I was wondering if anyone would be willing to provide a little help on the Extended Choice Parameter plugin for Jenkins.
Currently I have an Application Choice Parameter which has a list like so:
all
payroll
parts
service
business office
general ledger
PD2500R
GL1000D
GL1100R
GL0406R
SD1700R
PD0720R
SD1140R
What I would like to do is have the ability to be able to have a list like so:
all
business office
BO object
BO object
BO object
general ledger
GL1000D
GL1100R
GL0406R
Then if the user for example chooses just Business office it runs everything under Business Office, or if they just choose one of the objects under Business Office it just runs the tests for that one object.
Is the Extended Choice Parameter plugin the right option for this, and if so, how would I go about setting it up. I downloaded that plugin, but there is not a whole lot of documentation on how to actually use it.
Related
I am using DNN 9.3.2 and Evoq 9.3.7.
I would like to paywall content in a section of the website with teaser content i.e. so that they can read a part of the article but need to pay/ log in to access the content. 'Members' would also need to be able to log in and bypass the paywall. Users would idealy be able to manage their account from here. The paywall would also need to be able to handle a complex pricing model i.e. different prices for different user types, possibly different content available for different user types.
Would anyone be able to advise how best to do this with DNN/ Evoq, and which modules from DNN store (if any) would be useful?
Thanks!
I have never tried this, but in theory any shop solution should give you that functionality. Have a look at OpenStore, which is Open Source and free.
Or a News/Blog module that supports paid content, as EasyDnnNews.
I believe you'll have to brew your own or ask a specialist who knows what they are doing already. The basic principle is as follows:
Protect a page with a role - let's call it Patrons which only paying users will get
Create a page for users to pay on, and if successful, assign them the role
You can also do things like ensure that the role is only given for a certain time, and then the users must pay again.
If you have a subscription model, you would probably run a timer job or something to verify payments have happened again, and if true, extend the role assignment
First, I don't know if this is the right place to discuss idea related to Sense/Net SN evolution & learning process about it!
Anyway, this is my story:
I have tried & tested some SN functionality especially content type definition CTD; It is really elegant!
Sense/Net wiki documentation gives us "Know How" and we may write 200 wiki pages about SN. All included information are true. However, we don't have the complete model in which we can see the whole system model and how all cases derived from it.
I searched SN codeplex.com pages but didn't find how SN evolved to be mature ECM platform.
Also, searched google using the following KWs:
"Document Management System Modeling"
"Role-based access control (RBAC) model"
.....
Please collaborate & help.
It's curious that no one from SenseNet has answered, but I'll give it a shot even though I don't know a lot of the history. I've been working with SenseNet for the last 4+ years, developed the pysensenet extension, communicate with the developers, and am familiar with the source code, so I know a bit about the framework.
The framework has evolved over that last 15+ years and is pretty remarkable. Here are a few facts and highlights:
The data model is at it's core an XML Tree where each tree node has an internal representation as a C# class and can hold any number of properties/Fields. This is referred to as Content, and the database as the Content Repository.
The XML Tree is persisted in a SQL Database and uses Lucene.NET for indexing.
Content / data queries are made in Lucene and not SQL.
At one time the database was arbitrary (SQL), then stored procedures in MS SQL Server locked it into MS SQL, although recently (SenseNet 7) supports blob storage in MongoDB.
Fields can be one of 9 built-in field types, or a custom type that you define.
A node in the XML Tree, aka "Content", can hold a field that references another node somewhere else in the tree, like a linked list inside a tree! OK, a doubly linked list since both nodes can refer to each other. Very cool.
There is no "external model", or as SenseNet says, "Everything is Content".
The permission system is node based and is incredibly granular. For example, you can define permissions such that one role, group or person, can only see the Content at a particular node. And it integrates with Active Directory.
All Content can be versioned and tracked. For example, a Content Type of "Contact" (person) could have versioning on for the person's name. This way if someone changed their name, the Content Repository would have a history of the all name changes.
Hopefully this doesn't come off as a SenseNet marketing piece -- I don't work for them and don't benefit if you purchase a license -- but may help you compare it to other technologies such as SharePoint and Alfresco.
In TFS, every Team is associated with Project. Also every Team has their own work items. Team can have more than one area path, similarly one area path can be associated with more than one team.
So I need to create a report where we can get all Work Items associated with specific team.
Is there any way to get that mapping from any table from TFS databases or using REST API?
No such report by default. You can add a custom field to represent teams in your organization, you can reconfigure the agile planning tools and pages to support your teams and decouple assignment to teams and area paths.
Detailed steps, you can follow MSDN article: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn144940.aspx
I would like to extend my WinForms app, which a feature that allows me to monitor which functions are used by the users.
The idea is to count how many times e.g. a button has been clicked, or a popup was opened.
I want to know which features are used more or less often by the users.
Any ideas how this can be done? (Or even if somebody solved this problem already)
tia,
Martin
The only mechanism I can think on to do what your looking for is to use a logger like log4net / Log4PostSharp to log details to a log file on the machine, this would give you details on usage for that particular client. You would have to create a custom attribute that you could decorate your methods with that would result in something being written out to the log file, otherwise your code would end up littered with code to implement the logging!
Have a look at this article too, it uses Log4PostSharp with AOP (Aspect Oriented Programming) which would make the implementation of the logging much more cleaner (uses attributes).
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/log4postsharp-intro.aspx
You can find some if you google for the term "application analytics" instead of "feature tracking".
I have found the following products:
includeapp.com
Software Statistics Service
Dotfuscator for .NET, DashO for Java
FusionAnalytics
Flurry Analytics
OpenSpan Desktop Analytics
DeskMetrics
EQATEC Analytics
Rapidengines
I might say that I also plan to create such a product. When it will be Beta I will add it to the list.
I am using LLBL Gen Pro v2.6 and am attempting to create a means of auditing changes made to the database. Now, I know that LLBL Gen has auditing built into it using AuditorBase and dependency injection. The question I have is; I need to track not only the stuff that LLBL Gen exposes as auditable, but also the User who made the changes. From what I've seen there isn't a built in way of gathering this information. Has anyone used LLBL Gen's built in auditing and determined a way to do this?
Wayne E. Pfeffer
I have used LLBLGens Auditing classes. Determining the user is really something that you will have to handle. There are too many variables for LLBLGen to actually do this for you. How are your users handled? Is this a winforms or asp.net application?
The best solution would be to store the UserId in a session variable or static variable depending on which is more appropriate for your application. In your implementation of the Auditing class you can just pull the UserId from its storage place.
Another potential solution would be to override the Entity Class or the Data Adapter classes and pass the UserId in to your save methods. However, this would be a lot more work.
In my WinForms app, I accomplish this by creating a custom IPrincipal and stick that on System.Threading.Thread.CurrentPrincipal when a user logs into the application. Then, I can easily grab that from inside my LLBLGen auditing classes.
We're also about to implement auditing of changes to the db, and have the same issue of adding the user_id to the auditlog. I can see you can do the pull-approach, e.g. fetchingn the user_id from the web session (we're building a web application), but this would completely mess up the layering of the application, as I see it!?
I.e. if the DAL pulls data information from the presentation layer (web session), I won't be able to use the DAL in other contexts?
Best regards,
--thomas