I'm using twitter bootstrap with a popover and got a AngularJS scoped variable to appear correctly. The below works.
(data-content="{{notifications[0].user}} shared {{notifications[0].user_two}}'s records")
When I add the following
(data-content="<b>{{notifications[0].user}} shared {{notifications[0].user_two}}'s records</b>")
No errors show up, but all of the {{}} no longer render.
So I tried this as a test of sorts
(data-content="<div ng-repeat='item in notifications'>test {{item}} <br/><hr/></div>")
Much like the last example, I see the "test" but not the {{item}}. And the "test" only show s up once, even though the notifications had three elements. When I look at the DOM there's this
<div class="popover-content">
<div ng-repeat="item in notifications">you <br><hr></div>
</div>
I've also tried just creating a directive to iterate through the array and make the output I want, but my attempt to set data-content equal to a directive have been failures. The examples I've found elsewhere I'm confident would work, but I just wanted to confirm before I begin implementing something like this (http://tech.pro/tutorial/1360/bootstrap-popover-using-angularjs-compile-service) or (Html file as content in Bootstrap popover in AngularJS directive) that I'm not missing a straightforward fix to the problem I outlined above that would not require me creating a directive.
Edit:
Plunkr Url http://plnkr.co/edit/VZwax4X6WUxSpUTYUqIA?p=preview
html might be breaking it, try marking it as trusted html using $sce
How do you use $sce.trustAsHtml(string) to replicate ng-bind-html-unsafe in Angular 1.2+
$scope.html = '<ul><li>render me please</li></ul>';
$scope.trustedHtml = $sce.trustAsHtml($scope.html);
<button ... data-content="trustedHtml" ...> </button>
Related
I would like to apologize that I couldn't provide any code snippet regarding this question, I am a newbie about AngularJS.
<div ng-repeat="item in list" ng-view></div>
Using the code above, would it be possible to render different template which would be dependent on item.type property. I was expecting a result like this:
item.type == "image" returning: <div><img src="'IMAGE_URI'"></div>
item.type == "text" returning: <div><p>TEXT</p></div>
As of now I have create a template html for the enumeration of item.type. Is this concern possible using AngularJS? I've recently learned that ng-view accompannied with ng-route.
I think one way you can do it is to use 'ng-if' to conditionally include html:
<div ng-repeat="item in list">
<div ng-if="item.type == 'image'><img src="'IMAGE_URI'"></div>
<div ng-if="item.type == 'text'><div><p>TEXT</p></div>
</div>
You can have only one ng-view,
take a look at this answer.
from the documentation for ng-view:
ngView is a directive that complements
the $route service by including the rendered
template of the current route into the main
layout (index.html) file.
Every time the current route changes,
the included view changes with it according
to the configuration of the $route service.
Requires the ngRoute module to be installed.
What you're looking for is ng-include, combined with ng-switch,
take a look at this answer on how to combine the two.
ng-include creates a new child scope, which in turn inherits from the controller.
have a look at this answer for more information about the topic.
I am using this way:
<div ng-cloak>{{ message.userName || message.text }}</div>
Is this the only / best way to ensure the user does not see the {{ }} when AngularJS is still loading ?
There are several ways to hide content before Angular has a chance to run
Put the content you want to hide in another template, and use ngInclude
<div ng-include="'myPartialTemplate.html'"></div>
If you don't actually want another request made to the server to fetch another file, there are a couple of ways, as explained in the $templateCache docs. There are tools to "compile" external HTML templates into JS to avoid having to do this manually, such as grunt-angular-templates.
Similar to ngInclude, if you put everything in custom directives, with its own template, then the template content won't be shown until Angular has had a chance to run.
<my-directive></my-directive>
With a definition of:
app.directive('myDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
template: '<div>Content hidden until Angular loaded</div>'
}
});
ngBind as an alternative to {{}} blocks
<div>Hello <span ng-bind="name"></span></div>
ngCloak as you have mentioned (in this list for completeness).
<div ng-cloak>Content hidden until Angular compiled the template</div>
But you must have certain styles loaded before the page is rendered by the browser, as explained in the ngCloak docs.
You can use ng-bind too as the documentation explains.
A typical advantage about ng-bind is the ability to provide a default value while Angular is loading (indeed, ng-cloak can only hide the content):
<p>Hello, <span ng-bind="user.name">MyDefaultValueWhileAngularIsLoading<span/></p>
Then as soon Angular is loaded, the value will be replaced by user.name.
Besides, ng-cloak is useful when dealing with blocks (many HTML lines) and ng-bind on a particular element.
I am trying to do what looks like a simple process: to display a list of items received from an HTTP request with animation.
First of all, here is my way of doing it ( I am open to any suggestions to do it in a better angular way ):
I define a scope variable state that I initialize to loading in my controller and that I change to loaded when I receive data from the HTTP request.
I initialize a scope variable items with the received data.
In my view, I use ng-switch for the states, and ng-repeat with the items.
I define an animation with css on ng-repeat.
Here is a plunkr ( with a $timeout instead of the request ).
I cannot understand why the animation does not work.
Any help will be appreciated. Thanks.
The reason it is happening is because your ng-when. The same thing happens with ng-if, but would work fine if you used ng-show.
The problem is that when your ng-when condition returns true, the ng-when first renders it's content in a detatched dom (so animations do not happen). This dom is then attached to the dom tree (this step is animated but you would have to put your animation class on the ng-when).
When using something like ng-show or ng-hide things work as expected because the dom is always attached (it is simply shown/hidden).
This might be considered either a bug or a limitation of ng-animate, you might want to post a github issue and see if the angular guys have any thoughts.
