So based in the following problem from cumulative sum query I created the solution. But is any other way to solve the problem in C with linear complexity O(N)?
Problem description:
William Macfarlane wants to look at an array.
You are given a list of N numbers and Q queries. Each query is
specified by two numbers i and j; the answer to each query is the sum
of every number between the range [i, j] (inclusive).
Note: the query ranges are specified using 0-based indexing.
Input
The first line contains N, the number of integers in our list (N <=
100,000). The next line holds N numbers that are guaranteed to fit
inside an integer. Following the list is a number Q (Q <= 10,000). The
next Q lines each contain two numbers i and j which specify a query
you must answer (0 <= i, j <= N-1). Output
Output
For each query, output the answer to that query on its own line in the
order the queries were made.
Here is the solution:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <limits.h>
struct node {
int first;
int last;
};
int sum_array(int *array, int first, int last) {
int sum = 0;
for (int i = first; i <= last; i++) {
sum += array[i];
}
return sum;
}
int main() {
FILE* input = fopen("share.in","r");
int N = 0;
fscanf(input,"%d",&N);
int *array = (int*)malloc(N * sizeof(int));
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
fscanf(input,"%d",&array[i]);
}
int Q = 0;
fscanf(input,"%d",&Q);
struct node query[Q];
for (int i=0; i < Q; i++) {
fscanf(input,"%d",&query[i].first);
fscanf(input,"%d",&query[i].last);
}
fclose(input);
int sum = 0;
for ( int i = 0; i < Q ; i++) {
int first = query[i].first;
int last = query[i].last;
sum = sum_array(array,first,last);
printf("Number of queries : %d , sum is %d\n",i ,sum);
}
free(array);
return 0;
}
Update:
The answer given is good. But for some reason I couldn't make it work.
So here is the code rewritten and if someone can explain me what I do wrong I will be happy! Keep in mind we want the range to be [first,last]
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <limits.h>
struct node {
int first;
int last;
};
int sum_array(int *array, int first, int last) {
int sum = 0;
for (int i = first; i <= last; i++) {
sum += array[i];
}
return sum;
}
int main() {
FILE* input = fopen("share.in","r");
int N = 0;
fscanf(input,"%d",&N);
int *array = (int*)malloc(N * sizeof(int));
int *integralArray = (int*)malloc(N * sizeof(int));
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
fscanf(input,"%d",&array[i]);
integralArray[i] = array[i] + ((i > 0) ? array[i-1] : 0);
}
int Q = 0;
fscanf(input,"%d",&Q);
struct node query[Q];
for (int i=0; i < Q; i++) {
fscanf(input,"%d",&query[i].first);
fscanf(input,"%d",&query[i].last);
}
fclose(input);
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < Q ; i++) {
int first = query[i].first;
int last = query[i].last;
sum = integralArray[last] - integralArray[first - 1];
printf("Number of queries : %d , sum is %d\n",i ,sum);
}
free(array);
return 0;
}
You'd form the integral array. Modify to something like:
int *array = (int*)malloc(N * sizeof(int));
int *integralArray = (int*)malloc(N * sizeof(int));
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
fscanf(input,"%d",&array[i]);
integralArray[i] = array[i] + ((i > 0) ? integralArray[i-1] : 0);
}
So the element at integralArray[i] is the sum of all elements in array from 0 to i.
Then, to get the sum from a to b, where a > b, integralArray[b] is the sum from 0 to b and integralArray[a] is the sum from 0 to a so you can just compute integralArray[b] - integralArray[a] to get the total from a to b. Intuitively, integralArray[b] includes the numbers you want but it also includes the numbers up to and including a. You don't want those so you take them off again.
Vary appropriately for inclusion or exclusion of the number at a and the number at b. That as given will include the number at b but not that at a. You could adjust your integralArray to be one earlier (so integralArray[b] is the sum from 0 to b-1) or adjust your indices.
Related
Task:
Given a natural number N (set arbitrarily as a preprocessor constant) and one-dimensional array A0, A1, …, AN-1 of integers (generate positive and negative elements randomly, using the <stdlib.h> library function rand()). Perform the following actions: Determine the three maximum and two minimum values of this array.
