i Have the following code
char inputs []="3,0,23.30,3,30/55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,64,64,64,100,100,100,100,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,55,55,70/1.5,0.5,0.2,0.2,0.3,0.1";
char parameters[18];
strcpy(parameters,strtok(inputs,"/"));
and then some code to transmit my characters through uart and see them at a monitor. when i transmit the inputs i see them fine but when i transmit the parameters i see nothing the string is empty.
i have seen examples for strtok and it uses that code to split strings. I have also tried this kind of code at visual studio and when i print them it shows me the strings fine. Is there any chance that strtok doesn't function well with a microprocessor????
While working with microcontrollers, you have to take care from which memory area you are working on. On software running on a PC, everything is stored and run from the RAM. But, on a flash microcontroller, code is run from flash (also called program memory) while data are processed from RAM (also called data memory).
In the case you are working on, the inputs variable is storing an hardcoded character array, which can be const, and we don't know in which area the compiler chose to put it. So, we could rewrite you small program just to make sure that all the data are stored in program data and we will use the "_P" functions to manipulate this data.
#include <avr/pgmspace.h > // to play in program space
const char inputs PROGMEM []="3,0,23.30,3,30/55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,64,64,64,100,100,100,100,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,55,55,70/1.5,0.5,0.2,0.2,0.3,0.1"; // Now, we are sure this is in program memory space
char buffer[200]; // should be long enough to contain a copy of inputs
char parameters[18];
int length = strlen_P(inputs); // Should contains string length of 186 (just to debug)
strcpy_P(buffer,inputs); // Copy the PROGMEM data in data memory space
strcpy(parameters,strtok_P(buffer,"/")); // Parse the data now in data memory space
For more info on program space with avr gcc : http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/pgmspace.html
I don't use strtok much, if at all, but this appears to be the correct way to store the result of strtok() in an char[]:
const int NUM_PARAMS = 18;
const int MAX_CHARS = 64;
char parameters[NUM_PARAMS][MAX_CHARS];
char delims[] = "/";
char *result = NULL;
int count = 0;
result = strtok(inputs, delims);
while(result != NULL && count < NUM_PARAMS){
strncpy(parameters[count++], result, MAX_CHARS);
result = strtok(NULL, delims);
}
or this if you don't want to allocate unnecessary memory for smaller tokens:
const int NUM_PARAMS = 18;
char* parameters[NUM_PARAMS];
char delims[] = "/";
char *result = NULL;
int count = 0;
result = strtok(inputs, delims);
while(result != NULL && count < NUM_PARAMS){
parameters[count] = malloc(strlen(result) + 1);
strncpy(parameters[count++], result, MAX_CHARS);
result = strtok(NULL, delims);
}
parameters should now contain all of your tokens.
strtok() intentionally modifies the source string, replacing tokens with terminators as it goes. There is no reason to store the content in auxiliary storage whatsoever so long as the source string is mutable.
Splitting the string into conjoined constants (which will be assembled by the compiler, so they ultimately will be a single terminated string):
char inputs []="3,0,23.30,3,30/"
"55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,55,64,64,64,100,100,100,100,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,64,55,55,70/"
"1.5,0.5,0.2,0.2,0.3,0.1";
Clearly the second and third sequences delimited by '/' are nowhere near 17 chars wide (remember, your copy needs one more place for the terminator, thus only 17 chars can legally be copied).
Unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise, I see no reason you can't simply do this:
char *param = strtok(inputs, "/");
while (param != NULL)
{
// TODO: do something with param...
// ... then advance to next param
param = strtok(NULL, "/");
}
What you do with // TODO do something with param... is up to you. The length of the parameter can be retrieved by strlen(param), for example. You can make a copy, providing you have enough storage space as the destination (in the second and third cases, you don't provide enough storage with only an 18-char buffer in your example).
