I'm trying to create a system call handler, and I'm not sure how to store it.
I'm using the following typedef to store a (void *) pointer, which should receive the address of the function and an integer arg_no representing the number of arguments. Then, I create an array of this type.
typedef struct
{
void *foo;
int arg_no;
}td_sys_call_handler;
td_sys_call_handler ish[SYSCALL_HANDLER_NUM];
I'm trying to initialize the array in the following manner.
ish[0].foo = void (*halt) (void); ish[0].arg_no = 0;
ish[1].foo = void (*exit) (int status) NO_RETURN; ish[1].arg_no = 1;
ish[2].foo = pid_t (*exec) (const char *file); ish[2].arg_no = 1;
ish[3].foo = int (*wait) (pid_t); ish[3].arg_no = 1;
ish[4].foo = bool (*create) (const char *file, unsigned initial_size);
ish[4].arg_no = 2;
ish[5].foo = bool (*remove) (const char *file); ish[5].arg_no = 1;
ish[6].foo = int (*open) (const char *file); ish[6].arg_no = 1;
ish[7].foo = int (*filesize) (int fd); ish[7].arg_no = 1;
ish[8].foo = int (*read) (int fd, void *buffer, unsigned length);
ish[8].arg_no = 3;
ish[9].foo = int (*write) (int fd, const void *buffer, unsigned length);
ish[9].arg_no = 3;
ish[10].foo = void (*seek) (int fd, unsigned position);
ish[10].arg_no = 2;
ish[11].foo = unsigned (*tell) (int fd); ish[11].arg_no = 1;
But all the assignments from the function pointer to the void pointer produce the following error:
../../userprog/syscall.c: In function ‘syscall_init’:
../../userprog/syscall.c:76:17: error: expected expression before ‘void’
../../userprog/syscall.c:77:17: error: expected expression before ‘void’
../../userprog/syscall.c:78:17: error: expected expression before ‘pid_t’
../../userprog/syscall.c:79:17: error: expected expression before ‘int’
../../userprog/syscall.c:80:17: error: expected expression before ‘_Bool’
../../userprog/syscall.c:82:17: error: expected expression before ‘_Bool’
../../userprog/syscall.c:83:17: error: expected expression before ‘int’
../../userprog/syscall.c:84:17: error: expected expression before ‘int’
../../userprog/syscall.c:85:17: error: expected expression before ‘int’
../../userprog/syscall.c:87:17: error: expected expression before ‘int’
../../userprog/syscall.c:89:17: error: expected expression before ‘void’
../../userprog/syscall.c:91:17: error: expected expression before ‘unsigned’
I was under the impression that void* is the only instance of polymorphism in the language and that it can point to anything.
However, it appears that I'm wrong.
So which is the type of the pointer which can store the address of any function type?
Also, can you give me a good reference about C polymorphism? I've looked in many books but as far as I've seen the polymorphism chapter is very thin.
Thank you.
Yes, you are wrong.
void * pointers can point at any kind of data, but in C code (functions) are not data.
It's not valid to even cast between void * and function pointers: even though on most contemporary computers it will work as expected, the language does not guarantee that.
I don't understand from your code how you intended the "overloading" to be used in practice, how do you expect to call through the foo pointer? Just having the expected number of arguments is not enough, arguments have types and thus are handled differently in the function call.
The notation you need casts the system call function pointer to void *:
ish[0].foo = (void *)halt;
The C standard does not guarantee that pointers to functions will fit into pointers to data such as void *; fortunately for you, POSIX steps in and does guarantee that pointers to functions are the same size as pointers to data.
Your syntax is wrong. You should declare your function pointer first. Then you can use the address of the function pointer to assign to the pointer.
void (*halt) (void) = halt_sys_call_function;
ish[0].foo = &halt; ish[0].arg_no = 0;
C doesn't support traditional inheritance relationships in a direct way, but it does guarantee that the address of a structure is also the address of the first member of the structure. This can be used to emulate polymorphism in C. I described a similar approach in an answer I wrote about dynamic dispatch in C.
