I want to program at my school in my free time, but the compilers they have are buggy. I want to use gcc. The rules at my school say that I cannot install anything on the desktops there. I was thinking about installing gcc on a usb then I would use a bash emulator to compile the files. Would this work and if not how would I do it then?
I'm using this whenever I need to code on a laptop/PC i don't own : https://code.google.com/p/pocketcpp/
It compiles C and C++
Related
The following html link contains all the relevant bash command line records of the installation process. Thank you for help!
That was a bad question
I didn't use XCode through I know Xcode will make it easier! I use an Air, memory of 4GB currently.
If this won't work easily I probably will quit learning C or run and compile C on Windows. :(
And XCode stuff, whatever.
You command-line output indicates rather clearly that you aren't telling gcc what to compile, so it's throwing its hands up in exasperation:
$ gcc
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1: no input files
You'll need to specify the file you're compiling. Better yet, use an IDE, like Xcode.
<Shrug> What do you want us to say?
Obviousy Macports is trying to build/install gcc but it can't without a compiler. Yes gcc can be built without a preexisting compiler, but good luck and why? Especially when XCode is a free download, click click let it start and a little while later it's done. At that point as pointed out elsewhere, gcc, g++ will work, but it's not actually gcc but clang in disguise.
If you want, you can use macports or brew or whatever later if you really want to, but again why? For programs that only work using gcc extensions? Doubt it. You just want a c/c++ compiler. If you ever want to do programs for the Mac or IPhone, you need XCode anyway, gcc won't do.
I'm trying to compile a simple C program on mac However I can't ever seem to get Xcode to work so I want something else. I also want to check the code for errors while I'm running it anyone got a good idea?
open Terminal, cd to your source directory,
then type gcc -Wall yourProgram.c -o YourProgram and if everything is good, you will be able to execute the program typing ./YourProgram
Also, if you are just learning C, then do not use IDEs just yet. get used to the terminal and as your experience builds, move to an IDE.]
Also there are tools like lint that analyze your code statically. Use gdb and if available, use valgrind as well for runtime debugging. I am not sure if valgrind is available on mac. Have a look at dtrace and how to use it.
I am trying to run a MPI program with C language.
I have installed GCC compiler and the openmpi libraries. I am running ubuntu Linux and Netbeans IDE. My challenge is that after including ‘mpi.h’ in my header file and compiling the application, I still get ‘fatal error : cannot find file mpi.c’. I have the files in home/user/lib/openmpi/include, but I cant get it too work.
Can anyone help?
You could try to change the compiler to /path/mpicc and the debugger to mpirun. This should work, although I did not test it, but probably the best way to compile MPI code is via terminal.
If you really depend on the IDE you cound try writing your code with it (to take advantage of auto-completion and such) and compile it in terminal using mpicc -o main.exe main.cpp [other .cpp files] and run it with mpirun -np number_of_processes_to_use ./main.exe [args]. You could write a small script or a Makefile to do it all in one command.
Good luck!
to save yourself some sanity, I'd recommend opening up a terminal and going from there (at least until you figure out what's what).
Also, using the mpi compiler to do things would simplify your life. (and likely automatically solve the missing source issue, as it should know where they are by default).
If you still can't locate them during compile then I'd look at adding the location where mpi.c & mpi.h are located to your C Include Path: How to add a default include path for gcc in linux?
I'm trying to compile a downloaded program in Windows. The program is usually run in Linux, but is programmed to also run in Windows (the code has #if defined(_WIN32)'s in it, and claims to work with borland free tools). When I try to use make from the command line, it tells me "Incorrect command line argument: -C". In the makefile, there are many lines that say "make -C" followed by a directory name. Does this syntax not work in Windows? What is a correct way to do this? Is there any way to compile this for native use in Windows with this makefile?
Windows itself doesn't come with a make utility. Microsoft does have a 'make' utility that comes with their development tools (such as Visual Studio, the Platform SDK, or the Windows Driver Kit) but it's called nmake.
You probably need GNU make to process those makefiles. you can get a copy for Windows here:
http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/
However, if the makefile isn't written to be able to be run on Windows, it'll probably not work well. You'll also need to make sure you have whatever other development tools the makefile calls upon (maybe the Borland compiler or GCC), and there may be other configuration that needs to be done specific to the project you want to build. It's probably not a matter of just having the correct make utility.
-C is "change working directory" only for the gmake command (from the GNU package). You should take a look in the manual for your Make-Utility and see, wheather it supports something äquivalent.
Peter
Are you using cygwin?
Are there any instructions for installing on windows(perhaphs in a README file)?
I haven't done C in a long time. I'd like to compile this program, but I have no idea how to proceed. It seems like the makefile refers to GCC a lot and I've never used GCC.
I just want an executable that will run on windows.
You may need to install either cygwin or mingw, which are UNIX-like environments for Windows.
http://www.mingw.org/
http://www.cygwin.com/
When downloading/installing either cygwin or mingw, you will have the option of downloading and installing some optional features; you will need the following:
gcc (try version 2.x first, not 3.x)
binutils
GNU make (or gmake)
If it requires gcc and you want it to run on Windows, you could download Cygwin.
That's basically an emulator for GNU/Linux type stuff for Windows. It works with an emulation DLL.
http://www.cygwin.com/
In order to compile this program you need a C compiler. It does not have to be gcc, although you are already given a makefile set up to use gcc. The simplest thing for you to do would be the following:
Install cygwin
Open the cygwin command prompt
go into the directory where you have your makefile
type 'make'
That should compile your program
If you are not comfortable with using command line tools then you can download the free version of MS Visual Studio and import the source files into a new Visual Studio project. This way you would not need to install cygwin and use gcc, but you would need to know how to create projects and run programs in Visual Studio.
You almost certainly don't need all of cygwin to compile using gcc. There are plenty of standalone gcc clones for Windows, like gcw.
If it's reasonably portable C code (I haven't looked at it), then you may be able to just ignore the included Makefile and feed the source into whatever compiler you do want to use. What happens when you try that?
Dev-C++ provides a simple but nice IDE which uses the Mingw gcc compiler and provides Makefile support. Here are the steps I used to build the above code using Dev-C++ (i.e. this is a "how-to")
After downloading the source zip from NIST, I
downloaded and installed the Dev-C++ 5 beta 9 release
created a new empty project
added all the .c files from sts-2.0\src
Then under Project Options
added -lm in the Linker column under Parameters
added sts-2.0\include to the Include Directories in Directories
set the Executable and Object directories to the obj directory under the Build Options
and then hit OK to close the dialog. Go to Execute > Compile and let it whirl. A minute later, you can find the executable in the sts-2.0\obj directory.
First, there is little chance that a program with only makefiles will build with visual studio, if only because visual studio is not a good C compiler from a standard POV (the math functions in particular are very poorly supported on MS compilers). It may be possible, but it won't be easy, specially if you are not familiar with C. You should really stick to the makefiles instead of trying to import the code in your own IDE - this kind of scienfitic code is clearly meant to be compiled from the command line. It is a test suite, so trying things randomly is NOT a good idea.
You should use mingw + msys to install it: mingw will give you the compilers (gcc, etc...) and msys the shell for the make file to run correctly. Contrary to one other poster, I would advise you against using gcc 2 - I don't see any point in that. I routinely use gcc 3 (and even 4) on windows to build scientific code, it works well when the code is unix-like (which is the standard platform for this kind of code).