Use an array of values for a slider - arrays

I want to use an array of id, for my little slider-viewer I'm building. I just want to display multiple things using 2 buttons next and previous.
For now I use something like this, using only 2 url id, but I need at least 20 urlid in my viewer :
var urlid1 = 'd3885ca76ac54e958c2855a4fbd3dbf3';
var urlid2 = '3aa64527d1614998b4812bfefbbc896a';
function Next() {
client.init( urlid2 );
}
function Previous() {
client.init( urlid1 ); }
So I've never use an array before, and the things I tried didn't work. Do you know a proper way to do that ?

This seems straight forward enough
var index = 0;
var array = ["url1", "url2", "url3", ...]
function next() {
index++;
if(index > array.length) {
index = 0;
}
client.init(array[index]);
}
function previous() {
index--;
if(index < 0) {
index = array.length;
}
client.init(array[index]);
}
It may be better practice to actually refactor those changes to the index variable to other functions to enable reuse, but this should give you an idea of how it is done.
If client is something that you have wrote then you might want to look at the naming of your functions, init is normally reserved for instantiating the class as new, from your example you seem to be changing a resource so you may want a function name like client.show(); or client.update();

Thank's Varedis.
Final code is :
var index = 0;
var array = ["0e4b4e0789bf41c7b05129a76de0abb0","3aa64527d1614998b4812bfefbbc896a","d3885ca76ac54e958c2855a4fbd3dbf3","8f927023e10c40b9b22d3c13df7c08aa"];
client.init(array[index]);
function next() {
index++;
if(index >= array.length) {
index = 0;
}
client.init(array[index]);
}
function previous() {
index--;
if(index < 0 ) {
index = array.length-1;
}
client.init(array[index]);
}
I had to use " index = array.length-1; " but I can't explain it. You know why ? How index could be 5 if I only have 4 values ?

Related

How to check whether array includes certain value google Apps Script

I'm using range.getValues() to load an array in Google Apps Script.
I want to loop through the array and do something if the array includes the value I'm looking for.
if (array.include("abc")){*doSomething*}
The problem is when I use this method, the array contain another arrays, so array.include() doesn't work.
I can use a workaround like this:
for (var i = 0; i<=array.length; i++){
if (array[i] == "abc"){*doSomething*}
I wonder are there a better way to do it?
I tried to use array.indexOf() but it returns -1 for 0th value, which is weird
function find() {
const ss=SpreadsheetApp.getActive();
const sh=ss.getSheetByName('Sheet1');
const haystack=sh.getDataRange().getValues();
const needle="44";
let found = false;
haystack.forEach(r=>{
r.forEach(c=>{
if(c==needle) {
found=true;
}
})
});
if(found) {
SpreadsheetApp.getUi().alert('Needle was found in haystack');
}
}
or
function find() {
const ss=SpreadsheetApp.getActive();
const sh=ss.getSheetByName('Sheet1');
const haystack=sh.getDataRange().getValues();
const needle="44";
let found = false;
haystack.forEach(r=>{
if(~r.indexOf(needle)) {
found=true;
}
});
if(found) {
SpreadsheetApp.getUi().alert('Needle was found in haystack');
}
}
Recommendation:
Alternatively, you can also try this way:
function arrayCheck(){
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getActiveSheet();
var arr = ss.getDataRange().getValues(); //Get all values from sheet
Logger.log(arr);
arr.forEach(function(res) {
if(res == 'abc'){
Logger.log("Found a match");
//do something
}else{
Logger.log(res+" does not match abc");
}
});
}
Here's a sample sheet where I've got all the array values from:
Here's the result:

Best way to get an element using its id from an array in Angular [duplicate]