Code with search for two minimum values:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define N 9
int main() {
int M[N], i, a[N], fbig, sbig, tbig, min, smin;
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
M[i] = rand() % 20 - 10;
printf("%i\t", M[i]);
}
printf("\n");
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
if (a[i] < min) {
smin = min;
min = a[i];
} else
if (a[i] < smin && a[i] != min)
smin = a[1];
}
printf("\nMinimum=%d \nSecond Minimum=%d", min, smin);
return 0;
}
I tried to compare array elements with each other but here is my result:
-7 -4 7 5 3 5 -4 2 -1
Minimum=0
Second Minimum=0
I would be very grateful if you could help me fix my code or maybe I'm doing everything wrong and you know how to do it right. Thank you for your time
I will revise my answer if op address what to do about duplicate values. My answer assume you want possible duplicate values in the minimum and maximum arrays, while other answers assume you want unique values.
The easiest solution would be to sort the input array. The minimum is the first 2 values and the maximum would be the last 3:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#define MAX_N 3
#define MIN_N 2
#define N 9
void generate(size_t n, int a[n]) {
for(size_t i = 0; i < n; i++)
a[i] = rand() % 20 - 10;
}
void print(size_t n, int a[n]) {
for(size_t i = 0; i < n - 1; i++)
printf("%d, ", a[i]);
if(n) printf("%d\n", a[n-1]);
}
int cmp_asc(const void *a, const void *b) {
if(*(int *) a < *(int *) b) return -1;
if(*(int *) a > *(int *) b) return 1;
return 0;
}
int main() {
int t = time(0);
srand(t);
printf("%d\n", t); // essential for debugging
int a[N];
generate(N, a);
print(N, a);
qsort(a, N, sizeof *a, cmp_asc);
print(MIN_N, a);
print(MAX_N, a + (N - MAX_N));
}
If you cannot use sort then consider the following purpose built algorithm. It's much easier to use arrays (min and max) rather than individual values, and as a bonus this allows you to easily change how many minimum (MIN_N) and maximum (MAX_N) values you want. First we need to initialize the min and max arrays, and I use the initial values of the input array for that. I used a single loop for that. To maintain the invariant that the min array has the MIN_N smallest numbers we have seen so far (a[0] through a[i-1]) we have to replace() largest (extrema) of them if the new value a[i] is smaller. For example, if the array is min = { 1, 10 } and the value we are looking at is a[i] = 5 then we have to replace the 10 not the 1.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#define MAX_N 3
#define MIN_N 2
#define N 9
void generate(size_t n, int a[n]) {
for(size_t i = 0; i < n; i++)
a[i] = rand() % 20 - 10;
}
void print(size_t n, int a[n]) {
for(size_t i = 0; i < n - 1; i++)
printf("%d, ", a[i]);
if(n) printf("%d\n", a[n-1]);
}
int cmp_asc(const void *a, const void *b) {
if(*(int *) a < *(int *) b) return -1;
if(*(int *) a > *(int *) b) return 1;
return 0;
}
int cmp_desc(const void *a, const void *b) {
return cmp_asc(b, a);
}
void replace(size_t n, int a[n], int v, int (*cmp)(const void *, const void *)) {
int *extrema = &a[0];
for(size_t i = 1; i < n; i++) {
if(cmp(extrema, &a[i]) < 0) {
extrema = &a[i];
}
}
if(cmp(extrema, &v) > 0)
*extrema = v;
}
void min_max(size_t n, int a[n], size_t min_n, int min[n], size_t max_n, int max[n]) {
for(size_t i = 1; i < n; i++) {
if(i < min_n)
min[i] = a[i];
else
replace(min_n, min, a[i], cmp_asc);
if(i < max_n)
max[i] = a[i];
else
replace(max_n, max, a[i], cmp_desc);
}
}
int main() {
int t = time(0);
srand(t);
printf("%d\n", t); // essential for debugging
int a[N];
generate(N, a);
print(N, a);
int min[MIN_N];
int max[MAX_N];
min_max(N, a, MIN_N, min, MAX_N, max);
print(MIN_N, min);
print(MAX_N, max);
}
and here is example output. The first value is a the seed in case you have to reproduce a run later. Followed by input, min and max values:
1674335494
-7, 0, -2, 7, -3, 4, 5, -8, -9
-9, -8
7, 5, 4
If MIN_N or MAX_N gets large, say, ~1,000+, then you want sort the min and max arrays and use binary search to figure out where to inserta[i]. Or use a priority queue like a heap instead of arrays.
