Cycle through List and Ordering - c

I want to create a linked list.
The user adds numbers and the idea is that the numbers are inserted to the list in descending order.
Here goes what I did, but when rearranging, it just orders the first number...
int addInputNumber(numberList **node){
numberList *temp;
int userInput;
temp = (numberList*)malloc(sizeof(numberList));
//Memory Check
if ( temp == 0 )//out of memory, return 0
return 0;
//Get the users input
printf("Give me a Number!\n");
scanf("%d",&userInput);
//Add it to the list.
temp->numbero = userInput;
///Link to the list.
temp->next = *node;
*node = temp;
//Lets cycle through the list.
numberList *temp2;
int helpNumber;
temp2 = *node;
//Rearrange the list.
while(temp2 != 0){
if(temp->numbero < temp2->numbero){
//Switch position..
helpNumber= temp2->numbero;
temp2->numbero = temp->numbero;
temp->numbero = helpNumber;
temp2 = *node;// If we change number, we must cycle from the beginning AGAIN.
}//eof if
temp2 = temp2->next;
}//eof while
return 0;
}//eof addNUmber function.
Here's the structure just in case:
typedef struct dynamicNumberList {
int numbero;
struct dynamicNumberList *next;
}numberList;
I've got 2 quick questions.
Why would it only arrange the first number?
This list adds a space towards the left (visually), how could I make it so I can add a space to the right?

You need to get into the habit of creating one function per task, instead of cramming everything into a single one. It makes the code easier to read and reuse and reduces the chance of errors.
A correct implementation could look like this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
typedef struct s_List
{
int n;
struct s_List *next;
} List;
void print_list (List *head)
{
List *ptr;
for (ptr = head; ptr; ptr = ptr->next) {
printf ("%d\t", ptr->n);
}
putchar ('\n');
}
List * make_node (int n, List *next)
{
List * node = malloc (sizeof(List));
node->n = n;
node->next = next;
return node;
}
void insert_number_front (List **head, int n)
{
*head = make_node (n, *head);
}
void insert_number_after (List *prev, int n)
{
prev->next = make_node (n, prev->next);
}
// If HEAD is sorted, it will stay sorted after insertion
void insert_number_sorted (List **head, int n)
{
List *ptr;
List *ptr2;
// search for the rightmost node whose number is smaller than n.
ptr2 = NULL;
for (ptr = *head; ptr; ptr = ptr->next) {
if (ptr->n >= n)
break;
ptr2 = ptr;
}
// If such a node exists we insert the new node after it,
// otherwise we insert it at the front of the list.
if (ptr2) {
insert_number_after (ptr2, n);
}
else {
insert_number_front (head, n);
}
}
int input_number ()
{
int n;
printf ("enter a number: ");
scanf ("%d", &n);
return n;
}
int main ()
{
List *head = NULL;
int i;
// By adding elements exclusively with insert_number_sorted()
// we ensure the list is always sorted
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
int n;
n = input_number ();
insert_number_sorted (&head, n);
}
print_list (head);
return 0;
}
To answer your second question, what you have here is a singly linked list, which can be described by a pointer to the first node. If you want to be able to insert nodes at the back you need to maintain an additional pointer to the last node. However this is not necessary in this case.

Related

Cannot sort a single linked list in C

I have a trouble with sorting the linked list. In main() I add 7 items to linked list, and I try to sort them using selection sort. I tried debugging and going step by step but could not find where things went wrong.
