I'm running GNU Screen and gdb with TUI, and I'm having some issues relating to scrollback, so I want to send the output to a different screen window. What's the best way to do this?
Ideally i'd want the tui input and output (i.e. anything I do like 'print ' from gdb) to be on one window, and the output from printf's, etc to be on a different screen window.
Does anyone know how to do this?
(I'm actually doing remote debugging over gdb + serial, so it's connecting via target remote /dev/ttyS0 in my ~/.gbdinit).
There are maybe a few ways to do this. I think the simplest is the "tty" command though. See "help tty".
Another approach is that taken by "screenify" -- use gdb's inferior call functionality to change the controlling tty (and various std* file descriptors) of the program.
Another approach is to just run your program in another tty and then use "attach".
Related
I was debugging in terminal using gdb, and I typed inlayout src,then I entered the UI mode.
Most of the time, it worked fine, but sometimes, the whole terminal text code got mixed.(I post the picture below.).
what's more, sometimes I typed in some shell command in gdb like !pmap <pid>, its output's format was also strange.
I tried to set TERM to screen-256color but it doesn't work.
I solved it in some sense.
I redirect the output of my program to another tty.
Is it possible to turn on logging feature by default in xterm?
Lets say for example, I have example program in c that give an output in xterm everytime i ran the program from default bash terminal in linux. And I want to save the output that shows in xterm into a file everytime the programs is run.
I'm using centos7_x86_64 fyi
Thanks.
In Windowmaker:
Hold down ctrl + left click in xterm window (on the terminal text), click on "log to file".
A cool thing to do is when you're coding, log the terminal, and then when you cat the Xterm log, you see coding in fast forward. If you wanted you could video it.
Note that there are also other menus in xterm, accessible using Ctrl+Left Click, Ctrl+Middle Click, Ctrl+Right Click.
Log file will be in the directory that you launched Xterm from, and will be in the format: Xterm.log.<hostname>.<date>.<time>.log.
This is a very good question, there's no reason to mark down a question like this.
It can be done in two ways:
Using script:
xterm -e script mylogfile -c "someCommand -i input_file -o output_file -f someArg"
Redirect to a file:
xterm -e 'someCommand --arguments 2>&1> /path/to/mylogfile'
I do essentially this with "terminal-window", mrxvt, "hcm" and "pypty".
terminal-window wraps mrxvt, just filling in some commandline options. mrxvt is a lightweight, multitabbed, nonunicode terminal emulator not dissimilar to xterm.
hcm is a GUI that makes it easy to run a shell (or other command) on a remote host. It can also start an mrxvt with remote ssh's without requiring the GUI if you prefer (using hcm-term).
pypty is a /usr/bin/script reimplementation that is written in Python. It is not significantly different from /usr/bin/script, except it gives a "dated files mode", that allows you to have one file per pseudo terminal per day. So if you leave a shell logged in overnight, you get one file per day - this tends to make it easier to find what you're looking for.
All this combines to give you pseudo terminal logging with great ease. Commands are run on remote hosts, but logged locally. Just start a "fancy terminal-window" (or use hcm-term), and everything you see on the screen plus control characters (but not nonechoed passwords) will be logged under ~/.hcm/logs/<year>/<month>/<day>/* .
Also, if you hit the shell button in the lower right of mrxvt, you get another ssh session into the same remote host, which is also logged locally (to a different file under ~/.hcm/logs/...). When I started making use of that feature, I had no idea how much I would grow to like it.
You can obtain them from http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/hcm/ There's a video there that shows how easy it is to set up and get started with.
BTW, fancy terminal-window sets up $PS0 or "trap DEBUG" to give you command start times and finish times. It's great for post mortems. It does this without replacing any of the usual bash startup files.
I wrote terminal-window, hcm and pypty, but I can't take credit for mrxvt. :)
HTH
I know how to get the stdout into a file using dup/dup2 system calls, but how do I get the entire output that would be normally shown on my terminal(including the prompt that says my username along with the $ symbol and the current working directory) to a file?
