AngularAMD + ui-router + dynamic controller name? - angularjs

I'm trying to write a generalized route in my application and resolve the view and controller names on the fly based on the route params.
I have the following code that works:
$stateProvider.state('default', angularAMD.route({
url: '/:module/:action?id',
templateUrl: function (params) {
var module = params.module;
var action = module + params.action.charAt(0).toUpperCase()
+ params.action.substr(1);
return 'app/views/' + module + '/' + action + 'View.html';
},
controller: 'userController',
}));
However, I'm unable to figure out a way to resolve the controller name dynamically. I tried using resolve as described here, but ui-router seems to handle resolve differently than angular-route.
Any pointers?
EDIT: I've already tried using controllerProvider but it doesn't work for me (for instance, the following code just returns a hard coded controller name to test whether it actually works):
controllerProvider: function () {
return 'userController';
}
Gives me the following error:
Error: [ng:areq] Argument 'userController' is not a function, got undefined
http://errors.angularjs.org/1.3.3/ng/areq?p0=userController&p1=not%20aNaNunction%2C%20got%20undefined

This is a link to working plunker.
solution
We need two features of the UI-Router:
resolve (to load the missing pieces of js code)
controllerProvider (see cites from documentation below)
angularAMD - main.js definition
This would be our main.js, which contains smart conversion controllerName - controllerPath:
require.config({
//baseUrl: "js/scripts",
baseUrl: "",
// alias libraries paths
paths: {
"angular": "angular",
"ui-router": "angular-ui-router",
"angularAMD": "angularAMD",
"DefaultCtrl": "Controller_Default",
"OtherCtrl": "Controller_Other",
},
shim: {
"angularAMD": ["angular"],
"ui-router": ["angular"],
},
deps: ['app']
});
controllers:
// Controller_Default.js
define(['app'], function (app) {
app.controller('DefaultCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.title = "from default";
});
});
// Controller_Other.js
define(['app'], function (app) {
app.controller('OtherCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.title = "from other";
});
});
app.js
Firstly we would need some method converting the param (e.g. id) into controller name. For our test purposes let's use this naive implementation:
var controllerNameByParams = function($stateParams)
{
// naive example of dynamic controller name mining
// from incoming state params
var controller = "OtherCtrl";
if ($stateParams.id === 1) {
controller = "DefaultCtrl";
}
return controller;
}
.state()
And that would be finally our state definition
$stateProvider
.state("default", angularAMD.route({
url: "/{id:int}",
templateProvider: function($stateParams)
{
if ($stateParams.id === 1)
{
return "<div>ONE - Hallo {{title}}</div>";
}
return "<div>TWO - Hallo {{title}}</div>";
},
resolve: {
loadController: ['$q', '$stateParams',
function ($q, $stateParams)
{
// get the controller name === here as a path to Controller_Name.js
// which is set in main.js path {}
var controllerName = controllerNameByParams($stateParams);
var deferred = $q.defer();
require([controllerName], function () { deferred.resolve(); });
return deferred.promise;
}]
},
controllerProvider: function ($stateParams)
{
// get the controller name === here as a dynamic controller Name
var controllerName = controllerNameByParams($stateParams);
return controllerName;
},
}));
Check it here, in this working example
documentation
As documented here: $stateProvider, for a state(name, stateConfig) we can use controller and controllerProvider. Some extract from documentation:
controllerProvider
...
controller (optional) stringfunction
Controller fn that should be associated with newly related scope or the name of a registered controller if passed as a string. Optionally, the ControllerAs may be declared here.
controller: "MyRegisteredController"
controller:
"MyRegisteredController as fooCtrl"}
controller: function($scope, MyService) {
$scope.data = MyService.getData(); }
controllerProvider (optional) function
Injectable provider function that returns the actual controller or string.
controllerProvider:
function(MyResolveData) {
if (MyResolveData.foo)
return "FooCtrl"
else if (MyResolveData.bar)
return "BarCtrl";
else return function($scope) {
$scope.baz = "Qux";
}
}
...
resolve
resolve (optional) object
An optional map<string, function> of dependencies which should be injected into the controller. If any of these dependencies are promises, the router will wait for them ALL to be resolved before the controller is instantiated...
I.e. let's use controllerProvider:
... to resolve the controller name dynamically...
In case, that you managed to get here, maybe you'd like to check another similar solution with RequireJS - angular-ui-router with requirejs, lazy loading of controller