#define LARGE 40
struct Node
{
char password[LARGE];
int score;
struct Node *next;
};
struct Node *front = NULL, *rear = NULL;
/* function to swap data of two nodes a and b*/
void swap(struct Node *a, struct Node *b)
{
int temp = a->score;
char temp2[150];
strcpy(temp2, a->password);
a->score = b->score;
strcpy(a->password, b->password);
strcpy(b->password, temp2);
b->score = temp;
}
void selectionsort(struct Node *head)
{
struct Node *first,*second,*temp;
int i,j,N;
N= 7;
printf("%u\n",front->score);
first = head;
second = first->next;
for(i=0;i<N-1;i++){
for(j=i+1;j<N;j++){
if(first->score > second->score){
swap(first,second);
}
second = second->next;
printf("%u\n",front->score);
}
first = first->next;
printf("%u\n",front->score);
}
printf("%u\n",front->score);
}
int main()
{
char value1[40] ="abcdefg";
int valscor1= 1600;
enQueue(value1,valscor1);
int valscor2= 95;
enQueue(value1,valscor2);
int valscor3= 110;
enQueue(value1,valscor3);
int valscor4= 123;
enQueue(value1,valscor4);
int valscor5= 12;
enQueue(value1,valscor5);
int valscor6= 44;
enQueue(value1, valscor6);
int valscor7= 11;
enQueue(value1, valscor7);
struct Node* head = front;
//sorting and printing the first score (which should be eleven but it is 1600 right now
selectionsort(head);
displayQueue();
return 0;
}
Here is my output, the lines that have a lot of 1600's in them are being printed inside selection sort. I tried to see what was the first element each step of my for loops. Below those numbers you can see the whole order of the list items. my outputs
You forgot to repoint second to first->next.
void selectionsort(struct Node *head)
{
struct Node *first,*second,*temp;
int i,j,N;
N= 7;
printf("%u\n",front->score);
first = head;
second = first->next;
for(i=0;i<N-1;i++){
for(j=i+1;j<N;j++){
if(first->score > second->score){
swap(first,second);
}
second = second->next;
printf("%u\n",front->score);
}
first = first->next;
second = first->next; // <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Please add this one.
printf("%u\n",front->score);
}
printf("%u\n",front->score);
}

Printing extra 0 and not removing front nodes in linked list implementation in C

My code has two separate (although likely connected) problems, one of which being that when I print out the linked list (regardless of if I push nodes to the front or to the back), it prints an additional 0 at the start of the linked list. I saw a similar post about this, but the implementation of the push method was different, as it didn't take head as an argument, so I've defined head in the main() method with:
struct node *head = NULL;
and my linked list instantiation looks like
struct node *temp, *ptr;
temp=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(temp==NULL) {
exit(0);
}
temp->next=NULL;
if(head==NULL) {
head=temp;
} else {
ptr=head;
while(ptr->next!=NULL) {
ptr=ptr->next;
}
ptr->next=temp;
ptr->data=NULL;
}
The issue I'm having is that I'm not sure whether or not the issue is in the print method, my push front method or my linked list instantiation.
The relevant code is:
case PUSH_FRONT: ; // push onto front of list
struct node *temp1;
temp1=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(temp1==NULL) {
break;
}
temp1->next=NULL;
temp1->data=val;
if(head==NULL) {
head=temp1;
} else {
temp1->next=head;
head=temp1;
}
break;
case PRINT_LIST: ; // print list
printf("Elements: ");
struct node *ptr4;
ptr4=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(head==NULL) {
break;
} else {
ptr4=head;
while(ptr4) {
printf("%d",ptr4->data);
printf(" ");
ptr4=ptr4->next;
}
printf("\n");
free(ptr4);
}
break;
My other issue (although I'm still convinced that this issue lies elsewhere) is that my pop front method does absolutely nothing, which I'm guessing has to do with the initial instantiation of the linked list. The relevant code is:
case POP_FRONT: ; // remove from front of list
// If list is empty, do nothing.
struct node *ptr2;
ptr2=(struct node *)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(ptr2==NULL) {
break;
}
if(head==NULL) {
break;
} else if(head->next==NULL) {
ptr2=head;
head=head->next;
free(ptr2);
}
break;
You should post code someone could download and compile. And when
needed a data file or a description of the problem. Code fragments are
not good.
