I have UI-elements like a textbox and I want to bind them to a ViewModel. I need to access many properties of the textbox like the text- or the IsEnabled-property.
Is it possible that I bind the textbox directly to another textbox in the ViewModel with all their properties instead of binding every single property to properties?
Yes, using an ElementName, but you still bind all properties though.
<!-- Bound to ViewModel -->
<TextBox Name="tbOne" IsEnabled="{Binding OneIsEnabled}" Text={Binding TextOne}/>
<TextBox Name="tbTwo" IsEnabled="{Binding ElementName=tbOne, Path=IsEnabled}" Text={Binding ElementName=tbOne, Path=Text}/>
There is no built-in way to bind all dependency properties of the TextBox to another. Personally, I would prefer binding directly to the ViewModel.
An alternative solution would be to create a UserControl that internally clones the TextBox with all bindings:
<CloneControl Target="{Binding ElementName=tbOne}"/>
Here, the ControlControl would inspect the target, and have code that create a new TextBox, and sets the bindings in code. This is only useful if you are doing this very often, and there is a slightly performance price to pay, as you are adding another level of controls to the UI tree.
Related
I'm building a window with a set of rows that share the same layout, but their contents should be different, eg:
| (Label Content:)"Name1" | (Textbox Text)"SomeText" |
| (Label Content:)"Name5" | (Textbox Text)"OtherText" |
I've defined a DataTemplate which basically holds a Grid specifying the size of each column, holds all the elements it requires (a few labels, textboxes, etc.) and sets their common properties.
<UserControl.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="AxisRangeEntry" x:Shared="False">
<Grid HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Top">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="50" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="50" />
....
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Label x:Name="MyLabel" Grid.Column="0" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center">
...
<TextBox x:Name="MyTextbox" Grid.Column="2" Width="110" HorizontalContentAlignment="Right" />
...
</Grid>
</DataTemplate>
</UserControl.Resources>
Then in my window I start adding the data template as ContentControls in a stack panel:
<ContentControl ContentTemplate="{StaticResource AxisRangeEntry}" />
<ContentControl ContentTemplate="{StaticResource AxisRangeEntry}" />
....
I'm struggling to figure out how I can define certain properties of controls inside the DataTemplate to be bindable to, and bind them to a static value/external property when I start defining the ContentControls. Effectively each ContentControl would need to be able to define things like it's MyLabel content and MyTextbox text.
I've previously created CustomControls, which had DependencyProperties on them, which I could then bind to when adding them on another window. With a DataTemplate however I'm not sure how I would define these fields as bindable and bind to them when including a new version of the template.
Any help would be appreciated.
From what it sounds like, you are not using the MVVM pattern.
For your situation, I'd recommend using MVVM -- take a look at this article for a quick intro for something that would fit your case (ItemsControl with an ItemTemplate)
What you would do is create an ObservableObject to represent each row, and then bind the collection of ObservableObjects to an ItemsControl's ItemsSource, with the ItemTemplate set to the DataTemplate you created. In the DataTemplate, you would specify each binding to the property on the ObservableObject's row, and WPF would bind to the correct instance for each row.
http://www.wpf-tutorial.com/list-controls/itemscontrol/
Either way, DataTemplates are primarily used for templating a certain data-type. If you really need to implement the view in this way, a custom UserControl with dependency properties would be the way to go.
You present a dynamic nature of items to be bound, so this answer will attempt to provide guidance within the parameter's set.
...[to] define certain properties of
controls inside the DataTemplate to be bindable to,
Within a template the binding will default to the parents data context. Simply saying {Binding} will default to that item in the data context. If the bound item has a specific property then use {Binding MyPropertyName}. Just verify that the parent, or its ancestors have a valid data context.
Think of data templates in its final location, as if you had hard coded it there. It will behave the same....
and bind them to a static value/external property when I start defining the
ContentControls.
Since this sounds like it is in a custom control, the datacontext will be the ultimate consumer's datacontext and most likely the datacontext will be worthless.
If it is on a custom control, then use named binding and bind it to a property on the control. For example the control's name, in XAML, is given the name "MyControl" (x:Name="MyControl")and in the template binding, one can path directly to it such as
{Binding MyCustomControlDependencyProperty, ElementName=MyControl}
created CustomControls, which had Dependency properties
With the above rules one can still, and should IMHO, use dependency properties of the custom control to pass on the information from the consumer to the the datatemplate which will use it dynamically..
This is the scenario:
I have a telerik gridview on my page, this is bound to a PagedCollectionView
with items of class "GekoppeldeOntvangstRegel",
this class implements INotifyPropertyChanged
Several columns have a CellTemplate with a TextBlock bound to an object of this class, like this:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ConverterParameter='aantal', Converter={StaticResource GekoppeldeRegelDecimalFormatConverter}, NotifyOnValidationError=True, ValidatesOnDataErrors=True, ValidatesOnExceptions=True, ValidatesOnNotifyDataErrors=True}" HorizontalAlignment="Right" ToolTipService.ToolTip="{Binding ConverterParameter='aantal', Converter={StaticResource GekoppeldeRegelToolTipDecimalFormatConverter}}" />
This converter converts the "Aantal" property to a string with a specific number of decimals.