Consider a struct formatted to hold each function specifically:
typedef struct
{
void (*halt) (void);
void (*exit) (int status);
pid_t (*exec) (const char *file);
int (*wait) (pid_t);
bool (*create) (const char *file, unsigned initial_size);
bool (*remove) (const char *file);
int (*open) (const char *file);
int (*filesize) (int fd);
int (*read) (int fd, void *buffer, unsigned length);
int (*write) (int fd, const void *buffer, unsigned length);
void (*seek) (int fd, unsigned position);
unsigned (*tell) (int fd);
} myFuncs;
OR
This is messy and VERY unmaintable, but if you did cast each pointer to a void*, using void *addressOfWait = (void*)&wait;, then you could re-cast to the correct function pointer type before calling:
int (*waitFunctionPointer)(pid_t) = addressOfWait;
Then you could call that pointer:
waitFunctionPointer((pid_t) 1111); //wait for process with pid of 1111
I'll ask for #problemPotato's forgiveness for filching his structure definition:
typedef struct
{
void (*halt) (void);
void (*exit) (int status);
pid_t (*exec) (const char *file);
int (*wait) (pid_t);
bool (*create) (const char *file, unsigned initial_size);
bool (*remove) (const char *file);
int (*open) (const char *file);
int (*filesize) (int fd);
int (*read) (int fd, void *buffer, unsigned length);
int (*write) (int fd, const void *buffer, unsigned length);
void (*seek) (int fd, unsigned position);
unsigned (*tell) (int fd);
} fs_ops;
Say you have matching functions, declared like:
int ext5_open(const char * file);
unsigned ext5_tell (int fd);
then you can define and initialize a variable like (the bare name of the function is a pointer to it):
fs_ops ext5_ops = {
.open = ext5_open,
.tell = ext5_tell,
};
Fields that aren't initialized get NULL (i.e., pointer to no function). You can change the value of a field, ask if it is set (if(ext5_ops.seek == NULL) ...), and call the function:
retval = ext5_ops.(*ext5_open)("/tmp/junk");
(the parenteses around (*ext5_open) are because * (pointer indirection) binds less strongly than function call).
A function pointer can be converted into a void *, but it's a little trickier to convert it back to correct function-pointer type in order to call it. It should be possible by using a union. You'll need a separate union-member of the correct type for type of function that you want to store. And, as user4815162342 notes in a comment, you'll need to manage all the various combinations, probably with an enum.
typedef struct
{
union {
void *vp;
void (*v__v)(void);
void (*v__i)(int);
pid_t (*pid__ccp)(const char *);
int (*i__pid)(pid_t);
bool (*b__ccp_u)(const char *, unsigned);
bool (*b__ccp)(const char *);
int (*i__ccp)(const char *);
int (*i__i)(int);
int (*i__i_vp_u)(int, void *, unsigned);
int (*i__i_cvp_u)(int, const void *, unsigned);
void (*v__i_u)(int, unsigned);
unsigned (*u__i)(int);
} fp;
int arg_no;
}td_sys_call_handler;
The idea here is to try to encode the types into the identifiers, as a kind of "apps-Hungarian". This way, the meaning of any of these identifiers is directly visible.
It may be easier to generate these pointers and the associated enum at the same time. I think the easiest way to manage this part is with my favorite trick, X-Macros. Warning: it just gets more and more weird.
#define function_types(_) \
_(v__v, void, void) \
_(v__i, void, int) \
_(pid_ccp, pid_t, const char *) \
_(i__pid, int, pid_t) \
_(b__ccp_u, const char *, unsigned) \
_(b__ccp, const char *) \
_(i__ccp, const char *) \
_(i__i, int) \
_(i__i_vp_u, int, void *, unsigned) \
_(i__i_cvp_u, int, const void *, unsigned) \
_(v__i_u, int, unsigned) \
_(u__i, unsigned, int) \
/* end function_types */
This "master"-macro is a comma separated table of tokens which is passed, row by row, to the _ underscore macro, which is passed-in.
