Help needed here. I'm a bit lost checking all possible editions and configurations of SQL Server.
What I'd like seems straight forward: a version of SQL Server (ideally 2008, or higher), on a single PC (client+server), with a small footprint. I just want to self train in ddbb's basic administration (user creation, schemas, scripts, copying ddbbs, stored procedures).
These ddbb's won't be used with webs, other users, etc. Just myself, at most with an Access front-end linked to the SQL Server DB.
My doubts are:
Is is better SQL Server Express 2008, Compact Edition (CE), SQL
Lite, something else ??
I would prefer using SQL Lite (seems the
simplest), but my concern is how 'similar' (for things like schemas,
permissions, scripts management, files names, no worries about multiple servers, though) is SQL lite to
a full SQL Server ?
I'd just like to familiarize with the basics in my pc so that when confronted to a real SSIS I can learn it quickly.
Thanks in advance, p.
I'd go with SQL Express if you're planning to learn SQL Server. Although SQLite has a small footprint it is completely different from SQL Server. Queries to get and manipulate data are similar (but not identical in every manner), but everything related to metadata (schemas etc.) is completely different.
Related
Is it possible using SQL Server Replication to replicate data to AND from (bi-directional) Oracle and SQL Server? The schemas are completely different. In real-time would be a bonus.
Have already investigated Oracle Golden Gate, which seemed to do the job, although the licence cost is not insignificant!
I wondered if anyone has had any experience in replicating data across different schemas, and what other tools they employed? I realise this is a bit of an open-ended question but any advice and previous experiences would be most useful.
Thanks
Duncan
I recently had to create a solution to import periodically lots of data from different databases (most of the time from Oracle databases) to a SQL Server database (a data warehouse). To do so, I used SQL Server Integration Service to create a package able to import, transform and insert the data as I wanted (since it was from heterogeneous sources too). This software comes with SQL Server and the version 2005 and superior is really easy to use (graphical programming). In your case, you could trigger your created services when needed. I am not sure it is the best solution since you would need to create a SSIS service for each direction (from Oracle to SQL Server and from SQL Server to Oracle).
I'm currently using SQL Server Management Studio.
I have a development database, and access to a live database.
I just want to able to migrate my development tables to the live server.
I'm consulting stack flow first, since I don't want to blow anything up.
If you know what tables you want to migrate and they don't yet exist on the prod server, it's as simple as scripting the table definition, then running the script on the server. If it's more complex than that, I would recommend any number of tools which compare database schemas and automatically generate scripts you can run on the destination server to add/alter/remove what you need. A good freeware one for simple jobs is DBComparer. It's pretty basic. An excellent commercial one are the Sql Tools by Red Gate
We are using SQL Examiner Suite for this, but there are a lot of similar tools.
This is worth a look at - I've used it before and it works well and is very easy: Microsoft SQL Server Database Publishing Wizard http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyId=56E5B1C5-BF17-42E0-A410-371A838E570A&displaylang=en
I Want Implement a Software by C#.net.I want Use a DataBase Manager Software like Access or SqlLite or etc.My Program Saved Many Data in Local Machine.
I Do Not Want Publish or Move Data to Other Pcs
What DataBase Manager Software Must be Choose?
Not Different DataBase is Free or have a price.
what is the Best DataBase Manager Software to Save many Data in Local Machine?
For sure you are looking for a free database so for that you can use many databases like mysql ,postgresql , and sql server msde or access
but we still have other scenario, if you are going to distribute this application to other pcs so you have to think about deployment and in this case you can eliminate the mysql , postgresql because they depend on servers but msde (it's also server ) is much easier and you can found alot of tutorials how to deploy it with your project
It depends on how much you are expert in database and for what reason you are using it? are you going to need complex queries or it just a storage place for the data ?
if it's complex query i will go for msde for sql server if it's only for saving information may be i will go for access or even xml
Well if you are developing in C# consider using the MSSql Compact Edition. This allows you to create a local database and use it much like SqlLight. However, the support is much better, especially when you using Visual Studio. There you can find it as LocalDatabase under Data when you adding a new item. (Not 100% sure whether it is present on all versions of VS though).
Firefox has an SQLite Manager add-on.
I think the best choice depends on your needs, for example if you must synchronize data with sql server for me the best choise was sql express.
I would vote for SQL Express. You get essentially a scaled down SQL Server that is capable of working with quite a bit of data. SQL Express plays well with Visual Studio and you will be able to take advantage of the System.Data.SqlClient and related namespaces which come with the .NET framework out of the box. They are also better than the Odbc namespaces. Finally, there is a LOT of online support for SQL Express and, as far as I know, SQL Express's flavor of SQL (T-SQL) is the same as that of SQL Server. So should you one day need the flexibility of running with either or (local database, or server database) you will have it. Also, SQL Express is fairly commonly used in the microsoft world so you should be able to find lots of examples, if need by.
TurboDB for .NET from dataweb is a good solution, if you want a powerful engine with stored procedures and professional support from the manufacturer:
http://www.dataweb.de/en/products/dotnet_database.html
Hello,
I'm new here, so sorry, if my question is too basic. However, maybe you have some advice, example, links, which could help me... I'm trying to find something helpfull for few days, but no results as for now.
