Reversing a string in C using Recursion - c

I have written a program to reverse a string using recursion. But the output I get is an empty string always.
I want to know what is wrong with my logic?
#include<stdio.h>
void reverse(char a[], int start, int end)
{
char t;
if(start>=end)
return;
else
{
t = a[start]; a[start] = a[end]; a[end] = t;
reverse(a,++start,--end);
}
}
int main(void)
{
char a[] = "hello";
int n = sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]);
printf("Given string is : %s ",a);
reverse(a,0,n-1);
printf("Reversed string is : %s ",a);
return 0;
}
The output:
Printing the individual characters I get,

Your string is actually 6 bytes long - 'h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o', '\0'. The last character is a null byte, which is a string terminator. It signals to functions like printf or strlen where the string ends. When you call reverse, it reverses the entire string, so now the terminator is the very first byte, and printf interprets that as an empty string.
There are two ways to fix this. Either make the index that you pass to reverse one smaller (call reverse(a, 0, n-2)), or use strlen instead of sizeof (int n = strlen(a)).

Always remember, the array index for nth element will be n-1.
Your array has 6 elements, so the index will run from 0 to 5, the last [6th] elemst being the NUL terminator.
As per your logic, the NUL terminator becomes the first element in the reversed array, hence no output as string.
Following the logic, your first call to reverse() should be reverse(a,0,n-2); to avoid the NUL being put as the first element in reversed array.

Related

'\0' and printf() in C

In an introductory course of C, I have learned that while storing the strings are stored with null character \0 at the end of it. But what if I wanted to print a string, say printf("hello") although I've found that that it doesn't end with \0 by following statement
printf("%d", printf("hello"));
Output: 5
but this seem to be inconsistent, as far I know that variable like strings get stored in main memory and I guess while printing something it might also be stored in main memory, then why the difference?
The null byte marks the end of a string. It isn't counted in the length of the string and isn't printed when a string is printed with printf. Basically, the null byte tells functions that do string manipulation when to stop.
Where you will see a difference is if you create a char array initialized with a string. Using the sizeof operator will reflect the size of the array including the null byte. For example:
char str[] = "hello";
printf("len=%zu\n", strlen(str)); // prints 5
printf("size=%zu\n", sizeof(str)); // prints 6
printf returns the number of the characters printed. '\0' is not printed - it just signals that the are no more chars in this string. It is not counted towards the string length as well
int main()
{
char string[] = "hello";
printf("szieof(string) = %zu, strlen(string) = %zu\n", sizeof(string), strlen(string));
}
https://godbolt.org/z/wYn33e
sizeof(string) = 6, strlen(string) = 5
Your assumption is wrong. Your string indeed ends with a \0.
It contains of 5 characters h, e, l, l, o and the 0 character.
What the "inner" print() call outputs is the number of characters that were printed, and that's 5.
In C all literal strings are really arrays of characters, which include the null-terminator.
However, the null terminator is not counted in the length of a string (literal or not), and it's not printed. Printing stops when the null terminator is found.
All answers are really good but I would like to add another example to complete all these
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
char a_char_array[12] = "Hello world";
printf("%s", a_char_array);
printf("\n");
a_char_array[4] = 0; //0 is ASCII for null terminator
printf("%s", a_char_array);
printf("\n");
return 0;
}
For those don't want to try this on online gdb, the output is:
Hello world
Hell
https://linux.die.net/man/3/printf
Is this helpful to understand what escape terminator does? It's not a boundary for a char array or a string. It's the character that will say to the guy that parses -STOP, (print) parse until here.
PS: And if you parse and print it as a char array
for(i=0; i<12; i++)
{
printf("%c", a_char_array[i]);
}
printf("\n");
you get:
Hell world
where, the whitespace after double l, is the null terminator, however, parsing a char array, will just the char value of every byte. If you do another parse and print the int value of each byte ("%d%,char_array[i]), you'll see that (you get the ASCII code- int representation) the whitespace has a value of 0.
In C function printf() returns the number of character printed, \0 is a null terminator which is used to indicate the end of string in c language and there is no built in string type as of c++, however your array size needs to be a least greater than the number of char you want to store.
Here is the ref: cpp ref printf()
But what if I wanted to print a string, say printf("hello") although
I've found that that it doesn't end with \0 by following statement
printf("%d", printf("hello"));
Output: 5
You are wrong. This statement does not confirm that the string literal "hello" does not end with the terminating zero character '\0'. This statement confirmed that the function printf outputs elements of a string until the terminating zero character is encountered.
When you are using a string literal as in the statement above then the compiler
creates a character array with the static storage duration that contains elements of the string literal.
So in fact this expression
printf("hello")
is processed by the compiler something like the following
static char string_literal_hello[] = { 'h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o', '\0' };
printf( string_literal_hello );
Th action of the function printf in this you can imagine the following way
int printf( const char *string_literal )
{
int result = 0;
for ( ; *string_literal != '\0'; ++string_literal )
{
putchar( *string_literal );
++result;
}
return result;
}
To get the number of characters stored in the string literal "hello" you can run the following program
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
char literal[] = "hello";
printf( "The size of the literal \"%s\" is %zu\n", literal, sizeof( literal ) );
return 0;
}
The program output is
The size of the literal "hello" is 6
You have to clear your concept first..
As it will be cleared when you deal with array, The print command you are using its just counting the characters that are placed within paranthesis. Its necessary in array string that it will end with \0
A string is a vector of characters. Contains the sequence of characters that form the
string, followed by the special ending character
string: '\ 0'
Example:
char str[10] = {'H', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o', '\0'};
Example: the following character vector is not one string because it doesn't end with '\ 0'
char str[2] = {'h', 'e'};

