I have an ng-repeat. And I would like to change the class of just that element vs the entire group.
<button ng-class="defaultClass" ng-repeat="tube in node.Tubes" ng-click="toggleBtn(tube)">{{"Tube " + ($index + 1)}}</button>
with the above HTML on my ng-click I can pass the tube, which really only gives me the data passed from the API, if I console.log(this) I see the class name in an element called $$watchers but that seems odd to change it from there.
$scope.toggleBtn = function (element) {
console.log(element);
console.log(this);
}
In my controller I have $scope.defaultClass = "btn btn-off"; but if I change that with the function it changes every element.
How can I only change the class of the element clicked?
Continuing from the comments. Than you can't use $scope variable for that, because, as you said, it will be the same. TO solve this you need to use ng-class properly.
Docs: https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngClass (see an example at the bottom of the page)
<button ng-class="{'btn-on' : tube.toggled, 'btn-off' : !tube.toggled}" ng-repeat="tube in node.Tubes" ng-click="toggleBtn(tube)">{{"Tube " + ($index + 1)}}</button>
http://plnkr.co/edit/WKLJ45yRYu1583C2ZnfT?p=preview
I'm not sure I understand if that's what you want, but you can use:
<button class="btn" ng-repeat="tube in node.Tubes" ng-class="{'btn-off':!toggled, 'btn-on':toggled}" ng-click="toggled = !toggled">{{"Tube " + ($index + 1)}}</button>
no need to add any code to the controller in this case.
These other answers are excellent. However, I would like to point out another method for this. Let's say you were looping through an array of receipts. For example, in the controller you had receipts in scope:
$scope.receipts = [ ... ];
And on the front-end you were looping through these receipts:
<div ng-repeat="receipt in receipts">{{ receipt.[attribute] }}</div>
One way to keep track of unique classes is to add a "class" key to the receipt objects. For example a receipt would look like:
receipt { 'id': '1', 'class' : ' ... ' }
On the front-end, you would determine the class using ng-class:
<div ng-repeat="receipt in receipts">
<div ng-class="receipt.class"></div>
</div>
And then, you could pass the receipt and its ID to a toggleButton() method like so:
<div ng-repeat="receipt in receipts">
<div class="btn" ng-click="toggleClass(receipt.id)"></div>
<div ng-class="receipt.class"></div>
</div>
And then within the controller you could simply update the class for that particular receipt (assuming here there is a method getReceipt() that gets a receipt from the array $scope.receipts):
$scope.toggleClass = function(id) {
getReceipt(id).class = { ... }
}
This would dynamically change the class for that single receipt based on the logic within the toggleClass() function.
Related
Hi I am trying to dynamically add a class to an element that is updated on the view.
http://jsfiddle.net/9s1rfwa8/7/
<div ng-app>
<div ng-controller="TodoCtrl">
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="todo in todos" class="bigfont todo done-{{todo.done}}"> <span>{{todo.text}}</span>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
function TodoCtrl($scope) {
$scope.todos = [{
text: 'learn angular',
done: true
}, {
text: 'build a demo angular appsdfsdfsf',
done: false
}, {
text: 'build an awesome angular app',
done: false
}];
}
How do I add a class to the ng-repeat element that is only changed and not to others.
I am trying to give it a flip effect to the elements that changes.
Ng-repeat will duplicate element that is repeated. If you want to apply class to only one of the element repeated, then you need to add a condition e.g. $index === 0 to ng-class.
ng-class={'first-item-class': $index === 0}
this will apply to the first element only. Use any kind of condition logic to identify its the one you want to apply to.
You can use a custom filter for this, custom filter will be executed whenever there is a change.
For example you can change done property inside your todo object every time user clicks on the row and use the value of todo.done to set class inside your filter
html
<li ng-repeat="todo in todos | filter:handleChange"
class="bigfont todo done-{{todo.done}} {{todo.class}}"
ng-click="todo.done = !todo.done">
<span>{{todo.text}}</span>{{todo.class}}
</li>
js
$scope.handleChange = function(row){
if(!row.done){
row.class = '';
}
else{
row.class = 'changed'
}
return true;
}
this should give you a general idea on how to approach your problem, you can find a working sample in the following plunker.
