Epicor - what a beastly creature!
Epicor asking for password after making a table change, any idea why?!?!
We removed the relationship from the (part table) and set up a criteria, instead. Now it is asking for a password, which should not be happening.
the login happens when I try to run the report. I am trying to figure out what I did to aggravate Epicor. The table was already there. I removed the relationship (part table) and added a criteria, instead, otherwise, that is exactly what I would have done. The only reason that I did not add a table to a report data definition, like I originally wanted to is because the parts table could only be added once. Which is why I removed the relationship and added a criteria, instead.
From your description, it sounds like the problem is related to the xml generated by Epicor for a non-BAQ based report data definition. Crystal and SSRS reports ask login information when either there is more than one datasource is referenced in the report, or there is improper relationships defined.
Note:
If you are not a report developer and you have modified this in an attempt to change the end data, I recommend you contact the report developer responsible for maintaining these before proceeding. Otherwise, read on.
Based on my experience, I would say if you are confident in the new relationship structure you have in the report data definition, the solution to this problem is likely within the report itself. Generate an xml file by running a test report, then open the .rpt (or .rdl) associated with this report and set the datasource to the new xml file. This should update the new xml schema used as the datasource. Even if none of the fields were changed in the data definition, the datasource schema definition that is stored in these files define exactly the data formatting that the report expects to receive when it is opened by Epicor.
If that doesn't solve the problem and you are using Crystal, the xml relationships may be defined in a way that will effect the way the data is displayed, which can be adjusted by using database expert->links tab in crystal. You should reconnect all of the links to match the report data definition within Epicor.
If none of that works, open up and view the xml file.
It is not unheard of for report data definitions in Epicor to break behind the scenes when altering relationships, and the xml file generated by the test report may not be a fully-qualified xml file. I have seen many xml files that do not have elements closed, etc. that will cause various problems when attempting to run the report. In this case, my recommendation is to create a completely new report data definition (do not copy), and re-enter all of the parameters that existed in the former definition. Repeat the refreshing of the report datasource as described above and this problem should be fixed.
Related
Hope you're well. I'm currently building out a report, but despite my best efforts so far, I can't get some information to populate within the report. It does not appear to me that salesforce is recognizing the field "Agent Incoming Connecting Time" within the object "AC_Agent_Performance". However, I can pull in some other fields within the same object into the Agent Performance report, so I'm not clear on what is not taking place in the field that I wish to see within the report. Here are some of the things that I've tried:
I have checked the access to the field. The first photo (Photo 1) Shows an example of a working object, the the second one shows an example of one that does not.
The API name seems to work, and is consistent with other fields within the object that work.
I have checked the page layout for the object (even though I don't think this is the issue), and I have mirrored other fields to the best of my knowledge that ARE populating within the report.
I reviewed the CTI flows to see if there was something missing in there on a lark, but there was nothing in there that would lead me to believe that this was the source of the problem.
I have tried setting up a new field in the object (formula), that references the field that I'm trying. to pull in, but that just returns a result of 'zero' for all values.
One thing that I have done that appears to be working, is I have set up a joined report, which uses both "AC Agent Performance" object and "AC Historical Queue Metrics" object in the report. The result that is returning appears to be accurate (please see the picture (picture number 3)). However, I don't think that this is the right way to go about this, and I don't want to do it this way. I want to use the report with one object rather than with two.
I know that permissions are the most likely issue, so I've taken a close look at these. Please let me know if there is something wrong with how I have the permissions configured. The First image depicts the 'Field Level Security'. The second image depicts the'field accessibility'. They are both like this, the whole way down:
Please note one other thing, which is that the last picture depicts a different field within the object displaying in the report.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I can proceed so the field "Agent Incoming Connecting Time" will display within the report?
Please also note, that these are objects that contain data that is populated from AWS' Amazon Connect.
This last photo, shows that the object does not have any information in it within the report.
If the field isn't populated there's not much you can do on the reporting side of things. You already tried "joined report". You should check why the integration doesn't populate it, maybe read integration documentation, contact the managed package's support...
The tables are connected with lookup or master-detail, right? In a pinch you could try making formula field on "AC Agent Performance" looking "up" and pulling the value from related AC historical queue metrics. If the relationship is other way around (performance -> down to related list -> metrics) you could try to make-do with a master detail and rollup summary field. I don't know this package, no idea if you can pull it off when you don't have full control over the fields.
If you can't really use the relationships and absolutely need to report on single table - you could capture intermediate results of the report to a helper table and then report on that. It's called "reporting snapshots". Or write some nightly (hourly?) batch that recalculates stuff and writes homemade "rollup" to these fields?
I would like to take the Audit History provided by Enterprise Architect and create a SQL query to report through a BI tool that will allow myself and other users to search the history of an object but I am having a little trouble understanding the audit table: t_snapshot.
From what I can tell, t_snapshot has a Style column that contains "INSERT," "UPDATE," and "DELETE" which would tell me what is happening and the Notes column can tell me what object it is referencing but so far I've only been able to get a partial picture. What I have not been able to deduce is when any event occurred or which user made the change.
If anyone has encountered this problem in the past, your input would be appreciated.
Well, I don't know whether you really want to touch that.
There's a column called BinContent which contains what you are looking for. It looks like
<LogItem><Row Number="0"><Column Name="object_id"><Old Value="1797"/><New Value="1797"/></Column><Column Name="name"><Old Value="CB"/><New Value="CBc"/></Column><Column Name="modifieddate"><Old Value="07.12.2018"/><New Value="11.12.2018"/></Column><appliesTo><Element Type="Action"/></appliesTo></Row><Details User="Thomas" DateTime="2018-12-11 08:22:59"/></LogItem>
So basically some XML describing the change including the plain text user name.
