Angularjs directive conditional rendering without ng-if - angularjs

I have a directive which I render only if my authentication service tells me so:
<div my-loggedin-directive ng-if="security.isAuthenticated()"></div>
The directive itself is quite empty :
.directive('myLoggedinDirective', [
function() {
return {
templateUrl: 'modules/myLoggedinDirective.tpl.html',
restrict: 'A',
replace: true,
link: function($scope) {
$scope.$on('$destroy', function() {
console.log('$destroy');
});
}
};
}
]);
Since my directive should be always rendered when I'm logged in, the ngIf logic should be inside the directive declaration, and not in a ng-if (the directive without the ngIf would be totally broken).
How can I change the directive code (injecting the test on the security service inside the directive declaration) knowing that I want the same behavior as the ngIf ? :
directive present in the DOM only when nfIf resolves to true
automatic calling of $destroy when nfIf resolve to false) ?
I tried to use compile function and a watcher to watch security.isAuthenticated() without success

Declare extra directive attribute that will pass security object into your directive:
<div my-loggedin-directive my-security='security'></div>
And directive should include scope, make sure it uses two-way binding:
.directive('myLoggedinDirective', [
function() {
return {
scope: {
security: "=mySecurity"
}
templateUrl: 'modules/myLoggedinDirective.tpl.html',
restrict: 'A',
replace: true,
link: function($scope) {
$scope.$on('$destroy', function() {
console.log('$destroy');
});
$scope.$watch('security', function(newVal, oldVal) {
if (newVal.isAuthenticated()) {
// do something
} else {
// do something
}
});
}
};
}
]);
And now you can access $scope.security variable in your temple myLoggedinDirective.tpl.html
<div ng-if="security.isAuthenticated()">...</div>

Related

How to pass object to directive through attribute in AngularJS?

I want to pass object (reference - two way binding) through ATTRIBUTE not by isolated scope. How can I do this? Because code bellow passing string instead of object:
HTML
<tr ng-form="rowForm" myDirective="{{row.data}}">
Directive
angular.module("app").directive("myDirective", function () {
return {
require: ["^form"],
restrict: "A",
link: function (scope, element, attrs, ctrls) {
scope.$watch(function () {
return attrs.myDirective;
}, function (newValue, oldValue) {
// .....
Directives can do two-way data binding without parsing or compile anything manually, sorry for not delivering the plunker but it's rebelius and won't save for me
JS
var app = angular.module('plunker', []);
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.myObj = {name: 'Tibro', age: 255}
})
.directive('myDirective', function(){
return {
scope: {
'myAttribute': '='
},
template: '{{myAttribute}}',
link: function(scope){
scope.myAttribute.age= 31
}
}
})
HTML
<body ng-controller="MainCtrl">
controller: {{myObj}} <br/>
directive: <my-directive my-attribute="myObj"></my-directive>
</body>
OUTPUT
controller: {"name":"Tibro","age":31}
directive: {"name":"Tibro","age":31}
you can see from the output that passed object has been binded two-way and change made in directive is reflected on controller level
The result of {{ }} interpolation is a string. An object can't be passed like that.
Bindings are idiomatic here and thus preferable. The whole thing becomes messy when the directive is forced to use parent scope. However, it can be done by parsing scope properties manually with $parse:
$scope.$watch(function () {
var myDirectiveGetter = $parse($attrs.myDirective);
return myDirectiveGetter($scope);
}, ...);
This is a job for binding (< or =, depending on the case). If isolated scope isn't desirable, this can be done with inherited scope and bindToController:
scope: true,
bindToController: {
myDirective: '<'
},
controllerAs: `vm`,
controller: function ($scope) {
$scope.$watch('vm.myDirective', ...);
}
Notice that directive attribute is my-directive, not myDirective.
Couple of things:
myDirective in the tr should be my-directive, as per Angular's
conventions.
{{row.data}} prints the variable, you need to pass it without the
{{}} for it to go through as an object.