I've got an array:
myArray = [{'id':'73','foo':'bar'},{'id':'45','foo':'bar'}, etc.]
I'm unable to change the structure of the array. I'm being passed an id of 45, and I want to get 'bar' for that object in the array.
How do I do this in JavaScript or using jQuery?
Use the find() method:
myArray.find(x => x.id === '45').foo;
From MDN:
The find() method returns the first value in the array, if an element in the array satisfies the provided testing function. Otherwise undefined is returned.
If you want to find its index instead, use findIndex():
myArray.findIndex(x => x.id === '45');
From MDN:
The findIndex() method returns the index of the first element in the array that satisfies the provided testing function. Otherwise -1 is returned.
If you want to get an array of matching elements, use the filter() method instead:
myArray.filter(x => x.id === '45');
This will return an array of objects. If you want to get an array of foo properties, you can do this with the map() method:
myArray.filter(x => x.id === '45').map(x => x.foo);
Side note: methods like find() or filter(), and arrow functions are not supported by older browsers (like IE), so if you want to support these browsers, you should transpile your code using Babel (with the polyfill).
As you are already using jQuery, you can use the grep function which is intended for searching an array:
var result = $.grep(myArray, function(e){ return e.id == id; });
The result is an array with the items found. If you know that the object is always there and that it only occurs once, you can just use result[0].foo to get the value. Otherwise you should check the length of the resulting array. Example:
if (result.length === 0) {
// no result found
} else if (result.length === 1) {
// property found, access the foo property using result[0].foo
} else {
// multiple items found
}
Another solution is to create a lookup object:
var lookup = {};
for (var i = 0, len = array.length; i < len; i++) {
lookup[array[i].id] = array[i];
}
... now you can use lookup[id]...
This is especially interesting if you need to do many lookups.
This won't need much more memory since the IDs and objects will be shared.
ECMAScript 2015 (JavaScript ES6) provides the find()
method on arrays:
var myArray = [
{id:1, name:"bob"},
{id:2, name:"dan"},
{id:3, name:"barb"},
]
// grab the Array item which matchs the id "2"
var item = myArray.find(item => item.id === 2);
// print
console.log(item.name);
It works without external libraries. But if you want older browser support you might want to include this polyfill.
Underscore.js has a nice method for that:
myArray = [{'id':'73','foo':'bar'},{'id':'45','foo':'bar'},etc.]
obj = _.find(myArray, function(obj) { return obj.id == '45' })
I think the easiest way would be the following, but it won't work on Internet Explorer 8 (or earlier):
var result = myArray.filter(function(v) {
return v.id === '45'; // Filter out the appropriate one
})[0].foo; // Get result and access the foo property
Try the following
function findById(source, id) {
for (var i = 0; i < source.length; i++) {
if (source[i].id === id) {
return source[i];
}
}
throw "Couldn't find object with id: " + id;
}
myArray.filter(function(a){ return a.id == some_id_you_want })[0]
A generic and more flexible version of the findById function above:
// array = [{key:value},{key:value}]
function objectFindByKey(array, key, value) {
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i][key] === value) {
return array[i];
}
}
return null;
}
var array = [{'id':'73','foo':'bar'},{'id':'45','foo':'bar'}];
var result_obj = objectFindByKey(array, 'id', '45');
Performance
Today 2020.06.20 I perform test on MacOs High Sierra on Chrome 81.0, Firefox 77.0 and Safari 13.1 for chosen solutions.
Conclusions for solutions which use precalculations