Why don’t we need for loop to print strings in C?

I don't understand Why don’t we have to print strings in for loop ? In normal cases we need to print arrays in for loop. For example, if we want to print the array of integers. It will be like this:
int a[n];
for (i = 0; i < n; i++){
printf("%d", a[i]);
}
But for strings like:
char s[100] = " Hello ";
printf("%s\n", s);
it is enough to write the name of array.
EDIT: It seems like I didnt ask my question properly as some of you wrote answers which is not related to my question.I edit my question.
Strings terminate with the empty character '\0', that's how it is possible to know when a string ends even without explicitly passing its length.
The difference is that C-style strings (which are char arrays) are zero-terminated, whereas int arrays are normally not zero terminated.
Theoretically, you could also create an int array which is zero-terminated and print that in a loop:
int a[] = {5,7,3,0};
for (i=0;a[i]!=0;i++)
{
printf("%d",a[i])
}
However, the problem with zero-terminated int arrays is that the number 0 could be a meaningful value, so you cannot be sure that it really is the end of the array when you encounter that value. With strings, however, the ASCII-Code 0 does not represent a meaningful value, so you can be reasonably sure that you have reached the end of the string.
Your example is far from analogous. %d refers to a single integer, while %s refers to an entire (but still single) string.
You are not passing the size of the array n[] to printf either - rather you are calling printf n times. You are printing one int just as you are printing one string.
The actual string length is not known a priori, rather printf iterates the string until it encounters the \0 terminator. Equivalent to:
for( int i = 0; s[i] != '\0'; i++)
{
printf( "%c", s[i] ) ;
}
because
char s[100] = " Hello ";
is equivalent to:
char s[100] = { ' ', 'H', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o', ' ', '\0' } ;
Strings are multiple characters all at once. You cannot ask for a specific character from a string. If you want to do so, you must refer to it as an array of chars like this
for (i = 0; i < n; i++){
printf("%c", s[i]);
}
It is because you are already providing the parameter which is "%s" to the printf function which already has a definition telling it how to print a string.
Hope it helps.
One of the reason is that char only takes 1 byte of memeory and when you just press a character, the first index of array is filled up completely and it moves on to the next one till it encounters NULL character. This is not the case with integer array where the size is more than 1 byte and is machine dependent. So you cannot escape the first index by just pressing the number less than the maximum range. If you try to do this, it will store your numbers in first index only and hence a for loop is required there.