Directive scope not getting updated in controller

My directive's controller is not getting updated with the scope that was set using the '=' two-way-binding.
Here is my directive:
.directive('navigation', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
selection: '=?selectedItem',
goforward: '&onForward'
},
controller: function() {
var vm = this;
vm.hideForward = !vm.selection
},
controllerAs: 'vm',
bindToController: true,
template: '<button ng-hide="vm.hideForward" ng-click="vm.goforward()">Continue</button>'
};
});
Here is my html file where I use the directive:
<div class='product' ng-click='ctrl.selectedItem = true'>item</div>
<navigation on-forward="ctrl.goForward()" selected-item='ctrl.selectedItem'></navigation>
note: the ctrl.goForward() works just fine.
The vm.selectedItem in the html's controller is only set to true once the product div is clicked.
I expected the ctrl.selectedItem to get passed into my directive's controller and modify the vm.hideForward value, except this is not happening.
I want to be able to change whether the navigation directive is visible and/or active depending on variables that are passed into it from whatever controller's scope I used my directive in.
If I place a <div>{{vm.selectedItem}}</div> inside my directive's template, that does print out properly depending on how ctrl.selectedItem that value changes. My issue is getting the directive's controller to change as well.
How am I setting up this scope binding improperly? I am using angular 1.5.3
You dont need the double brackets for binding a function to ng-click, use ng-click="vm.goforward()"
Pass the function to the directive as on-forward="ctrl.goForward", if you use parenthesis you will be passing the result of the function call instead.
Also for, ng-click='ctrl.selectedItem === true' you should use ng-click='ctrl.selectedItem = true' to set the value, as === is a comparison operator.
ctrl.selectedItem seems to be a variable from the present controller. So while passing it as attribute, you need to pass it as '{{ctrl.selectedItem}}" .
Try using:
**<navigation on-forward="ctrl.goForward()" selected-item='{{ctrl.selectedItem}}'></navigation>**
Try this
.directive('navigation', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
selection: '=selectedItem',
goforward: '&onForward'
},
controller: function(scope) {
var vm = this;
vm.hideForward = !scope.selection
},
controllerAs: 'vm',
bindToController: true,
template: '<button ng-hide="vm.hideForward" ng-click="vm.goforward()">Continue</button>'
};
});

Angularjs Is there a cleaner more "angular" way to replace a transcluded class value in a directive template?

Below is the only way i could figure out how to get a directive to pull out an attribute from its origin element, get a new value by hitting a service, and then adding that new service method return as a class in the directive template. i'm wondering if there is an alternative pattern that might be cleaner then this pattern that might use ng-class or possibly ng-transclude:
html:
<my-directive data-condition="{{hour.condition}}"></my-directive>
js:
angular.module('myApp')
.directive('myDirective', function (myService) {
return {
transclude: true,
replace: true,
scope: true,
template: '<i class="{{wiIconClass}}"></i>',
restrict: 'E',
link: function($scope, $elm, attrs){
$scope.wiIconClass=myService.getValue(attrs.condition);
}
}
});
If your function myService.getValue is synchronous, you could simply do:
<div ng-class="getClass(hour.condition)">
And in your controller:
$scope.getClass = function(condition) {
return myService.getValue(condition);
}
Alternatively, you can directly put your service within your scope:
$scope.myService = myService;
So the HTML becomes
<div ng-class="myService.getValue(hour.condition)">
In both cases, you will need to inject your service into your controller:
myModule.controller('myController', function($scope, myService) {
// this controller has access to myService
})
I would use the Directives scope parameter instead of using the Directives Attribute values. This is because when using the attributes you will need to setup a $watch to see when that value updates, with using $scope you get the benefit of the binding aspect.
As far as to respond to the best way, its hard to say without knowing your actual task. You can have Angular update the elements css class value in several different ways.
Here's a working Plunker with some small updates to your existing code.
http://plnkr.co/edit/W0SOiBEDE03MgostqemT?p=preview
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('myController', function($scope) {
$scope.hour = {
condition: 'good'
};
})
.factory('myService', function() {
var condValues = {
good: 'good-class',
bad: 'bad-class'
};
return {
getValue: function(key) {
return condValues[key];
}
};
})
.directive('myDirective', function(myService) {
return {
transclude: true,
replace: true,
scope: {
condition: '='
},
template: '<i class="{{myService.getValue(condition)}}"></i>',
restrict: 'E',
link: function(scope, elm, attrs) {
scope.myService = myService;
}
};
});

In angular.js, can a directive controller access data in a page controller that loaded it?

