Angular. restrict: 'A' directive. Pass object - angularjs

Is there a way to pass configuration object into custom directive which defined as a attribute-directive?
I've got an object in Controller that I want to send to directive:
$scope.configObject = {
count: 5,
mode: 'fast',
getData: myService.getData // function of external service that avaliable in controller
}
In my View I declare directive:
<div class='list-class' my-list='configObject'></div>
Directive looks like:
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
var config = angular.fromJson(attrs.myList);
}
}
i've tried to get config object using angular.getJson - but it doesn't work for functions (it's possible to get only count and mode). Is .getJson() the incorrect way to get config?
Also (I guess it's not even possible) - is there a way to get config object avoiding accessing to
attrs.myList
directly? I mean if I change initializing of directive from
.directive('myList', function() { ... }) to
.directive('myCustomList', function() { ... })
shall I change accessing to
attrs.myCustomList
because view would look like
<div class='list-class' my-custom-list='configObject'></div>

you can pass it using isolate scope if you want
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: { config : '=myList' }
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
//access using scope.config
}
}
or as already answered you can parse it from attrs
$parse(attrs["myList"])(scope);
and yes if you change the directive to myCustomList, you will have to change the code
scope: { config : '=myCustomList' }
or
$parse(attrs["myCustomList"])(scope);

You can use $parse service to fetch the config object.
(function(){
var directiveName = 'myList';
angular.module('YourModule').directive(directiveName,['$parse',function($parse){
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
var config = $parse(attrs[directiveName])(scope);
}
};
}]);
})();

You can $eval the attribute
link: function(scole, element, attrs) {
var config = scope.$eval(attrs['myList']);
}

Related

Optimizing code in angular directive

In angular directive init function i am declaring constant and utilizing the constant in html. I have multiple directives utilizing the same constant i want to keep the constants a reusable one.
In the below example i am using scope.sName and scope.sType in both test and test1 directive how can i have IT IN A COMMON PLACE AND REUSE IT.
app.directive('test', function() {
return {
restrict:'A',
scope: { someVal: '='}
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope.sType = InvertoryConstant.serviceType;
scope.sName = InvertoryConstant.serviceName;
}
}});
app.directive('test1', function() {
return {
restrict:'A',
scope: { someVal: '='}
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope.sType = InvertoryConstant.serviceType;
scope.sName = InvertoryConstant.serviceName;
}
}});
You can use the $provider.constant method in AngularJS for creating DRY constants:
angular.module('projectApp', [])
.constant('EXAMPLE_CONSTANT','exampleConstant')
You can inject EXAMPLE_CONSTANT into any of your modules, as a dependency

Directive within another directive - scope var undefined

I'm trying to generate a smart-table directive from within a custom directive I've defined:
<div ng-controller="myContrtoller">
<containing-directive></containing-directive>
</div>
The directive definition:
angular.module('app')
.directive('containingDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
template: '<table st-table="collection" st-pipe="scopeFun"></table>',
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
scope.scopeFun = function () {
// solve the misteries of life
}
}
}
});
As you can see my directive tries to replace the element by the template generated by the st-table directive, using the st-pipe directive depending on the first, briefly:
ng.module('smart-table')
.controller('stTableController' function () {
// body...
})
.directive('stTable', function () {
return {
restrict: 'A',
controller: 'stTableController',
link: function (scope, element, attr, ctrl) {
// body
}
};
})
.directive('stPipe', function (config, $timeout) {
return {
require: 'stTable',
scope: {
stPipe: '='
},
link: {
pre: function (scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
var pipePromise = null;
if (ng.isFunction(scope.stPipe)) { // THIS IS ALWAYS UNDEFINED
// DO THINGS
}
},
post: function (scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
ctrl.pipe();
}
}
};
});
Problem:
The st-pipe directive checks the scope var stPipe if it is defined or not by: if (ng.isFunction(scope.stPipe)). This turns out to be ALWAYS undefined. By inspecting I found two things:
From the stPipe directive, the value supposed to be scope.stPipe that is my scopeFun defined within my containingDirective is undefined on the scope object BUT defined within the scope.$parent object.
If I define my $scope.scopeFun within the myContrtoller I don't have any problem, everything works.
Solution:
I did find a solutions but I don't know what really is going on:
Set replace: false in the containingDirective
Define the scope.scopeFun in the pre-link function of containingDirective
Questions:
Why is the scopeFun available in the stPipe directive scope object if defined in the controller and why it is available in the scope.$parent if defined in the containingDirective?
What is really going on with my solution, and is it possible to find a cleaner solution?
From the docs: "The replacement process migrates all of the attributes / classes from the old element to the new one" so what was happening was this:
<containing-directive whatever-attribute=whatever></containing-directive>
was being replaced with
<table st-table="collection" st-pipe="scopeFun" whatever-attribute=whatever></table>
and somehow st-table did not enjoy the extra attributes (even with no attributes at all..).
By wrapping the containingDirective directive template within another div fixed the problem (I can now use replace:true):
<div><table st-table="collection" st-pipe="scopeFun"></table></div>
If someone has a more structured answer would be really appreciated