Now the struct type can be constructed by writing additional macros to use the rows, these are passed-in as _ to the table macro to instantiate the template:
#define create_function_pointer(id, ret, ...) \
ret (*id)(__VA_ARGS__);
#define create_function_type_id(id, ret, ...) \
f__ ## id
typedef struct {
union {
void *vp;
function_types(create_function_pointer)
} fp;
int arg_no;
enum {
function_types(create_function_type_id)
} type;
} td_sys_call_handler;
Now an array of these structs can be populated:
td_sys_call_handler ish[SYSCALL_HANDLER_NUM];
int i=0;
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ halt, 0, f__v__v };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ exit, 1, f__v__i };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ exec, 1, f__pid__ccp };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ wait, 1, f__i__pid };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ create, 2, f__b__ccp_u };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ remove, 1, f__b__ccp };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ open, 1, f__i__ccp };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ filesize, 1, f__i__i };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ read, 3, f__i__i_vp_u };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ write, 3, f__i__i_cvp_u };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ seek, 2, f__v__i_u };
ish[i++] = (td_sys_call_handler){ tell, 1, f__u__i };
Now, calling a function given one of these structs will require (as you surmised) a switch, with a separate case for each signature. It needs to crack the arguments using stdarg and the call with the appropriate union member function pointer.
void make_sys_call(td_sys_call_handler ish, ...){
va_list ap;
int i;
const char *ccp;
pid_t pid;
bool b;
void *vp;
unsigned u;
const void *cvp;
va_start(ap, ish);
switch(ish.type) {
case f__v__f: ish.fp.v__v();
break;
case f__v__i: i = va_arg(int);
ish.fp.v__i(i);
break;
case f__pid__ccp: ccp = va_arg(const char *);
ish.fp.pid__ccp(ccp);
break;
// etc.
}
va_end(ap);
}
It will not be possible to return different types directly. You will either need to allocate a union type variable to hold the return value and return that, or something even more insane. An external stack data type could hold unions of the various return types. Depending on profiling results, it may be appropriate to consider this instead of returning the unions.
HTH.
Related
my code: https://godbolt.org/z/de7fbdjh7
code from source: https://stackoverflow.com/a/49072888/15603477
Almost exact the same.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
typedef struct
{
int iValue;
int kValue;
char label[6];
} my_data;
int cmp_mydata_ivalue(my_data* item1 , my_data* item2 )
{
if(item1->iValue < item2->iValue) return -1;
if(item1->iValue > item2->iValue) return 1;
return 0;
}
int main(void){
my_data datalist[256] = {0};
{
int i;
for(i = 0;i<20;i++){
datalist[i].iValue = i+100;
datalist[i].kValue = i+1000;
sprintf(datalist[i].label,"%2.2d", i+10);
}
}
printf("new line\n");
{
my_data srchitem = {105,1018,"13"};
my_data *foundItem = (my_data*) bsearch(&srchitem, datalist,20, sizeof(my_data),cmp_mydata_ivalue);
bsearch_results(&srchitem, foundItem);
}
}
The same question asked many times. But I don't know how to cast it.
error code:
*callback1.c: In function ‘main’:
callback1.c:58:89: warning: passing argument 5 of ‘bsearch’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
58 | my_data *foundItem = (my_data*) bsearch(&srchitem, datalist,20, sizeof(my_data),cmp_mydata_ivalue);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int (*)(my_data *, my_data *) {aka int (*)(struct <anonymous> *, struct <anonymous> *)}*
One way to try to use gcc option to supress the error. Another way is somewhere I need to cast. But now i don't know how to cast.
Tutorial I found so far: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/c_standard_library/c_function_bsearch.htm
The comparison function must have the type
int ( const void *, const void * )
See the declaration of the function bsearch
void *bsearch(const void *key, const void *base,
size_t nmemb, size_t size,
int (*compar)(const void *, const void *));
So you should declare and define your function like
int cmp_mydata_ivalue( const void *a , const void *b )
{
const my_data *item1 = a;
const my_data *item2 = b;
if ( item1->iValue < item2->iValue) return -1;
if(item1->iValue > item2->iValue) return 1;
return 0;
}
Don't ever use workarounds to suppress errors/warnings from the compiler. You should carefully understand them and fix the code instead. If you chose to ignore them, you must be very conscious of what are the implications.
