Execute a c program as a background process - c

I am trying to make a background process in C to disable the visibility of the output/execution window. I used the following code but on using this the antivirus software reporst it as a threat and generates warnings:
HWND stealth;
AllocConsole();
stealth=FindWindowA("ConsoleWindowClass",NULL);
ShowWindow(stealth,0);
details are :
language : c
compiler : dev cpp
platform : windows 7/8
Is there any way I can create a background process in C without antivirus alerts?

If you just want an application that runs in the background without showing a console window, then the solution to your problem is far simpler: just don't create a console window!
Now, easier said than done. You've presumably created a Console application using the template in Visual Studio or some other IDE. This causes the application to be flagged when it is built as a Console application, and such applications always have a console window allocated to them on startup.
You don't want that, so you need to indicate that your application is not a Console application. In fact, it is just a regular Windows (Win32) application that doesn't show any windows. When writing a standard Windows application, no windows are created by default. If you don't create them in your code, then nothing gets created or displayed. And that's exactly what you want for a background process.
How you make this magic happen depends on your compiler/linker/IDE. Assuming you are using Visual Studio, you can follow these steps:
Right-click your project in the Solution Explorer.
Open the "Linker" category in the left-hand tree.
Select the "System" item in the tree.
Change the "Subsystem" setting to Windows, rather than Console.
That will automatically set the /SUBSYSTEM linker flag to specify WINDOWS, rather than CONSOLE.
(Edit: I just noticed that you said you're using Dev CPP. I've never used that IDE, but according to the directions I find online, you can just set the target to "GUI" in your project options. That should cause the -Wl,-subsystem,windows switch to be set when the linker is called. If not, find the linker flags in your project options and ensure that that switch is being passed.)
You will also need to take the final step of changing your application's entry point. Console applications have an entry point named main. For Windows applications, it is named wWinMain and has the following signature:
int WINAPI wWinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance,
HINSTANCE hPrevInstance,
PWSTR pCmdLine,
int nCmdShow);
You should be able to simply change the signature of your main method to the above signature for wWinMain and be off to the races.
If you don't want to do it the right way, there is still a better option than what you're currently doing. Instead of issuing suspicious-looking commands to hunt around, look for a process, and hide its windows (just smacks of malware, doesn't it?), you can simply deallocate the console window that is automatically created for your application. To do that, call the FreeConsole function.
It takes no parameters, because a process can only ever be attached to one console. You don't need to tell it what to free because there is only one possibility. The console window will automatically be closed when it has been detached from all processes—if your application is the one that created it and the only one that was attached to it, that means it'll close automatically.
If you need a console window again for some reason, you can call AllocConsole.

Related

How do i make my C program run in the background on windows?

I need my C program to run in the background, so without any open window or without blocking the terminal if run from there.
I can't find much info on how to do it online.
edit: To do what i needed, i just added -mwindows to the gcc command.
Windows supports two program types; GUI and console.
Console applications automatically get a console window if the parent process does not already have one.
GUI applications do not get a console and they can have 0, 1 or multiple windows. If you don't create a window your application is basically only visible in Task manager. GUI applications typically use WinMain as the startup function instead of main. Notepad.exe is a GUI application that creates a window.
You need to tell the compiler/linker that you are creating a GUI program. If you are using Visual Studio, it probably has a project template you can use.

