I am trying to build a single select statement from two separate ones.
Basically I have a list of Names in a table which do repeat like so:
Name| Date
John 2014-11-22
John 2013-02-03
Joe 2012-12-12
Jack 2011-11-11
Bob 2010-10-01
Bob 2013-12-22
I need to do a Select distinct Name from Records which returns John, Joe, Jack, Bob.
I then want to so a Select on another table where I pass in the rows returned above.
SELECT Address, Phone From dbo.Details
WHERE Name = {Values from first SELECT query}
Having trouble with the syntax.
If you do not want to return any values from the subquery, you can use either IN or EXISTS
SELECT Address, Phone From dbo.Details
WHERE Name IN (SELECT DISTINCT Name FROM Records)
-- OR --
SELECT Address, Phone From dbo.Details D
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM Records R WHERE R.Name = D.Name)
(In most RDBMS the EXISTS is less resource intensive).
If you want to return values from the subquery, you should use JOIN
SELECT
D.Address,
D.Phone,
R.Name -- For example
FROM
dbo.Details D
INNER JOIN dbo.Records R
ON D.Name = R.Name
SIDENOTE These are sample queries, it is possible that you have to fine tune them to match your exact requirements.
You can use:
SELECT Address, Phone, name
FROM details
-- "in" is the difference from your first query, needed due to multiple values being returned by the subquery
WHERE name in (
SELECT distinct name
FROM namesTable
)
Additionally the following should work:
SELECT d.Address, d.Phone, n.name
FROM details d
inner join (
select distinct name
from namesTable
) n on d.name = n.name
So there are two ways you can go about doing this. One, create a temporary table and perform a join (*actually in retrospect you could also join to your second table as a subquery, or use something like a CTE if you're using SQL SERVER, but the modifications if you wanted to go that route should be pretty obvious)
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE my_table AS
{your first select query};
SELECT Address, Phone From dbo.Details
INNER JOIN my_table AS mt
ON mt.name = dbo.name
Another option would be to perform an IN or EXISTS query using your select query
SELECT Address, Phone From dbo.Details
WHERE name IN (SELECT name from my_table)
Or, better yet (eg SQL Server IN vs. EXISTS Performance),
SELECT Address, Phone From dbo.Details
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * from my_table WHERE my_table.name = dbo.name)
You might have to modify the syntax slightly, depending on if you are using MySQL or SQL Server (not sure about that later, honestly). But this should get you started down the right path
This will give you the names and their address and phone number:
SELECT DISTINCT N.Name, D.Address, D.Phone
FROM dbo.Details D INNER JOIN dbo.Names N ON D.Name = N.Name
When using a subquery that is not scalar (doesn't return only one value) in the where clause use IN and of course only one column in the subquery:
SELECT Address, Phone
From dbo.Details
WHERE Name IN (Select Name from Table)
Related
I have two tables
1- Table of TestModules
TestModules
2- Table of TestModule_Results
TestModule_Results
in order to get the required information for each TestModule, I am using FULL OUTER JOIN and it works fine.
FULL OUTER JOIN result
But what is required is slightly different. The above picture shows that TestModuleID = 5 is listed twice, and the requirement is to list the 'up-to-date' results based on time 'ChangedAt'
Of course, I can do the following:
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM TestModule_Results
WHERE DeviceID = 'xxx' and TestModuleID = 'yyy'
ORDER BY ChangedAt DESC
But this solution is for a single row and I want to do it in a Stored Procedure.
Expected output should be like:
ExpectedOutput
Any advise how can I implement it in a SP?
Use a Common Table Expression and Row_Number to add a field identifying the newest results, if any, and select for just those
--NOTE: a Common Table Expression requires the previous command
--to be explicitly terminiated, prepending a ; covers that
;WITH cteTR as (
SELECT *
, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY DeviceID, TestModuleID
ORDER BY ChangedAt DESC) AS ResultOrder
FROM TestModule_Results
--cteTR is now just like TestModule_Results but has an
--additional field ResultOrder that is 1 for the newest,
--2 for the second newest, etc. for every unique (DeviceID,TestModuleID) pair
)
SELECT *
FROM TestModules as M --Use INNER JOIN to get only modules with results,
--or LEFT OUTER JOIN to include modules without any results yet
INNER JOIN cteTR as R
ON M.DeviceID = R.DeviceID AND M.TestModuleID = R.TestModuleID
WHERE R.ResultOrder = 1
-- OR R.ResultOrder IS NULL --add if Left Outer Join
You say "this solution is for a single row"? Excellent. Use CROSS APPLY and change the WHERE clause from hand-input literal to the fields of the original table. APPLY operates at row level.
SELECT *
FROM TestModules t
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM TestModule_Results
WHERE TestModule_Results.DeviceID = TestModules.DeviceID -- put the connecting fields here
ORDER BY ChangedAt DESC
)tr
I have 2 tables which contains 5 unique cities each. I want all 10 cities but i don't want to use UNION. Is there any alternative for UNION.
