Elastix: is there a way to setup a conference with infinite duration? Cause when I create it from the Elastix web manager they only last some days and they dissapear
Make sure you create the conference under the PBX Configuration tab and not the Conferences tab.
Then it's permanent and won't disappear.
Related
First off I would like to say your product is amazing! Has made the job of inheriting an old DNN instance a much more intuitive experience.
Apologies if this is really simple thing I'm missing but I'm at a dead end after scouring the docs and internet.
I'm using Evoq content and up until the start of the week the publishing workflow had been working fine rich text WISIWIG fields but it seems something has changed. Now when publishing changes any apps that are embedded in rich content fields display the demo item when not logged in.
I've recreated the issue on a smaller scale to illustrate the problem:
When logged in it looks as expected - on the left is a button that's placed directly onto the page, on the right is a button inside a rich text field:
logged in
And when logged out:
logged out
As you can see the button that is embedded as a rich text field is displaying the demo item.
I've gone through all of the content items and ensured that they are set to publish and not draft or hide and ensured the page is set to published in DNN.
Aldo I've double checked how the fields are setup but as this was working previously, I'm doubtful that this is the issue but for clarity here is how the fields look in the model:
Rich text field model
And it's rendered to the page using:
#{
var renderSvc = GetService<IRenderService>();
}
#renderSvc.All(Content, field: "BodyContentBlocks", merge: Content.Body)
I've been scouring the docs and internet for hints of what might be going on but the closest I could find was this thread on github but it doesn't seem to be quite the same issue.
Any help would be massively apricated as this issue has cropped up just before moving to our production server (as they always do!) after working as expected for a couple of months. Let me know if you need any more info from me and thanks for your time.
Evoq has a page-workflow feature which is technically undocumented. 2sxc got a sponsor a few years ago who paid for the implementation but there are limitations to it. Some background:
Some data in 2sxc can be clearly assigned to a module or page - such as content added directly
Other data cannot be assigned to a page - such as a blog post
Because of this, the logic is to first determine if something is partOfPage and if yes - and workflow is active - then it will be set to be a draft. This way the end users don't see it.
Upon page-publish, everything that is partOfPage will be published, so the draft will become the live data.
I assume the detection of this was never implemented for inner content - I think inner-content was actually developed later. Because of this, I assume the toolbars for the inner-content-item tell the UI it's part of the page (resulting in draft), but the publish cycle doesn't know about this, since it's internally a sub-entity (which is just like a tag on a blog - not part of a page).
This is difficult to fix. A proper fix would require 2sxc to be modified to make sure that inner-content is never seen as part-of-page, OR that it's taken into account when publishing. Both of these options would probably take ca. 3 days of dev on 2sxc side and would only happen if we have a sponsor.
A workaround is to disable the Evoq-integration so the page publishing wouldn't happen. I believe there is a feature for this - and AFAIK you don't even have to become a Patron (which I highly recommend to support our thousands of hours of work):
Or you could manually try to publish it, but that will be difficult. Note that most of us will be on x-mas vacation so we won't be answering questions till mid Jan.
Summary of options
Avoid inner content for now
Disable Evoq Page Workflow in 2sxc
Manually publish the items (very difficult, needs super-user permissions because it's an unusual thing to publish)
Get some budget ca. 3 days to sponsor the feature https://2sxc.org/contact but wait till end of January
A mix of short-term solution + sponsoring
Sorry for the delay on this, I've been waiting for a decision. I'm going to close the question as we have been able to work around the issue for now with the help of your last comment. Avoiding inner content is working well enough for our use case. Thanks for your time and help and for making an amazing product!
I'm new to choregraphe and NAO. I'm working on different meditation exercises, that NAO guides the user through and I want to have one "Master application" that introduces the different exercises and let's the user choose, which one they want to do.
How do I implement an application switch in Choregraphe?
You can make an application that lists all the other applications, by calling ALPackageManager.packages2 and going through the results.
You have to spot packages that provide behaviors of nature "Interactive".
You can get their human-readable names to populate a graphical menu.
You can get their trigger sentences to populate a dialogue-based menu.