Solutions with precalculations (K,L) are (much much) faster than other solutions and will not be compared with them - probably they are use some special build-in browser optimisations
surprisingly on Chrome and Safari solution based on Map (K) are much faster than solution based on object {} (L)
surprisingly on Safari for small arrays solution based on object {} (L) is slower than traditional for (E)
surprisingly on Firefox for small arrays solution based on Map (K) is slower than traditional for (E)
Conclusions when searched objects ALWAYS exists
solution which use traditional for (E) is fastest for small arrays and fast for big arrays
solution using cache (J) is fastest for big arrays - surprisingly for small arrays is medium fast
solutions based on find (A) and findIndex (B) are fast for small arras and medium fast on big arrays
solution based on $.map (H) is slowest on small arrays
solution based on reduce (D) is slowest on big arrays
Conclusions when searched objects NEVER exists
solution based on traditional for (E) is fastest on small and big arrays (except Chrome-small arrays where it is second fast)
solution based on reduce (D) is slowest on big arrays
solution which use cache (J) is medium fast but can be speed up if we save in cache also keys which have null values (which was not done here because we want to avoid unlimited memory consumption in cache in case when many not existing keys will be searched)
Details
For solutions
without precalculations: A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J (the J solution use 'inner' cache and it speed depend on how often searched elements will repeat)
with precalculations
K
L
I perform four tests. In tests I want to find 5 objects in 10 loop iterations (the objects ID not change during iterations) - so I call tested method 50 times but only first 5 times have unique id values:
small array (10 elements) and searched object ALWAYS exists - you can perform it HERE
big array (10k elements) and searched object ALWAYS exist - you can perform it HERE
small array (10 elements) and searched object NEVER exists - you can perform it HERE
big array (10k elements) and searched object NEVER exists - you can perform it HERE
Tested codes are presented below
function A(arr, id) {
return arr.find(o=> o.id==id);
}
function B(arr, id) {
let idx= arr.findIndex(o=> o.id==id);
return arr[idx];
}
function C(arr, id) {
return arr.filter(o=> o.id==id)[0];
}
function D(arr, id) {
return arr.reduce((a, b) => (a.id==id && a) || (b.id == id && b));
}
function E(arr, id) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) if (arr[i].id==id) return arr[i];
return null;
}
function F(arr, id) {
var retObj ={};
$.each(arr, (index, obj) => {
if (obj.id == id) {
retObj = obj;
return false;
}
});
return retObj;
}
function G(arr, id) {
return $.grep(arr, e=> e.id == id )[0];
}
function H(arr, id) {
return $.map(myArray, function(val) {
return val.id == id ? val : null;
})[0];
}
function I(arr, id) {
return _.find(arr, o => o.id==id);
}
let J = (()=>{
let cache = new Map();
return function J(arr,id,el=null) {
return cache.get(id) || (el=arr.find(o=> o.id==id), cache.set(id,el), el);
}
})();
function K(arr, id) {
return mapK.get(id)
}
function L(arr, id) {
return mapL[id];
}
// -------------
// TEST
// -------------
console.log('Find id=5');
myArray = [...Array(10)].map((x,i)=> ({'id':`${i}`, 'foo':`bar_${i}`}));
const mapK = new Map( myArray.map(el => [el.id, el]) );
const mapL = {}; myArray.forEach(el => mapL[el.id]=el);
[A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L].forEach(f=> console.log(`${f.name}: ${JSON.stringify(f(myArray, '5'))}`));
console.log('Whole array',JSON.stringify(myArray));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js"></script>
This snippet only presents tested codes
Example tests results for Chrome for small array where searched objects always exists