When I update the "Aantal" property from code with the OnPropertyChanged("Aantal") of course the binding isn't updated (since the textblock is bound to the entire object, not the property) so the old value is still visible.
How can I refresh the column contents from my viewmodel or object when the property changes?
When I bind directly to the "Aantal" property everything works perfectly (besides the converter not being applied, which is necessary)
As a workaround I now have created several extra properties on the "GekoppeldeOntvangstRegel" class.
These properties call the converter and return the right value with the right number of decimals.
On these properties raising OnPropertyChanged does work to refresh the bindings.
I'm not really happy with this solution but it works for now.
As a continuation of the question Linking DataContext with another property in WPF.
At the very end of the research I was very surprised to find out that when one writes something like that:
<Label Content="{Binding Path=Name}" />
The DataContext against which the Content property is binded is of the Label control itself! The fact that it still works is due to the default inheritance of the DataContext value from the nearest parent.
But if you have this label wrapped in a custom control, and you don't want to bind your data to the DataContext property of that control, you would more likely love to have:
<Controls:SearchSettings Settings="{Binding Path=Settings}" />
And here you are. Now you need to set Settings as the DataContext for the SearchSettings control, for Label inside to bind against, but you can't, because that will trigger re-binding of Settings property.
I can't see the point in mixing binding properties using different sources: DataContext, by ElementName, etc.
So why would I ever use DataContext?
When you write
<Label name="myLabel" Content="{Binding Path=Name}" />
you are binding to myLabel.DataContext.Name, and not myLabel.Name.
The XAML in WPF is just a pretty user interface to display and interact with the actual data, otherwise known as the DataContext. The purpose of other binding sources (RelativeSource, ElementName, etc) is to point to another property that doesn't exist in the current control's DataContext
So suppose you have a Window. Without setting the DataContext, the window still displays but there is no data behind it.
Now suppose to set myWindow.DataContext = new ClassA();. Now the data that the window is displaying is ClassA. If ClassA has a property called Name, I could write a label and bind it to Name (such as your example), and whatever value is stored in ClassA.Name would get displayed.
Now, suppose ClassA has a property of ClassB and both classes have a property called Name. Here is a block of XAML which illustrates the purpose of the DataContext, and an example of how a control would refer to a property not in it's own DataContext
<Window x:Name="myWindow"> <!-- DataContext is set to ClassA -->
<StackPanel> <!-- DataContext is set to ClassA -->
<!-- DataContext is set to ClassA, so will display ClassA.Name -->
<Label Content="{Binding Name}" />
<!-- DataContext is still ClassA, however we are setting it to ClassA.ClassB -->
<StackPanel DataContext="{Binding ClassB}">
<!-- DataContext is set to ClassB, so will display ClassB.Name -->
<Label Content="{Binding Name}" />
<!-- DataContext is still ClassB, but we are binding to the Window's DataContext.Name which is ClassA.Name -->
<Label Content="{Binding ElementName=myWindow, Path=DataContext.Name}" />
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
As you can see, the DataContext is based on whatever data is behind the UI object.
Update: I see this question so often from new WPF users that I expanded this answer into a post on my blog: What is this “DataContext” you speak of?
From CodeProject by kishore Gaddam:
DataContext is one of the most fundamental concepts in Data Binding. The Binding object needs to get its data from somewhere, and there are a few ways to specify the source of the data like using Source property directly in the Binding, inheriting a DataContext from the nearest element when traversing up in the tree, setting the ElementName and RelativeSource properties in the Binding object.
Detailed example on CodeProject: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/321899/DataContext-in-WPF
In that particular case, you could do:
<Controls:SearchSettings DataContext="{Binding Path=Settings}" Settings="{Binding}" />
Assuming you want everything that may be content of the SearchSettings to use Settings as it's data context. Basically, the DataContext affects the element itself an any descendants that don't explicitly override it.
In most cases you do want to bind to the DataContext, in some templates on ItemsControls it is the only way to bind to the currently templated item for example. Further bindings to the DataContext are nice to write and read as they are concise.
In your example you can still set the DataContext, you only need to modify the binding on the Settings respectively:
<Controls:SearchSettings DataContext="{Binding Settings}" Settings="{Binding}"/>
This dialog makes no sense to me
http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/4223/50709706.gif
And I'm having trouble finding good tutorials on it. Most of the examples aren't detailed enough, or do stuff via code, but I'd like to take advantage of the IDE as much as possible.
Whats the difference between ItemsSource and DataContext?
I'd like to bind it to just a List for starters. I don't need SQL or databases or anything fancy. Where would I declare my list? In MainWindow.xaml.cs? How do I get it to appear in that dialog?