When an app is selected, use ALAutonomousLife.switchFocus to leave your launcher app and start the other app. Make sure the launch conditions of your launcher app leads to restarting it if a user is still around when the other app finishes.
Basically, we are building a small apps for mobile that list and display all applications/builds/details availables on the server. The listing is between 3-25 apps and each apps on the display occupy about 60 pixel hight with nice UI.
Apps 1 version ABC build date...
Details of the apps here (1-100 lines)
Apps 2 version ABC build date...
Details of the apps here (1-100 lines)
Apps 3 version ABC build date...
Details of the apps here (1-100 lines)
Apps 4 version ABC build date...
Details of the apps here (1-100 lines)
etc.
The listing order/size may change few times during a day (1-3). Is it good practice the just update the listing without any warning?
We have concerns if user is reading details for exemple while the refresh occured, the refresh will cause a scroll back to top. etc. We are talking about "good practice" of apps behavior.
Any comment or suggestion would be appreciated.
thanks,
I think it's all right to refresh data on an application if the goal of the application is to show the most actual data at all times.
But it is VERY important to give a clear and noticeable feed back to the user that the data has been refreshed, with an animation, some color changing or just an effect that goes well with the application.
Another option (and you have a great example just here in Browser Stack) is to tell the user that there is new data, and make them do something to update it.
Like a small prompt at the top of the screen that says "New data is available, tap here to update". That way you are sure that the user is 100% aware that data is being pushed to the application again, and that he agrees to do it.
Hope this helps.
I am currently running a SL3 project where we are in a highly iterative development mode with about 25 active test customers. I am making small changes at a clip of about 4 new builds per day. It is important to know this application is mission critical line of business for these 25 people, it is the tool they use all day to do their work so they are using it constantly and often launch their browser and the app in the morning and never close it until the end of the day.
The challenge is that when I make an update to the application I have no clean way to notify the users, in most cases this is ok as it is rare that I introduce a data contract change or something that would be a classic 'breaking' change to the app/service. Users keep plugging along and will get the change next time they refresh.
Right now we have resorted to emailing everyone and telling them to force refresh or close the browser and log back in.
Surely there is a better way...
Right now my train of thought is to have a method on the server that compares client xap versions and determines if the client being used is the most up to date, if so I will notify the user and make them update.
What have you done to solve this problem?
One way of doing it is to use a push mechanism (I used Kaazing Websoocket Gateway but any would do). When a new version of the XAP is released a message (either manually entered into the system by admin or automated triggered by XAP file change event) would be sent to all the clients. In the simplest scenario some notification would be shown to a user (telling him that a new version is released and the application needs to refresh) and then the app would refresh (by simply reloading the page) saving user's state if necessary.
If I would do this I would just keep it simple. A configuration value in web.config and a corresponding service method that simply returns that value (the value itself could be anything, but a counter is probably wise). Then you could have your Silverlight app poll that service method at regular intervals. Whenever the value changes (which you would do manually when you deploy a new version), just pop up a dialog telling the user to refresh the browser or log in/out. This way you don't have to force them to refresh every time. If you go with the idea of comparing xap file versions they will always be required to refresh, even for non-breaking changes.
If you want to take it further you could come up with some sort of mechanism to distinguish between different severity levels. For instance, if the new config value would contain the string "update_forced", you could force the users to reload the app by logging them out automatically (a little harsh, perhaps). If it contains the string "update_recommended", just show a little icon at the top right corner saying that there is a new version and that they should upgrade in their own time.
Granted, this was targeted at Silverlight 3, but with the PollingDuplex client and such in the newer versions of Silverlight, you could publish an "Update Now" bit to the clients, and build a mechanism in the client to alert the user that there is an update that is now out... that they should update it shortly, etc. You may even be able, through serialization and such, to save the state that they are in when they close the app to reload it.
We've done stuff similar with a LOB app that we built, so that as users are changing things, the rest of the userbase sees those changes immediately. Next up will be putting the flags in to change authorization and upgrades "on the fly" if you will.