Nested and dynamically created directives in angular.js

I am stuck with this for quite a long time.
In a directive, I would like to create another directive on the fly, based on a function. Instead of having 4 directive declarations, I would prefer to create a new directive in each 'tab' directive, that is to say each time a tab attribute is set in a DOM element.
Here is a part of the code (config is a factory that is use to configure some stuff) :
.directive('tab', function(config) {
return {
require: '^panelHandler',
restrict: 'A',
scope: true,
link: function(scope, elem, attrs, ctrl) {
ctrl.addPane(scope);
scope.select = function() {
ctrl.select(scope);
};
},
};
})
.directive('page1', directiveConfigurer('page1.html'))
.directive('page2', directiveConfigurer('page2.html'))
.directive('page3', directiveConfigurer('page3.html'))
.directive('page4', directiveConfigurer('page4.html'));
function directiveConfigurer(fileName) {
newDirective.$inject = ['config'];
return newDirective;
function newDirective(config) {
var directive = {
restrict: 'E',
scope: true,
templateUrl: config.filesDirectory + fileName,
};
return directive;
}
}
Thanks for your help.
EDIT :
Config...
angular.module('appLogic', ['socket-factory', 'data-factory', 'panelHandler-module'])
.factory('config', function() {
return {
filesDirectory : '../../templates/pages/',
fieldsNumber : 5,
};
});
and what I need...
link: function(scope, elem, attrs, ctrl) {
ctrl.addPane(scope);
//.directive('page' + number, directiveConfigurer(name))
scope.select = function() {
ctrl.select(scope);
};
},
If the directives are essentially the same, except for the template url, then you can just create a single directive and provide the concrete url path as an attribute:
<page src="page1.html">
To do that, use a function for templateUrl property of the directive definition object:
.directive("page", function(){
return {
templateUrl: function(tElem, tAttr){
return "/base/path/" + tAttr.src;
},
//...
};
});

custom directive required params

can we create a custom directive set as an element with required parameters , so that if these params are not provided by who ever would like to use it... then the directive must not work ???
**JS:**
app.directive('customDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope : {
data : "=data", ...
} ,
templateUrl: function(element, attr) {
// HTML file path
},
....
}
});
the case is now even if these params are not passed , the directive still works and injects the html in the view .
This is a generic question about directive not related to this specific case only .
You could add your own validation in the link function
app.directive('customDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope : {
data : "=data", ...
} ,
templateUrl: function(element, attr) {
// HTML file path
},
link: function(scope, element, attrs){
if(!data){
element.remove();
}
}
}
});
I'm not sure if there's a more official way though

Directive to directive communication using a service

I am attempting to perform the following. Use one directive to set information in a service.
Use another directive to retrieve information from this service. The directive setting the information seems to be doing it's job fine, however the one receiving the information does not react to it.
Below are how the directives look:
app.service('theStore',function(){
this.data;
});
app.directive('theOneThatSets', ['theStore', function(theStore){
return {
restrict: 'E',
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
element.click(function(event){
theStore.data = attrs.val;
});
}
};
}]);
app.directive('theOneThatReads', ['theStore', function(theStore){
return {
restrict: 'E',
template: '<stong>Received Text is - {{receivedValue}}</strong>',
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope.$watch('theStore.data',function(newVal){
scope.receivedValue = theStore.data;
});
}
};
}]);
plnkr here: http://plnkr.co/edit/9EMIwhUcneQoopNqqWtV
I don't know if you can do watchers on things that are not in scope. The best way to communicate between controllers/services/directives is to use $rootScope, $broadcast, and $on.
Example using your code:
app.directive('theOneThatSets', ['$rootScope', function(theStore){
return {
restrict: 'E',
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
element.click(function(event){
//theStore.data = attrs.val;
$rootScope.$broadcast('changeThisValue', attrs.val); // Send
});
}
};
}]);
app.directive('theOneThatReads', [function(theStore){
return {
restrict: 'E',
template: '<stong>Received Text is - {{receivedValue}}</strong>',
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope.$on('changeThisValue', function($event, value){
scope.receivedValue = theStore.data;
});
}
};
}]);
also, try creating a listener in your service like so:
app.service('myservice',function(){
this.listen = function($scope) {
$scope.$watch(function(){return someScopeValue},function(){
//$scope.dosomestuff();
});
}
});
//your controller
function myCtrl($scope,myservice) {
$scope.listen = function() {
myservice.listen($scope);
}
//call your method
$scope.listen();
}

Resources