There are multiple problems in your code:
min and smin are uninitialized, hence the comparisons in the loop have undefined behavior and the code does work at all. You could initialize min as a[0] but initializing smin is not so simple.
there is a typo in smin = a[1]; you probably meant smin = a[i];
Note that the assignment is somewhat ambiguous: are the maximum and minimum values supposed to be distinct values, as the wording implies, or should you determine the minimum and maximum elements of the sorted array?
For the latter, sorting the array, either fully or partially, is a simple solution.
For the former, sorting is also a solution but further testing will be needed to remove duplicates from the sorted set.
Here is a modified version to print the smallest and largest values:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#define N 9
#define N_MIN 2
#define N_MAX 3
void swap(int *a, int *b) {
int tmp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = tmp;
}
int main() {
int a[N], i, j, e, dup;
int smallest[N_MIN], nsmall = 0;
int largest[N_MAX], nlarge = 0;
srand(time(NULL));
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
a[i] = rand() % 20 - 10;
printf("%i\t", a[i]);
}
printf("\n");
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
e = a[i];
dup = 0;
for (j = 0; j < nsmall; j++) {
if (e == smallest[j]) {
dup = 1;
break;
}
if (e < smallest[j]) {
swap(&e, &smallest[j]);
}
}
if (!dup && nsmall < N_MIN) {
smallest[nsmall++] = e;
}
e = a[i];
dup = 0;
for (j = 0; j < nlarge; j++) {
if (e == largest[j]) {
dup = 1;
break;
}
if (e > largest[j]) {
swap(&e, &largest[j]);
}
}
if (!dup && nlarge < N_MAX) {
largest[nlarge++] = e;
}
}
printf("smallest values: ");
for (i = 0; i < nsmall; i++) {
printf(" %d", smallest[i]);
}
printf("\n");
printf("largest values: ");
for (i = nlarge; i --> 0;) {
printf(" %d", largest[i]);
}
printf("\n");
return 0;
}
As already noted, the most direct way to do this would be to simply sort the array. (In fact, if all you need is an output of five integers then your array only need be five elements long.) But I will presume that that is not the point of this homework.
Your goal isn’t super efficiency or a pretty algorithm. It is simply to solve the tasks. Do them one at a time.
First question: How would you find the largest value?
Answer: Loop through the array, keeping track of the largest element found so far.
int largest = array[0]; // why start with this value?
for (int n = 0; n < size; n++)
if (array[n] > largest)
largest = array[n];
Second question: How would you find the smallest value?
Answer: Almost the same way, with only a simple change: Instead of testing if (array[n] > largest) we want to test if (array[n] < smallest), right?
int smallest = largest; // why start with this value?
for (int n = 0; n < size; n++)
if (...) // new condition goes here
smallest = array[n];
Third question: How would you find the second smallest value?
Answer: It should not surprise you that you just need to change the if condition in that loop again. An element would be the second smallest if:
it is the smallest value greater than the smallest.
Think about how you would change your condition:
int second_smallest = largest; // why start with this value?
for (int n = 0; n < size; n++)
if (... && ...) // what is the new test condition?
second_smallest = array[n];
Remember, this time you are testing two things, so your test condition needs that && in it.
Fourth question: can you write another loop to find the second-largest? How about the third-largest?
At this point you should be able to see the variation on a theme and be able to write a loop that will get you any Nth largest or smallest value, as long as you already have the (N-1)th to work against.
Further considerations:
Is it possible that the third-largest is the same as the second-smallest?
Or the smallest?
Is it possible for there to not be a third-largest?
Does it matter?
Put all these loops together in your main() and print out the results each time and you are all done!
...
int main(void)
{
int array[SIZE];
// fill array with random numbers here //
int largest = array[0];
for (...)
if (...)