Related

Passing an object from route to Controller via Route Provider resolve

I am trying to pass a variable from the resolve method of the $routeProvider to the controller that would be used for this route.
but what happens is the object is being resolved but the controller does not wait till the resolution of the object.
here is a snippet from the code i am using:
app.config(["$locationProvider", "$routeProvider", "$httpProvider", function ($locationProvider, $routeProvider, $httpProvider) {
$locationProvider.hashPrefix('');
.when("/EditProduct/:id",
{
templateUrl: "App/Products/editProductView.html",
controller: "EditProductCtrl as vm",
resolve: {
product: function (productsResource, $route, $routeParams) {
console.log($route.current.params.id);
return productsResource.getProductById().get({ id: $route.current.params.id }, function (data) {
console.log("inside the resolved function");
console.log(data.Name);
return data;
})
}
}
})
.otherwise({ redirectTo: "/" });
so the log message with the name from the app.js statement is shown.
while the controller has the supposedly resolved product injected as follows:
(function () {
"use strict";
angular.module("ProductManagementTool").controller("EditProductCtrl", ["product","productsResource", "currentUser", EditUserCtrl]);
function EditProductCtrl(product, productsResource, currentUser) {
var editCtrlViewModel = this;
console.log("the full name is " + product.Name);
editCtrlViewModel.product = product;
editCtrlViewModel.title = "Edit: " + product.Name;
}
}());
while the log message in the controller is shown as undefined.
i am using angular js 1.6.1 .
Controller won't wait, cause resolved element is a Promise returned by $resource (I presume you use $resource). You should make something like this:
var editCtrlViewModel = this;
product.$promise.then(function (element) {
editCtrlViewModel.product = element;
editCtrlViewModel.title = "Edit: " + element.Name;
})

ui-router resolve is not working with the index page controller

I want to resolve some value before I load the first page of my application, but it kept telling me
Unknown provider: programClassSummaryProvider <- programClassSummary <- HomeCtrl
I pretty sure I did it correctly, because I did the same thing for any other controller and routing. but it is not working for my homepage controller.
It seems like it load the controller first, before it is resolved in the routing. Anything wrong with my code?
In routing.js
$stateProvider
.state('home', {
url: '/home',
controller: 'HomeCtrl',
controllerAs: 'vm',
templateUrl: 'index_main.html',
resolve: {
programClassSummary: ['GroupDataFactory', function (groupDf) {
return groupDf.getProgramClassSummary();
}]
},
ncyBreadcrumb: {
skip: true
}
});
in controller.js
angular
.module('issMccApp')
.controller('HomeCtrl', homeCtrl);
homeCtrl.$inject = ['$scope', '$location', '$state', '$auth', 'programClassSummary'];
/* #ngInject */
function homeCtrl($scope, $location, $state, $auth, programClassSummary) {
var vm = this;
vm.isAuthenticated = isAuthenticated;
vm.programClassSummary = programClassSummary;
if (!$auth.isAuthenticated()) {
$state.go('login');
return;
}
function isAuthenticated() {
return $auth.isAuthenticated();
}
}
in factory.js
function getProgramClassSummary(showAll) {
var query = "";
if (showAll)
query = APIConfigObj.base_url + '/api/group/infor/programclasssummary?all=1';
else
query = APIConfigObj.base_url + '/api/group/infor/programclasssummary';
return $http.get(query)
.success(function (result) {
return result;
})
.error(function (err) {
return err;
})
}
I'd say, we really have to distinguish the UI-Router state world, and angular itself. Reason why is clearly defined here (extracted $resolve from UI-Router API documentation):
$resolve
resolve(invocables, locals, parent, self)
Resolves a set of invocables. An invocable is a function to be invoked via $injector.invoke(), and can have an arbitrary number of dependencies. An invocable can either return a value directly, or a $q promise. If a promise is returned it will be resolved and the resulting value will be used instead. Dependencies of invocables are resolved (in this order of precedence)
from the specified locals
from another invocable that is part of this $resolve call
from an invocable that is inherited from a parent call to $resolve (or recursively
from any ancestor $resolve of that parent).
There is a wroking plunker, which uses this index.html
<body ng-controller="RootCtrl">
a summary for a root:
<pre>{{summary}}</pre>
<ul>
<li>home
<li>other
</ul>
<div ui-view=""></div>
So, here we use some RootCtrl, which won't go through state machine UI-Router, it is angular basic stuff
The root controller must be defined as
.controller('RootCtrl', ['$scope', 'GroupDataFactory', function ($scope, groupDf) {
$scope.summary = groupDf.getProgramClassSummary();
}])
For a state home, we can use different approach, in fact the same as above (simplifed version below)
.state('home', {
url: "/home",
templateUrl: 'tpl.home.html',
resolve: {
programClassSummary: ['GroupDataFactory', function (groupDf) {
return groupDf.getProgramClassSummary();
}]
},
controller: 'HomeCtrl',
})
And its controller is now able to consume the locals
.controller('HomeCtrl', ['$scope', 'programClassSummary', function ($scope, summary) {
$scope.summaryForHome = summary;
}])
Check it in action here