Having said that, the bsearch prototype is the following:
void* bsearch( const void *key, const void *ptr, size_t count, size_t size,
int (*comp)(const void*, const void*) );
meaning it expects the last parameter to be a function pointer to a function with the following signature:
int function(const void*, const void*);
What you are passing is a function of this kind
int cmp_mydata_ivalue(my_data* item1 , my_data* item2 )
Which is uncompatible, as C can't do any implicit cast. You must rewrite your function to something like this:
int cmp_mydata_ivalue( const void *cvp_item1 , const void *cvp_item2 )
{
const my_data *item1 = (const my_data *)cvp_item1;
const my_data *item2 = (const my_data *)cvp_item2;
}
I have an error when I compile my C program.
I have this code :
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SET__SIZE 10
#define SET__BOUND ((void*) NULL)
struct set {
void *s[SET__SIZE];
int cursor;
int (*cmp)(const void*, const void*);
void * (*copy)(const void*);
void (*del)(void *);
};
int find(const void *s[], void *c, int (*cmp)(const void*, const void*))
{
int i = 0;
while (s[i]!=SET__BOUND && cmp(s[i],c)<0)
i++;
return i;
}
int set__find(const struct set *se, void *c)
{
return (se->cmp(se->s[find(se->s,c,se->cmp)],c)==0);
}
For some reason, gcc is raising a warning for the find call in set__find saying :
note: expected ‘const void **’ but argument is of type ‘void * const*’
I can't understand why he thinks the argument is a constant pointer (if I understood the error right)
As I tried, the note goes away, when I change the code to
struct set {
void *s[SET__SIZE];
int cursor;
int (*cmp)(const void*, const void*);
void * (*copy)(const void*);
void (*del)(void *);
};
int find(void * const s[], void *c, int (*cmp)(const void*, const void*))
{
int i = 0;
while (s[i]!=SET__BOUND && cmp(s[i],c)<0)
i++;
return i;
}
int set__find(const struct set *se, void *c)
{
return (se->cmp(se->s[find(se->s,c,se->cmp)],c)==0);
}
Explanation
In the answer... No point of writting it again.
why he thinks the argument is a constant pointer
struct set {
void *s[SET__SIZE];
The structure set contains the array s.
const struct set *se
se points to a constant structure set. Because the structure is constant, the memory for the structure is constant. The elements of the array s can't be modified, they are in constant memory.
find(se->s,
Arrays decay to the pointer to the first element. So imagine it's TYPE s[SET__SIZE] where TYPE is a void*. TYPE s[SET__SIZE] decays to a pointer TYPE *. But, it's constant, so it's const TYPE s[SET__SIZE]. So it decays to a const TYPE *. You can't modify it, it's a constant array. TYPE is a void* - you can dereference the element and modify it then, but you can't modify the pointer value itself.
TL;DR you want int find(void * const s[] as in the other answer.
I wish to accomplish function overloading in C, but I am attempting to run my code on a Unix server that does not have C11 support therefore the _Generic keyword is not available.
(Upgrading the server so it has a newer version of GCC is not an option).
Are there any alternatives to using _Generic to simulate effective function overloading in C?
You can do a limited form of overloading, for some argument types, like so:
void func_int(int);
void func_long(long);
void func_longlong(long long);
#define FUNC(X) \
(sizeof(X) <= sizeof(int) ? func_int(X) \
: sizeof(X) == sizeof(long) ? func_long(X) \
: func_longlong(X))
This will allow you to use FUNC(i) and have it call different functions. It's limited, because you can only distinguish types by their size. That means if sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) then you will never call func_long, and if sizeof(long) == sizeof(long long) then you will never call func_longlong. Also, you can't overload for other types, such as double, if sizeof(double) is the same as one of the integer types you're testing for.