I believe that the data component of your list is just an int by looking at the code at the label PRINT_LIST
here goes what I think
a list is a collection of nodes. In java a list is even called a collection. In C++ lists are called containers. When you write code for a linked list as if it is a node you will have more work and less results.
as a direct consequence of using a node as a list you have 3 pointers here just to manage the list, in the instantiation code: head, temp and ptr, It is too much. Imagine if there where 3 lists...
a list with pointers only to one direction is harder to program and much less useful than one with pointers to next and previous nodes. If it is your decision may be you should reconsider. If the space of the additional pointer is not a concern, it is hard to justify not to use 2 pointers. Imagine a list for a library, a path,, a playlist, all the classic examples: it is very handful to be able to navigate in both directions.
the use of a switch() is uncommon. Why not just use functions?
back to your code
struct node *temp, *ptr;
temp=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(temp==NULL) {
exit(0);
}
temp->next=NULL;
if(head==NULL) {
head=temp;
} else {
ptr=head;
while(ptr->next!=NULL) {
ptr=ptr->next;
}
ptr->next=temp;
ptr->data=NULL;
}
here you write ptr->data = NULL; and we may think that data is a pointer, but in the list label you wrote
ptr4=head;
while(ptr4) {
printf("%d",ptr4->data);
printf(" ");
ptr4=ptr4->next;
}
printf("\n");
free(ptr4);
and data is just an int as you are using %d in the printf(). Well, the NULL in instantiation is, well, a zero.
And that NULL is the 0 you are complaining about.
This code seems to be much more complex and hard to read than it may need to be.
Let me show an alternative
about the declaration
You may write the node struct like
typedef struct _nd
{
int data;
struct _nd* next;
} node;
So you can use node in the declaration and not have to repeat struct at all times. Also it is useful to have a convention for typedef, like using first letter uppercase to help in readability
As I said before a list is a collection of nodes, it is NOT just a node --- with a pointer inside --- and each node has a payload, some data, usually a pointer. As an example consider
an alternate example of list structs
typedef struct _nda
{
int data;
struct _nda* next;
} Node;
struct _the_list
{
char* name;
unsigned size;
unsigned limit;
Node* head;
Node* tail;
};
typedef struct _the_list List;
Here the list is, well, List. And each list has head, tail, size, limit and even a name. I kept data as an int but is is not good: you really want it as a pointer, maybe (void*).
Why? Because in this way you can reuse the code everywhere with no change.
How to use a List like this?
Using functions like these possible prototypes
List* _create(const char*);
int _define_max(List* l, const unsigned);
List* _delete(List*);
int _empty(List*);
int _get_max(List*);
List* _insert_begin(int, List*);
List* _insert_end(int, List*);
int _insert_your_way(List*, int(*)(int,int));
int _print(List*);
int _print_your_way(List*, int(*)(int,int));
List* _remove(int, List*);
int _size(List*);
I will post a running example below just to have something you can test or ask about case you need. But it is the usual. Only these two functions are less usual, but more useful:
int _insert_your_way(List*, int(*F)(int,int));
int _print_your_way(List*, int(*F)(int,int));
Here you can pass a function like in the qsort() function, and the node is inserted at the position, using the function F() to compare the nodes. The effect is that you can have the nodes inserted (or listed) in any order, with no change in the list code, just by providing different functions to the print or insert function. C does that, C++ does that, everybody does that, so we can too :)
code for instantiating such a list
List* _create(const char* name)
{
List* one = (List*)malloc(sizeof(List));
one->name = (char*)malloc(1 + strlen(name));
strcpy(one->name, name);
one->size = 0;
one->limit = 0;
one->head = NULL;
one->tail = NULL;
return one;
}; // criar()
You may find that writing this way makes easier to maintain or read the code. And the List as a container is much more expressive: metadata about the list in included in the list. No need for ptr, head, temp, size or other controls hanging loose in main()
To create a list you can just write, like in the example
List* first = _create("The First List");
inserting nodes at the beggining
List* _insert_begin(int value, List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return l; //no list
if ((l->limit > 0) && (l->size == l->limit)) return l; // full
// ok: create a node and stuff data in
Node* nd = (Node*)malloc(sizeof(Node));
nd->data = value; // data comes in
nd->next = l->head; // depois vem o que estava na frente
l->head = nd; // nd fim
l->size = l->size + 1;
// if it is the first node
if (l->size == 1)l->tail = nd;
return l;
};
As I told you this is just a toy, an example. In practice you will use a void* in order to have a generic code. I am using an int as data here, as you did. To insert a few nodes in the list created above you just write
// insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the end
for(int i = 6; i<11; i+=1 ) _insert_end(i, first);
And you can have even an array of lists and all goes well. No external variables to look after. And each list has size updated, head, tail...