Regardless, remember, strtok() modifies the source inputs[] array. If that is not acceptable an alternative would be something like:
char *tmp_inputs = strdup(inputs);
if (tmp_inputs != NULL)
{
char *param = strtok(tmp_inputs, "/");
while (param != NULL)
{
// TODO: do something with param...
// ... then advance to next param
param = strtok(NULL, "/");
}
// done with copy of inputs. free it.
free(tmp_inputs);
}
There are considerably threading decisions to make as well, the very reason the version of strtok() that requires the caller (you) to tote around context between calls was invented. See strtok_r() for more information.
You have to initialialize parameters that way :
char parameters[18] = {'\0'};
Thus, it will be initialized with null characters instead of variable values. This is important, because strcpy will try to find a null character to identify the end of the string.
Just to make it clear...
parameters after its initialisation : [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
parameters after strtok : ['3',',','0',',','2','3','.','3','0',',','3',',','3','0',0,0,0,0]
Related
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm having a very hard time tracing down a strange error in my pebble watch app. I suspect it's a memory error but I can't find my mistake. I have an array of strings, and when I call menu_layer = menu_layer_create(bounds); it somehow seems to be corrupting my string. I explain more fully below. The description of the error is bolded.
I have a header files which declares three variables as extern so that they're global.
//externs.h
#ifndef EXTERNS_H
#define EXTERNS_H
// These global variables are accessible by all source files. Modified in main.c
extern int str_count;
extern char **str_titles;
extern char **str_teasers;
#endif
These three variables are modified in main.c, but are used in other c files. Below is a sample of my main.c file where I set the array of strings str_titles and str_teasers. The structure info contains two strings which are very long but are separated with the delimiter |. I copy these strings into a temporary buffer s_buffer and parse them apart with strtok, saving each new string into my array of strings.
This seems to work well, I've checked each string in a for loop and the last character is always the null-terminated byte and the one previous to it is a period (end of the sentence). I don't modify these values anywhere else, and I don't free them until the very very end of my program (because they should exist for the program's life).
I create a menu with a dynamic number of entries (in this case 6), and each menu has the title of one of the 6 strings within str_titles. There are no issues here. I can iterate through and APP_LOG this array of strings with no problem at any time in my program.
When each menu item is pressed, it should display the longer string from str_teasers in a scroll layer. It does this reliably only for the first three menu items. For the last three it is always blank. Trying to iterate and print the array of strings here with APP_LOG produces a litany of errors in the python framework used with the pebble logs and always ends with something like:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x98 in position 0: invalid start byte
The last part invalid start byte is sometimes something different, and the decode bytes and position changes based on the string. Note that in the logs always produces some error for the last three blank menu items, and only sometimes does it produce the error for the first three even if the scroll layer is not blank and displays the correct text (for the first three sometimes it prints to the logs without issue).
I've tried APP_LOG on str_teasers at various points, and when it fails, it does so after I call menu_layer = menu_layer_create(bounds); to create my menu. Before I make that call I can print all the strings with APP_LOG with no issue at all. I thought it was a heap corruption error, but I have available heap memory (~8100 Bytes) before and after the creation of the layer and my app doesn't crash.
Maybe I'm missing something very simple, but I can't find my mistake. I've allocated the memory for str_teasers correctly I believe, so I don't see why it should be modified at all. I've included a modified sample code below for reference.
