I'm having trouble using one way binding in directives with an isolate scope.
If I use an equal sign for two-way binding, and use the data like so: {{d.name}}, it works.
If I use an # sign, it doesn't work. If I use an equal sign and use the data like so: {{::d.name}}, it fails also.
You can see my full example at this plunker: http://plnkr.co/edit/8bUl8pZSV8Ryru6GDq2M?p=preview
Can someone please help me understand what's happening here? Thanks.
The one-way binding syntax you are trying to use, has been introduced since Angular 1.3.
In your demo you are using version 1.2.25.
You must change the script link:
<script data-require="angular.js#1.3.x" src="https://code.angularjs.org/1.3.0/angular.js" data-semver="1.2.25"></script>
The problem with the second directive, instead, is that the # is not a one-way binding, it simply takes the attribute as text.
To use it like you would, so you need to interpolate the text before passing it to the directive, like this
<h3>Directive 2</h3>
<p ng-repeat="d in data">
<dir2 d="{{d.name}}"></dir2>
</p>
DEMO
Related
I want to use ng-model directive as element rather than as attribute inside tag,is there any way to do it?
well I've already designed my webpage in html and javascript and I want to include it in angularJS using "ng-include". So rather than adding attribute like,
<input type="checkbox" id="checkbox" name='rejectedPartsConfirmtodothis' ng-model="reject">
I want to put it in the format like, (as said in angulaJS documentation )
<ng-model>
<input --->
</ng-model>
but this is not working, any idea how can I make it work?
Quoting the content of the page
Usage
as element: (This directive can be used as custom element, but be aware of IE restrictions).
<ng-model>
...
</ng-model>
according to v1.5 official documentation : https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngModel
Usage
as element: (This directive can be used as custom element, but be aware of IE restrictions).
<ng-model>
...
</ng-model>
I dont really think there would be a use case where you would really need to do this...instead try some alternative but use ng-model as an attribute as ng-model is a pre-defined directive given by angularjs...
You can build a new directive but you cannot modify ng-model to work as an element.
May be This is a simple question but it is challenging for me.
In angularJS when i write {{}} in html code so i write code like this like
if i talk about dynamic id, we write like code this
<div ng-repeat = 'item in itmes track by $index'>
<div id = "div-{{$index}}">{{item.name}}</div>
</div>
If i use any model without {{}} i write this example
<input id = 'name' ng-model = "item.name"/>
whenever i am coding in angular js, i write code without {{}} then if it is not work then i try code with {{}} and vise versa. and randomly 1 will correct
Question is when i write code with {{}} and without {{}} in html code ?
After the OP explained what exactly was the problem.
So, the question here is very simple: when do we use {{}} and when we don't in the context of ng-model.
When you do a <input type=... ng-model="someModel>, what you're essentially telling Angular is: "Here is an input element; attach $scope's someModel variable to the value of this input element.
Now, you can use this in your JavaScript controller like so: $scope.someModel, but what about HTML? We have a templating language in Angular, and when you give it some variable (say someModel), it'll search its $scope for it, and then put in the value there. If it is unable to, it'll throw a nasty error.
In essence, {{}} GETS the value, without that, you generally set the variable to gold the value of something.
Very simply put, AngularJS thinks that the content within the brace is an expression, which must be resolved. Once it is, Angular puts the value of the resolved expression there. In the most basic of the terms, you just tell it: "Here is some expression; put the evaluated value instead."
In ES6, we call it template strings.
So, you'll use it for expressions which mutate after every iteration. Say, a loop or something. Places where you know what the answer is, or you have static content, you won't use it.
Say you have the following bit of code:
...
...
$scope.figureOne = 10;
in your controller.js and the following in its view file:
<div>My age is {{ figureOne }}</div>
Angular gets the value from the $scope, and puts it there; so, the rendered form will be: My age is 10. However, if you had the following
<div>My age is figureOne</div>
This time, Angular knows that there is nothing to evaluate or resolve, so, it'll just render it as it is: My age is figureOne.
I hope I made it clear! :)
Angular directives have different types of parameters. Some parameters (#) expect string values and some expect javascript expressions (=) (with variables bound to $scope).
There's no obvious way to know which parameter expects what type of value (aside from looking at documentation).
If a variable expects static string value and you have an angular expression
then you'll need to evaluate it by wrapping in {{}}
If there variable expects an expression and you have an expression
simply type that in.
It's the best to avoid using {{}} where possible, your dynamic ID will fail when Angular hasn't interpolated the expression yet, use ng-attr-id="div-{{$index}} for that. https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive#-ngattr-attribute-bindings
Another example, if you have a slow connection and Angular isn't loaded yet users will see the {{}}, you can avoid this by using ng-bind="".
See this thread for more info: AngularJS : Why ng-bind is better than {{}} in angular?
It is very simple.
{{something}} - used for one way binding(Static).
<input type="text" value="{{something}}">
Now if you change its value in HTML ,you can not get it by $scope.something in js.
but If you use ng-model="something",you can get its value in JS.