SELECT DISTINCT CITY FROM TABLE1
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT CITY FROM TABLE2
Here is an alternate way
SELECT DISTINCT CASE WHEN a.city is null then b.city else a.city end
FROM Table1 FULL JOIN Table2b ON 1 = 0
it offers no advantage over UNION - but you might be interested in seeing FULL JOIN, which has its similarities to UNION
You can apply Full Outer join instead of Union
SELECT DISTINCT ISNULL(t.City,t1.City)
FROM dbo.TABLE1 t
FULL OUTER JOIN dbo.TABLE2 t1 ON t.City = t.City;
This query provides you the same result as union
You can insert the data that you want into a temporary table and retrieve it from there. That will avoid the need for a UNION.
SELECT DISTINCT CITY
INTO #City
FROM TABLE1
INSERT INTO #City
SELECT DISTINCT CITY
FROM TABLE2
SELECT DISTINCT City
FROM #City
If the first table is sure to contains all the records of the second table, then one can check if the id could be found inside a subquery with an OR clause.
I'm using an ORM framework which doesn't support the UNION operator (Apache OJB) and, with the above assumption, this strategy has proven to be faster than with the use of FULL OUTER JOIN.
For instance if the table STUDENT contains all the students of a province/state with a field for their current main school and another table, STUDENT_SECONDARY_SCHOOL, contains information for those students attending a second school part time, I can get the union of all students attending a particular school either full time or part time this way :
SELECT STD_ID FROM STUDENT
WHERE
STD_SCHOOL='the_school'
OR
STD_ID IN (SELECT STD_ID FROM STUDENT_SECONDARY_SCHOOL WHERE STD_SCHOOL='the_school')
Again, I want to emphasize that this is NOT the equivalent of a UNION but can be useful in some situations.
I'm having some difficulty combining the following queries, so that the results display in one row rather than in multiple rows:
SELECT value FROM dbo.parameter WHERE name='xxxxx.name'
SELECT dbo.contest.name AS Event_Name
FROM contest
INNER JOIN open_box on open_box.contest_id = contest.id
GROUP BY dbo.contest.name
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM open_option AS total_people
SELECT SUM(scanned) AS TotalScanned,SUM(number) AS Totalnumber
FROM dbo.open_box
GROUP BY contest_id
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM open AS reff
WHERE refer = 'True'
I would like to display data from the fields in each column similar to what is shown in the image below. Any help is appreciated!
Tab's solution is fine, I just wanted to show an alternative way of doing this. The following statement uses subqueries to get the information in one row:
SELECT
[xxxx.name]=(SELECT value FROM dbo.parameter WHERE name='xxxxx.name'),
[Event Name]=(SELECT dbo.contest.name
FROM contest
INNER JOIN open_box on open_box.contest_id = contest.id
GROUP BY dbo.contest.name),
[Total People]=(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM open_option),
[Total Scanned]=(SELECT SUM(scanned)
FROM dbo.open_box
GROUP BY contest_id),
[Total Number]=(SELECT SUM(number)
FROM dbo.open_box
GROUP BY contest_id),
Ref=(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM open WHERE refer = 'True');
This requires the Total Scanned and Total Number to be queried seperately.
Update: if you then want to INSERT that into another table there are essentially two ways to do that.
Create the table directly from the SELECT statement:
SELECT
-- the fields from the first query
INTO
[database_name].[schema_name].[new_table_name]; -- creates table new_table_name
Insert into a table that already exists from the INSERT
INSERT INTO [database_name].[schema_name].[existing_table_name](
-- the fields in the existing_table_name
)
SELECT
-- the fields from the first query
Just CROSS JOIN the five queries as derived tables:
SELECT * FROM (
Query1
) AS q1
CROSS JOIN (
Query2
) AS q2
CROSS JOIN (...
Assuming that each of your individual queries only returns one row, then this CROSS JOIN should result in only one row.
I have a CTE query filtering a table Student
Student
(
StudentId PK,
FirstName ,
LastName,
GenderId,
ExperienceId,
NationalityId,
CityId
)
Based on a lot filters (multiple cities, gender, multiple experiences (1, 2, 3), multiple nationalites), I create a CTE by using dynamic sql and joining the student table with a user defined tables (CityTable, NationalityTable,...)
After that I have to retrieve the count of student by each filter like
CityId City Count
NationalityId Nationality Count
Same thing the other filter.
Can I do something like
;With CTE(
Select
FROM Student
Inner JOIN ...
INNER JOIN ....)
SELECT CityId,City,Count(studentId)
FROm CTE
GROUP BY CityId,City
SELECT GenderId,Gender,Count
FROM CTE
GROUP BY GenderId,Gender
I want to something like what LinkedIn is doing with search(people search,job search)
http://www.linkedin.com/search/fpsearch?type=people&keywords=sales+manager&pplSearchOrigin=GLHD&pageKey=member-home
It's so fast and do the same thing.
