Related
I was doing a question about finding an element in an array using function pointer concept. But I am facing some issues regarding this.
Here is my code.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
bool compare( const void* a, const void* b)
{
return (*(int*)a == *(int*)b);
}
int search(const void * arr, int arr_size, int ele_size, void* x, bool compare(const void*, const void*))
{
char* ptr = *(char**)arr;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < arr_size; i++)
{
if (compare(ptr + i * ele_size, x))
{
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
int main()
{
int arr[] = { 2, 5, 7, 90, 70 };
int n = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
int x = 7;
printf("Returned index is %d ", search(arr, n, sizeof(int), &x, compare));
return 0;
}
The code is compile fine but not giving any output?
What is wrong with this code?
No need to de-reference arr, just alter its type to do the pointer math.
// char *ptr = *(char**) arr;
const char *ptr = arr;
Minor: Best practice to use const here.
I wish to sort a second array as per the first array. e.g.
first = {1,8,7,2,4}
second = {9,7,2,10,3}
I want first to be unchanged and second to be sorted in the same relative order as the first. i.e. the lowest value is at index 0, the second lowest value is at index 3, third lowest value is at index 4 etc etc
second = {2,10,9,3,7}
I have already tried some code for the following
#include <stdio.h>
typedef struct
{
int num;
int pos;
}ArrType;
ArrType arrA[5] = {{1,0},{8,1},{7,2},{2,3},{4,4}};
ArrType arrB[5] = {{9,0},{7,1},{2,2},{10,3},{3,4}};;
int cmparr(const void *a, const void *b)
{
ArrType *tmpa, *tmpb;
tmpa = (ArrType*) a;
tmpb = (ArrType*) b;
return(arrA[tmpa->pos].num - arrA[tmpb->pos].num);
}
int main(void)
{
int i;
qsort(arrB,5, sizeof(ArrType), cmparr);
for (i=0; i<5; i++)
{
printf ("%d ",arrB[i].num);
}
return (0);
}
The actual output is
9 10 3 2 7
I am open to a different data structure, but arrB should only be sorted one time.
I have seen some solutions for this in C++, Javascipt and other languages. But there is not a solution in C.
Edit - These arrays would be quite large in the final program. I am looking for a single sorting operation. i.e. single call to qsort
You need to create the meta-data that matches the desired ordering (i.e an array of indexes). Then apply that meta-data to the second array.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int first[] = {1,8,7,2,4};
int second[] = {9,7,2,10,3};
int compare(const void * a, const void * b);
int binary_search(int array[], int min, int max, int target);
void print_array(int * array, int c);
int main()
{
int idx;
int c = sizeof(first)/sizeof(int);
int * sorted = NULL;
int * indexes = NULL;
int * result = NULL;
if (NULL == (sorted = malloc(sizeof(first)))) {
return -1;
}
memcpy(sorted, first, sizeof(first));
if (NULL == (indexes = malloc(sizeof(first)))) {
free(sorted);
return -1;
}
memset(indexes, -1, sizeof(first));
if (NULL == (result = malloc(sizeof(second)))) {
free(sorted);
free(indexes);
return -1;
}
memset(result, -1, sizeof(second));
// 1st: Sort the reference array
qsort (sorted, c, sizeof(int), compare);
// 2nd: Record the position of each sorted element in the original array (this is your meta-data)
for (idx=0; idx<c; idx++) {
indexes[idx] = binary_search(sorted, 0, c, first[idx]);
}
// 3rd sort the target array
memcpy(sorted, second, sizeof(second));
qsort (sorted, c, sizeof(int), compare);
// 4th apply the stored positions to the sorted target array
for (idx = 0; idx < c; idx++) {
result[idx] = sorted[indexes[idx]];
}
print_array(result, c);
free(result);
free(indexes);
free(sorted);
return 0;
}
int compare(const void * a, const void * b)
{
return ( *(int*)a - *(int*)b );
}
int binary_search(int array[], int min, int max, int target)
{
int mid;
while (min <= max)
{
mid = min + (max - min)/2;
if (target > array[mid])
min = mid + 1;
else if (target < array[mid])
max = mid - 1;
else
return mid;
}
return -1;
}
void print_array(int * array, int c)
{
for(int i = 0; i < c; i++) {
printf("%d ", array[i]);
}
printf("\n");
}
Demo
Here is my approach, it uses qsort twice and arrC contains the result.