lazy loading angularjs controllers with ui-router resolve

I'm trying to get to work angular.js, ui-router, and require.js and feel quite confused. I tried to follow this tutorial http://ify.io/lazy-loading-in-angularjs/. First, let me show you my code:
app.js =>
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.config(function ($stateProvider, $controllerProvider, $compileProvider, $filterProvider, $provide) {
$stateProvider.state('home',
{
templateUrl: 'tmpl/home-template.html',
url: '/',
controller: 'registration'
resolve: {
deps: function ($q, $rootScope) {
var deferred = $q.defer(),
dependencies = ["registration"];
require(dependencies, function () {
$rootScope.$apply(function () {
deferred.resolve();
});
})
return deferred.$promise;
}
}
}
);
app.lazy = {
controller: $controllerProvider.register,
directive: $compileProvider.directive,
filter: $filterProvider.register,
factory: $provide.factory,
service: $provide.service
};
});
Now in my registration.js I have following code:
define(["app"], function (app) {
app.lazy.controller("registration" , ["$scope", function ($scope) {
// The code here never runs
$scope.message = "hello world!";
}]);
});
everything works well, even the code in registration.js is run. but the problem is code inside controller function is never run and I get the error
Error: [ng:areq] http://errors.angularjs.org/1.2.23/ng/areq?p0=registration&p1=not a function, got undefined
Which seems my code does not register controller function successfully. Any Ideas?
P.s. In ui-router docs it is said "If any of these dependencies are promises, they will be resolved and converted to a value before the controller is instantiated and the $routeChangeSuccess event is fired." But if I put the deferred.resolve(); from mentioned code inside a timeOut and run it after say 5 seconds, my controller code is run and my view is rendered before resolve, Strange.
Seems like I ran into the exact same problem, following the exact same tutorial that you did, but using ui-router. The solution for me was to:
Make sure the app.controllerProvider was available to lazy controller script. It looked like you did this using app.lazy {...}, which a really nice touch BTW :)
Make sure the lazy ctrl script uses define() and not require() I couldn't tell from your code if you had done this.
Here is my ui-router setup with the public app.controllerProvider method:
app.config(function ($stateProvider, $controllerProvider, $filterProvider, $provide, $urlRouterProvider) {
app.lazy = {
controller: $controllerProvider.register,
directive: $compileProvider.directive,
filter: $filterProvider.register,
factory: $provide.factory,
service: $provide.service
};
$urlRouterProvider.otherwise('/');
$stateProvider
.state('app', {
url:'/',
})
.state('app.view-a', {
views: {
'page#': {
templateUrl: 'view-a.tmpl.html',
controller: 'ViewACtrl',
resolve: {
deps: function ($q, $rootScope) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
var dependencies = [
'view-a.ctrl',
];
require(dependencies, function() {
$rootScope.$apply(function() {
deferred.resolve();
});
});
return deferred.promise;
}
}
}
}
});
});
Then in my lazy loaded controller I noticed that I had to use require(['app']), like this:
define(['app'], function (app) {
return app.lazy.controller('ViewACtrl', function($scope){
$scope.somethingcool = 'Cool!';
});
});
Source on GitHub: https://github.com/F1LT3R/angular-lazy-load
Demo on Plunker: http://plnkr.co/edit/XU7MIXGAnU3kd6CITWE7
Changing you're state's url to '' should do the trick. '' is root example.com/, '/' is example.com/#/.
I came to give my 2 cents. I saw you already resolved it, I just want to add a comment if someone else have a similar problem.
I was having a very similar issue, but I had part of my code waiting for the DOM to load, so I just called it directly (not using the "$(document).ready") and it worked.
$(document).ready(function() { /*function was being called here*/ });
And that solved my issue. Probably a different situation tho but I was having the same error.