Assignment after initialization to specific index in an array

After assigning 26th element, when printed, still "Computer" is printed out in spite I assigned a character to 26th index. I expect something like this: "Computer K "
What is the reason?
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
char m1[40] = "Computer";
printf("%s\n", m1); /*prints out "Computer"*/
m1[26] = 'K';
printf("%s\n", m1); /*prints out "Computer"*/
printf("%c", m1[26]); /*prints "K"*/
}
At 8th index of that string the \0 character is found and %s prints only till it finds a \0 (the end of string, marked by \0) - at 26th the character k is there but it will not be printed as \0 is found before that.
char s[100] = "Computer";
is basically the same as
char s[100] = { 'C', 'o', 'm', 'p', 'u','t','e','r', '\0'};
Since printf stops when the string is 0-terminated it won't print character 26
Whenever you partially initialize an array, the remaining elements are filled with zeroes. (This is a rule in the C standard, C17 6.7.9 §19.)
Therefore char m1[40] = "Computer"; ends up in memory like this:
[0] = 'C'
[1] = 'o'
...
[7] = 'r'
[8] = '\0' // the null terminator you automatically get by using the " " syntax
[9] = 0 // everything to zero from here on
...
[39] = 0
Now of course \0 and 0 mean the same thing, the value 0. Either will be interpreted as a null terminator.
If you go ahead and overwrite index 26 and then print the array as a string, it will still only print until it encounters the first null terminator at index 8.
If you do like this however:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
char m1[40] = "Computer";
printf("%s\n", m1); // prints out "Computer"
m1[8] = 'K';
printf("%s\n", m1); // prints out "ComputerK"
}
You overwrite the null terminator, and the next zero that happened to be in the array is treated as null terminator instead. This code only works because we partially initialized the array, so we know there are more zeroes trailing.
Had you instead written
int main()
{
char m1[40];
strcpy(m1, "Computer");
This is not initialization but run-time assignment. strcpy would only set index 0 to 8 ("Computer" with null term at index 8). Remaining elements would be left uninitialized to garbage values, and writing m1[8] = 'K' would destroy the string, as it would then no longer be reliably null terminated. You would get undefined behavior when trying to print it: something like garbage output or a program crash.
In C strings are 0-terminated.
Your initialization fills all array elements after the 'r' with 0.
If you place a non-0 character in any random field of the array, this does not change anything in the fields before or after that element.
This means your string is still 0-terminated right after the 'r'.
How should any function know that after that string some other string might follow?
That's because after "Computer" there's a null terminator (\0) in your array. If you add a character after this \0, it won't be printed because printf() stops printing when it encounters a null terminator.
Just as an addition to the other users answers - you should try to answer your question by being more proactive in your learning. It is enough to write a simple program to understand what is happening.
int main()
{
char m1[40] = "Computer";
printf("%s\n", m1); /*prints out "Computer"*/
m1[26] = 'K';
for(size_t index = 0; index < 40; index++)
{
printf("m1[%zu] = 0x%hhx ('%c')\n", index, (unsigned char)m1[index], (m1[index] >=32) ? m1[index] : ' ');
}
}

What is with the null character in reverse string program?