Yes you can, but this may be difficult in many details (depending on your expert level). For the shell to behave normally (I would mean exactly as in a terminal), then it needs to interact with a terminal (special system object). So you need to create a program that behave like a terminal, this what pseudo-terminals devices (/dev) are intended for. Read documentation about this to implement it but roughly, your application should behave like the user so should be connected to the slave side of the pseudo-terminal, and the shell to the master side of the pseudo-terminal. Then you can easily log real inputs made by the user and catch outputs made by the shell.
Can't comment cause of low reputation.
I would say there is no way to do that inside a code in C. Instead, you could use bash for example to redirect everything to a file, and leave the code in C as it is.
In this way you have all the info you want to save: prompt, current directory, call to the program (including flags), and of course the output of the program.
Well, you can do:
-For bash prompt PS1: Echo expanded PS1 (in case you want it expanded, if not there is a simple way to do it just echong PS1)
- For executed command: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/169259/how-to-capture-command-line-input-into-logfile-and-execute-it-at-the-same-time
- Standard output and error output: Redirect stderr and stdout in a Bash script
And that's all you want to capture, I think.
Look up the script command in Unix systems. If you want to capture all keyboard and std in/out for a command, use the script executable. If you want to see how it's done, look up the source.
My situation is the following: I've got a lot of small gizmos ( pretty close to routers, not exactly but anyway that's irrelevant) ; they are running a bare-bones MIPS-based Linux distro.
To control them, one can telnet there ( thru serial port ) and issue commands to an interactive bash-like shell which then writes back some output. The shell's input and output are both attached to /dev/ttyAS0.
Now, I'd like to automate all of this, i.e. write a program that will run inside the gizmo, be a small server listening on some port, and which would pass on any command to the said shell, capture shell's output and relay it back to whoever contacted to server.
I:
1) can install (small, <500KB) programs inside the gizmo
2) can't modify the OS, startup scripts, the shell, anything
3) have root access
4) know how to write a SOAP server
5) know how to get a SOAP message, translate it to a command and inject it into /dev/ttyAS0
6) DONT KNOW how to capture the shell's reply
7) know how to, having shell's reply, translate it back to a SOAP message and reply to the original inquirer.
So basically, the problem is 6) : how to, having injected a string to /dev/ttyAS0 and thus having made the shell execute it, capture the shell's output ?
I am aware of
http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/02/27/redirecting-output-from-a-running-process/
i.e. I know that I could change the shell's stdout if I had GDB ( or strace ) running inside the box, but I can't install it there - it's too big and anyway this approach seems too much like a hack.
So, summarizing:
How root can capture stdout of an already running process, IN PURE C, without gdb or strace, with no access to the way the process is started?
Or - almost equivalently - how to capture what's being written to a terminal, IN PURE C ?
You might want to take a look at reptyr. It will probably need some adaptation to work for your system though
Have you tried driving the serial port with a kermit script? I would probably forgo trying to insert a more clever proxy on the device and just try and drive the existing interface.
If you really want to get it on the device, you may be able to look at the source to something like screen or kermit to get a sense of how they interact with ttys.
I am trying to control ftp client from C program (OS X). I did fork and execve - process is started ok. The problem is with pipes - I can send command to ftp client process and get feedback from it just fine (If i send "help\n" i get back help output) but what I never get in pipe is "ftp> " prompt. Any ideas?
Ivan
Your ftp client is probably behaving differently if stdin/stdout is a terminal or something else (lots of program do, for a start the C library does buffering in a different way...) If you want to control that, search information about pseudo-terminals, that's a little too technical to be explained here. (And looks first at programs like expect, it's possible you won't have to write yours).
A program can examine stdin to find out whether it's a terminal or a pipe. In your case, the FTP program probably does that (for example to know whether it can use escape sequences to render progress bars or offer command line editing).
If you really need the prompt, you have to look into PTYs (pseudo terminals) which emulate a console.
wild guess: isn't the "ftp>" prompt written to STDERR ?