Sorting the numbers in a list / C - c

I need to sort the numbers that are entered in a list, but I am doing something wrong and it's sorting all of them except the first one.Any ideas how to fix this?
Here's my code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct node
{
int data;
struct node *next;
};
struct node* List;
void Add (struct node* p, int d)
{
struct node* q;
q=malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if (q==NULL)
printf("Not enaugh memory!");
else
{
q->data=d;
if(List==NULL)
{
q->next=NULL;
List=q;
}
else
{
struct node *ptr=List;
while((ptr->next!=NULL)&&(ptr->next->data>d))
{
ptr=ptr->next;
}
q->next=ptr->next;
ptr->next=q;
}
}
}
int main()
{
int n,i,a;
printf("How much numbers are you going to enter? ");
scanf("%d",&n);
for (i=1; i<=n; i++)
{
printf("\nEnter a number: ");
scanf("%d",&a);
Add(List,a);
}
printf("\nThe sorted numbers are: ");
struct node *ptr=List;
while(ptr!=NULL)
{
printf("%d\t",ptr->data);
ptr=ptr->next;
}
printf("\n\n");
system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
Thanks for the help in advance :-)

in add() function,
if(List==p)
this statement is true for all elements you insert to list since the call to add is,
Add(List,a);
so p=List. therefore the sorting code written in else part is not executed.
Also add statements to check for empty initial list.
You can use code similar to this,
void Add (int d)
{
struct node* q;
q=malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if (q==NULL)
printf("Not enaugh memory!");
else
{
q->data=d;
if(List==NULL)
{
q->next=NULL;
List=q;
}
else
{
struct node *ptr=List;
while((ptr->next!=NULL)&&(ptr->next->data>d))
{
ptr=ptr->next;
}
q->next=ptr->next;
ptr->next=q;
}
}
}
Since list is a global variable you dont need to pass it to Add() function. change the function call to
Add(a);

void Add (struct node* p, int d){
struct node* q;
q=malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if (q==NULL)
printf("Not enaugh memory!");
else{
q->data=d;
if(List==NULL || List->data < d){//modify this line
q->next= List;//and change NULL to List
List=q;
} else {
struct node *ptr=List;
while((ptr->next!=NULL)&&(ptr->next->data>d)){
ptr=ptr->next;
}
q->next=ptr->next;
ptr->next=q;
}
}
}

You always call Add with List as the first parameter, so it's alway true inside Add that (List==p). Consequently each new item is just inserted at the front of the list and there is no sorting at all.
EDIT 1
A good practice would be sending a list to the Add routine as a parameter. Or, if you want to keep it external, just don't give it to Add at all and test if(List == NULL)
void Add( int d)
{
// ... alloc 'q' and fill q->d here, then:
if(List == NULL)
{
q->next = NULL;
List = q;
}
else
{
struct node *b; // put q after b
for( b = List; b->next != NULL; b = b->next)
if( b->next->data >= d)
break;
q->next = b->next;
b->next = q;
}
}
EDIT 2
Example of transferring the list to a function by parameter
void Add( struct node **n, int d)
{
// ... alloc 'q' and fill q->d here, then:
while( *n != NULL && (*n)->data < d)
n = & (*n)->next;
q->next = *n;
*n = q;
}
int main()
{
// ...
Add( &List, a);
// ...
}

