Can anyone help me what does semantic means in following sentence?
We use semantic of data record for ...
Not just the data is seen as a bunch of text but is looked as a representation of objects and properties interlinking with other objects and properties, which gives more information about the data.
Related
I have a String field in JSON format that I am trying to extract the stripe decline code from. An example of the field is below:
{"errors":[{"message":"Your card has insufficient funds.","type":"payment","code":"card_declined","decline_code":"insufficient_funds","gateway":"stripe","stripe":{"type":"card_error","code":"card_declined","decline_code":"insufficient_funds","message":"Your card has insufficient funds.","charge":"ch_3JodUAHkqql8g8ta1ADf5fBf"}}]}
I have tried various combinations of UNNEST but continue to get an error message. I think that the issue is related to the fact the field is a combination of various STRUCTS/Arrays but had no luck extracting what I need. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
I think I found a solution. A little hacky, but I did the following in a CTE;
REPLACE(REPLACE(JSON_EXTRACT(error_message, '$.errors'),"[",""),"]","") as struct_1
And then took another JSON_EXTRACT of this;
JSON_EXTRACT(struct_1,'$.stripe.decline_code')
Consider below approach - non hacky one :o)
select json_extract_scalar(error, '$.stripe.decline_code') as decline_code
from your_table,
unnest(json_extract_array(error_message, '$.errors')) error
if applied to sample data in your question - the output is
I am experimenting with the IBM Watson NLU’s Text Analysis package in UiPath with a simple text. I am able to extract the KeyValue pair information for Categories, Concept, and Sentiments using .ToString() . However, I am having trouble in figuring out how to extract information for Keywords, Entity both are of type IBMKeyword, IBMEntity
A simple .ToString() method in the message box gives something that's not helping or I don't know how to use it.
Below is the screenshot of my UiPath Studio:
Try this. Since the variable has multiple keywords, it cannot be printed in a single message box without a loop
Stuck at a trivial problem in Grails 3.1.5: Show the fields of a domain object, excluding one of them, including a transient property. Yes, this is my first Grails 3 project after many years with previous versions.
The generated show.gsp contains
<f:display bean="rfaPdffile"/>
This will include a field that may contain megabytes of XML. It should never be shown interactively. The display: false constraint is no longer in the docs, and seems to be silenty ignored.
Next I tried explicitly naming the fields:
<f:with bean="rfaPdffile">
<f:display property='fileName'/>
<f:display property='pageCount'/>
...
</f:with>
This version suprisingly displays the values without any markup whatsoever. Changing display to field,
<f:with bean="rfaPdffile">
<f:field property='fileName'/>
<f:field property='pageCount'/>
...
</f:with>
sort of works, but shows editable values. So does f:all.
In addition I tried adding other attributes to f:display: properties (like in f:table), except (like in f:all). I note in passing that those two attributes have different syntax for similar purposes.
In the Field plugin docs my use case is explicitly mentioned as a design goal. I must have missed something obvious.
My aim is to quickly throw together a prototype gui, postponing the details until later. Clues are greatly appreciated
If I understood you correctly, you want to have all bean properties included in the gsp but the one with the "megabytes of XML" should not be displayed to the user?
If that is the case you can do:
f:with bean="beanName"
f:field property="firstPropertyName"
f:field property="secondPropertyName"
And the one you don't wish to display:
g:hiddenField name="propertyName" value="${beanName.propertyName?}"
f:with
So list all the properties as f:field or f:display and put the one you don't wish to display in a g:hiddenField Grails tag
You can also try:
f:field property="propertyName"
widget-hidden="true"
but the Label is not hidden in this case.
Hope it helps
My own answer: "use the force, read the source". The f:display tag has two rather obvious bugs. I will submit a pull request as soon as I can.
Bugs aside, the documentation does not mention that the plugin may pick up the "scaffold" static property from the domain, if it has one. Its value should be a map. Its "exclude" key may define a list of property names (List of String) to be excluded. This probably works already for the "f:all" tag; bug correction is needed for the "f:display" tag.