#include <stdio.h>
typedef struct
{
int num;
int pos;
}ArrType;
ArrType arrA[5] = {{1,0},{8,1},{7,2},{2,3},{4,4}};
int arrB[5] = {9,7,2,10,3};;
int arrC[5];
int cmpInt(const void *a, const void *b)
{
return(*a - *b);
}
int cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
{
ArrType *tmpa, *tmpb;
tmpa = (ArrType*) a;
tmpb = (ArrType*) b;
return(tmpa->num - tmpb->num);
}
int main(void)
{
int i;
qsort(arrA,5, sizeof(ArrType), cmp);
qsort(arrB,5, sizeof(ArrType), cmpInt);
for (i=0; i<5; i++)
{
arrC[arrA[i].pos] = arrB[i];
}
return (0);
}
Since C doesn't have a lambda compare (which could be used to sort an array of indexes according to first[]), the code below sorts an array of pointers ap[] to the elements of first[] using qsort(). Using pointers eliminates the need to pass an array name as a parameter for the compare function, which in turn allows the compare function to work with qsort(). The expression (ap[i]-first) converts a pointer into an index. Next second[] is sorted, also using qsort(). Then ap[] is used as a set of ranks to reorder second[] in place and in O(n) time.
To explain reorder by rank versus reorder by index:
dst[rank[i]] = src[i]; /* reorder by rank */
dst[i] = src[index[i]]; /* reorder by index */
Example code:
#include <memory.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
/* compare for ptr to integer */
int cmppi(const void *p0, const void *p1){
return (*(int *)p0 - *(int *)p1);
}
/* compare for ptr to ptr to integer */
int cmpppi(const void *p0, const void *p1){
return (**(int **)p0 - **(int **)p1);
}
int main()
{
int first[] = {1, 8, 7, 2, 4};
int second[] = {9, 7, 2,10, 3};
int **ap; /* array of pointers */
int *tmpp;
int tmpi;
size_t i, j;
/* allocate and generate array of pointers to first[] */
ap = (int **)malloc(sizeof(first)/sizeof(first[0])*sizeof(int *));
for(i = 0; i < sizeof(first)/sizeof(first[0]); i++)
ap[i] = &first[i];
/* sort ap */
qsort(ap, sizeof(first)/sizeof(first[0]), sizeof(int *), cmpppi);
/* sort second */
qsort(second, sizeof(second)/sizeof(second[0]), sizeof(int), cmppi);
/* reorder ap and second in place using ap as rank (O(n) time) */
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(second) / sizeof(second[0]); i++){
while(i != (j = ap[i] - first)){
tmpp = ap[i]; /* swap(ap[i], ap[j]) */
ap[i] = ap[j];
ap[j] = tmpp;
tmpi = second[i]; /* swap(second[i], second[j] */
second[i] = second[j];
second[j] = tmpi;
}
}
/* display second[] */
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(second) / sizeof(second[0]); i++)
printf("%3d", second[i]);
printf("\n");
free(ap);
return 0;
}
I created an insertion sort method which accepts an array, its size and a comparator. The comparator function is this:
int compare_int_ptr(void* ptr1, void* ptr2) {
double i1 = *(double*)ptr1;
double i2 = *(double*)ptr2;
if(i1<i2) {
return -1;
}
if(i1 == i2) {
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
The insertion is this:
void insertion_sort(void** array, int size, CompFunction compare){
int i,j;
void* key;
for(i = 1; i<size;i++){
key = array[i];
for(j = i-1; j>=0 && compare(array[j],key)>=0;j--){
swap(&array[j+1],&array[j]);
}
array[j+1] = key;
}
}
If I try to execute it, I get the segmentation fault error, so I think that I didn't used the pointer correctly. Is it correct that when I do the swap i pass it with the &?
EDIT: this is where I call the method:
int main(int argc, char const *argv[]) {
if(argc < 2) {
printf("Usage: sortingfirstusage <file_name>\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
double* array = load_array(argv[1]);
insertion_sort((void**)array, 3, compare_int_ptr);
free(array);
return 0;
The array is correctly loaded because I printed all the elements before calling the insertion sort and they were in.