Demo
I'm having an issue with ngRepeat :
I want to display a list of students in two different ways. In the first one they are filtered by group, and in the second they are not filtered.
The whole display being quite complex, I use a ngInclude with a template to display each student. I can switch between view by changing bClasseVue, each switch being followed by a $scope.$apply().
<div ng-if="currentCours.classesOfGroup !== undefined"
ng-show="bClassesVue">
<div ng-repeat="group in currentCours.classesOfGroup">
<br>
<h2>Classe : [[group.name]]</h2>
<div class="list-view">
<div class="twelve cell"
ng-repeat="eleve in group.eleves | orderBy:'lastName'"
ng-include="'liste_eleves.html'">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="list-view" ng-show="!bClassesVue">
<div class="twelve cell"
ng-repeat="eleve in currentCours.eleves.all"
ng-include="'liste_eleves.html'">
</div>
</div>
My problem happens when my list of students change (currentCours here). Instead of refreshing the ngRepeat, both lists concatenate, but only in the unfiltered view.
I tried adding some $scope.$apply in strategic places (and I synchronize my list for example) but it doesn't help.
EDIT : the function used to refresh currentCours in the controller. It's called when a "cours" is selected inside a menu.
$scope.selectCours = function (cours) {
$scope.bClassesVue = false;
$scope.currentCours = cours;
$scope.currentCours.eleves.sync().then(() => {
if ($scope.currentCours.classe.type_groupe === 1) {
let _elevesByGroup = _.groupBy($scope.currentCours.eleves.all, function (oEleve) {
return oEleve.className;
});
$scope.currentCours.classesOfGroup = [];
for(let group in _elevesByGroup) {
$scope.currentCours.classesOfGroup.push({
name: group,
eleves: _elevesByGroup[group]
});
}
$scope.bClassesVue = true;
}
});
utils.safeApply($scope);
};
Well, I found a workaround, but I still don't know why it didn't work, so if someone could write an explanation, I would be very thankful.
My solution was simply to open and close the template each time I switch between views.
I'm trying to make a minimal but fancy AngularJS tutorial example, and I am running into an issue where after updating the entire tree for a model (inside the scope of an ng-change update), a template that is driven by a top-level ng-repeat is not re-rendered at all.
However, if I add the code $scope.data = {} at a strategic place, it starts working; but then the display flashes instead of being nice and smooth. And it's not a great example of how AngularJS automatic data binding works.
What am I missing; and what would be the right fix?
Exact code - select a country from the dropdown -
This jsFiddle does not work: http://jsfiddle.net/f9zxt36g/
This jsFiddle works but flickers: http://jsfiddle.net/y090my10/
var app = angular.module('factbook', []);
app.controller('loadfact', function($scope, $http) {
$scope.country = 'europe/uk';
$scope.safe = function safe(name) { // Makes a safe CSS class name
return name.replace(/[_\W]+/g, '_').toLowerCase();
};
$scope.trunc = function trunc(text) { // Truncates text to 500 chars
return (text.length < 500) ? text : text.substr(0, 500) + "...";
};
$scope.update = function() { // Handles country selection
// $scope.data = {}; // uncomment to force rednering; an angular bug?