Related

Printing extra 0 and not removing front nodes in linked list implementation in C

My code has two separate (although likely connected) problems, one of which being that when I print out the linked list (regardless of if I push nodes to the front or to the back), it prints an additional 0 at the start of the linked list. I saw a similar post about this, but the implementation of the push method was different, as it didn't take head as an argument, so I've defined head in the main() method with:
struct node *head = NULL;
and my linked list instantiation looks like
struct node *temp, *ptr;
temp=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(temp==NULL) {
exit(0);
}
temp->next=NULL;
if(head==NULL) {
head=temp;
} else {
ptr=head;
while(ptr->next!=NULL) {
ptr=ptr->next;
}
ptr->next=temp;
ptr->data=NULL;
}
The issue I'm having is that I'm not sure whether or not the issue is in the print method, my push front method or my linked list instantiation.
The relevant code is:
case PUSH_FRONT: ; // push onto front of list
struct node *temp1;
temp1=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(temp1==NULL) {
break;
}
temp1->next=NULL;
temp1->data=val;
if(head==NULL) {
head=temp1;
} else {
temp1->next=head;
head=temp1;
}
break;
case PRINT_LIST: ; // print list
printf("Elements: ");
struct node *ptr4;
ptr4=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(head==NULL) {
break;
} else {
ptr4=head;
while(ptr4) {
printf("%d",ptr4->data);
printf(" ");
ptr4=ptr4->next;
}
printf("\n");
free(ptr4);
}
break;
My other issue (although I'm still convinced that this issue lies elsewhere) is that my pop front method does absolutely nothing, which I'm guessing has to do with the initial instantiation of the linked list. The relevant code is:
case POP_FRONT: ; // remove from front of list
// If list is empty, do nothing.
struct node *ptr2;
ptr2=(struct node *)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(ptr2==NULL) {
break;
}
if(head==NULL) {
break;
} else if(head->next==NULL) {
ptr2=head;
head=head->next;
free(ptr2);
}
break;
You should post code someone could download and compile. And when
needed a data file or a description of the problem. Code fragments are
not good.
I believe that the data component of your list is just an int by looking at the code at the label PRINT_LIST
here goes what I think
a list is a collection of nodes. In java a list is even called a collection. In C++ lists are called containers. When you write code for a linked list as if it is a node you will have more work and less results.
as a direct consequence of using a node as a list you have 3 pointers here just to manage the list, in the instantiation code: head, temp and ptr, It is too much. Imagine if there where 3 lists...
a list with pointers only to one direction is harder to program and much less useful than one with pointers to next and previous nodes. If it is your decision may be you should reconsider. If the space of the additional pointer is not a concern, it is hard to justify not to use 2 pointers. Imagine a list for a library, a path,, a playlist, all the classic examples: it is very handful to be able to navigate in both directions.
the use of a switch() is uncommon. Why not just use functions?
back to your code
struct node *temp, *ptr;
temp=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(temp==NULL) {
exit(0);
}
temp->next=NULL;
if(head==NULL) {
head=temp;
} else {
ptr=head;
while(ptr->next!=NULL) {
ptr=ptr->next;
}
ptr->next=temp;
ptr->data=NULL;
}
here you write ptr->data = NULL; and we may think that data is a pointer, but in the list label you wrote
ptr4=head;
while(ptr4) {
printf("%d",ptr4->data);
printf(" ");
ptr4=ptr4->next;
}
printf("\n");
free(ptr4);
and data is just an int as you are using %d in the printf(). Well, the NULL in instantiation is, well, a zero.
And that NULL is the 0 you are complaining about.
This code seems to be much more complex and hard to read than it may need to be.
Let me show an alternative
about the declaration
You may write the node struct like
typedef struct _nd
{
int data;
struct _nd* next;
} node;
So you can use node in the declaration and not have to repeat struct at all times. Also it is useful to have a convention for typedef, like using first letter uppercase to help in readability