angular-ui-router with requirejs, lazy loading of controller

Could you help me to understand how to load controller in the example below before the view? It looks like the view is loaded just immediately while the controller is not loaded yet.
//app.js
$stateProvider.state('index', {
url: "/",
views: {
"topMenu": {
templateUrl: "/Home/TopMenu",
controller: function($scope, $injector) {
require(['controllers/top-menu-controller'], function(module) {
$injector.invoke(module, this, { '$scope': $scope });
});
}
}
}
});
//top-menu-controller.js
define(['app'], function (app) {
app.controller('TopMenuCtrl', ['$scope', function ($scope) {
$scope.message = "It works";
}]);
});
//Home/TopMenu
<h3>TopMenu</h3>
<div ng-controller="TopMenuCtrl">
{{message}}
</div>
I created working plunker here.
Let's have this index.html:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>my lazy</title>
</head>
<body ng-app="app">
#/home // we have three states - 'home' is NOT lazy
#/ - index // 'index' is lazy, with two views
#/other // 'other' is lazy with unnamed view
<div data-ui-view="topMenu"></div>
<div data-ui-view=""></div>
<script src="angular.js"></script> // standard angular
<script src="angular-ui-router.js"></script> // and ui-router scritps
<script src="script.js"></script> // our application
<script data-main="main.js" // lazy dependencies
src="require.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
Let's observe the main.js - the RequireJS config:
require.config({
//baseUrl: "js/scripts",
baseUrl: "",
// alias libraries paths
paths: {
// here we define path to NAMES
// to make controllers and their lazy-file-names independent
"TopMenuCtrl": "Controller_TopMenu",
"ContentCtrl": "Controller_Content",
"OtherCtrl" : "Controller_Other",
},
deps: ['app']
});
In fact, we only create aliases (paths) for our ControllerNames - and their Controller_Scripts.js files. That's it. Also, we return to require the app, but we will in our case use different feature later - to register lazily loaded controllers.
what does the deps: ['app'] mean? Firstly, we need to provide file app.js (the 'app' means find app.js) :
define([], function() {
var app = angular.module('app');
return app;
})
this returned value is the one we can ask for in every async loaded file
define(['app'], function (app) {
// here we would have access to the module("app")
});
How will we load controllers lazily? As already proven here for ngRoute
angularAMD v0.2.1
angularAMD is an utility that facilitates the use of RequireJS in AngularJS applications supporting on-demand loading of 3rd party modules such as angular-ui.
We will ask angular for a reference to $controllerProvider - and use it later, to register controllers.
This is the first part of our script.js:
// I. the application
var app = angular.module('app', [
"ui.router"
]);
// II. cached $controllerProvider
var app_cached_providers = {};
app.config(['$controllerProvider',
function(controllerProvider) {
app_cached_providers.$controllerProvider = controllerProvider;
}
]);
As we can see, we just created the application 'app' and also, created holder app_cached_providers (following the angularAMD style). In the config phase, we ask angular for $controllerProvider and keep reference for it.
Now let's continue in script.js:
// III. inline dependency expression
app.config(['$stateProvider', '$urlRouterProvider',
function($stateProvider, $urlRouterProvider) {
$urlRouterProvider
.otherwise("/home");
$stateProvider
.state("home", {
url: "/home",
template: "<div>this is home - not lazily loaded</div>"
});
$stateProvider
.state("other", {
url: "/other",
template: "<div>The message from ctrl: {{message}}</div>",
controller: "OtherCtrl",
resolve: {
loadOtherCtrl: ["$q", function($q) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