...
int smallest = largest;
for (...)
if (...)
...
int second_smallest = largest;
for (...)
if (...)
...
int second_largest = smallest;
for (...)
if (...)
...
int third_largest = smallest;
for (...)
if (...)
...
printf( "The original array = " );
// print original array here, then: //
printf( "largest = %d\n", largest );
printf( "2nd largest = %d\n", second_largest );
printf( "3nd largest = %d\n", third_largest );
printf( "2nd smallest = %d\n", second_smallest );
printf( "smallest = %d\n", smallest );
return 0;
}
Example outputs:
{ 1 2 3 4 }
smallest = 1
2nd smallest = 2
3rd largest = 2
2nd largest = 3
largest = 4
{ 5 5 5 5 5 }
smallest = 5
2nd smallest = 5
3rd smallest = 5
largest = 5
{ 1 2 }
smallest = 1
2nd smallest = 2
3rd smallest = 2
largest = 2
Bonus: be careful with variable names. There has been no need to use short abbreviations since before the early nineties. Prefer clarity over brevity.
I am creating a C-prog that requires an array of 17 integers, all being less than 18 and unique. This is what I could do until now:
int ques_arr[17];
int x,y;
time_t t;
srand((unsigned)time(&t));
for(int a=0; a<17; a++)
{
x=rand()%18; //Assume that srand() has been declared in the program
for(int aa=0; aa<17; aa++)
{
if(x==ques_arr[aa])
{ do{
y=0;
y=rand()%18;
}while(y==ques_arr[aa]);
x=y;
ques_arr[a]=x;
}else ques_arr[a]=x;
}
}
My current algorithm is that everytime rand() generates a number, that number will be checked throughout array whether same number already exists or not, if it does, rand() keeps on generating a number until a unique number is obtained and then it is stored in the array.If such a number doesn't exist in the array, it's directly fed in to it.
As of now, numbers stored in the array are not unique.
Any help would be appreciated.
This is not an optimal solution, your time complexity once you have fixed the problem in your code is O(n²), you can reduce the time complexity to O(n) using the "Knuth Shuffle algorithm":
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <time.h>
static int rrand(int value)
{
return (int)((double)value * (rand() / (RAND_MAX + 1.0)));
}
static void randomize(int arr[], int size)
{
for (int idx = 0; idx < size; idx++)
{
arr[idx] = idx;
}
for (int idx = size; idx > 1; idx--)
{
int num = rrand(idx);
int tmp = arr[idx - 1];
arr[idx - 1] = arr[num];
arr[num] = tmp;
}
}
int main(void)
{
srand((unsigned)time(NULL));
int arr[17] = {0};
int size = sizeof arr / sizeof *arr;
randomize(arr, size);
for (int idx = 0; idx < size; idx++)
{
printf("%d\n", arr[idx]);
}
return 0;
}
I want to alphabetically sort the struct strings with radix sort, however I am struggling to apply radix sort to check each digit of the strings. I checked other posts but I couldn't find a structure similar to mine.
The problem is that my code checks for each ENTRY of the struct not EACH digit of the string in that entry. (By entry I mean; table[0], table[1] etc.) So basically it sorts the string in itself of each entry. I couldn't build the logic, can someone help me please?
EDIT: the length of the strings are not the same
Here is my code:
typedef struct FUNCTIONS_STRUCT
{
char *fncName;
void (*fnc)(char *);
char *description;
} FUNCTIONS_STRUCT_t;
FUNCTIONS_STRUCT_t FUNC_TABLE[] =
{
{ "ABCD", ABCD, "" },
{ "abcD", abcD, "" },
{ "EaBB", EaBB ,""}
//it goes on ..