//main.c
#include "strtok.h"
#include "externs.h"
int str_count;
char **str_titles;
char **str_teasers;
char *s_buffer;
const char delim[1] = "|";
char *token;
typedef struct {
int s_count;
char* s_titles;
char* s_teasers;
} s_info;
s_info info;
// Sample code
str_count = info.s_count;
// Declare arrays of appropriate size
str_titles = malloc(str_count * sizeof(char*));
str_teasers = malloc(str_count * sizeof(char*));
// This creates a copy of the entire string s_titles into s_buffer
int len = strlen(info.s_titles) + 1;
s_buffer = (char *)malloc(len);
strcpy(s_buffer, info.s_titles);
token = strtok(s_buffer, delim); // Get the first token for the titles
// Walk through the other tokens
int counter = 0;
while(token != NULL) {
*(str_titles + counter) = malloc((strlen(token) + 1) * sizeof(char));
*(str_titles + counter) = token;
token = strtok(NULL, delim);
counter++;
}
// This creates a copy of the entire string s_teasers into s_buffer
len = strlen(info.s_teasers) + 1;
s_buffer = (char *)realloc(s_buffer, len);
strcpy(s_buffer, info.s_teasers);
token = strtok(s_buffer, delim); // Get the first token for the teasers
// Walk through the other tokens
counter = 0;
while(token != NULL) {
*(str_teasers + counter) = malloc((strlen(token) + 1) * sizeof(char));
*(str_teasers + counter) = token;
token = strtok(NULL, delim);
counter++;
}
free(s_buffer);
In this code block
// Walk through the other tokens
int counter = 0;
while(token != NULL) {
*(str_titles + counter) = malloc((strlen(token) + 1) * sizeof(char));
*(str_titles + counter) = token;
token = strtok(NULL, delim);
counter++;
}
you allocate memory but immediately overwrite the pointer with the token pointer. Then, in the other, similar code block, you have overwritten the string into which these point. You might have been "lucky" since the memory was reallocated, and the previous string memory was still untouched by other processes. And indeed, you end by freeing this string buffer anyway, without having copied the tokens.
I think you need a strcpy here
// Walk through the other tokens
int counter = 0;
while(token != NULL) {
*(str_titles + counter) = malloc((strlen(token) + 1) * sizeof(char));
strcpy(*(str_titles + counter), token); // <<--- here
token = strtok(NULL, delim);
counter++;
}
Similarly for the teasers code block.
I also notice that you index by counter but have not checked it against the str_count you were supplied with, which was used to allocate memory for the array of string pointers.
So I'm new to C and the whole string manipulation thing, but I can't seem to get strtok() to work. It seems everywhere everyone has the same template for strtok being:
char* tok = strtok(source,delim);
do
{
{code}
tok=strtok(NULL,delim);
}while(tok!=NULL);
So I try to do this with the delimiter being the space key, and it seems that strtok() no only reads NULL after the first run (the first entry into the while/do-while) no matter how big the string, but it also seems to wreck the source, turning the source string into the same thing as tok.
Here is a snippet of my code:
char* str;
scanf("%ms",&str);
char* copy = malloc(sizeof(str));
strcpy(copy,str);
char* tok = strtok(copy," ");
if(strcasecmp(tok,"insert"))
{
printf(str);
printf(copy);
printf(tok);
}
Then, here is some output for the input "insert a b c d e f g"
aaabbbcccdddeeefffggg
"Insert" seems to disappear completely, which I think is the fault of strcasecmp(). Also, I would like to note that I realize strcasecmp() seems to all-lower-case my source string, and I do not mind. Anyhoo, input "insert insert insert" yields absolutely nothing in output. It's as if those functions just eat up the word "insert" no matter how many times it is present. I may* end up just using some of the C functions that read the string char by char but I would like to avoid this if possible. Thanks a million guys, i appreciate the help.
With the second snippet of code you have five problems: The first is that your format for the scanf function is non-standard, what's the 'm' supposed to do? (See e.g. here for a good reference of the standard function.)
The second problem is that you use the address-of operator on a pointer, which means that you pass a pointer to a pointer to a char (e.g. char**) to the scanf function. As you know, the scanf function want its arguments as pointers, but since strings (either in pointer to character form, or array form) already are pointer you don't have to use the address-of operator for string arguments.
The third problem, once you fix the previous problem, is that the pointer str is uninitialized. You have to remember that uninitialized local variables are truly uninitialized, and their values are indeterminate. In reality, it means that their values will be seemingly random. So str will point to some "random" memory.