As I said before a list is a collection of nodes, it is NOT just a node --- with a pointer inside --- and each node has a payload, some data, usually a pointer. As an example consider
an alternate example of list structs
typedef struct _nda
{
int data;
struct _nda* next;
} Node;
struct _the_list
{
char* name;
unsigned size;
unsigned limit;
Node* head;
Node* tail;
};
typedef struct _the_list List;
Here the list is, well, List. And each list has head, tail, size, limit and even a name. I kept data as an int but is is not good: you really want it as a pointer, maybe (void*).
Why? Because in this way you can reuse the code everywhere with no change.
How to use a List like this?
Using functions like these possible prototypes
List* _create(const char*);
int _define_max(List* l, const unsigned);
List* _delete(List*);
int _empty(List*);
int _get_max(List*);
List* _insert_begin(int, List*);
List* _insert_end(int, List*);
int _insert_your_way(List*, int(*)(int,int));
int _print(List*);
int _print_your_way(List*, int(*)(int,int));
List* _remove(int, List*);
int _size(List*);
I will post a running example below just to have something you can test or ask about case you need. But it is the usual. Only these two functions are less usual, but more useful:
int _insert_your_way(List*, int(*F)(int,int));
int _print_your_way(List*, int(*F)(int,int));
Here you can pass a function like in the qsort() function, and the node is inserted at the position, using the function F() to compare the nodes. The effect is that you can have the nodes inserted (or listed) in any order, with no change in the list code, just by providing different functions to the print or insert function. C does that, C++ does that, everybody does that, so we can too :)
code for instantiating such a list
List* _create(const char* name)
{
List* one = (List*)malloc(sizeof(List));
one->name = (char*)malloc(1 + strlen(name));
strcpy(one->name, name);
one->size = 0;
one->limit = 0;
one->head = NULL;
one->tail = NULL;
return one;
}; // criar()
You may find that writing this way makes easier to maintain or read the code. And the List as a container is much more expressive: metadata about the list in included in the list. No need for ptr, head, temp, size or other controls hanging loose in main()
To create a list you can just write, like in the example
List* first = _create("The First List");
inserting nodes at the beggining
List* _insert_begin(int value, List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return l; //no list
if ((l->limit > 0) && (l->size == l->limit)) return l; // full
// ok: create a node and stuff data in
Node* nd = (Node*)malloc(sizeof(Node));
nd->data = value; // data comes in
nd->next = l->head; // depois vem o que estava na frente
l->head = nd; // nd fim
l->size = l->size + 1;
// if it is the first node
if (l->size == 1)l->tail = nd;
return l;
};
As I told you this is just a toy, an example. In practice you will use a void* in order to have a generic code. I am using an int as data here, as you did. To insert a few nodes in the list created above you just write
// insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the end
for(int i = 6; i<11; i+=1 ) _insert_end(i, first);
And you can have even an array of lists and all goes well. No external variables to look after. And each list has size updated, head, tail...
printing nodes
print is also easy and can be more expressive, since we have metadata with limits, size, head, tail and even the name for each list.
sample program
int main(void)
{
List* first = _create("The First List");
_print(first);
_define_max(first,300);
_print(first);
// insert 5,4,3,2,1 at the beggining
for(int i = 5; i>0; i-=1 ) _insert_begin(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
// insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the end
for(int i = 6; i<11; i+=1 ) _insert_end(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
printf("empty(): %d size()= %d\n",
_empty(first),
_size(first) );
first = _delete(first);
_print(first);
return 0;
}
This code just
create a list and prints the nodes
set the optional limit to 300 nodes
list the nodes
insert 5,4,3,2,1 at the beginning
list the nodes
insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the tail
list the nodes
call a few functions on the list