};
// Function to find the Largest Number
int getMax(int array[], int n) {
int max = array[0];
int i;
for (i = 1; i < n; i++)
if (array[i] > max)
max = array[i];
return max;
}
// Function for Count sort
void countSort(int array[], int n, int dig) {
int output[n];
int i, count[10] = {0};
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
count[(array[i] / dig) % 10]++;
for (i = 1; i < 10; i++)
count[i] += count[i - 1];
for (i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--){
output[count[(array[i] / dig) % 10] - 1] = array[i];
count[(array[i] / dig) % 10]--;
}
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
array[i] = output[i];
}
void radixsort(int array[], int n) {
//Get the largest number to know the maximum number of digits
int m = getMax(array, n);
int dig;
//Counting sort is performed for every digit
for (dig = 1; m / dig > 0; dig *= 10)
countSort(array, n, dig);
}
int main()
{
int functionTableUnitSize = sizeof(FUNC_TABLE) / sizeof(FUNC_TABLE[0]);
radixsort(&FUNC_TABLE, functionTableUnitSize);
return 0;
}
I assume that the function names in your question have a uniform length of 4 alphanumeric characters. In C, identifiers can use 63 different alphanumeric characters from these groups:
lower case (abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz)
upper case letters (ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ)
digits (0123456789)
and the underscore (_)
Different encodings have a different order (e.g. EBCDIC lower case letters are sorted before upper case letters, while the reverse is true for ASCII). For a portable C programm we can therefore define our own lexical sorting order.
We can do this for example in a function called build_lexical_sorting_index.
Details
I have minimally adjusted the naming from the code you provide in your question
your functions must work with FUNCTION arrays and not with int arrays
radix_sort first creates the lexical sorting index
count_sort must then be called for each of the 4 alphanumeric characters of a function name
words are usually sorted from the leftmost character, that's why we do it this way
count_sort is then called for each of the 4 characters
this determines the index from the lexical_sorting index of the corresponding character from the function name
then the count sorting algorithm as shown in your question is applied
at the end the result is printed
If one slightly modifies your code according to the above mentioned points, it looks like this:
#include <stdio.h>
#define UNIFORM_FUNCNAME_LENGTH 4
typedef struct {
char *fnc_name;
void (*fnc)(char *);
char *description;
} FUNCTION;
void ABCD(char *a) {};
void abcD(char *a) {};
void EaBB(char *a) {};
void A012(char *a) {};
void _ABC(char *a) {};
FUNCTION func_table[] = {
{"ABCD", ABCD, ""},
{"abcD", abcD, ""},
{"EaBB", EaBB, ""},
{"A012", A012, ""},
{"_ABC", _ABC, ""}
//it goes on ..
};
int lexical_sorting_index[256] = {0};
int lexical_index(int ch) {
return lexical_sorting_index[ch];
}
void count_sort(FUNCTION *array, int n, int char_position) {
FUNCTION output[n];
int count[256] = {0};
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
int ch = array[i].fnc_name[char_position];
int index = lexical_index(ch);
count[index]++;
}
for (int i = 1; i < 256; i++)
count[i] += count[i - 1];
for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
int ch = array[i].fnc_name[char_position];
int index = lexical_index(ch);
output[count[index] - 1] = array[i];
count[index]--;
}
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
array[i] = output[i];
}
void build_lexical_sorting_index() {
int nr = 0;
for (int i = 'a'; i <= 'z'; i++)
lexical_sorting_index[i] = nr++;
for (int i = 'A'; i <= 'Z'; i++)
lexical_sorting_index[i] = nr++;
for (int i = '0'; i <= '9'; i++)
lexical_sorting_index[i] = nr++;
lexical_sorting_index['_'] = nr;
}
void radix_sort(FUNCTION *array, int n) {
build_lexical_sorting_index();
for(int char_position = UNIFORM_FUNCNAME_LENGTH - 1; char_position >= 0; char_position--)
count_sort(array, n, char_position);
}
int main() {
int table_size = sizeof(func_table) / sizeof(func_table[0]);
radix_sort(func_table, table_size);
for (int i = 0; i < table_size; i++)
printf("%s ", func_table[i].fnc_name);
return 0;
}
When the program is executed, the following is displayed in the debug console:
abcD ABCD A012 EaBB _ABC
I want to delete multiple elements from array using index array,this is my code:
// b is an index array, n is size of b,
// player is the array need to be delete elements,
// size is the size of player
void play_cards(int b[],int n,int player[],int *size){
int i;
for(i = 0; i < n; i++)
delete_cards(b[i],player,size);
}
void delete_cards(int n,int player[],int *size){
int i;
for(i = n; i < *size; i++)
player[i] = player[i+1];
*size -= 1;
}
int main(void){
int player[10] = {1,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,7};
int index[6] = {2,3,4,5,6,7};
int size = 10;
play_cards(index,6,player,&size);
for(int i = 0; i < size; i++)
printf("%d|",player[i]);
puts("");
return 0;
}
I expect print the player should be 1,2,6,7 instead of 1,2,3,4. How should I fix it?