I had to make a simple program to reverse a string. I eventually got this code from my own understanding but also help from google since I couldn't originally get it to work. It runs fine and outputs as it should and I understand all of it except for the reverse[j] = '\0' statement.
I kept getting symbols in my output when I didn't state it but I want to know how this works. Can anyone explain please?
#include<stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
char original[20], reverse[20];
int length, i, j;
printf("Enter a string:\n");
gets(original);
length = strlen(original);
for (i = length - 1, j= 0; i >= 0; i--, j++)
reverse[j] = original[i];
reverse[j] = '\0'; //I don't know what this statement does exactly
printf("The string reversed is:\n %s\n", reverse);
return 0;
}
If you want that a character array would contain a string then it has to have the terminating zero.
For example function strlen that is used in your program counts characters in a character array before the terminating zero.
Also function printf used with the format specifier %s outputs characters from a character array until the terminating zero will be encountered.
For example if you have an array like this
char s[10] = "Hello";
then the call strlen( s ) returns 5 instead of 10. And call printf( "%s\n", s ); outputs 6 characters (including the new line character).
Consider this demonstrative program
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
char s[10] = "Hello";
printf( "%d\n", printf( "%s\n", s ) );
return 0;
}
Its output is
Hello
6
This initialization
char s[10] = "Hello";
is fully equivalent to
char s[10] = { 'H', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0'};
If you need to reverse the string stored in the array it is obvious that you need to reverse characters before the first terminating zero. And if you want to copy the string in the reversed order to another character array you need to append the destination array with the terminating zero.
This loop
for (i = length - 1, j= 0; i >= 0; i--, j++)
reverse[j] = original[i];
copies in the reversed order all characters except the terminating zero from the original character array starting with the last character before the terminating zero to the destination character array. You need to append the destination character array with the terminating zero
reverse[j] = '\0';
The \0 is not really a character. It's the way a c program mark the end of a string. So if you only want to reverse a string you don't have to move this character at the begining of the reversed string.
original string: hello\0
reverse string : olleh\0
In C, a string always has a \0 at the end. Read why and how.
\0 is for null terminating the string. This will mark the end of the string. If it is not null terminated, the data in the succeeding locations will also wrongly treat as part of string.

C char array has different length than expected

I have a very simple code:
secret[]="abcdefgh";//this is declared in different function and is random word
int len=strlen(secret);//ofc it is 8 in this case
char word[len];
for(int a=0;a<len;a++){//expecting this will put '_' at positions 0-7
word[a]='_';
}
printf("%d %s",(int)strlen(word),word);
However, strlen(word) returns 11 and word contains "________� #", thus there is some obvious memory leak I can't see. Any idea?
This character array initialized by a string literal
secret[]="abcdefgh";
has 9 elements because it also includes the terminating zero of the string literal. So the definition above is equivalent to
secret[9]="abcdefgh";
Function strlen returns the number of elements of a character array that are before the terminating zero. So in this declaration
int len=strlen(secret);
variable len is initialized by 8
As result declaration
char word[len];
is equivalent to
char word[8];
In this loop
for(int a=0;a<len;a++){//expecting this will put '_' at positions 0-7
word[a]='_';
}
all elements of the aray are set to '_'. The arry does not have the terminating zero. So applaying function strlen to the array has undefined behaviour.
You could change the loop the following way
int a = 0;
for(;a<len - 1;a++){//expecting this will put '_' at positions 0-7
word[a]='_';
}
word[a] = '\0';
In this case function strlen would return number 7 and the program would be well-formed.
You just need to nul terminate the string, increase len by 1 and nul terminate your string.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(void)
{
char secret[]="abcdefgh";
int len=strlen(secret);
char word[len+1];
for(int a=0;a<len;a++)
{
word[a]='_';
}
word[a]=0; //or word[a]='\0'
printf("%d %s",(int)strlen(word),word);
return 0;
}
Regarding memory leak yes it can.
At first glance it seems you have forgot to put null at the end of your char array (pointer).
From my experience this leads to buffer overruns or stack corruption .
One addition and one modification
char word[len]; needs to be changed with char word[len+1];
Add a line world[len] = '\0'; before the last printf line.
That will be it
No space for the '\0'.
// "abcdefgh"
// 01234567
You need to define word with space for the NUL terminator.
char word[len + 1];
// "abcdefgh"
// 012345678 -- word[8] gets '\0'

Resources