deletes all data
output
List 'The First List' with 0 elements [MAX not defined yet]
List 'The First List' with 0 of 300 MAX elements
List 'The First List' with 5 of 300 MAX elements
First: 1
Last: 5
Elements
1
2
3
4
5
End of list
List 'The First List' with 10 of 300 MAX elements
First: 1
Last: 10
Elements
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
End of list
empty(): 0 size()= 10
Deleting 'The First List'
List not created!
the code (with almost no testing)
#include <memory.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
typedef struct _nda
{
int data;
struct _nda* next;
} Node;
struct _the_list
{
char* name;
unsigned size;
unsigned limit;
Node* head;
Node* tail;
};
typedef struct _the_list List;
List* _create(const char*);
int _define_max(List* l, const unsigned);
List* _delete(List*);
int _empty(List*);
int _get_max(List*);
List* _insert_begin(int, List*);
List* _insert_end(int, List*);
int _insert_your_way(List*, int(*)(void*));
int _print(List*);
int _print_your_way(List*, int(*)(void*));
List* _remove(int, List*);
int _size(List*);
int main(void)
{
List* first = _create("The First List");
_print(first);
_define_max(first,300);
_print(first);
// insert 5,4,3,2,1 at the beggining
for(int i = 5; i>0; i-=1 ) _insert_begin(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
// insert 6,7,8,9,10 at the end
for(int i = 6; i<11; i+=1 ) _insert_end(i, first);
// list again
_print(first);
printf("empty(): %d size()= %d\n",
_empty(first),
_size(first) );
first = _delete(first);
_print(first);
return 0;
}
List* _create(const char* name)
{
List* one = (List*)malloc(sizeof(List));
one->name = (char*)malloc(1 + strlen(name));
strcpy(one->name, name);
one->size = 0;
one->limit = 0;
one->head = NULL;
one->tail = NULL;
return one;
}; // criar()
int _define_max(List* l, const unsigned m)
{
if (l == NULL) return -1;
// new value can not be less than present size
if (l->size > m) return -2;
l->limit = m;
return m;
};
List* _delete(List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return NULL;
printf("Deleting '%s'\n", l->name);
free(l->name);
if (l->size == 0)
{
free(l);
return NULL; // empty
}; // if()
Node* node = l->head;
do
{
Node* p = node->next;
free(node);
node = p;
} while (node != NULL);
return NULL;
};
int _empty(List* L)
{
if (L == NULL) return -1;
return (L->size == 0);
};
int _get_max(List* L)
{
if (L == NULL) return -1;
return (int)L->limit;
};
List* _insert_begin(int value, List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return l; //no list
if ((l->limit > 0) && (l->size == l->limit)) return l; // full
// ok: create a node and stuff data in
Node* nd = (Node*)malloc(sizeof(Node));
nd->data = value; // data comes in
nd->next = l->head; // depois vem o que estava na frente
l->head = nd; // nd fim
l->size = l->size + 1;
// if it is the first node
if (l->size == 1)l->tail = nd;
return l;
};
List* _insert_end(int value, List* l)
{
if (l == NULL) return l;
if ((l->limit > 0) && (l->size == l->limit)) return l; // full
// ok: create a node and insert at the end
Node* nd = (Node*)malloc(sizeof(Node));
nd->data = value;
// first one?
if (l->size == 0)
{
l->head = nd;
nd->next = NULL;
}
else
{
nd->next = NULL; // no one after this
(l->tail)->next = nd;
}; // if()
l->tail = nd; // nd is tail now
l->size = l->size + 1;
// of this is the first node
if (l->size == 1)l->head = nd;
return l;
};
int _insert_your_way(List* L, int(*F)(void*))
{
return 0;
};
int _print(List* l)
{
if (l == NULL)
{
printf("List not created!\n");
return -1;
};
if (l->limit > 0)
{
printf("\nList '%s' with %d of %d MAX elements\n",
l->name,
l->size,
l->limit
);
}
else
{
printf("\nList '%s' with %d elements [MAX not defined yet]\n",
l->name,
l->size
);
}
if (l->size < 1) return 0;
// assume data as just an int
Node* p = l->head;
printf("\n First:%10d\n", l->head->data);
printf(" Last:%10d\n", l->tail->data);
printf("\nElements\n\n");
do
{
printf("%10d \n", p->data);
p = p->next;
} while (p != NULL);
printf("\nEnd of list\n\n");
return 0;
}; // _print()
int _print_your_way(List* L, int(*F)(void*))
{
return 0;
};
List* _remove(int value, List* L)
{
return NULL;
};
int _size(List* L)
{
if (L == NULL) return -1;
return (int)L->size;
};
It was extracted for a larger example, for WIndows. Compiled just under gcc 9.3 on Ubuntu on Windows WSL