The bincontent column(s) are actually zips which contain a single file str.dat holding the above information.
Good luck.
Currently we create Jasper PDF Reports from a single simple database table for our customers. This has been achieved programmatically. It's static. If the user wishes to change the query, he/she creates a change request, which we cannot deliver before the end of the next sprint (SCRUM).
The tool/library should be straight forward (e.g. convention over configuration) and employable from within a JavaEE container. And, open source.
Is there a dynamic tool that allows or customers to create the simple queries/reports themselves without knowing SQL? Means, they should be able to see the table and then create a query from it, execute and print (we could use Jasper Reports for the last one).
E.g. Select only data from year 2014, aggregate them by customer group and select columns x,y and z.
All of these criterias and query structure may change though, thus not just the value like year 2014.
Questions:
1) Is there a tool that presents the data in some kind of SAP-cube or something similar where the user could select the structure and attributes?
2) Can that tool save template queries (queries that the user has invoked before)?
thanks
With BIRT you could use parameters in the report... for example have one report that shows the whole data set or data cube (or at least a bit of all of the fields). Then you could add JavaScript to the report (or do all of the presentation in JavaScript for that matter), that shows the parameters a user can select from. These parameter values can then either be sent to a new report or could update the existing report. Parameters can be put into database queries too.
If that was exposed in JavaScript on a web page you could save the parameter values to an array and store them in the browser or server.
I need to change the DataSource for my SSRS reports. Some field names and DIM-FACT table names have changed on the SQL server 2008 database used to create SSRS reports. How can I change the DataSource do that without losing all of the work I have done? Some field names are not the same or have been removed.
The reports were already uploaded/deployed from Visual Studio and copied to SharePoint 2010, Is there a way to modify the original datasource without having to rewrite the whole dril-down report?
I am new to SSRS and I hope what I am asking makes sense )
Solution Explorer and Properties in Visual Studio where modified, but ReportData Section (on the left) are still the same. Can someone please help me?
In your example, you have your report splendidly broken out into 3 parts - an RDL, which is your actual Report definition; an RSD, which is your dataset, which houses a reference to a sproc or just your entire query, and maintains information about the field names, data types, etc; and an RDS, which is your datasource, and merely contains a connection string.
As long as the metadata between them remain the same, you can alter any of these files independently of the others - you can completely gut & rewrite your RSD, and as long as the field names, datatypes, and parameters are the same, the RDL will continue to work with no modifications needed. Similarly, you can change your datasource's (RDS) connection string, and as long as the new connection has access to the same objects, your RSD, and thus RDL will work fine.
So, if you merely need to change the data source, simply modify that file, and you're done.
It sounds, however, like you need to change your dataset. This can be as simple or as complicated as you'd like it to be. You could simply update your query, and alias all of the new field names back to what they were before your change. This would require no modifications to your RDL, though could be argued as being a bad practice.
Lastly, if this really is a simple change of replacing one value with another, know that all 3 files - RDS, RSD, RDL - are simply XML. Open them up using the Notepad clone of your choice, and do a find/replace for everything (you can also use "Code View" in Visual Studio).
I have a very simple database in access, but for each record i need to attach a scanned in document (probably pdf). What is the best way to do this, the database should not just link to a file on the pc, but should copy and keep the file with it, meaning if the original file goes missing the database is moved or copied, the file should still be accessable from within the Database. Is This possible? and what is the easiest way of doing it? If is should i can write a macro, i just dont know where to start. and also when i display a report of the table, i would like to just see thumbnails of the documents.
Thank you.
As the other answerers have noted, storing file data inside a database table can be a questionable practice. That said, I wouldn't personally rule it out, though if you are going to take that option, I'd strongly suggest splitting out the file data into its own table in its own backend file. For example:
Create a new database file called Scanned files.mdb (or Scanned files.accdb).
Add a single table called Scans with fields such as FileID (AutoNumber, primary key), MainTableID (matches whatever is the primary key of the main table in the main database file), FileName (Text), FileExt (Text) and FileData ('OLE object', really just a BLOB - don't actually use OLE Objects because they will bloat the database horribly).
Back in the frontend, add a reference to Scans as a linked table.
Use a bit of VBA to upload and extract files from the Scans table (if you're interested in the mechanics of this, post a separate question).
Use the VBA Shell routine (if you must) or ShellExecute from the Windows API (= the better option IMO) to open extracted data.
If you are using the newer ACCDB format, then you have the 'attachment' field type available as smk081 suggests. This basically does most of the above steps for you, however doing things 'by hand' gives you greater flexibilty - for example, it allows giving each file a 'DateScanned' or 'DateEffective' field.
That said, your requirement for thumbnails will require explicit coding whatever option you take. It might be possible to leverage the Windows file previewing API, though I'd be certain thumbnails are a definite requirement before investigating this - Access VBA is powerful enough to encourage attempts at complex solutions, but frequently not clean and modern enough to allow fulfilling them in a particularly maintainable fashion.
There is an Attachment type under Data Type when you go into Design View of your table. You can add an attachment field here. When you go into the Datasheet view of the table you can select this field for a particular row and a window will open for you to specify the attachment. This will cause your database to quickly grow in size if you add a lot of large attachments.
You can use an OLE field in a table, but I would really suggest you not use this approach. The database is going to be HUGE in no time, and you're going to regret it.
Instead, you should consider adding a field that stores the path to the file, and keep the files in one folder on your network. Then you can use a SHELL() command to open the file. What's the difference between restoring an Access database and restoring PDF files if something goes wrong? This will keep your database at a manageable size and reduce the possibility of corruption.