It seems to be a "feature" of angular that it won't add .ng-enter to repeat items inside ng-switch-when block. You can remove ng-switch-when="loaded" and it will work (You don't really need it as ng-repeat won't do anything if there is no items)
<div ng-switch="state">
<div ng-switch-when="loading">
<p>Please wait...</p>
</div>
<div >
<ul ng-repeat="item in items" class="animate-items">
<li>{{item}}</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
http://plnkr.co/edit/ocEj7BSQPSeIdnnfAOIE?p=preview
I'm building a reasonably non-trivial Angular-js application for the first time and am trying to establish some intuition about how to get things done. Most things are making sense, but there's one pattern in particular that has me stumped -
Whenever I place an "include" style directive inside an ng-switch, it is ignored. I've experimented with just about every style of ng-switch, ng-include, and ng-transclude I can think of to achieve the desired behaviour, but to no avail. I haven't noticed any documentation indicating that this would be disallowed, nor any equivalent style of pattern.
Here is an example of what I have tried to do:
<div ng-switch="is_logged_in()">
<div ng-switch-when="true">
logged-in:
<div ng-include="'views/logout.html'"> </div>
</div>
<div ng-switch-default>
not-logged-in
</div>
</div>
The expected behaviour being that the logout form is displayed when $scope.is_logged_in() returns true.
The behaviour I see is that "logged-in:" is displayed, but the include isn't.
I've tried various versions of Angular-js. I've inspected the network traffic and seen that the include is in-fact being fetched, but I can't get this to work. I've had the same behaviour manifest when trying to build my own template control structures using directives.
The way I've seen most examples dodge this is by using JS in a directive to manually show/hide various sections of the transcluded content - is this really the idiomatic way to get the behaviour I'm looking for?
Thanks!
While using ng-include I always assign the path to a variable in controller.
$scope.logoutlink ='views/logout.html'
And in the view you can assign as
<div ng-include="{{logoutlink}}"> </div>
It would be helpful to post a JSfiddle link.
Here is my plnkr: http://plnkr.co/edit/n8cRXwIpHJw3jUpL8PX5?p=preview You have to click on a li element and the form will appear. Enter a random string and hit 'add notice'. Instead of the textarea text you will get undefined.
Markup:
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="ticket in tickets" ng-click="select(ticket)">
{{ ticket.text }}
</li>
</ul>
<div ui-if="selectedTicket != null">
<form ng-submit="createNotice(selectedTicket)">
<textarea ng-model="noticeText"></textarea>
<button type="submit">add notice</button>
</form>
</div>
JS part:
$scope.createNotice = function(ticket){
alert($scope.noticeText);
}
returns 'undefined'. I noticed that this does not work when using ui-if of angular-ui. Any ideas why this does not work? How to fix it?
Your problem lies in the ui-if part. Angular-ui creates a new scope for anything within that directive so in order to access the parent scope, you must do something like this:
<textarea ng-model="$parent.noticeText"></textarea>
Instead of
<textarea ng-model="noticeText"></textarea>
This issue happened to me while not using the ng-if directive on elements surrounding the textarea element. While the solution of Mathew is correct, the reason seems to be another. Searching for that issue points to this post, so I decided to share this.
If you look at the AngularJS documentation here https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/textarea , you can see that Angular adds its own directive called <textarea> that "overrides" the default HTML textarea element. This is the new scope that causes the whole mess.
If you have a variable like
$scope.myText = 'Dummy text';
in your controller and bind that to the textarea element like this
<textarea ng-model="myText"></textarea>
AngularJS will look for that variable in the scope of the directive. It is not there and thus he walks down to $parent. The variable is present there and the text is inserted into the textarea. When changing the text in the textarea, Angular does NOT change the parent's variable. Instead it creates a new variable in the directive's scope and thus the original variable is not updated. If you bind the textarea to the parent's variable, as suggested by Mathew, Angular will always bind to the correct variable and the issue is gone.
<textarea ng-model="$parent.myText"></textarea>
Hope this will clear things up for other people coming to this question and and think "WTF, I am not using ng-if or any other directive in my case!" like I did when I first landed here ;)
Update: Use controller-as syntax
Wanted to add this long before but didn't find time to do it. This is the modern style of building controllers and should be used instead of the $parent stuff above. Read on to find out how and why.
Since AngularJS 1.2 there is the ability to reference the controller object directly instead of using the $scope object. This may be achieved by using this syntax in HTML markup:
<div ng-controller="MyController as myc"> [...] </div>
Popular routing modules (i.e. UI Router) provide similar properties for their states. For UI Router you use the following in your state definition:
[...]
controller: "MyController",
controllerAs: "myc",
[...]
This helps us to circumvent the problem with nested or incorrectly addressed scopes. The above example would be constructed this way. First the JavaScript part. Straight forward, you simple do not use the $scope reference to set your text, just use this to attach the property directly to the controller object.
angular.module('myApp').controller('MyController', function () {
this.myText = 'Dummy text';
});
The markup for the textarea with controller-as syntax would look like this:
<textarea ng-model="myc.myText"></textarea>
This is the most efficient way to do things like this today, because it solves the problem with nested scopes making us count how many layers deep we are at a certain point. Using multiple nested directives inside elements with an ng-controller directive could have lead to something like this when using the old way of referencing scopes. And no one really wants to do that all day!
<textarea ng-model="$parent.$parent.$parent.$parent.myText"></textarea>
Bind the textarea to a scope variable's property rather than directly to a scope variable:
controller:
$scope.notice = {text: ""}
template:
<textarea ng-model="notice.text"></textarea>
It is, indeed, ui-if that creates the problem. Angular if directives destroy and recreate portions of the dom tree based on the expression. This is was creates the new scope and not the textarea directive as marandus suggested.
Here's a post on the differences between ngIf and ngShow that describes this well—what is the difference between ng-if and ng-show/ng-hide.