The fourth problem is with the malloc call, where you use the sizeof operator on a pointer. This will return the size of the pointer and not what it points to.
The fifth problem, is that when you do strtok on the pointer copy the contents of the memory pointed to by copy is uninitialized. You allocate memory for it (typically 4 or 8 bytes depending on you're on a 32 or 64 bit platform, see the fourth problem) but you never initialize it.
So, five problems in only four lines of code. That's pretty good! ;)
It looks like you're trying to print space delimited tokens following the word "insert" 3 times. Does this do what you want?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char str[BUFSIZ] = {0};
char *copy;
char *tok;
int i;
// safely read a string and chop off any trailing newline
if(fgets(str, sizeof(str), stdin)) {
int n = strlen(str);
if(n && str[n-1] == '\n')
str[n-1] = '\0';
}
// copy the string so we can trash it with strtok
copy = strdup(str);
// look for the first space-delimited token
tok = strtok(copy, " ");
// check that we found a token and that it is equal to "insert"
if(tok && strcasecmp(tok, "insert") == 0) {
// iterate over all remaining space-delimited tokens
while((tok = strtok(NULL, " "))) {
// print the token 3 times
for(i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
fputs(tok, stdout);
}
}
putchar('\n');
}
free(copy);
return 0;
}
My application produces strings like the one below. I need to parse values between the separator into individual values.
2342|2sd45|dswer|2342||5523|||3654|Pswt
I am using strtok to do this in a loop. For the fifth token, I am getting 5523. However, I need to account for the empty value between the two separators || as well. 5523 should be the sixth token, as per my requirement.
token = (char *)strtok(strAccInfo, "|");
for (iLoop=1;iLoop<=106;iLoop++) {
token = (char *)strtok(NULL, "|");
}
Any suggestions?
In that case I often prefer a p2 = strchr(p1, '|') loop with a memcpy(s, p1, p2-p1) inside. It's fast, does not destroy the input buffer (so it can be used with const char *) and is really portable (even on embedded).
It's also reentrant; strtok isn't. (BTW: reentrant has nothing to do with multi-threading. strtok breaks already with nested loops. One can use strtok_r but it's not as portable.)
That's a limitation of strtok. The designers had whitespace-separated tokens in mind. strtok doesn't do much anyway; just roll your own parser. The C FAQ has an example.
On a first call, the function expects
a C string as argument for str, whose
first character is used as the
starting location to scan for tokens.
In subsequent calls, the function
expects a null pointer and uses the
position right after the end of last
token as the new starting location for
scanning.
To determine the beginning and the end
of a token, the function first scans
from the starting location for the
first character not contained in
delimiters (which becomes the
beginning of the token). And then
scans starting from this beginning of
the token for the first character
contained in delimiters, which becomes
the end of the token.
What this say is that it will skip any '|' characters at the beginning of a token. Making 5523 the 5th token, which you already knew. Just thought I would explain why (I had to look it up myself). This also says that you will not get any empty tokens.
Since your data is setup this way you have a couple of possible solutions:
1) find all occurrences of || and replace with | | (put a space in there)
2) do a strstr 5 times and find the beginning of the 5th element.
char *mystrtok(char **m,char *s,char c)
{
char *p=s?s:*m;
if( !*p )
return 0;
*m=strchr(p,c);
if( *m )
*(*m)++=0;
else
*m=p+strlen(p);
return p;
}
reentrant
threadsafe
strictly ANSI conform
needs an unused help-pointer from calling
context
e.g.
char *p,*t,s[]="2342|2sd45|dswer|2342||5523|||3654|Pswt";
for(t=mystrtok(&p,s,'|');t;t=mystrtok(&p,0,'|'))
puts(t);
e.g.