As others have pointed out, .find() is the way to go when looking for one object within your array. However, if your object cannot be found using this method, your program will crash:
const myArray = [{'id':'73','foo':'bar'},{'id':'45','foo':'bar'}];
const res = myArray.find(x => x.id === '100').foo; // Uh oh!
/*
Error:
"Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'foo' of undefined"
or in newer chrome versions:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'foo')
*/
This can be fixed by checking whether the result of .find() is defined before using .foo on it. Modern JS allows us to do this easily with optional chaining, returning undefined if the object cannot be found, rather than crashing your code:
const myArray = [{'id':'73','foo':'bar'},{'id':'45','foo':'bar'}];
const res = myArray.find(x => x.id === '100')?.foo; // No error!
console.log(res); // undefined when the object cannot be found
If you do this multiple times, you may set up a Map (ES6):
const map = new Map( myArray.map(el => [el.id, el]) );
Then you can simply do a O(1) lookup:
map.get(27).foo
You can get this easily using the map() function:
myArray = [{'id':'73','foo':'bar'},{'id':'45','foo':'bar'}];
var found = $.map(myArray, function(val) {
return val.id == 45 ? val.foo : null;
});
//found[0] == "bar";
Working example: http://jsfiddle.net/hunter/Pxaua/
Using native Array.reduce
var array = [ {'id':'73' ,'foo':'bar'} , {'id':'45' ,'foo':'bar'} , ];
var id = 73;
var found = array.reduce(function(a, b){
return (a.id==id && a) || (b.id == id && b)
});
returns the object element if found, otherwise false
You can use filters,
function getById(id, myArray) {
return myArray.filter(function(obj) {
if(obj.id == id) {
return obj
}
})[0]
}
get_my_obj = getById(73, myArray);
While there are many correct answers here, many of them do not address the fact that this is an unnecessarily expensive operation if done more than once. In an extreme case this could be the cause of real performance problems.
In the real world, if you are processing a lot of items and performance is a concern it's much faster to initially build a lookup:
var items = [{'id':'73','foo':'bar'},{'id':'45','foo':'bar'}];
var lookup = items.reduce((o,i)=>o[i.id]=o,{});
you can then get at items in fixed time like this :
var bar = o[id];
You might also consider using a Map instead of an object as the lookup: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Map
Recently, I have to face the same thing in which I need to search the string from a huge array.
After some search I found It'll be easy to handle with simple code:
Code:
var items = mydata.filter(function(item){
return item.word.toLowerCase().startsWith( 'gk );
})
See https://jsfiddle.net/maheshwaghmare/cfx3p40v/4/
Iterate over any item in the array. For every item you visit, check that item's id. If it's a match, return it.
If you just want teh codez:
function getId(array, id) {
for (var i = 0, len = array.length; i < len; i++) {
if (array[i].id === id) {
return array[i];
}
}
return null; // Nothing found
}
And the same thing using ECMAScript 5's Array methods:
function getId(array, id) {
var obj = array.filter(function (val) {
return val.id === id;
});
// Filter returns an array, and we just want the matching item.
return obj[0];
}
You may try out Sugarjs from http://sugarjs.com/.
It has a very sweet method on Arrays, .find. So you can find an element like this:
array.find( {id: 75} );
You may also pass an object with more properties to it to add another "where-clause".
Note that Sugarjs extends native objects, and some people consider this very evil...
As long as the browser supports ECMA-262, 5th edition (December 2009), this should work, almost one-liner:
var bFound = myArray.some(function (obj) {
return obj.id === 45;
});
Here's how I'd go about it in pure JavaScript, in the most minimal manner I can think of that works in ECMAScript 3 or later. It returns as soon as a match is found.