You are trying to sort an array of doubles. double *array points to the first of n elements:
array ==> [ double ] \
[ double ] |
. > n elements
. |
[ double ] /
You are casting array to a void **:
(void **)array ==> [ void * ] \
[ void * ] |
. > n elements
. |
[ void * ] /
It should not be hard to determine that trouble lies ahead. A void * is not a double. It may or may not be the same size as a double. It almost certainly doesn't point to a valid memory location, so if you dereference it you will invoke undefined behavior, almost certainly resulting in your program being killed by a signal. Unfortunately, your insertion_sort function does dereference it when it calls the comparison function:
key = array[i];
for(j = i-1; j>=0 && compare(array[j],key)>=0;j--){
array[i] and array[j] are both invalid void * values (because the underlying memory contains doubles, not void *s). Your comparison function dereferences them here:
double i1 = *(double*)ptr1;
double i2 = *(double*)ptr2;
ptr1 and ptr2 contain meaningless pointer values. They do not point to doubles. Dereferencing them invokes undefined behavior.
Here is a working version of insertion_sort using the same function type and equivalent functionality to the qsort function from the C standard library (although the function is a lot less efficient than qsort):
insertion_sort.h:
#ifndef INSERTION_SORT_H_INCLUDED__
#define INSERTION_SORT_H_INCLUDED__
#include <stddef.h>
void insertion_sort(void *base, size_t nmemb, size_t size,
int (*compar)(const void *, const void *));
#endif
insertion_sort.c:
#include <string.h>
#include "insertion_sort.h"
void insertion_sort(void *base, size_t nmemb, size_t size,
int (*compar)(const void *, const void *))
{
char (*b)[size] = base;
size_t i;
size_t j;
int cmp;
for (i = 1; i < nmemb; i++) {
j = i - 1;
/* search backwards for insertion point */
while ((cmp = compar(b + j, b + i)) > 0 && j > 0)
j--;
if (cmp <= 0)
j++; /* went back one too far */
if (j < i) {
/* rotate element i to position j, j to j+1, ..., i-1 to i */
char tmp[size];
memcpy(&tmp[0], &b[i][0], size);
memmove(&b[j + 1][0], &b[j][0], size * (i - j));
memcpy(&b[j][0], &tmp[0], size);
}
}
}
Here is an example of the usage of the above function:
main.c:
#include <stdio.h>
#include "insertion_sort.h"
int compar_double(const void *a, const void *b)
{
double d1 = *(const double *)a;
double d2 = *(const double *)b;
if (d1 < d2)
return -1;
if (d1 > d2)
return 1;
return 0;
}
void print_doubles(const double *d, size_t n)
{
size_t i;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
printf("%g\n", d[i]);
}
int main(void)
{
double numberlist[] = { 3.0, 1.0, 5.0, -4.0, 2.0 };
size_t len = sizeof numberlist / sizeof numberlist[0];
printf("Unsorted:\n");
print_doubles(numberlist, len);
printf("\n");
insertion_sort(numberlist, len, sizeof numberlist[0], compar_double);
printf("Sorted:\n");
print_doubles(numberlist, len);
return 0;
}
Here is the output produced by the above program:
Unsorted:
3
1
5
-4
2
Sorted:
-4
1
2
3
5
void qsort( void *ptr, size_t count, size_t size,
int (*comp)(const void *, const void *) );
Like qsort, your sorting function should take a void * as the first parameter, not void **. The double indirection is a mistake that you should have noticed when calling insertion_sort. Converting a double[] array to void ** requires a cast, whereas it can be converted automatically to void * without one.
Without knowing what load_array(argv[1]); does, the answer is impossible to predict as Peter suggested in the comments.
Assuming this function call is doing something legitimate and loading the array with pointers that can be de-referenced properly then your problem is the cast. You cannot make a pointer into a pointer to pointers. You have to pass the address of the pointer to accomplish what you want.
insertion_sort(&array, 3, compare_int_ptr);
So, what I'm trying to achieve here, is to use the C implementation of qsort in a 2d array, in witch I want only the rows to be sorted based on the its first element, for example:
int arr[3][2]={{65,1},
{45,2},
{66,3}}
I want the output to be:
int arr[3][2]={{45,2},
{65,1},
{66,3}}
Is there a way of doing this without implementing quicksort myself? If so, how?