require(["OtherCtrl"], function() { deferred.resolve(); });
return deferred.promise;
}],
},
});
}
]);
This part above shows two states declaration. One of them - 'home' is standard none lazy one. It's controller is implicit, but standard could be used.
The second is state named "other" which does target unnamed view ui-view="". And here we can firstly see, the lazy load. Inside of the resolve (see:)
Resolve
You can use resolve to provide your controller with content or data that is custom to the state. resolve is an optional map of dependencies which should be injected into the controller.
If any of these dependencies are promises, they will be resolved and converted to a value before the controller is instantiated and the $stateChangeSuccess event is fired.
With that in our suite, we know, that the controller (by its name) will be searched in angular repository once the resolve is finished:
// this controller name will be searched - only once the resolve is finished
controller: "OtherCtrl",
// let's ask RequireJS
resolve: {
loadOtherCtrl: ["$q", function($q) {
// wee need $q to wait
var deferred = $q.defer();
// and make it resolved once require will load the file
require(["OtherCtrl"], function() { deferred.resolve(); });
return deferred.promise;
}],
},
Good, now, as mentioned above, the main contains this alias def
// alias libraries paths
paths: {
...
"OtherCtrl" : "Controller_Other",
And that means, that the file "Controller_Other.js" will be searched and loaded. This is its content which does the magic. The most important here is use of previously cached reference to $controllerProvider
// content of the "Controller_Other.js"
define(['app'], function (app) {
// the Default Controller
// is added into the 'app' module
// lazily, and only once
app_cached_providers
.$controllerProvider
.register('OtherCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.message = "OtherCtrl";
});
});
the trick is not to use app.controller() but
$controllerProvider.Register
The $controller service is used by Angular to create new controllers. This provider allows controller registration via the register() method.
Finally there is another state definition, with more narrowed resolve... a try to make it more readable:
// IV ... build the object with helper functions
// then assign to state provider
var loadController = function(controllerName) {
return ["$q", function($q) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
require([controllerName], function() {deferred.resolve(); });
return deferred.promise;
}];
}
app.config(['$stateProvider', '$urlRouterProvider',
function($stateProvider, $urlRouterProvider) {
var index = {
url: "/",
views: {
"topMenu": {
template: "<div>The message from ctrl: {{message}}</div>",
controller: "TopMenuCtrl",
},
"": {
template: "<div>The message from ctrl: {{message}}</div>",
controller: "ContentCtrl",
},
},
resolve : { },
};
index.resolve.loadTopMenuCtrl = loadController("TopMenuCtrl");
index.resolve.loadContentCtrl = loadController("ContentCtrl");
$stateProvider
.state("index", index);
}]);
Above we can see, that we resolve two controllers for both/all named views of that state
That's it. Each controller defined here
paths: {
"TopMenuCtrl": "Controller_TopMenu",
"ContentCtrl": "Controller_Content",
"OtherCtrl" : "Controller_Other",
...
},
will be loaded via resolve and $controllerProvider - via RequireJS - lazily. Check that all here
Similar Q & A: AngularAMD + ui-router + dynamic controller name?
On one project I used lazy loading of controllers and had to manually call a $digest on the scope to have it working. I guess that this behavior does not change with ui-router.
Did you try that ?
define(['app'], function (app) {
app.controller('TopMenuCtrl', ['$scope', function ($scope) {
$scope.message = "It works";
$scope.$digest();
}]);
});