This happens because ng-model is two way binding.
<input type="text" ng-model="something">
Mostly We use ng-model for forms and {{}} to display static information like User details or else.
I am working on my first angular directive and still getting my head around the concepts and what's possible with directives. As I've been researching the best way to tackle this problem I haven't been able to identify an example that addresses what I'm trying to do, so thought I would ask for some help from the experts here.
I have an array of objects that are one of three types.
I would like to use the ng-repeat directive to iterate through this array and display the objects on the page.
Each object type has a different view associated with it as each object shares some properties, but also have unique properties.
I would like to set up a directive that displays the correct view based on the objective type.
So the logic would work something like the following:
<div ng-repeat="item in dataset">
<the-smart-directive>item</the-smart-directive>
</div>
One idea would be to have one directive where I determine the templateUrl based on the object type and then have a unique template for each of the objects.
Another idea would be to have a parent directive and then three other directives (one for each object type) and the parent directive would insert the correct object type directive (this is the idea that seems like the better approach, but I'm not sure how to actually implement this idea).
I'd love some help in understanding the best way to tackle this and how to implement. If you could provide some example code that would be wonderful and get me started on the right path.
Thanks for your help!
The way we are using it is with ng-switch inside the ng-repeat.
<div ng-repeat="item in dataset" ng-switch="item.type">
<directive-one ng-switch-when="1">
</directive-one>
<directive-two ng-switch-when="2">
</directive-two>
<directive-three ng-switch-when="3">
</directive-three>
</div>
Several times when creating or customizing a directive (either my own directive or for example https://github.com/dpiccone/ng-pageslide) I get a point where all the display logic is controlled by a single css class. At that point the directive boils down to adding and removing a single class. So instead of using a new directive I can simply use the ng-class directive (see an example here: https://gist.github.com/Hypercubed/8f40556eb0f6eddbcca3). Is there an advantage to the custom directive approach vs the ng-class/CSS styles approach? I guess the custom directive doesn't depend on $animate? Am I just doing it wrong?
Sorry for another directive vs. XXX question.
I think you're failing to see the forest for the all tress. You're focusing on a very minute detail and missing the larger picture. Directives are more than simply applying styles. I think an example is best. For example, take the rating directive. If you wanted to render a star rating model it might look like this:
<div ng-rating="album.rating" max="5"></div>
That may add the following to the DOM:
<ul class="inline">
<li ng-repeat="i in max">
<i ng-class="{ 'icon-start-empty': i > rating, 'icon-star': i <= rating }"></i>
</li>
</ul>
Under the covers ng-class it utilized, but that is only a part of the logic encapsulated in the rating directive. It allows the user to configure how many stars the rating is out of, and renders the same number of li elements. Then because you wrote a directive it allows you to reuse this logic where ever it's required. Using ng-class only works in that 1 location. If you want to do the same thing you're copying code which is a sign maybe you want to wrap that logic up in a directive.
Is there a way to have a HTML-view with pre-populated values from the server, and then get AngularJS to read those values into it's $scope?
I'm thinking of a scenario where the HTML is like this:
<div ng-controller="TestController">
<div ng-bind="title">Test Title</div>
<div ng-bind="itemCount">33</div>
<div ng-repeat="item in items">
<div ng-bind="item.title">Item 1 Title</div>
</div>
</div>
<button ng-click="update()">Update</button>
And the JavaScript is like this:
function TestController($scope) {
$scope.update = function() {
console.log($scope.title); // Should log "Test Title"
};
}
The thought behind this is to let the server render HTML that search engines can index, but have a JavaScript-model-representation of the content for manipulation through JS.
While ng-init is one solution, it requires you to explicitly set the value. So here is an alternative solution.
http://plnkr.co/edit/pq8yR9zVOHFI6IRU3Pvn?p=preview
Note : This solution wont work for ng-repeat. Control flow directives cant be used with this. But for simple extraction of information from ng-bind this works pretty well. All that you need to do is add the default directive ( code in plunk ) to wherever you are doing the bind and it will extract the text content and push it to the scope variable.
EDIT (solution with ng-repeat):
So, I was thinking of a way to make ng-repeat also work the same way. But getting ng-repeat to work like this isnt an easy job ( see the code for proof :P ). I have finally found a solution - here you go :
http://plnkr.co/edit/GEWhCNVMeNVaq9JA2Xm2?p=preview
There are a couple of things you need to know before you use this. This hasnt been thoroughly tested. It only works for repeating over arrays ( not objects ). There could be cases that have not been covered. I am overriding ngRepeat itself which could have other consequences. When you loop through the items ( in your server side code ) dont forget to add default="true" on the first element and default on the rest of the elements.
Hope this helps.
Add ng-init to your elements with the value so that it will work the way you want.
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngInit
I think what you really want is to make your application searchable by serving static files in parallell. Read more about it here http://www.yearofmoo.com/2012/11/angularjs-and-seo.html