var getKeyValueById = function(array, key, id) {
var testArray = array.slice(), test;
while(test = testArray.pop()) {
if (test.id === id) {
return test[key];
}
}
// return undefined if no matching id is found in array
return;
}
var myArray = [{'id':'73', 'foo':'bar'}, {'id':'45', 'foo':'bar'}]
var result = getKeyValueById(myArray, 'foo', '45');
// result is 'bar', obtained from object with id of '45'
More generic and short
function findFromArray(array,key,value) {
return array.filter(function (element) {
return element[key] == value;
}).shift();
}
in your case Ex. var element = findFromArray(myArray,'id',45) that will give you the whole element.
We can use Jquery methods $.each()/$.grep()
var data= [];
$.each(array,function(i){if(n !== 5 && i > 4){data.push(item)}}
or
var data = $.grep(array, function( n, i ) {
return ( n !== 5 && i > 4 );
});
use ES6 syntax:
Array.find, Array.filter, Array.forEach, Array.map
Or use Lodash https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.10#filter, Underscore https://underscorejs.org/#filter
Building on the accepted answer:
jQuery:
var foo = $.grep(myArray, function(e){ return e.id === foo_id})
myArray.pop(foo)
Or CoffeeScript:
foo = $.grep myArray, (e) -> e.id == foo_id
myArray.pop foo
Use Array.prototype.filter() function.
DEMO: https://jsfiddle.net/sumitridhal/r0cz0w5o/4/
JSON
var jsonObj =[
{
"name": "Me",
"info": {
"age": "15",
"favColor": "Green",
"pets": true
}
},
{
"name": "Alex",
"info": {
"age": "16",
"favColor": "orange",
"pets": false
}
},
{
"name": "Kyle",
"info": {
"age": "15",
"favColor": "Blue",
"pets": false
}
}
];
FILTER
var getPerson = function(name){
return jsonObj.filter(function(obj) {
return obj.name === name;
});
}
You can do this even in pure JavaScript by using the in built "filter" function for arrays:
Array.prototype.filterObjects = function(key, value) {
return this.filter(function(x) { return x[key] === value; })
}
So now simply pass "id" in place of key and "45" in place of value, and you will get the full object matching an id of 45. So that would be,
myArr.filterObjects("id", "45");
I really liked the answer provided by Aaron Digulla but needed to keep my array of objects so I could iterate through it later. So I modified it to
var indexer = {};
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
indexer[array[i].id] = parseInt(i);
}
//Then you can access object properties in your array using
array[indexer[id]].property
Use:
var retObj ={};
$.each(ArrayOfObjects, function (index, obj) {
if (obj.id === '5') { // id.toString() if it is int
retObj = obj;
return false;
}
});
return retObj;
It should return an object by id.
This solution may helpful as well:
Array.prototype.grep = function (key, value) {
var that = this, ret = [];
this.forEach(function (elem, index) {
if (elem[key] === value) {
ret.push(that[index]);
}
});
return ret.length < 2 ? ret[0] : ret;
};
var bar = myArray.grep("id","45");
I made it just like $.grep and if one object is find out, function will return the object, rather than an array.
Dynamic cached find
In this solution, when we search for some object, we save it in cache. This is middle point between "always search solutions" and "create hash-map for each object in precalculations".
let cachedFind = (()=>{
let cache = new Map();
return (arr,id,el=null) =>
cache.get(id) || (el=arr.find(o=> o.id==id), cache.set(id,el), el);
})();
// ---------
// TEST
// ---------
let myArray = [...Array(100000)].map((x,i)=> ({'id':`${i}`, 'foo':`bar_${i}`}));
// example usage
console.log( cachedFind(myArray,'1234').foo );
// Benchmark
let bench = (id) => {
console.time ('time for '+id );
console.log ( cachedFind(myArray,id).foo ); // FIND
console.timeEnd('time for '+id );
}
console.log('----- no cached -----');
bench(50000);
bench(79980);
bench(99990);
console.log('----- cached -----');
bench(79980); // cached
bench(99990); // cached