printing nodes
print is also easy and can be more expressive, since we have metadata with limits, size, head, tail and even the name for each list.
sample program
int main(void)
{
List* first = _create("The First List");
_print(first);
_define_max(first,300);
_print(first);
// insert 5,4,3,2,1 at the beggining
for(int i = 5; i>0; i-=1 ) _insert_begin(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
// insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the end
for(int i = 6; i<11; i+=1 ) _insert_end(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
printf("empty(): %d size()= %d\n",
_empty(first),
_size(first) );
first = _delete(first);
_print(first);
return 0;
}
This code just
create a list and prints the nodes
set the optional limit to 300 nodes
list the nodes
insert 5,4,3,2,1 at the beginning
list the nodes
insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the tail
list the nodes
call a few functions on the list
deletes all data
output
List 'The First List' with 0 elements [MAX not defined yet]
List 'The First List' with 0 of 300 MAX elements
List 'The First List' with 5 of 300 MAX elements
First: 1
Last: 5
Elements
1
2
3
4
5
End of list
List 'The First List' with 10 of 300 MAX elements
First: 1
Last: 10
Elements
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
End of list
empty(): 0 size()= 10
Deleting 'The First List'
List not created!
the code (with almost no testing)
#include <memory.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
typedef struct _nda
{
int data;
struct _nda* next;
} Node;
struct _the_list
{
char* name;
unsigned size;
unsigned limit;
Node* head;
Node* tail;
};
typedef struct _the_list List;
List* _create(const char*);
int _define_max(List* l, const unsigned);
List* _delete(List*);
int _empty(List*);
int _get_max(List*);
List* _insert_begin(int, List*);
List* _insert_end(int, List*);
int _insert_your_way(List*, int(*)(void*));
int _print(List*);
int _print_your_way(List*, int(*)(void*));
List* _remove(int, List*);
int _size(List*);
int main(void)
{
List* first = _create("The First List");
_print(first);
_define_max(first,300);
_print(first);
// insert 5,4,3,2,1 at the beggining
for(int i = 5; i>0; i-=1 ) _insert_begin(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
// insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the end
for(int i = 6; i<11; i+=1 ) _insert_end(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
printf("empty(): %d size()= %d\n",
_empty(first),
_size(first) );
first = _delete(first);
_print(first);
return 0;
}
List* _create(const char* name)
{
List* one = (List*)malloc(sizeof(List));
one->name = (char*)malloc(1 + strlen(name));
strcpy(one->name, name);
one->size = 0;
one->limit = 0;
one->head = NULL;
one->tail = NULL;
return one;
}; // criar()
int _define_max(List* l, const unsigned m)
{
if (l == NULL) return -1;
// new value can not be less than present size
if (l->size > m) return -2;
l->limit = m;
return m;
};
List* _delete(List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return NULL;
printf("Deleting '%s'\n", l->name);
free(l->name);
if (l->size == 0)
{
free(l);
return NULL; // empty
}; // if()
Node* node = l->head;
do
{
Node* p = node->next;
free(node);
node = p;
} while (node != NULL);
return NULL;
};
int _empty(List* L)
{
if (L == NULL) return -1;
return (L->size == 0);
};
int _get_max(List* L)
{
if (L == NULL) return -1;
return (int)L->limit;
};
List* _insert_begin(int value, List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return l; //no list
if ((l->limit > 0) && (l->size == l->limit)) return l; // full
// ok: create a node and stuff data in
Node* nd = (Node*)malloc(sizeof(Node));
nd->data = value; // data comes in
nd->next = l->head; // depois vem o que estava na frente
l->head = nd; // nd fim
l->size = l->size + 1;
// if it is the first node
if (l->size == 1)l->tail = nd;
return l;
};
List* _insert_end(int value, List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return l;
if ((l->limit > 0) && (l->size == l->limit)) return l; // full
// ok: create a node and insert at the end
Node* nd = (Node*)malloc(sizeof(Node));
nd->data = value;
// first one?