Using resolve in $routeProvider causes 'Unknown provider ...'

I am trying to do an asynchronous http request to load some data before my app loads and so I am using a resolve in $routeProvider which is an http request in my MainController. For some reason, I keep getting Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: appDataProvider <- appData where appData is where I do my http request. I am using AngularJS v 1.2.5.
Here is the code and two methods that I tried that both give the same error:
Method #1
MainController.js
var MainController = ['$scope','$location','appData',
function($scope, $location, appData){
console.log(appData.data);
}
];
MainController.loadData = {
appData: function($http, $location, MainFactory){
var aid = MainFactory.extractAid($location);
return $http({method: 'GET', url: URL_CONST + aid});
}
};
app.js
var app = angular.module('HAY', ['ngRoute']);
app.config(function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider
.when('/', {
redirectTo: '/pages/alerts'
})
.when('/pages/:pageName', {
templateUrl: function(params) {
return 'views/pages/' + params.pageName + '.html';
},
controller: MainController,
resolve: MainController.loadData
})
.otherwise({
redirectTo: '/pages/alerts'
});
});
I tried changing the name in case it was a conflicting system reserved keyword but with no luck. For some reason, appData is never recognized
Method #2
I also tried changing it around like so:
app.js
var app = angular.module('HEY', ['ngRoute']);
app.config(function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider
.when('/', {
redirectTo: '/pages/alerts'
})
.when('/pages/:pageName', {
templateUrl: function(params) {
return 'views/pages/' + params.pageName + '.html';
},
controller: MainController,
resolve: {
appData: ['$http', '$location','MainFactory', function($http, $location, MainFactory) {
var aid = MainFactory.extractAid($location);
return $http({method: 'GET', url: URL_CONST + aid});
}]
}
})
.otherwise({
redirectTo: '/pages/alerts'
});
});
MainController.js
var MainController = ['$scope','$location','appData',
function($scope, $location, appData){
console.log(resolvedData);
}
];
However, the result was exactly the same. Does this have something to do with angular 1.2.5 ?
Here is a working version from someone else
http://mhevery.github.io/angular-phonecat/app/#/phones
And here is the code:
function PhoneListCtrl($scope, phones) {
$scope.phones = phones;
$scope.orderProp = 'age';
}
PhoneListCtrl.resolve = {
phones: function(Phone) {
return Phone.query();
},
delay: function($q, $defer) {
var delay = $q.defer();
$defer(delay.resolve, 1000);
return delay.promise;
}
}
angular.module('phonecat', ['phonecatFilters', 'phonecatServices', 'phonecatDirectives']).
config(['$routeProvider', function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.
when('/phones', {templateUrl: 'partials/phone-list.html', controller: PhoneListCtrl, resolve: PhoneListCtrl.resolve}).
otherwise({redirectTo: '/phones'});
}]);
Here's an example of the code I've used in the application I'm working on, not sure it will help much because its not much different than how you have it already.
Routing
.when('/view/proposal/:id',{
controller : 'viewProposalCtrl',
templateURL : 'tmpls/get/proposal/view',
resolve : viewProposalCtrl.resolveViewProposal
})
Controller
var viewProposalCtrl = angular.module('proposal.controllers')
.controller('viewProposalCtrl',['$scope','contacts','details','rationale',
function($scope,contacts,details,rationale){
$scope.contacts = contacts;
$scope.details = details;
$scope.rationale = rationale;
// [ REST OF CONTROLLER CODE ]
});
// proposalSrv is a factory service
viewProposalCtrl.resolveViewProposal = {
contacts : ['$route','proposalSrv',function($route,proposalSrv){
return proposalSrv.get('Contacts',$route.current.params.id)
.then(function(data){
return data.data.contacts;
},function(){
return [];
});
}],
details : ['$route','proposalSrv',function($route,proposalSrv){
return proposalSrv.get('Details',$route.current.params.id)
.then(function(data){
return data.data.details;
},function(){
return {};
});
}],
rationale : ['$route','proposalSrv',function($route,proposalSrv){
return proposalSrv.get('Rationale',$route.current.params.id)
.then(function(data){
return data.data.rationale;
},function(){
return {};
]
}]
};
Now that I think about it, when I was developing my application I did have a problem and not sure why when I named my resolve function "resolve." This gave me a problem:
.when('/path',{
// stuff here
resolve : myCtrlr.resolve
})
but this did not:
.when('/path',{
//stuff here
resolve : myCtrlr.myResolveFn
})
Another Possibility
The only other thing I can think of, is that you're returning the promise from the $http call and then trying to use appData.data Try using the .then function or one of the other functions (.success,.error) to retrieve the information from the promise.
The problem was NOT due to previously using different version of AngularJS.
Here are the fixes using the code that I have above.
In app.js, you need to declare the controller as controller: 'MainController' and NOT as controller: MainController even though you have var MainController = app.controller('MainController', ....).
Second and biggest thing was that in my index.html I declared my controller already like so:
index.html
body ng-app="HEY" controller="MainController" /body
This was causing the whole Unknown provider error Apparently angular wont tell you that you have already declared the controller that you are using to do the resolve it and that that will cause a weird error that have nothing to do with the resolve.
I hope this helps someone who may have the same problem.
One thing I noticed in angular 1x docs is that YOU DO NOT SPECIFY THE RESOLVED PARAMETER AS AN ANNOTATED DEPENDENCY
So this:
.when('/somewhere', {
template: '<some-component></some-component>',
resolve: {
resolvedFromRouter: () => someService.fetch()
}
})
export default [
'$scope',
'someService',
'resolvedFromRouter'
Controller
]
function Controller($scope, someService, resolvedFromRouter) {
// <= unknown provider "resolvedFromRouter"
}
is wrong. You don't specify the resolved parameter as a dependency, in the docs:
For easier access to the resolved dependencies from the template, the resolve map will be available on the scope of the route, under $resolve (by default) or a custom name specified by the resolveAs property (see below). This can be particularly useful, when working with components as route templates.
So just do this instead:
.when('/somewhere', {
template: '<some-component></some-component>',
resolve: {
resolvedFromRouter: () => someService.fetch()
}
})
export default [
'$scope',
'someService',
Controller
]
function Controller($scope, someService) {
$scope.$resolve.resolvedFromRouter; // <= injected here
}

Resources