$http.get('https://rawgit.com/opendatajson/factbook.json/master/' +
$scope.country + '.json').then(function(response) {
$scope.data = response.data;
});
};
$scope.countries = [
{id: 'europe/uk', name: 'UK'},
{id: 'africa/eg', name: 'Egypt'},
{id: 'east-n-southeast-asia/ch', name: 'China'}
];
$scope.update();
});
The template is driven by ng-repeat:
<div ng-app="factbook" ng-controller="loadfact">
<select ng-model="country" ng-change="update()"
ng-options="item.id as item.name for item in countries">
</select>
<div ng-repeat="(heading, section) in data"
ng-init="depth = 1"
ng-include="'recurse.template'"></div>
<!-- A template for nested sections with heading and body parts -->
<script type="text/ng-template" id="recurse.template">
<div ng-if="section.text"
class="level{{depth}} section fact ng-class:safe(heading);">
<div class="level{{depth}} heading factname">{{heading}}</div>
<div class="level{{depth}} body factvalue">{{trunc(section.text)}}</div>
</div>
<div ng-if="!section.text"
class="level{{depth}} section ng-class:safe(heading);">
<div class="level{{depth}} heading">{{heading}}</div>
<div ng-repeat="(heading, body) in section"
ng-init="depth = depth+1; section = body;"
ng-include="'recurse.template'"
class="level{{depth-1}} body"></div>
</div>
</script>
</div>
What am I missing?
You changed reference of section property by executing section = body; inside of ng-if directives $scope. What happened in details (https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngIf):
ng-repeat on data created $scope for ng-repeat with properties heading and section;
Template from ng-include $compile'd with $scope from 1st step;
According to documentation ng-if created own $scope using inheritance and duplicated heading and section;
ng-repeat inside of template executed section = body and changed reference to which will point section property inside ngIf.$scope;
As section is inherited property, you directed are displaying section property from another $scope, different from initial $scope of parent of ngIf.
This is easily traced - just add:
...
<script type="text/ng-template" id="recurse.template">
{{section.Background.text}}
...
and you will notice that section.Background.text actually appoints to proper value and changed accordingly while section.text under ngIf.$scope is not changed ever.
Whatever you update $scope.data reference, ng-if does not cares as it's own section still referencing to previous object that was not cleared by garbage collector.
Reccomdendation:
Do not use recursion in templates. Serialize your response and create flat object that will be displayed without need of recursion. As your template desired to display static titles and dynamic texts. That's why you have lagging rendering - you did not used one-way-binding for such static things like section titles. Some performance tips.
P.S. Just do recursion not in template but at business logic place when you manage your data. ECMAScript is very sensitive to references and best practice is to keep templates simple - no assignments, no mutating, no business logic in templates. Also Angular goes wild with $watcher's when you updating every of your section so many times without end.
Thanks to Apperion and anoop for their analysis. I have narrowed down the problem, and the upshot is that there seems to be a buggy interaction between ng-repeat and ng-init which prevents updates from being applied when a repeated variable is copied in ng-init. Here is a minimized example that shows the problem without using any recursion or includes or shadowing. https://jsfiddle.net/7sqk02m6/
<div ng-app="app" ng-controller="c">
<select ng-model="choice" ng-change="update()">
<option value="">Choose X or Y</option>
<option value="X">X</option>
<option value="Y">Y</option>
</select>
<div ng-repeat="(key, val) in data" ng-init="copy = val">
<span>{{key}}:</span> <span>val is {{val}}</span> <span>copy is {{copy}}</span>
</div>
</div>
The controller code just switches the data between "X" and "Y" and empty versions:
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.controller('c', function($scope) {
$scope.choice = '';
$scope.update = function() {
$scope.data = {
X: { first: 'X1', second: 'X2' },
Y: { first: 'Y1', second: 'Y2' },
"": {}
}[$scope.choice];
};
$scope.update();
});
Notice that {{copy}} and {{val}} should behave the same inside the loop, because copy is just a copy of val. They are just strings like 'X1'. And indeed, the first time you select 'X', it works great - the copies are made, they follow the looping variable and change values through the loop. The val and the copy are the same.
first: val is X1 copy is X1
second: val is X2 copy is X2
But when you update to the 'Y' version of the data, the {{val}} variables update to the Y version but the {{copy}} values do not update: they stay as X versions.
first: val is Y1 copy is X1
second: val is Y2 copy is X2
Similarly, if you clear everything and start with 'Y', then update to 'X', the copies get stuck as the Y versions.