char *p,*t,s[]="2,3,4,2|2s,d4,5|dswer|23,42||5523|||3654|Pswt";
for(t=mystrtok(&p,s,'|');t;t=mystrtok(&p,0,'|'))
{
char *p1,*t1;
for(t1=mystrtok(&p1,t,',');t1;t1=mystrtok(&p1,0,','))
puts(t1);
}
your work :)
implement char *c as parameter 3
Look into using strsep instead: strsep reference
Use something other than strtok. It's simply not intended to do what you're asking for. When I've needed this, I usually used strcspn or strpbrk and handled the rest of the tokeninzing myself. If you don't mind it modifying the input string like strtok, it should be pretty simple. At least right off, something like this seems as if it should work:
// Warning: untested code. Should really use something with a less-ugly interface.
char *tokenize(char *input, char const *delim) {
static char *current; // just as ugly as strtok!
char *pos, *ret;
if (input != NULL)
current = input;
if (current == NULL)
return current;
ret = current;
pos = strpbrk(current, delim);
if (pos == NULL)
current = NULL;
else {
*pos = '\0';
current = pos+1;
}
return ret;
}
Inspired by Patrick Schlüter answer I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string
char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)
{
char* string = *newString;
char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
int tokLenght = 0;
char* tok = (char*) 0;
if(!string) return (char*) 0;
delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
if(delimiterFound){
tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
}else{
tokLenght = strlen(string);
}
tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
tok[tokLenght] = '\0';
*newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;
return tok;
}
you can use it like
char* input = "1,2,3,,5,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) ){
printf("%s\n", tok);
}
This suppose to output
1
2
3
5
I tested it for simple strings but didn't use it in production yet, and posted it on code review too, so you can see what do others think about it
Below is the solution that is working for me now. Thanks to all of you who responded.
I am using LoadRunner. Hence, some unfamiliar commands, but I believe the flow can be understood easily enough.
char strAccInfo[1024], *p2;
int iLoop;
Action() { //This value would come from the wrsp call in the actual script.
lr_save_string("323|90||95|95|null|80|50|105|100|45","test_Param");
//Store the parameter into a string - saves memory.
strcpy(strAccInfo,lr_eval_string("{test_Param}"));
//Get the first instance of the separator "|" in the string
p2 = (char *) strchr(strAccInfo,'|');
//Start a loop - Set the max loop value to more than max expected.
for (iLoop = 1;iLoop<200;iLoop++) {
//Save parameter names in sequence.
lr_param_sprintf("Param_Name","Parameter_%d",iLoop);
//Get the first instance of the separator "|" in the string (within the loop).
p2 = (char *) strchr(strAccInfo,'|');
//Save the value for the parameters in sequence.
lr_save_var(strAccInfo,p2 - strAccInfo,0,lr_eval_string("{Param_Name}"));
//Save string after the first instance of p2, as strAccInfo - for looping.
strcpy(strAccInfo,p2+1);
//Start conditional loop for checking for last value in the string.
if (strchr(strAccInfo,'|')==NULL) {
lr_param_sprintf("Param_Name","Parameter_%d",iLoop+1);
lr_save_string(strAccInfo,lr_eval_string("{Param_Name}"));
iLoop = 200;
}
}
}
I'm trying to pass a string to chdir(). But I always seem to have some trailing stuff makes the chdir() fail.
#define IN_LEN 128
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
int counter;
char command[IN_LEN];
char** tokens = (char**) malloc(sizeof(char)*IN_LEN);
size_t path_len; char path[IN_LEN];
...
fgets(command, IN_LEN, stdin)
counter = 0;
tmp = strtok(command, delim);
while(tmp != NULL) {
*(tokens+counter) = tmp;
tmp = strtok(NULL, delim);
counter++;
}
if(strncmp(*tokens, cd_command, strlen(cd_command)) == 0) {
path_len = strlen(*(tokens+1));
strncpy(path, *(tokens+1), path_len-1);
// this is where I try to remove the trailing junk...
