}
#BeforeMethod
#Parameters("browser")
public void start(String browser) throws Exception {
driver = new FirefoxDriver();
driver.get(url);
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
#Test(priority = 10, dataProvider = "dataprovider Test A", dataProviderClass = xxx.class)
public void TestA(Variable1,
Variable2,Variable3) throws Exception {
some test here...
}
#Test(priority = 20, dataProvider = "dataprovider Test B", dataProviderClass = xxx.class)
public void TestB(Variable1,
Variable2,Variable3)
throws Exception {
some test here...
}
#AfterMethod
public void tearDown() {
driver.quit();
}
Now I want to dynamically assign different group for each test for different url. I am thinking add a variable 'flag' in the #Factory dataprovider:
#Factory(dataProvider = "xxxx global variables", dataProviderClass = xxxx.class)
public GetVariables(String hostName, String url, String flag) {
this.hostName = hostName;
this.url = url;
this.flag = flag;
}
That when flag.equals("A"), it will only run test cases in test groups={"A"}.
When flag.equals("B"), it will only run test cases in test groups ={"B"},
When flag.equals("A,B"), it will only run test cases in test groups ={"A","B"}
Is there any way I can do that?
Thank you!
TestNG groups provides "flexibility in how you partition your tests" but it isn't for conditional test sets. For that you simply use plain old Java.
You can use inheritance or composition (I recommend the latter, see Item 16: Favor composition over inheritance from Effective Java).
Either way the general idea is the same: use a Factory to create your test class instances dynamically creating the appropriate class type with the appropriate test annotations and/or methods that you want to run.
Examples:
Inheritance
import org.testng.annotations.Factory;
import org.testng.annotations.Test;
public class DemoTest {
#Factory
public static Object[] createTests() {
return new Object[]{
new FlavorATest(),
new FlavorBTest(),
new FlavorABTest()
};
}
/**
* Base test class with code for both A-tests and B-tests.
*
* Note that none of these test methods are annotated as tests so that
* subclasses may pick which ones to annotate.
*/
public static abstract class BaseTest {
protected void testA() {
// test something specific to flavor A
}
protected void testB() {
// test something specific to flavor B
}
}
// extend base but only annotate A-tests
public static class FlavorATest extends BaseTest {
#Test
#Override
public void testA() {
super.testA();
}
}
// extend base but only annotate B-tests
public static class FlavorBTest extends BaseTest {
#Test
#Override
public void testB() {
super.testB();
}
}
// extend base and annotate both A-tests and B-tests
public static class FlavorABTest extends BaseTest {
#Test
#Override
public void testA() {
super.testA();
}
#Test
#Override
public void testB() {
super.testB();
}
}
}
Composition
import org.testng.annotations.Factory;
import org.testng.annotations.Test;
public class DemoTest {
#Factory
public static Object[] createTests() {
return new Object[]{
new FlavorATest(),
new FlavorBTest(),
new FlavorABTest()
};
}
private static void testA() {
// test something specific to flavor A
}
private static void testB() {
// test something specific to flavor B
}
// only create A-test methods and delegate to shared code above
public static class FlavorATest {
#Test
public void testA() {
DemoTest.testA();
}
}
// only create B-test methods and delegate to shared code above
public static class FlavorBTest {
#Test
public void testB() {
DemoTest.testB();
}
}
// create A-test and B-test methods and delegate to shared code above
public static class FlavorABTest {
#Test
public void testA() {
DemoTest.testA();
}
#Test
public void testB() {
DemoTest.testB();
}
}
}
Your factory methods won't be as simple as you'll need to use your "flag" from your test data to switch off of and create instances of the appropriate test classes.
I'm trying to learn EJB3,
I created an EJB project with just a bean class:
package com;
import javax.ejb.Local;
import javax.ejb.Stateless;
#Stateless
#LocalBean
public class MyBean {
public MyBean() {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
}
public String getMessage(){
return "Hello";
};
}
I deployed this project on Jboss 6 , then i create a Java project (adding in the build path the ejbProject above and Jboss-client.jar to make RMI calls).
for testing , this is the class i created:
import javax.ejb.EJB;
import javax.naming.Context;
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
import javax.naming.NamingException;
import com.MyBean;
public class LanceProgram {
// #EJB
//public static MyBean mybean;
public static void main(String[] args) {
Context ctx;
try {
ctx = new InitialContext();
MyBean exampleBean = (MyBean) ctx.lookup("MyBean");
System.out.println(exampleBean.getMessage());
} catch (NamingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Normally, when running this, i should have a reference to MyBean,but it's null and i have this error message (using JNDI lookup):
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext cannot be cast to com.MyBean
at LanceProgram.main(LanceProgram.java:17)
While with an EJB injection i have a NullPointerException !
this i my jndi.properties file specifications:
java.naming.factory.initial=org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory
java.naming.provider.url=localhost:1099
java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=org.jboss.ejb.client.naming
I'm trying to make a call to a bean which doesn't implements an interface.
Thanks for helping
Is it possible to combine cucumber with CamelBlueprintTestSupport? I have my runner class:
#RunWith(Cucumber.class)
#CucumberOptions(monochrome=true,
format={ "pretty", "html:target/cucumber"},
features = "C:/Users/Developer/workspace_camel/SRV002_PatronInformation/src/test/resources/cucumber/asynchronousErrorHandling.feature")
public class RunFeature_SRV002_PatronInformationTest {
}
and my blueprint test class with the scenarios:
public class SRV002_PatronInformationScenarioTest extends CamelBlueprintTestSupport {
#Override
protected String getBlueprintDescriptor() {
return "/OSGI-INF/blueprint/blueprint.xml";
}
#Given("^client communicates asynchronous via socket$")
public void client_communicates_asynchronous_via_socket() throws Throwable {
System.out.println("test");
}
#When("^client posts message$")
public void an_error_occurs_inside_the_integration() throws Throwable {
String endpoint = "netty4:tcp://localhost:5000?sync=false&textline=true";
template.sendBody(endpoint, "test");
}
#Then("^the integration should not return response to the client$")
public void the_integration_should_not_return_the_error_to_the_client() throws Throwable {
System.out.println("test");
}
}
The problem now is that, when I run this I run into nullpointerexception at template.sendbody because the context, bundle and routes haven't started. For some reason it seems adding #RunWith(Cucumber) prevents the camel routes from starting.
Anyone knows how this can be solved? Thanks
Souciance
Ok so I managed to solve this.
For reference look here:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/How-to-test-routes-when-using-another-TestRunner-td5772687.html
Thanks to Gregor Lenz for the help.
Essentially the key here is that in your Camel BlueprintTestSupport class, inside the test method, that starts the given scenario you need to add this.setUp(). See the code below:
In Cucumber
SRVXXX_FileTransferCamelRunner filetransfer = new SRVXXX_FileTransferCamelRunner();
#Given("^an input file$")
public void an_input_file() throws Throwable {
endpoint.append("file:C:/Camel/input?fileName=input.txt");
}
#When("^client puts the file in the input directory$")
public void client_puts_the_file_in_the_input_directory() throws Throwable {
filetransfer.testPutFile(fileData.toString(), endpoint.toString());
}
#Then("^the integration should move the file to the output directory$")
public void the_integration_should_move_the_file_to_the_output_directory() throws Throwable {
String outputPath = "C:/Camel/output/input.txt";
filetransfer.testFileHasMoved(outputPath);
}
In Camel
#Test
public void testPutFile(String body, String endpoint) throws Exception {
this.setUp();
template.sendBody(endpoint,body);
Thread.sleep(2000);
assertFileNotExists(endpoint);
}