How do I avoid MDIParent form from resizing

I am designing a Windows Form app. I have an MDIParent form that loads in a maximized state, and loads its child forms in a maximized state as well. However, when I open an OpenFileDialog, or any datareader object, the MDIParent shrinks to a smaller size with all its forms and controls.
This solution Opening child form is causing mdiform to change size and shrink does not apply/work in my situation.
Also this solution https://support.microsoft.com/en-nz/help/967173/restoring-a-maximized-or-minimized-mdi-parent-form-causes-its-height-t did not work for me.
Some background: I have seen this behaviour in almost all my WinForm applications but I have never been keen to sort it out. I was able to narrow down to the causes as highlighted above when I started investigate it. Some posts are describing it as a windows bug, but it has existed for as long as the screen resolutions started going above 1024 (VS 2010) for my case. I hoped it is not just a windows bug...
I hoped it is not just a windows bug...
Feature, not a bug, but it is not one that Winforms programmers like very much. Notable is that there have been several questions about mystifying window shrinkage in the past few months. I think it is associated with the release of Win10 Fall Creators edition. It has deep changes to the legacy Win32 api layer and they've caused plenty of upheaval.
In your specific case, the "feature" is enabled by a shell extension. They get injected into your process when you use OpenFileDialog. The one that does this is very, very evil and does something that a shell extension must absolutely never do. It calls SetProcessDPIAware(). Notable is that it might have been written in WPF, it has a very sneaky backdoor to declare itself dpiAware. Just loading the PresentationCore assembly is enough. But not otherwise limited to WPF code, any code can do this and that might have been undetected for a long time.
One way to chase down this evil extension is by using SysInternals' AutoRuns utility. It lets you selectively disable extensions. But there is also a programmer's way, you can debug this in VS.
Use Project > Properties > Debug tab > tick the "Enable native code debugging" checkbox. Named slightly different in old VS versions btw. Then Debug > New Breakpoint > Function Breakpoint. Function name = user32!SetProcessDPIAware, Language = C. You can exercise this in a do-nothing WPF app to ensure that everything is set correctly. For completeness you can also add the breakpoint for SetProcessDPIAwareness, the new flavor.
Press F5 to start debugging and trigger the OpenFileDialog.ShowDialog() call. The breakpoint should now hit, use Debug > Windows > Call Stack to look at the stack trace. You typically will not see anything very recognizable in your case since the evil code lives in a DLL that you don't have a PDB for. But the DLL name and location (visible in Debug > Windows > Modules) ought to be helpful to identify the person you need to file a bug with. Uninstall it if you can live without it.
Last but not least, it is getting pretty important to start creating Winforms apps that are dpiAware so such a bug can never byte. You kick this off by declaring your app to be dpiAware so DPI virtualization is disabled. Plus whatever you need to do in your code to ensure the UI design scales properly.

WPF application shows managed has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) in InitializeComponent call

When I launch my WPF application and when it goes to InitializeComponent function call of one user control, it silently quits and only leaves one message in the output window saying Managed (v4.0.30319)' has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d). When I say "silently", I mean there is no exception is caught even if I wrap this InitializeComponent call with a try-catch block (that's how I normally find where the problem is)
Here is what I did: in this application project we need to use a reference Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc.dll, with version number 10.0.4504.0. Since it is an interop library, when I added this reference in VS2012, it automatically sets the property Embedded Interop Types as true, which I assume means it will not keep an individual dll in the output folder but instead embed this library into the main output (at least this is how it seems in our other references, for example, Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.dll). However, when I launch the project, it throws an XamlParseException saying:
"Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc, Version=10.0.4504.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system
cannot find the file specified.":"Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc, Version=10.0.4504.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35""
It seems that the reference was not embedded(or the version is not currect. But I verified that the reference version is indeed 10.0.4504.0)
Next I copied this dll directly to the output folder bin\Debug\, to make sure that it can find this library. This time the exception is not thrown, but the whole application just silently quits as I described in the beginning. I tried to google the code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) but there is no article about it. I tried to set the Embedded Interop Types to true/false but the problem is the same.
UPDATE:
I'd like to add more description here. As mentioned above, the problematic library is OWC(Office Web Component)10. I followed this link to make OWC work with VB.NET desktop application: HOW TO: Handle Events for the Office Web Components in Visual Studio .NET. But this official article is so old so I had to make a lot of changes to compile the wrapper dll(mainly because of namespace mismatch). Then when I add the reference to the actual interop library Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc, if I follow the default setting and let the Embedded Interop Types as True, at runtime it will complain (throw a XamlParseException) that the assembly cannot be loaded (see description above). What the hell? I thought make it as "embedded" would guarantee this library will be found. Then I copy this dll to the output folder, then I have this silently quit problem. But it might be worth mentioning that this time the output window shows the Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc.dll is indeed loaded. Actually it is the last message before the managed has exited message. So it must still relate to this library.
All of this only happens with OWC10. There is actually a similar way to do that in OWC11(the latest, but unfortunately still pretty old version since it came with Office2003): HOW TO: Handle Events for the Office 2003 Web Components in Visual Studio .NET. But it actually works and the control is displayed on my application. It is because of some other reason that I wanted to try OWC10 instead of OWC11
When I launch my WPF application and when it goes to InitializeComponent function call of one user >control, it silently quits and only leaves one message in the output window saying Managed
(v4.0.30319)' has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d). When I say "silently", I mean there is >no exception is caught even if I wrap this InitializeComponent call with a try-catch block (that's >how I normally find where the problem is)
Next I copied this dll directly to the output folder bin\Debug\, to make sure that it can find this >library. This time the exception is not thrown, but the whole application just silently quits as I >described in the beginning. I tried to google the code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) but there is no >article about it. I tried to set the Embedded Interop Types to true/false but the problem is the >same.
I had exactly the same thing happening to me today, "has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d)." (This happened in both a VB and C# .NET WinForms application for me). I tried debugging and saw I never even got into the Form_Load code block.
I "solved" this in the end by running visual studio as an administrator (and then just opening & building and running the project via the menu).
This is a win8 security issue and it isn't well explained anywhere.
(I got distracted and just opened up a specific project straight out of my task bar/solution file which caused this to happen to me).
You've probably found this out by yourself by now, hope you didn't lose any hair over it :)
Just pointing this out for other people who might have this error occuring somewhere.
Also had this issue, the 'silent' exit with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) on x64 platforms, on x86 platforms everything was OK.
Part of my application is unmanaged C++, another part is C#. It turned out that my C++ code was not completely ready for the x64 platform. The following change fixed the issue in my case:
// before
g_OrigWndProc = reinterpret_cast<WNDPROC>(::SetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWLP_WNDPROC,
reinterpret_cast<LONG>(WindowProc)));
// fixed version
g_OrigWndProc = reinterpret_cast<WNDPROC>(::SetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWLP_WNDPROC,
reinterpret_cast<LONG_PTR>(WindowProc)));
So, the generic recommendation is to verify that your code is completely ready for the x64 platform.