EDIT
This is what my code looks like:
int f(int a, int b)
{
return a-b;
}
qsort(arr[0],3,sizeof(int),f);
You're not sorting integers, you're sorting "things" that happen to be a number of integers in size.
So, don't lie to qsort() about your element size:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
static int cmprow(const void *a, const void *b)
{
const int * const ia = a, * const ib = b;
return ia[0] < ib[0] ? -1 : ia[0] > ib[0];
}
int main(void) {
int arr[3][2]={{65,1},
{45,2},
{66,3}};
qsort(arr, sizeof arr / sizeof *arr, sizeof *arr, cmprow);
for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof arr / sizeof *arr; ++i)
{
for (size_t j = 0; j < sizeof *arr / sizeof **arr; ++j)
printf("%d ", arr[i][j]);
putchar('\n');
}
return 0;
}
This prints:
45 2
65 1
66 3
Here is the problem:
qsort(arr[0],3,sizeof(int),f);
This function take size_t as the second argument. You have passed 3. Thats not the size, thats count of elements in the array arr. In a crude way, you need something like 3*sizeof(int). Or better sizeof(arr) / sizeof *arr.
So, change it to
qsort(arr, sizeof(arr) / sizeof *arr, sizeof(int), sizeof *arr, comparator);
With:
int comparator(const void *p, const void *q)
{
// Get the values at given addresses
int l = *(const int *)p;
int r = *(const int *)q;
// both odd, put the greater of two first.
if ((l&1) && (r&1))
return (r-l);
// both even, put the smaller of two first
if ( !(l&1) && !(r&1) )
return (l-r);
// l is even, put r first
if (!(l&1))
return 1;
// l is odd, put l first
return -1;
}
/*I recently learnt qsort function. This c code is giving incorrect output. Need help with this.
PROBLEM- Sorting an array of integers in alternate fashion. (the elements at even indices and those at odd indices are sorted separately)
OUTPUT- 0 4 1 2 5 8 7 5 9 3
10 5
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
// This function is used in qsort to decide the relative order
// of elements at addresses p and q.
int comparator(const void *p, const void *q)
{
// Get the values at given addresses
int l = *(const int *)p;
int r = *(const int *)q;
return (l-r);
}
// A utility function to print an array
void printArr(int arr[], int n)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < n; i = i+1)
printf("%d ", arr[i]);
}
// Driver program to test above function
int main()
{
int arr[] = {1,4,7,2,9,3,0,8,6,5};
int size0 = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
int size1 = (int) ((float)sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]) / 2 + 0.5);
int size2 = size0 - size1;
qsort((void *)arr+1, size2, 2*sizeof(arr[0]), comparator);
//sort odd positions
qsort((void *)arr, size1, 2*sizeof(arr[0]), comparator);
//sort even positions
printf("Output array is\n");
printArr(arr, size0);
printf("\n%d %d", size0, size1);
return 0;
}
It is possible to use qsort() for sorting of even/odd elements separately.
However, the setup must be changed slightly to accomplish this.
As Peter mentioned correctly (and I didn't consider before as I must admit) sorting for even elements will "destroy" the result for odd elements as swapping considers the element size which is denoted as pair of even and odd element.
This in mind, a solution can be done for all that if the result of first sorting is saved before second sorting is done.
In my sample, I copied the relevant elements after first sorting and merged them in after second sorting.