// but it doesn't work on a second system
if(chdir(path) < 0) {
error_string = strerror(errno);
fprintf(stderr, "path: %s\n%s\n", path, error_string);
}
// just to check if the chdir worked
char buffer[1000];
printf("%s\n", getcwd(buffer, 1000));
}
return 0;
}
There must be a better way to do this. Can any help out? I'vr tried to use scanf but when the program calls scanf, it just hangs.
Thanks
It looks like you've forgotten to append a null '\0' to path string after calling strncpy(). Without the null terminator chdir() doesn't know where the string ends and it just keeps looking until it finds one. This would make it appear like there are extra characters at the end of your path.
You have (at least) 2 problems in your example.
The first one (which is causing the immediately obvious problems) is the use of strncpy() which doesn't necessarily place a '\0' terminator at the end of the buffer it copies into. In your case there's no need to use strncpy() (which I consider dangerous for exactly the reason you ran into). Your tokens will be '\0' terminated by strtok(), and they are guaranteed to be smaller than the path buffer (since the tokens come from a buffer that's the same size as the path buffer). Just use strcpy(), or if you want the code to be resiliant of someone coming along later and mucking with the buffer sizes use something like the non-standard strlcpy().
As a rule of thumb don't use strncpy().
Another problem with your code is that the tokens allocation isn't right.
char** tokens = (char**) malloc(sizeof(char)*IN_LEN);
will allocate an area as large as your input string buffer, but you're storing pointers to strings in that allocation, not chars. You'll have fewer tokens than characters (by definition), but each token pointer is probably 4 times larger than a character (depending on the platform's pointer size). If your string has enough tokens, you'll overrun this buffer.
For example, assume IN_LEN is 14 and the input string is "a b c d e f g". If you use spaces as the delimiter, there will be 7 tokens, which will require a pointer array with 28 bytes. Quite a few more than the 14 allocated by the malloc() call.
A simple change to:
char** tokens = (char**) malloc((sizeof(char*) * IN_LEN) / 2);
should allocate enough space (is there an off-by-one error in there? Maybe a +1 is needed).
A third problem is that you potentially access *tokens and *(tokens+1) even if zero or only one token was added to the array. You'll need to add some checks of the counter variable before dereferencing those pointers.
I'm writing a function that gets the path environment variable of a system, splits up each path, then concats on some other extra characters onto the end of each path.
Everything works fine until I use the strcat() function (see code below).
char* prependPath( char* exeName )
{
char* path = getenv("PATH");
char* pathDeepCopy = (char *)malloc(strlen(path) + 1);
char* token[80];
int j, i=0; // used to iterate through array
strcpy(pathDeepCopy, path);
//parse and split
token[0] = strtok(pathDeepCopy, ":"); //get pointer to first token found and store in 0
//place in array
while(token[i]!= NULL) { //ensure a pointer was found
i++;
token[i] = strtok(NULL, ":"); //continue to tokenize the string
}
for(j = 0; j <= i-1; j++) {
strcat(token[j], "/");
//strcat(token[j], exeName);
printf("%s\n", token[j]); //print out all of the tokens
}
}
My shell output is like this (I'm concatenating "/which" onto everything):
...
/usr/local/applic/Maple/bin/which
which/which
/usr/local/applic/opnet/8.1.A.wdmguru/sys/unix/bin/which
which/which
Bus error (core dumped)
I'm wondering why strcat is displaying a new line and then repeating which/which.
I'm also wondering about the Bus error (core dumped) at the end.
Has anyone seen this before when using strcat()?
And if so, anyone know how to fix it?
Thanks
strtok() does not give you a new string.
It mutilates the input string by inserting the char '\0' where the split character was.
So your use of strcat(token[j],"/") will put the '/' character where the '\0' was.
Also the last token will start appending 'which' past the end of your allocated memory into uncharted memory.
You can use strtok() to split a string into chunks. But if you want to append anything onto a token you need to make a copy of the token otherwise what your appending will spill over onto the next token.