if (l->size == 0)
{
l->head = nd;
nd->next = NULL;
}
else
{
nd->next = NULL; // no one after this
(l->tail)->next = nd;
}; // if()
l->tail = nd; // nd is tail now
l->size = l->size + 1;
// of this is the first node
if (l->size == 1)l->head = nd;
return l;
};
int _insert_your_way(List* L, int(*F)(void*))
{
return 0;
};
int _print(List* l)
{
if (l == NULL)
{
printf("List not created!\n");
return -1;
};
if (l->limit > 0)
{
printf("\nList '%s' with %d of %d MAX elements\n",
l->name,
l->size,
l->limit
);
}
else
{
printf("\nList '%s' with %d elements [MAX not defined yet]\n",
l->name,
l->size
);
}
if (l->size < 1) return 0;
// assume data as just an int
Node* p = l->head;
printf("\n First:%10d\n", l->head->data);
printf(" Last:%10d\n", l->tail->data);
printf("\nElements\n\n");
do
{
printf("%10d \n", p->data);
p = p->next;
} while (p != NULL);
printf("\nEnd of list\n\n");
return 0;
}; // _print()
int _print_your_way(List* L, int(*F)(void*))
{
return 0;
};
List* _remove(int value, List* L)
{
return NULL;
};
int _size(List* L)
{
if (L == NULL) return -1;
return (int)L->size;
};
It was extracted for a larger example, for WIndows. Compiled just under gcc 9.3 on Ubuntu on Windows WSL

How do I Bubble Sort a linked list?

I am trying to create a linked list and sort it by Bubble Sort. I succeeded to create the linked list, but when I am trying to Bubble Sort it, some accidents occur and I do not know the problem. What is the problem?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
//the struct of LinkedList
typedef struct Node
{
int data;
struct Node * pNext;
}NODE,*PNODE;
PNODE createList();//Creat one LinkedList
int lengthList(PNODE pHead);//get the length of LinkedList
void sortList(PNODE);//bubble sort
int main()
{
int length;
PNODE pHead=NULL;
pHead=createList();
sortList(pHead);
return 0;
}
//Create LinkedList
PNODE createList()
{
int i,n;
int val;
PNODE pHead=(PNODE)malloc(sizeof(NODE));
if(pHead==NULL)
{
printf("failed to create!\n");
exit(-1);
}
pHead->pNext=NULL;
PNODE pTail=pHead;
printf("please input the length of the LinkedList:");
scanf("%d",&n);
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
printf("number %d is:\n",i+1);
scanf("%d",&val);
PNODE pNew=(PNODE)malloc(sizeof(NODE));
if(pNew==NULL)
{
printf("failed to create\n");
exit(-1);
}
pNew->data=val;
pTail->pNext=pNew;
pNew->pNext=NULL;
pTail=pNew;
}
return pHead;
}
//get the length of LinkedList
int lengthList(PNODE pHead)
{
int i=0;
PNODE p=pHead->pNext;
while(p!=NULL)
{
i++;
p=p->pNext;
}
return i;
}
//bubble sort
void sortList(PNODE pHead)
{
int i,j,t,len;
PNODE p,q;
len=lengthList(pHead);
p=pHead->pNext;
for(i=0;i<len-1;i++)
{
for(j=0;j<len-i;j++)
{
q=p->pNext;
if( p->data > q->data)
{
t=p->data;
p->data=q->data;
q->data=t;
}
p=q;//here may be the error
}
}
return;
}
You are running off the end of your list in sortList
p=pHead->pNext;
for(i=0;i<len-1;i++)
{
for(j=0;j<len-i;j++)
{
q=p->pNext;
....
p=q;//here may be the error
}
}
Bug 1) Your list is only len long but you are attempting to advance p to p->pNext far more then len times.
Bug 2) pHead does not need to be a full NODE - it's just a PNODE pointer. You never use its data field. You should have pHead point to the first node in the list, and then start your iteration at pHead rather than pHead->pNext.
Bug 3) You never clean up your memory allocations.