I'm working in a distributed environment. I have a Oracle server hundreds of miles away and a MS SQL server close to me. I'm writing a application using Visual Web Developer 2008 Express. I need some data from Oracle. It's not worth to query the Oracle server every time i need some data from it. I'd prefer to run some Oracle queries once each night and store results in some local (SQL Server) tables. I assume, I should run queries through standard windows scheduler (Windows Server 2008). I have the basic connectivity - I can open Oracle Database from local Visual Studio.
The questions are:
How to write a query/procedure/function that would get data from Oracle and put them into a SQL Server table (possibly recreated before each query run)?
How can I run such a query from command line (or in other way run from scheduler)
What naming conventions are applicable? In VS I use something like //IP.IP.IP.IP/Name and a user with password.
Thanks for any help or advice.
Regards,
Matteo
I suggest you speak to the DBA's of the Oracle and SQL Server databases, as there may be other considerations you need to bear in mind. (Data Integrity, Security, ownership etc.)
One route you could follow would be to implement DTS (For older databases) or SSIS (for new versions of SQL Server) processes to copy the data across on the schedule you want. (This is pretty much what they were built for.)
How much data are we talking about?
If there is a small quantity that you need to transfer every day, you can write a stupid fetch and insert script in language of your choice.
You only need to search for better solutions if "sync" would take too much resources.
Thanks...
I'm the DBA for the SQL Server, which will serve only for my application. For Oracle I just want to read data and I have enough privileges and agreement with DBA's. Security, ownership and integrity are not an issue for now. I just need some technical advise how to get data from Oracle to MSSQL tables on a schedule.
I use MS SQL Server 2008 Express SP1. I'm very close to solve my problem - I have established connections and everything installed and working. I just don't know, how to run a query, which would get data from Oracle and put into MSSQL, on regular basis, without manual interaction.
I've some experience in programming, but not much in databases (except creating complex SQl queries). Therefore some example or links to detailed description would be helpful. I'm not sure about naming conventions, differences between procedures, functions and queries, command line options to run db automation procedures and so on. I'm also not sure, about which mechanisms or technologies are available in MS SQL Server 2008 Express edition.
One of our clients is upgrading their servers because the old machines can't handle the load of the database anymore. They have been using sql 2000 for the last 6 years and the db has grown to hold a few GB of data.
Will it be worth upgrading to 2005 or 2008? What are the major benefits of the new versions compared to 2000?
In addition to the CLR integration mentioned by Galwegian, the main pluses for me are:
there is much better XML support in 2005
Common Table Expressons
Another difference to note is that instead of the DTS packages that you would have been used to Sql 2005 uses Integration Services, which while similar is a whole different ball game.
Depending on what edition of SQL Server you are using, SQL 2005 have less restrictive hardware limitations/caps than corresponding editions in SQL2k.
For example, SQL 2000 Standard Edition won't use more than 2Gb (in practice 1.7Gb) while SQL 2005 Standard Edition is not capped (allows up to OS max).
See:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa933149(SQL.80).aspx
...and...
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2005/en/us/compare-features.aspx
So: if you're running standard edition + your SQL Server 2000 instance currently uses ~1.6Gb RAM + your server has 3Gb or more physical RAM then it is probably worth upgrading just for the benefits increased memory usage brings... (more cached table data, indexes, plans etc)
I you are planing to upgrade from SqlServer 2000 I would skip 2005 and go directly to SqlServer 2008
It has all the features of 2005 plus some extras (for example an option to pass a table variable as a parameter to stored procedure, new date types, spatial data handling,etc.)
You can refer to Advantages of MS SQL Server 2008 over MS SQL Server 2005 question for the comprehensive list of features
EDIT
I can see that the question has been updated and now SqlServer 2008 is included in the question.
MS SQL 2005 and 2008 have a lot of hyped technologies, one of them is the ability to stuff CLR code into Stored Procedures. DON'T DO THIS!
Another "feature" is the ability to expose your database as WebServices, yet again; DON'T DO THIS!
A third feature is the ability to use "notifications" from your database and into your application layer, yet again; DON'T DO THIS...!
You database is a bucket and it should "store data", period. A lot of the features Microsoft put into 2005 and 2008 I feel sure they did because they wanted to complicate the usage of O/RM libraries which abstracts away the actual database vendor so that people can change databases as they wish. Then by adding a lot of "stupid features" which goes against every single Best Practices we've learned about databases since the 70s they managed to create a new lock-in which removed the vendor locks by making people use stuff they really shouldn't use anyway...
A part from that there might be a lot of cool features in 2005 and 2008 (like one mentioned here; support!) and things like optimalizations, bugfixes and such. But be careful so you don't start using stuff that craps down your app and makes it impossible to use best practices and locks you in... :(
The main benefit is CLR integration to be honest - it allows you much more flexibility in the way you code your database, giving you the option of including procedural C# or VB.NET in your procedures instead of set-based T-SQL.
There are some new features that are useful, like service broker for example, but in performance terms you aren't going to see huge improvements in moving from 2000 to 2005. You would be much better off a) tuning your DB and b) investing in new hardware.
I think that SQL Server 2000 is no more supported by Microsoft. If I'm wrong, it will be soon...
Separation of users and schemas is another goodie. In SQL 2005, if you want schema separation by logical/functional area or similar rather than by user in your database, you can create schemas such as "hr", "sales", "accounting", "production" and then create user tables under the respective schemas.
In SQL 2000, the schema name was identical to the table owner/creator.
Online index rebuilds are a nice feature to have. I think it might only be an option in Enterprise edition though.