Think of "DataContext" as the default value for "Source" in a binding.
When you create a binding, you can specify the path and source, like this (I'll use TextBox as an example):
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Foo,Source={StaticResource Bar}}" />
So my TextBox.Text property is bound to a Foo property on an object called Bar (a resource somewhere in the application).
However, if you have a whole bunch of things that you want to bind to properties on Bar, it's easier to set Bar as the DataContext of the parent container. A Binding without a Source will just use the DataContext by default, and DataContext flows through to child controls from the parent. So:
<StackPanel DataContext="{StaticResource Bar}">
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Foo}" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Fizz}" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Buzz}" />
</StackPanel>
All of the TextBoxes are still binding to properties on Bar, but they're doing it without setting it as a Source explicitly.
So let's have another look at the dialog you posted. It's giving you several options for the "source" of the ItemsSource binding. When you choose "DataContext", you're telling Visual Studio that the ItemsControl doesn't need to know the source - it'll pick it up from the DataContext of the parent container (maybe even the Window itself).
If you chose one of the other options (ElementName, RelativeSource or StaticResource) then you'd be setting the binding's source explicitly for that ItemsControl.
Once you've told it that it's binding to the DataContext, you'll need to drop into the "Path" section of the dialog and tell it which property to bind the items of the control to. In the end, the markup would look something like this (assuming it's a ListBox):
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Foos}" />
So the items in the ListBox are coming from a property called "Foos", and that property is on an object that's set in the DataContext somewhere higher in the logical tree (perhaps on the Window itself).
You rarely need to use the data context of a control outside of the control. The most common use case for setting DataContext(DataContext = this;) is within UserControl's code-behind to make all controls within the UserControl to bind to the control's properties.
When you use a ListBox, setting ItemsSource is sufficient, unless you are doing something funky.
This is a pretty good walkthrough: http://windowsclient.net/learn/video.aspx?v=315275
Specifically, you need to set the DataContext first to tell it where to look for the ItemsSource. The easiest way is to set this on the Window through the XAML:
<Window.DataContext>
<controllers:DownloadManager />
</Window.DataContext>
I have a UserControl(a) with a stackpanel which has its ItemSource set to a collection.
The StackPanel then contains a set of UserControl(b) that contain a few buttons and a datagrid control.
Is there a way from the code behind in the UserControl(b) to access properties in the code behind of the parent UserControl(a).
Basically when UserControl(a) loaded into a window a parameter is passed in that contains whether the form will be considered read only or not. I would like bind the visibility of the buttons in Usercontrol(b) to the readonly property in the codebehind of the parent UserControl(a).
Normally with WPF I'd suggest you implement the Model-View-ViewModel pattern (see MSDN).
With this pattern you'd create a ViewModel with all of the data in that you want to bind. This would be set as the data context for the (a) usercontrol. That control would then bind all of it's controls to properties on the datacontext.
The child (b) usercontrol would inherit this datacontext and could therefore bind it's controls to the same properties as (a) uses. This is because datacontexts are inherited down the logical (and visual) tree until such point as it's overridden.
So for you I'd be looking at creating a ViewModel that contains the property ReadOnly. You can then set this ViewModel object as the datacontext for the (a) usercontrol. The (b) usercontrol, since it's under the (a) usercontrol hierarchy will inherit the same datacontext. This will then allow you to bind controls within (b) to the same properties as (a) as shown below.
<Button IsEnabled="{Binding ReadOnly}"
Context="Click me!"
Command="{Binding ClickMeCommand}" />
To set the datacontext in the view code-behind I do something like this constructor shown below.
public MyView(IMyViewModel viewModel)
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = viewModel;
}
MyView is the class that inherits from UserControl in your instance. You don't have to get the viewmodel in the way I have, I'm using Unity to inject the viewmodel into the views that are constructed automatically since I'm using Prism but you can just create it as a normal object and assign it to the datacontext.
Note that I've also bound the command to the button using the datacontext as I usually expose those via the ViewModel too, this is easy if you create a wrapper class that implements ICommand and proxies to a delegate. See DelegateCommand blog article or look at the DelegateCommand class in Prism if you are interested.
If for some reason you do override the datacontext, which can happen when using a master/details view where you change the datacontext of the details section of the view to be the currently selected item in the list, then you can still access the parent datacontext by using a relative source binding.
E.g.
<ComboBox Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1" x:Name="Unit" IsReadOnly="True"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=DataContext.AvailableUnits, RelativeSource=
{RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor,
AncestorType={x:Type Window}}}"
DisplayMemberPath="Name" SelectedItem="{Binding Unit}" />
Note the ItemsSource binding uses a relative source to find the parent window and then bind to a property of it's datacontext. I've also split the ItemsSource binding within the quotes across multiple lines for clarity here but don't do that in your xaml, I'm not sure it'll work there (not tried to see if markup extensions are that tolerant of whitespace).