This is my sample testQSortEvenOdd.c:
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int compEven(const int *p1, const int *p2)
{
return (p1[0] > p2[0]) - (p1[0] < p2[0]);
}
int compOdd(const int *p1, const int *p2)
{
return (p1[1] > p2[1]) - (p1[1] < p2[1]);
}
void printArray(size_t n, int *arr, int step)
{
for (; n--; arr += step) printf(" %d", *arr);
putchar('\n');
}
int main()
{
int arr[] = { 1, 4, 7, 2, 9, 3, 0, 8, 6, 5 };
enum { size = sizeof arr / sizeof *arr };
assert(!(size & 1));
/* sort odd positions */
qsort(arr, (size + 1) / 2, 2 * sizeof *arr,
(int(*)(const void*, const void*))&compOdd);
/* output of sorted array for odd positions */
puts("Odd elements sorted:");
printArray(size / 2, arr + 1, 2);
int arrRes[(size + 1) / 2];
for (size_t i = 1; i < size; i += 2) arrRes[i / 2] = arr[i];
/* sort even positions */
qsort(arr, (size + 1) / 2, 2 * sizeof *arr,
(int(*)(const void*, const void*))&compEven);
/* output of sorted array for even positions */
puts("Even elements sorted:");
printArray((size + 1) / 2, arr, 2);
/* merge array with copy */
for (size_t i = 1; i < size; i += 2) arr[i] = arrRes[i / 2];
puts("Merged elements:");
printArray(size, arr, 1);
/* done */
return 0;
}
Tested in Cygwin on Windows 10 (64 bit):
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.4.0
$ gcc -std=c11 -o testQSortEvenOdd testQSortEvenOdd.c
$ ./testQSortEvenOdd
Odd elements sorted:
2 3 4 5 8
Even elements sorted:
0 1 6 7 9
Merged elements:
0 2 1 3 6 4 7 5 9 8
$
Some additional notes:
The way I (and the questioner) used qsort(), it handles two consecutive int values at once. Hence, it must be granted that the array has an appropriate number of elements. (Otherwise, qsort() either does out-of-bound access or cannot consider the last element.) To consider this fact, I inserted the
assert(!(size & 1));
which can be read as "Assure that the array has an even number of elements."
I decided to make separate functions compEven() and compOdd() as IMHO it simplified things. I changed the signature of both to my needs and got complains (warnings) from gcc about wrong function signature. Therefore, I casted the function pointers to the expected type (to make gcc silent).
Jonathon gave a nice hint to make the comparison functions robust against underflow issues. return p1[0] - p2[0]; can cause wrong results when the difference becomes greater than INT_MAX or smaller than INT_MIN. Instead he recommends to use:
return (p1[0] > p2[0]) - (p1[0] < p2[0]);
which never can have any overflow/underflow issues.
How it works:
In case a < b: (a > b) - (a < b) ⇒ 0 - 1 ⇒ -1
In case a == b: (a > b) - (a < b) ⇒ 0 - 0 ⇒ 0
In case a > b: (a > b) - (a < b) ⇒ 1 - 0 ⇒ 1
Very clever Jonathan Leffler – I'm impressed.
qsort:
void qsort( void *ptr, size_t count, size_t size,
int (*comp)(const void *, const void *) );
Sorts the given array pointed to by ptr in ascending order. The array contains count elements of size bytes. Function pointed to by comp is used for object comparison.
ptr - pointer to the array to sort
count - number of element in the array
size - size of each element in the array in bytes
comp - comparison function which returns a negative integer value if
the first argument is less than the second,
In your program, you are passing size of each element as 2*sizeof(arr[0]) which results in 8 bytes which is incorrect input to qsort(). Hence you are getting incorrect output.
qsort needs a contiguous block of memory to function properly.
If you need to sort odd and even indexed elements separately, you could start by separating the elements, sort them indipendently and then merge the two parts.