Printing and Deleting queue in C

I'm trying to write a program that enqueue, dequeue, delete a chosen number and print the list. I have problems with the dequeue that i think is because of the menu part when you write a number, I've tried to fix it but the it removes the last number and not the first. The print shows the wrong number and when I tried to solve that problem I got the same problem as I had in dequeue. It's sometinhg wrong in delete but i cant figure it out.
I appreciate all the help i can get
edit:
I've changed it a lot and now everything else works except delete. I want delete to find the number i enter and delete it.
queue.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include<conio.h>
struct node
{
int info;
struct node *ptr;
int next;
}*first, *last, *temp, *first1;
void enq(int data);
void deq();
void empty();
void display();
void create();
void delete_queue();
int count = 0;
void main()
{
int no, ch;
printf("\n 1 - Enqueue");
printf("\n 2 - Dequeue");
printf("\n 3 - Delete");
printf("\n 4 - Display");
printf("\n 5 - Exit");
create();
while (1)
{
printf("\n Enter choice : ");
scanf_s("%d", &ch);
switch (ch)
{
case 1:
printf("Enter data : ");
scanf_s("%d", &no);
enq(no);
break;
case 2:
deq();
break;
case 3:
printf("Enter data : ");
scanf_s("%d", &no);
delete_queue(no);
case 4:
display();
break;
case 5:
exit(0);
default:
printf("Wrong choice, Please enter correct choice ");
break;
}
}
}
void create()
{
first = last = NULL;
}
void enq(int data)
{
if (last == NULL)
{
last = (struct node *)malloc(1 * sizeof(struct node));
last->ptr = NULL;
last->info = data;
first = last;
}
else
{
temp = (struct node *)malloc(1 * sizeof(struct node));
last->ptr = temp;
temp->info = data;
temp->ptr = NULL;
last = temp;
}
count++;
}
void display()
{
first1 = first;
if ((first1 == NULL) && (last == NULL))
{
printf("Queue is empty");
return;
}
while (first1 != last)
{
printf("%d ", first1->info);
first1 = first1->ptr;
}
if (first1 == last)
printf("%d", first1->info);
}
void deq()
{
first1 = first;
if (first1 == NULL)
{
printf("\n Error: Trying to display elements from empty queue");
return;
}
else
if (first1->ptr != NULL)
{
first1 = first1->ptr;
printf("\n Dequed value : %d", first->info);
free(first);
first = first1;
}
else
{
printf("\n Dequed value : %d", first->info);
free(first);
first = NULL;
last = NULL;
}
count--;
}
void delete_queue()
{
int retval = -1;
if (first)
{
struct node *temp = first;
first = first->next;
if (!first) { last = first; }
retval = temp->next;
free(temp);
}
return retval;
}
void empty()
{
if ((first == NULL) && (last == NULL))
printf("\n Queue empty");
else
printf("Queue not empty");
}
Let me start with a few points of advice about design and style:
I do not recommend this:
typedef struct node {
int data;
struct node *next;
} node;
you are typedefing struct node to node. while it is not illegal, it is confusing. I would recommend
typedef struct _node {
int data;
struct _node *next;
} node;
Additionally, I do not recommend use of global variable with static storage class to keep track of your queue, instead you should create a queue in your main. Use global variables only when you have compelling reasons to do so.
Do remember that when you get rid of your global variable, you will need to rewrite your enqueue dequeue delete etc... functions to take in a queue_c * as parameter (because it wont have access to queueref any more)
Now for the reason that your code is not working properly and #Weather Vane alluded to:
you have a big problem in your delete function.
int delete(int data)
{
int result = 0;
node *curr_ptr; //pointer just created and not initialized
node *prev_ptr; //not initialized
node *temp_ptr; //not initialized
while (curr_ptr != NULL)
//curr_ptr was just created, where is it pointing? fatal error here
{
//inside this block lets imagine curr_ptr is pointing to a valid
//node in the global queue
if (curr_ptr->data == data)
{
result = 1;
if (curr_ptr->next != NULL)
{
temp_ptr = curr_ptr;
//both pointers point to the same thing
destroy_node(temp_ptr);
//now you just destroyed both nodes
prev_ptr->next = curr_ptr->next;
//the first time this block runs prev_ptr is uninitialized
//so prev_ptr->next will most likely seg fault
//this happens for example if you call this function
//for the first time with a long queue
}
else
{
temp_ptr = curr_ptr;
queueref.last = prev_ptr;
prev_ptr->next = NULL;
destroy_node(temp_ptr);
//again you are destroying both curr_ptr and temp_ptr
}
}
curr_ptr = curr_ptr->next;
prev_ptr = prev_ptr->next;
return result;
}
}
Perhaps it would be better if you think edge cases very carefully and rethink some of the logic from scratch. (test edge cases as you go)

