I did autocomplete in textbox but when i select from the autocomplete is not appending down, but its coming what i type in the textbox,
i tried these much i dont know where i doing mistake
please check this out :http://plnkr.co/edit/NPvT642ZDWu0vsXvnKla?p=preview
i am doing with help of this code:http://jsfiddle.net/viralpatel/aLDJJ/
SCRIPT
$scope.complete=function(){
$( "#tags" ).autocomplete({
source: $scope.availableTags
});
}
$scope.contacts = ["dimond", "hello"];
$scope.add = function() {
$scope.contacts.push($scope.newcontact);
$scope.newcontact = "";
}
});
I need the text which i select in autocomplete to be append down in ul li, but its not coming please check this out, I tried as much i can, so some one help me out.
thanks
I agree with Claies that it is never always a good idea to mix angular and jquery. But if you want to go with the same approach, then you can remove ng-model= 'newContact' in your html (as 2 way binding is not required with the following approach), and replace your complete function with below code.
$scope.complete = function(){
var newContact = $('#tags').val();
$scope.contacts.push(newContact);
$('#tags').val();
}
Related
I have a activity state, and when there are no activities I would like to display a message. So I created a if/else statement that checks if the $scope activities has any content, if not it injects a certain code into the template.
if(!$scope.activities.length){
var empty = function(){
$scope.renderHtml = function (htmlCode) {
return $sce.trustAsHtml(htmlCode);
};
$scope.body = '<div>There are no activities yet, <a ui-sref="home.users">click here to start following some friends!</a></div>';
}
empty()
}
The problem is that ui-sref doesn't work, a normal 'a href` does work though. Are there any solid work arounds for this problem?
To get this work I created a element with ng-show,
%div{"ng-show" => "activitiesHide"}
And this js,
activitiesService.loadActivities().then(function(response) {
$scope.activities = response.data;
if(!$scope.activities.length){
$scope.activitiesHide = response.data
}
})
I place the results from the service in the activities scope, and then check in the js if it has content. If not activate the activitesHide show.
I am trying to implement this server side pagination example of ng-grid mentioned here http://angular-ui.github.io/ng-grid/ . Unfortunately, I do not quite understand the code.
Here is my situation:
1. Say I have a page which has 2 text boxes and a button. I would like to post the values of these two text boxes to a web service on ng-click of the button. Returned json should be displayed as grid. But the code in the plunker http://plnkr.co/edit/50vJrs?p=preview
$scope.getPagedDataAsync = function (pageSize, page, searchText) {
setTimeout(function () {
var data;
if (searchText) {
var ft = searchText.toLowerCase();
$http.get('largeLoad.json').success(function (largeLoad) {
data = largeLoad.filter(function(item) {
return JSON.stringify(item).toLowerCase().indexOf(ft) != -1;
});
$scope.setPagingData(data,page,pageSize);
});
} else {
$http.get('largeLoad.json').success(function (largeLoad) {
$scope.setPagingData(largeLoad,page,pageSize);
});
}
}, 100);
};
will render the grid on page load (which I do not want). What I dont understand is how to associate the $scope.getPagedDataAsync function with a ng-click?
The html code doesnt have any textbox for searching through the grid even though in the controller they have $scope.filterOptions. How is the search happening the in plunker code?
Wish there was more documentation on the site.
Thank you
In the plunker, the function quoted in your question is immediately invoked:
$scope.getPagedDataAsync($scope.pagingOptions.pageSize, $scope.pagingOptions.currentPage);
Does commenting out that line have the desired effect?
As for the filter, it's probably there as a convenience so you can add a filter text field yourself. It is defined in an object so you can use a custom directive or ng-include block.
$scope.testObj = [{'name':'john'},{'name':'bob'}];
In this case I do
$scope.watch(testObj.name, examplefunction, true)....
this does not work but this does
$scope.watch(testObj[0].name...)
The former stops the page from completely loading, am I doing this wrong? I read a bunch of stackoverflow examples that used the same syntax. Basically what I am trying to accomplish is to save the object to the database before sending it off to another module, when a user finishes editing a certain cell in ng-grid(name in this example).