You can not use multiple select but you can use more than one CTE like this.
WITH CTEA
AS
(
SELECT 'Coulmn1' A,'Coulmn2' B
),
CETB
AS
(
SELECT 'CoulmnX' X,'CoulmnY' Y
)
SELECT * FROM CTEA, CETB
For getting count use RowNumber and CTE some think like this.
ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( ORDER BY COLUMN NAME )AS RowNumber,
Count(1) OVER() AS TotalRecordsFound
Please let me know if you need more information on this.
Sample for your reference.
With CTE AS (
Select StudentId, S.CityId, S.GenderId
FROM Student S
Inner JOIN CITY C
ON S.CityId = C.CityId
INNER JOIN GENDER G
ON S.GenderId = G.GenderId)
,
GENDER
AS
(
SELECT GenderId
FROM CTE
GROUP BY GenderId
)
SELECT * FROM GENDER, CTE
It is not possible to get multiple result sets from a single CTE.
You can however use a table variable to cache some of the information and use it later instead of issuing the same complex query multiple times:
declare #relevantStudent table (StudentID int);
insert into #relevantStudent
select s.StudentID from Students s
join ...
where ...
-- now issue the multiple queries
select s.GenderID, count(*)
from student s
join #relevantStudent r on r.StudentID = s.StudentID
group by s.GenderID
select s.CityID, count(*)
from student s
join #relevantStudent r on r.StudentID = s.StudentID
group by s.CityID
The trick is to store only the minimum required information in the table variable.
As with any query whether this will actually improve performance vs. issuing the queries independently depends on many things (how big the table variable data set is, how complex is the query used to populate it and how complex are the subsequent joins/subselects against the table variable, etc.).
Do a UNION ALL to do multiple SELECT and concatenate the results together into one table.
;WITH CTE AS(
SELECT
FROM Student
INNER JOIN ...
INNER JOIN ....)
SELECT CityId,City,Count(studentId),NULL,NULL
FROM CTE
GROUP BY CityId,City
UNION ALL
SELECT NULL,NULL,NULL,GenderId,Gender,Count
FROM CTE
GROUP BY GenderId,Gender
Note: The NULL values above just allow the two results to have matching columns, so the results can be concatenated.
I know this is a very old question, but here's a solution I just used. I have a stored procedure that returns a PAGE of search results, and I also need it to return the total count matching the query parameters.
WITH results AS (...complicated foo here...)
SELECT results.*,
CASE
WHEN #page=0 THEN (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM results)
ELSE -1
END AS totalCount
FROM results
ORDER BY bar
OFFSET #page * #pageSize ROWS FETCH NEXT #pageSize ROWS ONLY;
With this approach, there's a small "hit" on the first results page to get the count, and for the remaining pages, I pass back "-1" to avoid the hit (I assume the number of results won't change during the user session). Even though totalCount is returned for every row of the first page of results, it's only computed once.
My CTE is doing a bunch of filtering based on stored procedure arguments, so I couldn't just move it to a view and query it twice. This approach allows avoid having to duplicate the CTE's logic just to get a count.
I have a query:
SELECT Content.content_name, Language2.Name, Language2.language_id,
Content.id, Content.content_description,
FROM Language AS Language2
LEFT JOIN contents AS Content ON (Language2.language_id = Content.language_id)
How do I select only the distinct content_name?
You do this:
SELECT DISTINCT Content.content_name
FROM Language AS Language2
LEFT JOIN contents AS Content ON (Language2.language_id = Content.language_id)
So why does this not answer your question?
Let's consider the following data (just the first two columns):
content_name Name
XXXXX 1234
XXXXX 5678
SELECT DISTINCT implies you only want one row, but what do you want for Name?
What you need to do is rewrite the code to use GROUP BY and pick the appropriate aggregate function for the other columns:
SELECT
Content.content_name,
MIN(Language2.Name) AS Name,
MIN(Language2.language_id) AS language_id,
MIN(Content.id) AS id,
MIN(Content.content_description) AS content_description,
FROM
Language AS Language2
LEFT JOIN contents AS Content
ON (Language2.language_id = Content.language_id)
GROUP BY
Content.content_name
Now, likely this does not produce what you want either, but one thing is for certain, you can not trick the database engine to just "pick one of the rows to return, I don't care which one."
WITH q AS
(
SELECT Content.content_name, Language2.Name, Language2.language_id, Content.id, Content.content_description, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY content_name ORDER BY language_id) AS rn
FROM Language Language2
LEFT JOIN
Contents AS Content
ON Language2.language_id = Content.language_id
)
SELECT *
FROM q
WHERE rn = 1
You mean something like following
SELECT Content.content_name,
FROM Language AS Language2
LEFT JOIN contents AS Content ON (Language2.language_id = Content.language_id)
Group by Content.content_name