linked linked insertion function

Hello I am trying to create n number of lists. Each list is ordered linked list with a new instance. However, I also need a combined ordered linked list. Following is the code for the same. When it comes to each independent list I do not have any problems. However, when I am trying to insert every node into a globally declared linked list nodes, I am getting error(The input crashes with iteration of one node value.) Please have a look at the function and call highlighted to make things clear where I am exactly getting the error. Please make a note of global declarations. Thanks in advance.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <malloc.h>
struct node{
int number;
struct node*next;
};
typedef struct node NODE;
NODE*createlist(int),*rel_strt,*new_entry[100];
NODE *start1=NULL,*rear1,*m1,*temp11;
NODE *insert_in_end(NODE*node1);
int i,num,n2,j,v,u;
int main() {
v=0;u=0;
printf("\n Enter the number of lists:");
scanf("%d",&n2);
for(j=0;j<n2;j++) {
printf("\n\n Enter the number of inputs to the list %d: \n ",j+1);
scanf("%d",&num);
new_entry[v]=createlist(num);
display(new_entry[v]);
v++;
}
printf("\nThe final List is:");
display(start1);
return 0;
}
NODE*insert_in_end(NODE *node11) { //problem in this function
int inf1=node11->number;
if(start1==NULL) {
start1=rear1=node11;
} else {
m1=start1;
if(m1->number>inf1) {
node11->next=m1;
start1=node11;
} else {
while(m1->next) {
if(m1->next->number < inf1)
m1=m1->next;
else
break;
}
temp11=m1->next;
m1->next=node11;
node11->next=temp11;
}
}
return start1;
}
void display(NODE*nodex) {
while(nodex!=NULL) {
printf("%d ->",nodex->number);
nodex=nodex->next;
}
}
NODE *createlist(int n1) {
NODE *node1,*start,*rear,*m,*temp1;
start=NULL;
for(i=0;i<n1;i++) {
node1=(NODE*) malloc(sizeof(NODE));
int inf;
printf("Enter node value %d:",i+1);
scanf("%d",&inf);
node1->number=inf;
node1->next=NULL;
insert_in_end(node1); // error during second fuction call check function definition
if(start==NULL) {
start=rear=node1;
} else {
m=start;
if(m->number>inf) {
node1->next=m;
start=node1;
} else {
while(m->next) {
if(m->next->number < inf)
m=m->next;
else
break;
}
temp1=m->next;
m->next=node1;
node1->next=temp1;
}
}
}
return start;
}
I suggest you define a function insertValue that would make it much more convenient for you. It will also make your code much more readable.
The function is below and you should see that it is very close to what you have.
// Returns the new start of the list after inserting value in increasing order
Node* insertValue(Node * list, int value)
{
Node *newNode, *m;
newNode = malloc(sizeof(NODE));
newNode->number = value; // added this
newNode->next = NULL; // added this
if(list == NULL)
return newNode;
if(value < list->number)
{
newNode->next = list;
return newNode;
}
m = list;
while(m->next)
{
if(value < m->next->number)
break;
m = m->next;
}
newNode->next = m->next;
m->next = newNode;
return list;
}
Your main function should now iterate over reading the numbers for the different short lists as below. As you see, variable names are more explicit than yours. They are limited to the minimum and there are no global variables.
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
NODE *globalList = NULL, *lists[100];
int nbrOfLists, listNo, nbrOfVal, valNo, val;
printf("\n Enter the number of lists:");
scanf("%d", &nbrOfLists);
if(nbrOfLists < 0 || nbrOfLists > 100)
return -1;
for(listNo = 0; listNo < nbrOfLists; listNo++)
{
printf("\n\n Enter the number of inputs to the list %d: \n ",listNo+1);
scanf("%d", &nbrOfVal);
lists[listNo] = NULL;
for(valNo = 0; valNo < nbrOfVal; valNo++)
{
printf("Enter node value %d:", valNo+1);
scanf("%d", &val);
// Here we insert the value in both lists
lists[listNo] = insertValue(lists[listNo], val);
globalList = insertValue(globalList, val);
}
display(lists[listNo]);
}
display(globalList);
return 0;
}
Your display function is correct. I provide it below, but it's the same as yours. The problem you encountered was because I forgot to initialize the fields of the node after I malloc it.
void display(NODE * list)
{
while(list)
{
printf("%d ->", list->number);
list = list->next;
}
}