Also you need to take more care with your memory allocation you are leaking memory all over the place :-)
PS. If you must use C-Strings. use strdup() to copy the string.
char* prependPath( char* exeName )
{
char* path = getenv("PATH");
char* pathDeepCopy = strdup(path);
char* token[80];
int j, i; // used to iterate through array
token[0] = strtok(pathDeepCopy, ":");
for(i = 0;(token[i] != NULL) && (i < 80);++i)
{
token[i] = strtok(NULL, ":");
}
for(j = 0; j <= i; ++j)
{
char* tmp = (char*)malloc(strlen(token[j]) + 1 + strlen(exeName) + 1);
strcpy(tmp,token[j]);
strcat(tmp,"/");
strcat(tmp,exeName);
printf("%s\n",tmp); //print out all of the tokens
free(tmp);
}
free(pathDeepCopy);
}
strtok does not duplicate the token but instead just points to it within the string. So when you cat '/' onto the end of a token, you're writing a '\0' either over the start of the next token, or past the end of the buffer.
Also note that even if strtok did returning copies of the tokens instead of the originals (which it doesn't), it wouldn't allocate the additional space for you to append characters so it'd still be a buffer overrun bug.
strtok() tokenizes in place. When you start appending characters to the tokens, you're overwriting the next token's data.
Also, in general it's not safe to simply concatenate to an existing string unless you know that the size of the buffer the string is in is large enough to hold the resulting string. This is a major cause of bugs in C programs (including the dreaded buffer overflow security bugs).
So even if strtok() returned brand-new strings unrelated to your original string (which it doesn't), you'd still be overrunning the string buffers when you concatenated to them.
Some safer alternatives to strcpy()/strcat() that you might want to look into (you may need to track down implementations for some of these - they're not all standard):
strncpy() - includes the target buffer size to avoid overruns. Has the drawback of not always terminating the result string
strncat()
strlcpy() - similar to strncpy(), but intended to be simpler to use and more robust (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strlcat)
strlcat()
strcpy_s() - Microsoft variants of these functions
strncat_s()
And the API you should strive to use if you can use C++: the std::string class. If you use the C++ std::string class, you pretty much do not have to worry about the buffer containing the string - the class manages all of that for you.
OK, first of all, be careful. You are losing memory.
Strtok() returns a pointer to the next token and you are storing it in an array of chars.
Instead of char token[80] it should be char *token.
Be careful also when using strtok. strtok practically destroys the char array called pathDeepCopy because it will replace every occurrence of ":" with '\0'.As Mike F told you above.
Be sure to initialize pathDeppCopy using memset of calloc.
So when you are coding token[i] there is no way of knowing what is being point at.
And as token has no data valid in it, it is likely to throw a core dump because you are trying to concat. a string to another that has no valida data (token).
Perphaps th thing you are looking for is and array of pointers to char in which to store all the pointer to the token that strtok is returnin in which case, token will be like char *token[];
Hope this helps a bit.
If you're using C++, consider boost::tokenizer as discussed over here.
If you're stuck in C, consider using strtok_r because it's re-entrant and thread-safe. Not that you need it in this specific case, but it's a good habit to establish.
Oh, and use strdup to create your duplicate string in one step.
replace that with
strcpy(pathDeepCopy, path);
//parse and split
token[0] = strtok(pathDeepCopy, ":");//get pointer to first token found and store in 0
//place in array
while(token[i]!= NULL) { //ensure a pointer was found
i++;
token[i] = strtok(NULL, ":"); //continue to tokenize the string
}
// use new array for storing the new tokens
// pardon my C lang skills. IT's been a "while" since I wrote device drivers in C.
const int I = i;
const int MAX_SIZE = MAX_PATH;
char ** newTokens = new char [MAX_PATH][I];
for (int k = 0; k < i; ++k) {
sprintf(newTokens[k], "%s%c", token[j], '/');
printf("%s\n", newtoken[j]); //print out all of the tokens
}
this will replace overwriting the contents and prevent the core dump.
and don't forget to check if malloc returns NULL!