WPF application using win32 dialogs on XP crashes

We have a WPF application that was developed on Windows 7 using VS 2010 and .NET 4.0 framework.
I have created an install package for it using the Visual Studio Installer.
When running on XP it appears to go into a bad state after using the win32 OpenFileDialog. It took me a while to track this down, as it doesn't fail right away. The dialog appears, you select the file you want to open, it opens up and is displayed on the screen. I was using it for about two minutes and then it crashed. I get the message that my program has encountered a problem and needs to close.
I can now run my application, open a file and make it crash right away, since a specific action always makes it crash. It does on any file I open, even a new one.
So I tried opening the same file without using the OpenFileDialog, I have a MRU list that I selected the file from, and it works flawlessly. I have not been able to make it crash.
Anyone experience similar behavior or have any ideas?
Since I do not have a debug environment on the XP machine I tried putting in some tracing statements within the application to write out to our log file where it is and what value some variables have. The really strange thing is that as soon as the OpenFileDialog.ShowDialog method is called all writing to our log file stops. I am just using standard file I/O and actually open, write and then close the file for every log message. This makes it difficult to debug this way, but also further supports the fact that something is gone wrong in the environment.
I have tried on four different XP machines, all with the same results.

Is it possible for an application to take ownership of a window from another application?

Basically, I have two applications that run sequentially (second is started by the first, and the first exits immediately after.) I'd like to pass ownership of a window the first application created to the second application. The actual contents of the window don't need to be passed along, it's just being drawn in by DirectX.
Alternatively, but less desirably, is it possible to at least disable the window closing/opening animation, so it at least looks like the desired effect is achieved?
(This is in C, using the vanilla Win32 API.)
Instead of separated application make a DLL that will be loaded by the first application and run within it.
I suspect that you're going to run into problems because the WindowProc function is located in the memory address space of the program that you're closing.
Also, a quick look at the second remark at the bottom of the documentation for RegisterClass doesn't seem to offer up much hope.
The only work around that I can suggest for what you've described is to not close the first application until the second application is finished with the window in question.
you can use API hooking to make your DLL capture API windows calls sent by the application window and respond as if your DLL is the windows DLL
for more information about hooking check :
Hooks Overview

Resources