The upshot is: ng-init seems to fail to set up watchers correctly somehow when looped variables are copied in this situation. I could not follow Angular internals well enough to understand where the bug is. But avoiding ng-init solves the problem. A version of the original example that works well with no flicker is here: http://jsfiddle.net/cjtuyw5q/
If you want to control what keys are being tracked by ng-repeat you can use a trackby statement: https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngRepeat
<div ng-repeat="model in collection track by model.id">
{{model.name}}
</div>
modifying other properties won't fire the refresh, which can be very positive for performance, or painful if you do a search/filter across all the properties of an object.
Is it possible to use ngClass with an expression AND a class map? I want to conditionally add a class based on the existence of a variable as well as use that variable in the expression that creates the class.
For instance, if isActive() is true and getStatus() returns "valid" I want the class list to be "element element--active element--valid". If getStatus() returns undefined I want the class list to be "element element--active".
<div
class="element"
ng-class="{
'element--active': ctrl.isActive(),
'element--{{ ctrl.getStatus() }}': ctrl.getStatus()
}"></div>
Doesn't seem to work.
<div
class="element element--{{ctrl.getStatus()}}"
ng-class="{
'element--active': ctrl.isActive()
}"></div>
Works but then there's an extra hanging "element--" if getStatus() returns undefined.
Do I have to add a method in my controller to handle the class generation?
i'd suggest to make just one function call to get the classes. It will make it cleaner and have the class logic in one place.
In your controller:
this.getElementStatus = function(){
var rules = {active:this.isActive()}; //Prefix with element-- {element--active:}
rules[this.getStatus()] = true; //Prefix with element--, rules['element--' + this.getStatus()] = true
return rules;
}
and your view would just be:
<div
class="element"
ng-class="ctrl.getElementStatus()"></div>
It seems like your element-- is redundant with the rule instead make use of cascadeability(CSS) property. and define rules as :
Example:
.element.active{ /*....*/ }
.element.success {/*...*/}
.element.error{/*...*/}
This will help in maintenance, gets more verbose and get to the natural way of adding css rules and could remove these kind of complexities from the view.
You could as well do:
<div class="element"
ng-class="{'active': ctrl.isActive(), '{{ctrl.getStatus()}}':true}"
or :
<div class="element"
ng-class="[ctrl.isActive() ? 'active' : '', ctrl.getStatus()]"
If you don't mind getting a true added as a rule(should not affect anything anyways) then,
<div class="element"
ng-class="[!ctrl.isActive() || 'element--active' , 'element--' + ctrl.getStatus()]">
You can use class and ng-class map on the same element. But since your class name is dynamic you will have to something like this.
<div
ng-class="'element '
+ (ctrl.isActive() ? ' element--active' : '')
+ (ctrl.getStatus() ? ' element--' + ctrl.getStatus() : '')"></div>
I am trying to pull all items from my array called 'collections'. When I input the call in my html I see only the complete code for the first item in the array on my page. I am trying to only pull in the 'edm.preview' which is the image of the item. I am using Angular Firebase and an api called Europeana. My app allows the user to search and pick which images they like and save them to that specific user.
here is the js:
$scope.users = fbutil.syncArray('users');
$scope.users.currentUser.collections = fbutil.syncArray('collections');
$scope.addSomething = function (something) {
var ref = fbutil.ref('users');
ref.child($rootScope.currentUser.uid).child('collections').push(something);
}
$scope.addSomething = function(item) {
if( newColItem ) {
// push a message to the end of the array
$scope.collections.$add(newColItem)
// display any errors
.catch(alert);
}
};
and the html:
<ul id="collections" ng-repeat="item in collections">
<li ng-repeat="item in collections">{{item.edmPreview}}</li>
</ul>
First, remove the outer ng-repeat. You want to only add the ng-repeat directive to the element which is being repeated, in this case <li>.
Second, from your AngularJS code, it looks like you want to loop over users.currentUser.collections and not just collections:
<ul id="collections">
<li ng-repeat="item in users.currentUser.collections">{{item.edmPreview}}</li>
</ul>
And third, you're defining the function $scope.addSomething twice in your JavaScript code. Right now, the second function definition (which, incidentally, should be changed to update $scope.users.currentUser.collections as well) will completely replace the first.