It can be used to overload for e.g. float, double or long double, where you might have different implementations of a function that calculate more or less precisely depending on the precision (i.e. number of bits) in the argument type.
The GCC manual explicitly shows a GNU99 (-std=gnu99) workaround since at least version 3.1.1.
There are limitations, of course: all variants must have the same return type, and all function variants must make syntactic sense. The latter is often the cause of various compile errors (invalid types for function variant parameters). That can be avoided by declaring the functions without parameter prototypes; however, one must then remember that default type promotions will then take place (float are promoted to double, and all integer types smaller than int are promoted to int or unsigned int). Consider this example program:
#define _GNU_SOURCE /* for asprintf() */
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
typedef struct {
double x;
double y;
double z;
double d;
} plane;
static const char *foo_char_array();
static const char *foo_int();
static const char *foo_long();
static const char *foo_double();
static const char *foo_float();
static const char *foo_short();
static const char *foo_plane();
#define foo(x) \
( __builtin_choose_expr( __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), int), foo_int(x), \
__builtin_choose_expr( __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), long), foo_long(x), \
__builtin_choose_expr( __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), short), foo_short(x), \
__builtin_choose_expr( __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), float), foo_float(x), \
__builtin_choose_expr( __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), double), foo_double(x), \
__builtin_choose_expr( __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), plane), foo_plane(x), \
__builtin_choose_expr( __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), char []), foo_char_array(x), \
(void)0 ))))))) )
int main(void)
{
double d = 1.0;
float f = 2.0f;
short s = 3;
long n = 4L;
plane p = { 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 };
printf("foo(9) = %s\n", foo(9));
printf("foo(10L) = %s\n", foo(10L));
printf("foo(11.0f) = %s\n", foo(11.0f));
printf("foo(12.0) = %s\n", foo(12.0));
printf("foo(\"bar\") = %s\n", foo("bar"));
printf("foo(d) = %s\n", foo(d));
printf("foo(f) = %s\n", foo(f));
printf("foo(s) = %s\n", foo(s));
printf("foo(n) = %s\n", foo(n));
printf("foo(p) = %s\n", foo(p));
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
static const char *foo_char_array(char x[]) { return "char []"; }
static const char *foo_int(int x) { static char buffer[40]; snprintf(buffer, sizeof buffer, "(int)%d", x); return (const char *)buffer; }
static const char *foo_long(long x) { static char buffer[40]; snprintf(buffer, sizeof buffer, "(long)%ld", x); return (const char *)buffer; }
static const char *foo_float(double x) { static char buffer[40]; snprintf(buffer, sizeof buffer, "%af", x); return (const char *)buffer; }
static const char *foo_double(double x) { static char buffer[40]; snprintf(buffer, sizeof buffer, "%a", x); return (const char *)buffer; }
static const char *foo_short(int x) { static char buffer[40]; snprintf(buffer, sizeof buffer, "(short)%d", x); return (const char *)buffer; }
static const char *foo_plane(plane p) { static char buffer[120]; snprintf(buffer, sizeof buffer, "(plane){ .x=%g, .y=%g, .z=%g, .d=%g }", p.x, p.y, p.z, p.d); return (const char *)buffer; }
You do not need to determine the type based on a single parameter; you can do e.g. __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), double) && __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(y), double) to verify both x and y are of type double.
When compiled and run, the above program will output
foo(9) = (int)9
foo(10L) = (long)10
foo(11.0f) = 0x1.6p+3f
foo(12.0) = 0x1.8p+3
foo("bar") = char []
foo(d) = 0x1p+0
foo(f) = 0x1p+1f
foo(s) = (short)3
foo(n) = (long)4
foo(p) = (plane){ .x=5, .y=6, .z=7, .d=8 }
tested on 32-bit x86 Linux (ILP32), as well as on x86-64 (LP64). And yes, the above program will leak memory, since it never free()s the dynamically allocated strings returned by the foo_..() function variants.
I found a method that appears to work, however I still get a couple warnings at compile time...