As #Airsource pointed out the bugs, keep in mind most of them are caused because of poor designing choice of your program. Try to do it like below & you will run into less errors
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
typedef struct _Node{
int data;
struct _Node* next;
}Node;
typedef struct {
Node* headPtr;
Node* tailPtr;
unsigned size;
}List;
static void create_node(List* list, int element) {
if (list->headPtr == NULL) {
// List is empty
list->headPtr = (Node* )malloc(sizeof(Node));
list->headPtr->data = element;
list->headPtr->next = 0;
list->tailPtr = list->headPtr;
list->size++;
}else{
// List was already populated
Node* temp = (Node* )malloc(sizeof(Node));
temp->data = element;
temp->next = 0;
list->tailPtr->next = temp;
list->tailPtr = temp;
list->size++;
}
}
void create_list(List* list, int length){
int ele;
int i;
list->headPtr = list->tailPtr = 0;
list->size = 0;
for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
scanf("%d", &ele);
create_node(list, ele);
}
}
void print_list(List* list){
Node* loop = list->headPtr;
while(loop){
printf("%d ", loop->data);
loop = loop->next;
}
printf("\n");
}
int main(){
List* list;
int n;
printf("Enter the length of the list: ");
scanf("%d", &n);
create_list(list, n);
print_list(list);
bubble_sort(list);
print_list(list);
if (cleanup(list))
printf("Memory rescued!!\n");
else
printf("OOPS!! Error\n");
return 0;
}
Moreover, you can get the size anytime just by list->size. No need for separate function to do that.
Finally to sort it using bubble sort you could do something like this below
void bubble_sort(List* list) {
int i, j;
Node* first, *second;
int temp;
first = list->headPtr;
second = list->headPtr->next;
for (i = 0; i < list->size - 1; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < list->size - i - 1; j++) {
if (first->data > second->data){
temp = first->data;
first->data = second->data;
second->data = temp;
}
first = second;
second = second->next;
}
first = list->headPtr;
second = list->headPtr->next;
}
}
and for cleanup you do this
bool cleanup(List* list) {
Node* curr = list->headPtr;
Node* nxt = list->headPtr->next;
while(nxt){
free(curr);
curr = nxt;
nxt = curr->next;
}
list->headPtr = list->tailPtr = 0;
list->size = 0;
return !nxt ? true: false;
}
There are couple of bugs in your program. I will address them one by one:
Line 28 PNODE pHead=(PNODE)malloc(sizeof(NODE));
Here you are allocating a memory and creating a node before checking if n>0 or not.
Line 36 printf("please input the length of the LinkedList:");
Now up to this point you have created a one node, head node which has no value in it (so contains garbage)
In effect your createList() creates a linked list with n+1 nodes instead of n and the head->value contains garbage.
Solution:
printf("please input the length of the LinkedList:");
scanf("%d", &n);
for(i=0; i<n; i++)
{
PNODE pNew = (PNODE)malloc(sizeof(NODE));
if(pNew == NULL)
{
printf("failed to create!\n");
exit(-1);
}
scanf("%d", &val);
pNew->data = val;
pNew->pNext = NULL;
if (!i)
pHead = pNew;
else
pTail->pNext = pNew;
pTail = pNew;
}
return pHead;
Line 59 PNODE p=pHead->pNext;
Here you are counting nodes starting from the second node (leaving out head). No wonder you will get length as n as you have created a linked list of length n+1 in your createList()
Imagine what if n = 0 and thus pHead = NULL?
Then this line will result in SegFault.
Solution:
change PNODE p=pHead->pNext; to PNODE p = pHead;
Line 73 p=pHead->pNext;
Here you will start sorting excluding the first node, head node.
Also this should be inside the outter for and outside of the inner for to reset the p to first node for each pass.
Line 76 for(j=0;j<len-i;j++)
Here j must be less than len - 1 - i as in pass 1 (i = 0) in the worst case j will be equal to len-1 for j < len-i, where p will point to the last node of linked list and q will be NULL as q = p -> pNext. Which will make q->data to result in SegFault.
To summarise, your sort routine is producing SegFault in the very first Pass and even if it didn't (by properly adjusting the loop-terminating expression in inner for) the outer for loop is contributing nothing towards the sorting except increasing the time complexity.