I am designing a Point-Of-Sale system for a small shop. The shop just have one Point-Of-Sale but often they are one to three users (sellers) in the shop. Each user have their own user account in the system so they login and logout very often. How should I design the login/logout system in a good way?
For the moment the users don't use passwords, because it takes so long time to type the password each time they login.
The Platform is Windows Vista but I would like to support Windows 7 too. We use Active Directory on the Network. The system is developed in Java/Swing for the moment, but I'm thinking about to change to C#.NET/WPF.
I am thinking about an SmartCard solution, but I don't know if that fits my situation. It would be more secure (which I like) but I don't know if it will be easy to implement and smooth to use, i.e. can I have the POS-system running in the background or started very quickly when the users switch? Are SmartCard solutions very expensive? (My customers are small shops) Is it preferred to use .NET or Java in a SmartCard solution?
What other solutions do I have other than passwords/no passwords/smartcards?
How should I design the login/logout system in a good way?
Is there any good solution using SmartCards for this purpose?
I would like suggested solutions both for C#.NET/WPF and Java/Swing platforms.
I would like suggested solutions both for Active Directory solutions and solutions that only use one user profile in Windows.
How is this problem solved in similar products? I have only seen password-solutions, but they are clumsy.
An interesting solution is to use "Fast User Switching", i.e. the capability to have multiple user sessions open on the same PC. The POS software could be launched through the Startup folder of each seller account and would stay active in each seller session.
I thought that being in a domain (i.e. using Active Directory) disables Fast User Switching, but according to The old new thing, this was true on XP only. I just checked with my Win7 machine at work: it is in a domain but still has the "switch user" menu item.
The main advantage is that if your software is already multi-user aware, you don't need to change it.
I should have made the Fast User Switching check before writing what is below, because this seems to be the simplest solution. Here are other ideas, anyway.
Another solution is what you mention of having a single Windows user but several "virtual users" that your application manages. A smart card is a good way to implement a pseudo-login. In C++, the API allows detecting the removal or insertion of a card, so the application could detect this and read the card after insertion to know who's currently in front of the computer. .NET can easily call this API through P/Invoke; I don't know much of Java, except that JNI could be a solution to call the native API if there is no managed library that publishes this capability.
What should be done is researching the different types of card and how to talk to them, as your app should use a card that does not require a PIN to be accessed (or you are back to the slow login system, except if tying a 4-digit number is not considered too slow).
I've seen restaurants where waiters insert a key into the cash register in order to be identified. I googled "cash registers" but could only find a complete solution package, rather than the components like a key reader.
An almost idiotic question is: how much security do you need ? Does it make sense to have big buttons on the first screen of the app, where people click in order to tell the system who they are ? When they are done, they click on a "Finish" button and the app goes back to the "identify" screen. I've put this at the end because it is so simplistic that it has a low probability of being useful.
I'm not familiar with a broad range of smart card provider solutions, but I know Gemalto has a .Net friendly setup. Most others are geared to Java, but support is widening.
With regards to switching user sessions and your application, it depends on how "heavy" your application is. If your app requires quite a bit of start-up time / resources then you might consider creating the basic application as a service on the machine which can run in the background continuously and then you can load a light-weight UI to interact with the service with each user session (maybe launch via Startup menu).
There is a C# project on CodeProject which provides a framework for interacting with smart card services in windows - might be interesting reading.
I had a chance to work with the Open Source Computer Vision library (OpenCV)
in one of my past projects and its "Face-Recognition" is what you're after. It is written using native code, but can be easily used with Java, .NET, Android, iOS. All you need is a webcam and a button "Switch User" with the onClickListener that will take a picture and compare it with the images of your employees. Advantage? Once the picture's taken, it gets processed in less than 10ms. And as Timores mentioned earlier, once the face is recognised, you simply switch the session. Simple yet effective solution. Good luck!
maybe you want to think about using barcode scanner... probably you already have this device on POS ... my software for bars and restaurants use barcode scanner to recognize users. You have 2 options for using: first, user must log in with own barcode card, then he can use the application ... the second is better, everyone can use application, but to print the receipt user must use barcode card. After then he is responsible for that amount on this receipt.