Angular 2: Delete object in Array

I want to delete an object in an array when that object's ID is equal to the ID of the object getting compared. Currently, it only removes the first object in the array
if(this.selectedProducts.length > 0){
for(let x of this.selectedProducts){
if(prod._id === x._id){
this.selectedProducts.splice(x,1); //this is the part where I 'delete' the object
this.appended = false;
}else{
this.appended = true;
}
}
if (this.appended) {
this.selectedProducts.push(prod);
}
}else{
this.selectedProducts.push(prod);
}
this.selectEvent.emit(this.selectedProducts);
}
this.selectedProducts.splice(x,1);
The first parameter to splice must be the index, not the object.
If you're using for...of, you can't get the index easily. So you should use a regular for loop instead. With some additional simplifications, your code would look like this:
for (let i = this.selectedProducts.length - 1; i >= 0; this.selectedProducts.length; i--) {
if (prod._id === this.selectProducts[i]._id) {
this.selectedProducts.splice(i, 1); //this is the part where I 'delete' the object
}
}
this.selectedProducts.push(prod);
It's highly likely that using filter would be better anyway:
this.selectedProducts = this.selectedProducts.filter(x => prod._id !== x._id).concat(prod);

AngularJS .destroy() shows console error, but works?

I use destroy() function something like this:
$scope.Cities[i].destroy();
Then when I use it my app works fine, but the console says:
$scope.Cities[i] is undefined
However without it, it doesn't work. Should I ignore the error?
MORE CODE
$scope.Somefunction= function (id) {
for (var i = 0; i < $scope.Cities.length; i++) {
if ($scope.Cities[i] == id) {
$scope.SpliceCities(i);
$scope.Cities[i].destroy();
}
}
$scope.SpliceCities = function(i) {
$scope.Cities.splice(i, 1);
};
}
Function is called on ng-click on country.
splice mutates the array, so the i index points to another element when calling destroy(). If i pointed to the last element before the splice, you get this error. Fortunately splice also returns the elements that were spliced out as an array, so try this:
$scope.Somefunction = function (id) {
for (var i = 0; i < $scope.Cities.length; i++) {
if ($scope.Cities[i].id == id) {
var spliced = $scope.Cities.splice(i, 1);
spliced[0].destroy();
break;
}
}
}

Difficulty returning an array of indexes of each element from an array that matches search term

Hi I am really struggling making code for a function that 'returns an array of indexes from an already populated array containing strings, when it matches the search term'.
So if the search term matches a word or characters in the element of the array regardless of its order, it should return the indexes in which those words are apparent in the array. Not using jquery grep feature.
Here is some code to illustrate what I mean.
array_test = ["Today was hot","Tomorrow will be hot aswell", "Yesterday the weather was not so good","o1234 t12345"]
function locateSearch(array_test,searchTerm){
var myArray = [];
for(i=0;i<array_test.length;i++){
if(...) // what should i be testing here, this is where i have been going wrong...
myArray[myArray.length] = i;
}
return myArray;
}
document.write(locateSearch,'ot') //this should return indexes [0,1,2,3]
Sorry If I have not explained this so well, appreciate your help. Thank you.
array_test = ["Today was hot","Tomorrow will be hot aswell", "Yesterday the weather was not so good","o1234 t12345"];
function locateSearch(array_test,searchTerm){
searchTerm = searchTerm.toLowerCase();
var myArray = [];
for(var i = 0; i < array_test.length; i++){
for(var j = 0; j < searchTerm.length; j++) {
if(array_test[i].toLowerCase().indexOf(searchTerm[j]) >= 0) {
myArray.push(i);
break;
}
}
}
return myArray;
}
alert(locateSearch(array_test, 'To').toString());
Also see this jsfiddle.
=== UPDATE ===
If every char has to be in the same string:
array_test = ["Today was hot","Tomorrow will be hot aswell", "Yesterday the weather was not so good","o1234 t12345"];
function locateSearch(array_test,searchTerm){
searchTerm = searchTerm.toLowerCase();
var myArray = [];
var bFound;
for(var i = 0; i < array_test.length; i++){
bFound = true;
for(var j = 0; j < searchTerm.length; j++) {
if(array_test[i].toLowerCase().indexOf(searchTerm[j]) == -1) {
bFound = false;
break;
}
}
if (bFound) {
myArray.push(i);
}
}
return myArray;
}
alert(locateSearch(array_test, 'es').toString());
Also see my updated jsfiddle.
if I understood your question correctly...
if(array_test[i].indexOf(searchTerm).toLowercase() != -1)
myArray.push(i);
You didn't mention if the search was case sensitive, but assuming it is I threw it in there
if you need your test to be case insensitive use the regEx match method instead of indexOf()
so... if(array[i].match(/searchTerm/i) != null){ myArray.push(i) }
Try this:
array_test = ["Today was hot","Tomorrow will be hot aswell", "Yesterday the weather was not so good","o1234 t12345"]
function locateSearch(array_test,searchTerm) {
var myArray = [];
for(i=0;i<array_test.length;i++) {
if(array_test[i].indexOf(searchTerm) != -1) // what should i be testing here, this is where i have been going wrong...
myArray.push(i);
}
return myArray;
}
document.write(locateSearch,'ot') //this should return indexes [0,1,2,3]
This will return indexes of all elements in array_test that contain the search term.

Resources