Solution:
for(i = 0; i < len - 1; i++)
{
p = pHead;
for(j = 0; j < len - 1 - i; j++)
{
q = p -> pNext;
if(p->data > q->data)
{
t = p -> data;
p -> data = q -> data;
q -> data = t;
}
p = q;
}
}
A question:
How are you checking whether element have been sorted or not?
A printList() routine would have been helpful in spotting the above bugs.
"Always verify whether you correctly stored the input or not by explicitly printing the same before processing it!"

Sequence insert at arbitrary index implemented with Linked list

I'm trying to implement sequence_insert_at using the add_to_front function here
Everything before
typedef struct sequence *Sequence;
is pasted from another c file.
void sequence_insert_at(Sequence s, int pos, int item)
{
struct node* temp = s->lst;
for(; pos > 0; --pos)
{
temp = temp->rest;
}
add_to_front(&temp, item);
++s->length;
if(!temp->rest)
{
s->end = temp;
}
//s->lst = temp;
}
I don't know why I keep getting a runtime error. if I clone s->lst and traverse the clone, I'm not modifying the pointer to the node in s, but if I change temp, s->lst should have the reflected changes since the nodes are all linked still. Any ideas as to how to fix this? I tried creating another node that is one before the temp after traversal, and then setting it->rest = temp, but that failed as well.
following mistakes a could spot but only so far to get the main function run
new_sequence does not initialize anything in Sequence it creates. lst is not initialized when you access it in sequence_insert_at
struct node* temp = s->lst;
here how it should look like
Sequence new_sequence()
{
Sequence s = malloc(sizeof(struct sequence));
if(!s)
{
printf("Out of memory. Can't allocate s\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
s->lst = malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(! s->lst) {
printf("Out of memory. Can't allocate lst\n");
}
s->lst->rest = NULL;
s->length = 0;
return s;
}
also s->lst->rest has to be set to NULL, this is what tells that the list has no more elements an not end witch turns obsolete.
struct sequence
{
struct node* lst;
int length;
};
You should be passing the sequence itself to your functions not a pointer to some internal data in the sequence.
add_to_front(&temp, item);
Your sequence_insert_at function should be the one that can handle any position not add_to_front() so it is easier to call with the position 0 from add_to_front() and your having the the hole work done in one function, not a half here and a half there.
void sequence_insert_at(Sequence s, int pos, int item)
{
if(s && pos <= s->length) {
print_sequence(s);
struct node *newnode = malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if (newnode == NULL) {
printf("ERROR! add_to_front ran out of memory!\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
newnode->first = item;
struct node* temp = s->lst;
struct node* prv = NULL;
for(int i = 0; i < pos; i++) {
printf("skip %d\n", temp->first);
prv = temp;
temp = temp->rest;
}
newnode->rest = temp;
if(pos == 0) {
printf("insert as first\n");
s->lst = newnode;
} else {
printf("insert before %d\n", temp->first);
prv->rest = newnode;
}
++s->length;
}
}
and in add_to_front only one statement is needed
void add_to_front(Sequence s, int item) {
sequence_insert_at(s, 0, item);
}
as for inserting at the back of the list
void add_to_back(Sequence s, int item) {
sequence_insert_at(s, s->length, item);
}
A small test with the main function
void print_sequence(Sequence s)
{
struct node* temp = s->lst;
for(int i = 0; i < s->length; temp = temp->rest) {
printf("%d ", temp->first);
i++;
}
printf("\n");
}
int main()
{
Sequence derp = new_sequence();
sequence_insert_at(derp, 0, 14);
add_to_front(derp, 16);
sequence_insert_at(derp, 0, 17);
sequence_insert_at(derp, 2, 15);
add_to_back(derp, 13);
print_sequence(derp);
delete_sequence(derp);
return 0;
}
output is:
17 16 15 14 13
You'll have to go trough the other functions and fix them.