My subjective impression is that the fields plugin is in a tight spot. It is intertwined with the Grails architecture, making it sensitive to changes in Grails internals. It is also required by the standard scaffolding plugin, making it very visible. Thus it needs constant attention from maintainers, a position not to be envied. Even now conventions for default constraints seem to have changed somewhere between Grails 3.0.9 and 3.1.7.
Performance of the fields plugin is sensitive to the total number of plugins in the app where it is used. It searches all plugins dynamically for templates.
For the wish list I would prefer stricter tag naming. The main tags should be verbs. There are two main actions, show and edit. For each action there are two main variants, single bean or multiple beans.
My answer is that at present (2 March 2017) there is no answer. I have searched the Net high and low. For the index (list) and create and edit views, the fields plugin works well enough. A certain field can be easily excluded from the create and edit views, relatively easily from the list view (by listing those that should show), and in no way I could find from the show view. This is such a common need that one would suspect it will be addressed soon. Also, easily showing derived values in the show view, like 'total' for an invoice. One can do that by adding an ordered list with a list item showing the value below the generated ordered list of values, but that is kind of a hack.
In some ways, the old way was easier. Yes, it generated long views, but they were generated and didn't have to be done by the programmer - just custom touches here and there.
I'm trying to create a content type that allows me to post multiple images from an external database in this sort of style: http://www.newageman.co.uk/14-time-travelling-celebrities
In an ideal world this is what I would like my group of fields to look like in the article creation screen.
http://oi57.tinypic.com/wi0z8i.jpg
Any idea how I would achieve this using best practices? To post articles like this I'm currently using a piece of php code but it's confusing for my contributors, so would like to use fields. I've never made a module or custom field before.
Thank you!
I have done something similar using the Field Group module, you may give it a try.
My goal is to display various shapes(polygons, points, linestring) on google maps by using data entered into a Postgis database dynamically(i mean by that we can see modifications in the map in real time).
I was looking for a way to do this that used the spatial structure already provided in postgis(already designating if shape is a linestring or polygon, etc) instead of parsing out the coordinates and then re-entering spatial structure in google maps. I saw that google maps api is now compatible with kml data formats. And then I read that i have to convert postgis data to kml format.
I've done some reading in the forums about the actual process of converting postgis data to kml via FWTools, but didn't see anything that would help me. I'm new to kml but am familiar with postgis and perl and PHP. Is there a tutorial for the process of converting postgis data to kml? Where can I get started? Thanks for any help
You can use PostGIS to convert to KML directly:
SELECT ST_AsKML(geometry) from MyTable;
ST_AsKML is one of several output formats, including WKT, GML, GeoJSON, etc.
To show dynamic data in Google Earth, a common pattern is to use KML with a NetworkLink element. Have the link's viewRefreshMode equal to onStop and Google Earth will make requests (to a URL served by PHP, presumably) with bounding box parameters attached. Use the bounding box to query features in the PostGIS database, and return results as kml. This is great if you have lots and lots of features, but only want to retrieve those in the region the user is looking at.
Depending on the complexity of your application, you may also want to look at GeoDjango. (Familiarity with PostGIS is a big head start!)
You can get a textual representation of the spatial data from a Postgres DB using a text conversion function, like
SELECT AsText(MyGemoetry) from MyTable
then you parse the string, create your objects using various API functions - depending on the PostGIS geometry type - and append these object to the main GE plugin object in a DOM like way.
If you are familiar with JavaScript and have a fundamental knowledge of XML, a good start is http://code.google.com/apis/earth/documentation/reference/
Don't forget to specify unique ID's to your objects so you can find them later to drop/modify.
Maybe you can get some inspirations here, display the linked "locator.js" file and look at function PaintSubField(Coord) ... this is another way, bit crude but effective, avoiding to mess around with too many individual parent/child objects and structures
You also may want to consult sample applications and use the code playground for "rapid prototyping"
re "realtime" you need at least an event that you can link your generation/redraw routines to.
Good luck
MikeD