This was solved here. See if this works for you.
http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/choroshin/2014/03/26/angularjs-watch-for-changes-in-specific-object-property/
Here is a JSFiddle with example
var app=angular.module('App', []);
function ctrl($scope){
$scope.count=0;
$scope.people = [{id:1,name: "bill"}, {id:2,name: "jim"}, {id:3,name: "ryan"}]
$scope.$watch(function($scope) {
return $scope.people.
map(function(obj) {
return obj.name
});
}, function (newVal) {
$scope.count++;
$scope.msg = 'person name was changed'+newVal;
}, true);
}
http://jsfiddle.net/byws7/28/
I am new to backbonejs. What I am trying to do is, render a template on page load and pass model as data parameter in _.template function. Here is my bacbone code:
var Trip = Backbone.Model.extend({
url: '/trips/' + trip_id + '/show'
});
var InviteTraveller = Backbone.View.extend({
el: '.page',
render: function () {
var that = this;
var trip = new Trip();
trip.fetch({
success: function(){
console.log(trip); //logs trip object correctly
var template = _.template($('#invite-traveller-template').html(), {trip: trip});
that.$el.html(template);
}
});
}
});
var Router = Backbone.Router.extend({
routes: {
'': 'fetchTrip'
}
});
var inviteTraveller = new InviteTraveller();
var router = new Router();
router.on('route:fetchTrip',function () {
inviteTraveller.render();
});
Backbone.history.start();
And here is my sample template:
<script type="text/template" id="invite-traveller-template">
<h3>Trip</h3>
<h3><%= trip.get('name') %></h3>
</script>
On running, I am getting the this in browser window and console shows:
trip is not defined
I am facing this issue since yesterday but could not figure out the solution yet. Not understanding what is going wrong, code also seems to be right. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Update:
I removed
inviteTravellers.render();
from router.on() and then reloaded the page in browser. I still got same error which means that <script></script> (template) is being compiled before calling render() of InviteTraveller view. What can be the possible reason for this?
I had the same issue (underscore v1.8.2). My fix:
var template = _.template($('#invite-traveller-template').html());
var compiled = template({trip: trip});
that.$el.html(compiled);
You're passing the whole model to the template. Typically you would call model.toJSON and then pass its result to the template. Additionally using <%= in your template to render the attribute, which is meant for interpolating variables from that JSON object you're passing.
You can pass a whole model to the template and use <% ... %> to execute pure Javascript code and use print to get the attribute but it's probably overkill.
Have a look at this fiddle.
You code work perfectfly, here's it
I think that your problem came from another code, not the one you have posted, because there's no way for your view to render if you remove :
inviteTravellers.render();
Try to chaneg <h3><% trip.get('name'); %></h3> by <h3><%= trip.get('name') %></h3>
My code seems to be right but still my template was getting compiled on page load and I was getting trip is not defined error. I did not understand the reason of this behavior yet.
I solved this issue by using handlebarsjs instead of default underscore templates.
I've noticed that some web sites offer Ajax-ian search that refreshes the URL and displays the GET params used, for example:
someapp.com/search/Tokyo?price_min=80&price_max=300
As a result of an Ajax GET request.
I want to know how can I accomplish this by using Backbone.js, I understand that by using backbone's push state this may be possible, am I right?
How could I define a route like that (let's say the same case, scoped to /search) for a Place model for example?
Where would I do this? in a Router or in a Model?
I appreciate all the answers regarding this topic. And I apologize in advance for not providing any code, I usually do, but this exercise will be a proof of concept I'd like to make, and I hope backbone is the right tool for the job.
Thank you!
This is a working example of the solution - jsfiddle.net/avrelian/dGr8Y/, except that jsFiddle does not allow Backbone.history.navigate method to function properly.
Suppose, we have a button
<input class="fetch-button" type="button" value="Fetch" />
and a handler
$('.fetch-button').click(function() {
Backbone.history.navigate('posts/?author=martin', true);
});
This is our collection of posts
var Posts = Backbone.Collection.extend({
url: 'api/posts'
});
This is our Router with a custom parameter extractor
var Router = Backbone.Router.extend({
routes: {
'posts/?:filters': 'filterPosts'
},
filterPosts: function(filters){
posts.fetch({data: $.param(filters)});
},
_extractParameters: function(route, fragment) {
var result = route.exec(fragment).slice(1);
result.unshift(deparam(result[result.length-1]));
return result.slice(0,-1);
}
});
It is simplified $.deparam analog. You could use your own instead.
var deparam = function(paramString){
var result = {};
if( ! paramString){
return result;
}
$.each(paramString.split('&'), function(index, value){
if(value){
var param = value.split('=');
result[param[0]] = param[1];
}
});
return result;
};
And finally, instantiation of posts collection and router object
var posts = new Posts;
var router = new Router;
Backbone.history.start();
When a user clicks on the button address bar changes to myapp.com/s/#posts?author=martin. Please, note the sign #. We use a hash query string. Of course, you can use push state, but it is not widespread yet.