In angular.js, can a directive controller access data in a page controller that loaded it?
/**
* Profile directive
*/
.directive('profile', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
templateUrl: '/partials/users/_profile.html',
scope: {
user: '=',
show: '=?'
},
controller: function($scope, $rootScope){
$scope.show = angular.isDefined($scope.show) ? $scope.show : { follow: true, link: true };
$scope.currentUser = $rootScope.currentUser;
//do stuff here and then set data in UserShowCtrl
}
};
});
The <profile user="user"></profile> method is called from ./users/show.html which uses the UserShowCtrl controller.
Is there anyway I can use scope on the profile directive with its own controller and still be able to pass data to the UserShowCtrl?
Even though the profile can be isolated to its own functionality, it still needs to set some data on the page level in the UserShowCtrl controller.
Here is where _user.html is loading the <profile> directive. The data for the page is served by the UserShowCtrl and has some collections that get updated when things happen, like following a user.
<ol class="following" ng-show="showConnections == 'following'">
<li ng-repeat="following in user.following">
<profile user="connections[following]"></profile>
</li>
</ol>
Right now there is an ng-click="follow(user)"> that is happening in the _profile.html. I would like to be able to have the directive handle this but also update the collections in the UserShowCtrl.
Edit: here is a plunker demonstrating what I'm trying to do:
http://plnkr.co/edit/9a5dxMVg9cKLptxnNfX3
You need to use a service in order to share any information between controllers, directives, services
something like
angular.module('myapp',[]).
service('myservice',function(){
return {a:'A',b:'B'}
}).
controller('mycontroller',['myservice',function(myservice){
//do someting with myservice
}]).
directive('mydirective',['myservice',function(myservice){
//do someting with myservice
}]);
there controller and directive access the same data through the service
You can access the parent scope from your directive with $scope.$parent.myvar.
myvar will be resolved in parent scope, which means prototypical scope inheritance is used to resolve the variable.
However, this does not guarantee that myvar is coming from the same scope as UserShowCtrl since its possible that any scope in between the 'profile' directive and UserShowCtrl's scope may override 'myvar'.
A better solution would be to use directive-to-directive communication. There are generally two ways for directives to communicate:
Through attributes passed into your directive. You've already used this method to import 'user' and 'show' from parent scope into your directive's isolated scope.
Requiring another directive. When you use 'require: ^UserShow', you are specifying that your 'profile' directive requires another directive as a dependency. The '^' means that it will search for the directive on the current element, or any parent element further up the DOM tree. UserShow's controller is then passed to your link function:
.directive('UserShow', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
controller: function($scope){
$scope.myvar = 'test';
this.setMyVar = function(var) {
$scope.myvar = var;
}
}
};
});
.directive('profile', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
templateUrl: '/partials/users/_profile.html',
require: '^UserShow',
scope: {
user: '=',
show: '=?'
},
controller: function($scope, $rootScope){
},
link: function(scope, element, attr, UserShowCtrl) {
UserShowCtrl.setMyVar('hello world!);
}
};
});
HTML:
<user-show>
<profile>...</profile>
</user-show>
I am not quite sure what your after.
You are already having 2 two-way data bindings, which means that if you change user in your directive, that will also flow to the outside scope.
So you already have a solution in front of you...
So if that is not "good enough", there is something missing in your question.
Here is an illustration: http://plnkr.co/edit/qEH2Pr1Pv7MTdXjHd4bD?p=preview
However, if you use something in your outside template that creates a child scope, binding it as "value" there is NOT enough, you need to have a . in there.
But that is where there is missing something to the question, if you share your show.html I may be able to find where the scope breaks apart and explain why...
Relevant Source from demo.js:
app.directive('profile', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
template: '<div><input type="text" ng-model="user"></input></div>',
scope: { //defines an isolate scope.
user: '=',
show: '=?'
},
controller: function($scope, $rootScope){
$scope.show = angular.isDefined($scope.show) ? $scope.show : { follow: true, link: true };
$scope.currentUser = $rootScope.currentUser;
$scope.user = "Changed by scope!";
//do stuff here and then set data in UserShowCtrl
}
};
});
app.controller('UserShowCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.value = "Value set outside!";
$scope.alertValue = function() {
alert($scope.value);
}
});
Relevant Source from home.html:
<div ng-controller="UserShowCtrl">
{{ value }}
<profile user="value"></profile>
<button ng-click="alertValue()">ALERT!</button>
</div>

How to load constants from service to directive?

I am trying to load language constants from service to a directive and show them to user.
I have discovered that if I just use {{}} in div, then the text is not rendered.
However, by adding any character, i.e. '.' will make it load.
I would be grateful, if someone can explain, what is going on behind scenes and why I need those extra characters.
Directive code
directive('projectHeader', ['LangService', function(langService) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
scope: true,
link: function postLink($scope, tElement, tAttrs, controller) {
$scope.lang = langService.getLocalisedStrings();
},
templateUrl: "app/header.html"
};
}])
header.html
<div class="header">{{lang.header}}.</div>
LangService definition
angular.module('project.services').factory('LangService', ['$http', function ($http) {
var langConstants;
return {
init: function(lang) {
$http.get("app/lang/"+ lang + ".properties").then(function(response){
langConstants = response.data;
});
},
getLocalisedStrings: function () {
return langConstants;
}
};
}]);
You might have a race between the postLink and the $http in the init method. Try adding a watch on getLocalisedStrings() in the directive so that $scope.lang gets updated as soon as getLocalisedStrings() returns some data.

Resources