C program not recognizing null pointer

I'm trying to recurvisely implement an insert function in C, but I'm having all sorts of issues. I'm in an intro CS class and they started throwing C labs at us before we had ever worked with it before. Part of the issue is that the list pointer is not being recognized as NULL and I'm also pretty sure that I'm using malloc improperly.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define True 1
#define False 0
typedef int BOOLEAN;
struct Node{
int value;
struct Node *next;
};
void insert(int x, struct Node **pL){
printf("insert\n");
if(*pL == NULL){
printf("inside if\n");
struct Node *pN;
pN = (struct Node*) malloc(sizeof(struct Node));
(*pN).value = x;
(*pN).next = NULL;
return;
}
if (*pL != NULL){
printf("inside else\n");
insert(x, &(((*pL)->next)));
}
printf("end insert\n");
};
void printList(struct Node *L){
while (L != NULL){
printf("%d", (*L).value);
printList((*L).next);
}
return;
};
main(){
printf("main\n");
struct Node* L;
//L).next = NULL;
int i;
printf("for loop\n");
for (i = 3; i < 20; i+=2){
printf("%d\n", i);
insert(i, &L);
}
printList(L);
};
First of all, in main you need to initialise L:
struct Node* L = NULL;
Second, in insert when you allocate the new node pN, you are not assigning it to the pL, i.e., it doesn't get inserted. Put this right before the return; in insert:
*pL = pN;
(Also you could remove the return and change if (*pL != NULL) into else.)
Then, in printList you are both iterating with a while loop, and with recursion. Choose one, not both, e.g.,:
while (L) {
printf("%d\n", L->value);
L = L->next;
}
Also, throughout your code you can replace (*pointer_to_struct).field with pointer_to_struct->field for better style.

What is wrong with my array of linked lists implementation as all elements get over-written?

I'm trying to implement a hash table as an array of linked lists. Currently I'm trying to have a simple hash table where the key is the index of the array and value is a singly linked list for implementing chaining.
This is the code that I've written so far:
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
struct Node
{
int value;
struct Node *next;
};
struct Node *hashtable[7];
int empty(int index)
{
if(hashtable[index]==NULL)
return 0;
return 1;
}
void addNode(int frame,struct Node **iter)
{
if(*iter==NULL)
*iter=malloc(sizeof(struct Node));
else
{
while((*iter)->next != NULL)
(*iter)=(*iter)->next;
(*iter)->next=malloc(sizeof(struct Node));
(*iter)=(*iter)->next;
}
(*iter)->value=frame;
(*iter)->next=NULL;
}
void print()
{
int i;
struct Node **iter;
for(i=0;i<7;i++)
{
iter=&hashtable[i];
while(*iter !=NULL)
{
printf("%d%s%d\n",(*iter)->value,"--",i);
(*iter)=(*iter)->next;
}
}
}
int main()
{
int i=0,count=7;
for(i=0;i<7;i++)
hashtable[i]=NULL;
i=empty(1);
printf("%d",i);
do
{
printf("Enter no:\n");
scanf("%d",&i);
struct Node** temp;
temp=&hashtable[i-1%7];
addNode(rand(),temp);
count--;
print();
} while(count > 0);
return 0;
}
When I'm calling print, I can only see one element added to one particular index, which is the last element that was added, what am I doing wrong here?
void add_node(int frame,struct Node **iter)
{
/* find (pointer to) NULL pointer at end of chain */
for ( ; *iter; iter = &(*iter)->next ) {;}
*iter = malloc(sizeof **iter );
(*iter)->value = frame;
(*iter)->next = NULL;
}

Resources