You can do that even without allocating any extra memory:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int less_int(const void *lhs, const void *rhs)
{
return *(const int *)lhs < *(const int *)rhs ? -1
: *(const int *)lhs > *(const int *)rhs ? 1 : 0;
}
int greater_int(const void *lhs, const void *rhs)
{
return *(const int *)lhs > *(const int *)rhs ? -1
: *(const int *)lhs < *(const int *)rhs ? 1 : 0;
}
void sort_ascending(int* arr, size_t n)
{
qsort(arr, n, sizeof *arr, less_int);
}
void sort_descending(int* arr, size_t n)
{
qsort(arr, n, sizeof *arr, greater_int);
}
inline void swap_int(int* a, int* b)
{
int tmp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = tmp;
}
size_t partition_odd_even(int* arr, size_t n )
{
size_t n_odds = n - n / 2;
for (size_t i = 1, j = n_odds + n_odds % 2; i < n_odds; i += 2, j += 2)
{
swap_int(arr + i, arr + j);
}
return n_odds;
}
void interleave_odd_even(int* arr, size_t n )
{
size_t n_odds = n - n / 2;
for (size_t i = 1; i < n_odds; ++i )
{
for (size_t j = n_odds - i; j < n_odds + i; j += 2)
{
swap_int(arr + j, arr + j + 1);
}
}
}
void print_arr(int* arr, size_t n);
int main(void)
{
int arr[] = {1, 4, 7, 2, 9, 3, 0, 8, 6, 5};
size_t arr_size = sizeof arr / sizeof *arr;
print_arr(arr, arr_size);
size_t n_odds = partition_odd_even(arr, arr_size);
size_t n_evens = arr_size - n_odds;
// print_arr(arr, arr_size);
sort_ascending(arr, n_odds);
// print_arr(arr, n_odds);
sort_descending(arr + n_odds, n_evens);
// print_arr(arr + n_odds, n_evens);
interleave_odd_even(arr, arr_size);
print_arr(arr, arr_size);
return 0;
}
void print_arr(int* arr, size_t n)
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < n; ++i)
{
printf(" %d", arr[i]);
}
puts("");
}
Which gives:
1 4 7 2 9 3 0 8 6 5
0 8 1 5 6 4 7 3 9 2
EDIT
As noted in the comments below by greybeard the code above is not really time efficient as the merge part is O(N²). Using a temporary array which contains only the elements to be sorted in a particular way, the following program only need O(N) extra time and O(N/K) space, where K is the number of different sorting order needed (2 in OP's question).
Jonathan Leffler also pointed out that it could be made more general allowing the algorithm "to handle 3, 4, … N evenly interlaced sub-arrays, possibly with different sort orders for each". I implemented it in the following snippet by passing to the sort function an array of pointer to compare functions.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
// compare functions
typedef int (*PCMPFN)(const void*, const void*);
int ascending_cmp_int(const void *lhs, const void *rhs)
{
return *(const int *)lhs < *(const int *)rhs ? -1
: *(const int *)lhs > *(const int *)rhs ? 1 : 0;
}
int descending_cmp_int(const void *lhs, const void *rhs)
{
return *(const int *)lhs > *(const int *)rhs ? -1
: *(const int *)lhs < *(const int *)rhs ? 1 : 0;
}
// This function is never called. Whithout knowing the actual implementation
// of 'qsort' we can't make any assumption
int untouched_cmp_int(const void *lhs, const void *rhs)
{
(void)lhs; // Those parameters are unused here, this is to avoid a warning
(void)rhs;
return 0;
}
// Copy the elements of the source array starting from index 'start' with stride 'step'
size_t strided_split(int* dest, const int *src, size_t n, size_t start, size_t step)
{
size_t j = 0;
for (size_t i = start; i < n; i += step, ++j)
{
dest[j] = src[i];
}
return j;
}
// Inverse of the previous
void strided_merge(int* dest, const int *src, size_t n, size_t start, size_t step)
{
for (size_t i = start, j = 0; j < n; i += step, ++j)
{
dest[i] = src[j];
}
}
// Apply different sort orders to different elements
void alternate_sort(int* arr, const size_t n, PCMPFN comps[], const size_t k)
{
int tmp[n/k + 1]; // Please note that VLA are optional in C11
for ( size_t i = 0; i < k; ++i )
{
if ( comps[i] == untouched_cmp_int )
continue;
// First select the elements
size_t n_copied = strided_split(tmp, arr, n, i, k);
// then sort only them as needed
qsort(tmp, n_copied, sizeof tmp[0], comps[i]);
// Once sorted, copy back the elements in the source array
strided_merge(arr, tmp, n_copied, i, k);
}
}
void print_arr(const int* arr, const size_t n);
int main(void)
{
int arr[] = {1, 4, 7, 2, 9, 3, 0, 8, 6, 5};
const size_t N = sizeof arr / sizeof *arr;
print_arr(arr, N);
PCMPFN compares[] = {
descending_cmp_int, untouched_cmp_int, ascending_cmp_int
};
const size_t K = sizeof compares / sizeof *compares;
alternate_sort(arr, N, compares, K);
print_arr(arr, N);
return 0;
}
void print_arr(const int* arr, const size_t n)
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < n; ++i)
{
printf(" %d", arr[i]);
}
puts("");
}