Finally i should note that variable names you have choosen are little bit confusing if not misleading, i would name them this way
typedef struct node {
int data; /* the data that a node holds */
struct node* next; /* the pointer to the next node */
} Node_t;
typedef struct sequence {
struct node* head; /* head or first element of the sequence/list */
int length; /* length is ok but size is better */
} Sequence_t;

Circular linked list going in infinite loop

I am supposed to do a program which can do polynomial addition/subtraction/multiplication/evaluation using circular linked list.
My multiplication code is going in infinite loop, and I have marked a comment where it is happening (detected with printf statements, removed).
list* poly_mul(list *p1, list *p2) {
term tmp;
list *result = malloc(sizeof(list));
memcpy(result, p1, sizeof(list));
node *b = p2->head;
node *r = result->head;
do {
do {
tmp.exp = r->data.exp + b->data.exp;
tmp.coeff = r->data.coeff * b->data.coeff;
unsigned int add_term = 1;
node *c = result->head;
do {
if(c->data.exp == tmp.exp) {
c->data.coeff += tmp.coeff;
add_term = 0;
break;
}
c = c->next;
//Here it goes in infinite loop
} while(c != result->head);
if(add_term)
node_add(result, &tmp);
b = b->next;
} while(b != p2->head);
r = r->next;
} while(r != result->head);
return result;
}
The structures used are here:
typedef struct {
int exp;
int coeff;
} term;
typedef struct node {
term data;
struct node *next;
} node;
typedef struct {
node *head;
node *tail;
unsigned int count;
} list;
And this is the code in main:
void main() {
list p1, p2, *p3;
p1.count = p2.count = 0;
poly_create(&p1);
p3 = poly_mul(&p1, &p2);
poly_print(p3);
}
void poly_create(list *l) {
int i, n;
printf("\nEnter number of terms in the polynomial: ");
scanf("%d", &n);
for(i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
printf("\nEnter details for term %d: ", i);
term_append(l);
}
void node_add(list *l, term *t) {
node *tmp = malloc(sizeof(node));
memcpy(&tmp->data, t, sizeof(term));
if(l->count == 0) {
l->head = tmp;
l->tail = tmp;
tmp->next = tmp;
}
else {
l->tail->next = tmp;
tmp->next = l->head;
l->tail = tmp;
}
l->count++;
}
void term_append(list *l) {
term t;
enter:
printf("\nEnter term as <coefficient>,<exponent>: ");
scanf("%d,%d", &t.coeff, &t.exp);
if(!t.coeff) {
printf("\nCoefficient is zero, reenter term");
goto enter;
}
if(l->count >= 1) {
node *i = l->head;
do {
if(i->data.exp == t.exp) {
printf("\nExponent %d was already entered, reenter term", t.exp);
goto enter;
}
i = i->next;
} while(i != l->head);
node_add(l, &t);
}
else
node_add(l, &t);
}
Please get me a solution for this problem, I've been trying to solve this for the past three hours.
Why is it going into an infinite loop? You can find out by using a debugger and stepping through the code. Just put a breakpoint at the appropriate place and you should be able to find it yourself. In all likelihood, you have a loop in your linked list.
You can check for loops in your linked list with two pointers. The first one (tail) point to the start of your list. The second (head) points to the second element of your list. Loop till head is past the last element (I have those pointed to NULL, not head) by incrementing both head and tail by one. If at any point tail > head, you have a loop.
What happens if you printf("%d",(int) c); at each iteration? I suspect that result->head is pointing to a node which is pointing to a member of the linked list, but is not in the linked list itself.
Potential test: Add a int seen to each member of the list and increment it on each member as you loop for a given number of nodes (something excessively high such as INT_MAX) and, when the loop stops, see if result->head->seen > 0:
typedef struct node {
term data;
struct node *next;
// to be removed later
int seen;
} node;
// place this before you get the infinite loop
unsigned int i = 1;
c->seen = 0;
do
{
c = c->next;
c->seen = i;
// replace INT_MAX with some number which is greater than the maximum list length
} while(++i <= INT_MAX);
// this should be roughly equal to i (might be off by 1).
// I'll bet it isn't though!
printf("result->head->seen = %d", result->head->seen);
One possible cause: you're never creating p2. Are you missing a line like this in your main function:
poly_create(&p2);
?

Resources