First I would not call the function delete_cards as it suggests that it deletes multiple cards which it does not - just delete_card would make things more clear.
Anyway - when you change the player array before you have played all cards in the index array, you change the meaning of the indexes. This is why your current code doesn't work.
So you can do two things:
a) Play all cards first and then delete the cards played. This could be done by first marking played card with -1 and then have a loop where you removed all element being -1
or
b) Play a card, delete it and adjust the remaining elements in index by decrementing them by one. Note: This solution requires that index is sorted (lowest first).
Solution a) could look something like this:
void delete_played_cards(int player[],int *size)
{
int i;
int next_pos = 0;
int deleted = 0;
for(i = 0; i < *size; i++)
{
if (player[i] != -1)
{
player[next_pos] = player[i];
if (i != next_pos)
{
player[i] = -1;
}
++next_pos;
}
else
{
++deleted;
}
}
*size -= deleted;
}
void play_cards(int b[],int n,int player[],int *size)
{
int i;
for(i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
player[b[i]] = -1; // Mark card as played
}
delete_played_cards(player,size);
}
int main(void)
{
int player[10] = {1,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,7};
int index[6] = {2,3,4,5,6,7};
int size = 10;
play_cards(index,6,player,&size);
for(int i = 0; i < size; i++)
printf("%d|",player[i]);
puts("");
return 0;
}
Modify play_cards:
void play_cards(int b[], int n, int player[], int *size)
{
int i;
for(i = n-1; i >= 0; i--)
delete_cards(b[i],player,size);
}
This will start deleting from the end of array.
As BLUEPIXY mentioned.
here is a pseudocode that you can work with:
given a sorted list, 1..n
for i = 2 up to length of list:
if list[i] is equal to list[i-1]:
shift the sublist [2..] 1 position to the left
else
increment i by 1
If you want to delete easily and efficiently without using loop you can use memcpy
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define INDEX_MAX 6
int main ()
{
int size = 10;
int src[] = {1,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,7};
int index[] = {2,3,4,5,6,7};
int x;
size = size - INDEX_MAX;
memcpy(src+2, src+8, sizeof(int)*(size-2));// - 2 since index 1 and 2 remains in the array
for(x = 0; x < size; x++){
printf("%d",src[x]);
}
return(0);
}
I have developed this knapsack algorithm based on pseudo-code found on wikipedia. It works fine for small number of items and capacity (n=6, v=2014), but it crashes for large numbers (n=5, v=123456789).
Additional problem is, that my program is tested by makefile with time limit set at 1 second.
What can i do to save time and memory?
v - Knapsack capacity
n - Number of items
weight[] - Weights
value[] - Values
int knapSack(int v, int weight[], int value[], int n){
int a, i, j;
int **ks;
ks = (int **)calloc(n+1, sizeof(int*));
for(a = 0; a < (n+1); a++) {
ks[a] = (int *)calloc(v+1, sizeof(int));
}
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++){
for (j = 0; j <= v; j++){
if (weight[i-1] <= j){
ks[i][j] = max(value[i-1] + ks[i-1][j-weight[i-1]], ks[i-1][j]);
} else {
ks[i][j] = ks[i-1][j];
}
}
}
int result = ks[n][v];
for(i = 0; i < (n+1); i++) {
free(ks[i]);
}
free(ks);
return result;
}
An array of 123456789 integer elements declared on the stack will crash many implementations of C. Sounds like this is your problem. Did you declare your arrays inside of a function (on the stack)?
// on heap
static int v[123456789]={0};
// on the stack (inside a function like main() )
int foo()
{
int v[123456789]={0};
}