Working code:
#include <stdio.h>
#define print(x) \
__builtin_choose_expr(__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), int ), print_int(x) , \
__builtin_choose_expr(__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), char[]), print_string(x), \
(void)0))
void print_int(int i) {
printf("int: %d\n", i);
}
void print_string(char* s) {
printf("char*: %s\n", s);
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
print(1);
print("this");
return 0;
}
output:
int: 1
char*: thing
Compiler warnings:
gcc overload.c -o main
overload.c: In function 'main':
overload.c:19: warning: passing argument 1 of 'print_string' makes pointer from integer without a cast
overload.c:20: warning: passing argument 1 of 'print_int' makes integer from pointer without a cast
It is somehow possible using function pointers, and nameless struct inside a union. Here comes an example in which we overload the add and mul functions. There are two unions LIBI, and LIBF containing nameless structures. LIBI contains the function pointers add and mulc which only use integer values. LIBF is the same as LIBI except that add and mul use float variables. In addition, we need to create addi, muli, addf, and mulf functions outside of these unions. Functions pointers in unions will be referred to these 4 functions. For example, add in LIBI is referred to addi because addi uses int values and add in LIBF is referred to addf as it uses only float variables. This example can also be used as a way of emulating namespace in C which is absent in the language. Unions act like the namespace in this example.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
union {
struct {
void (*add)(int *, int);
void (*mul)(int *, int);
};
}LIBI;
union {
struct {
void (*add)(float *, float);
void (*mul)(float *, float);
};
}LIBF;
void addi(int *a, int c){
*a += c;
}
void addf(float *a, float c){
*a += c;
}
void muli(int *a, int c){
*a *= c;
}
void mulf(float *a, float c){
*a *= c;
}
int main(void){
LIBI.add = addi;
LIBF.add = addf;
LIBI.mul = muli;
LIBF.mul = mulf;
int ia = 10;
int ib = 2;
float fa = 20.0f;
float fb = 2.0f;
LIBI.add(&ia,ib);
LIBF.add(&fa,fb);
printf("%d\n",ia);
printf("%f\n",fa);
LIBI.mul(&ia,ib);
LIBF.mul(&fa,fb);
printf("%d\n",ia);
printf("%f\n",fa);
return 0;
}
I want to write a wrapper for read and write unix functions, but read has a const void pointer parameter, and write a simple void pointer as a parameter.
So, a prototype like this, will fail for one of the functions:
typedef ssize_t (*genericStreamHandler)(int, const void*, size);
Do not prototype the function signature if code needs to allow incompatible functions.
The following compiles without warnings/errors.
#include <stdio.h>
ssize_t file_read(int h, const void* b, int sz) {
if (b) return 0;
return h + sz;
}
ssize_t file_write(int h, void* b, int sz) {
if (b) return 0;
return h + sz;
}
//typedef ssize_t (*genericStreamHandler)(int, void*, int);
// v--- No function prototype
typedef ssize_t (*genericStreamHandler)();
int main(void) {
genericStreamHandler gFH1 = file_read;
genericStreamHandler gFH2 = file_write;
char buf[10];
return (*gFH1)(0, buf, 10) + (*gFH2)(0, buf, 10);
}
OTOH, the better answer may lie in taking another approach that does not need a common type for variant function signatures.
After some research I didn't find a good way to implement the std::bind in C.
I build a small program that implements an equivalent of std::bind in C by hacking the stack.
There's two functions I will try to bind to function with pre-defined arguments.
My problem is this code is only working under Windows. Under Linux, this is a mess. I this the problem is my knowledge of the stack and the way that arguments are store in memory.
Thanks,
Please, find below the code I made:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
The two functions I want to bind :
void test1 (int nombre, char t, int nombre2)
{
printf ("test 1 : %d%c%d\n", nombre, t, nombre2);
}
void test2 (char t, int nombre, int nombre2)
{
printf ("test 2 : %c%d%d\n", t, nombre, nombre2);
}
Two struct that will store the argument of each function (order of fields is important).
typedef struct {
int nombre;
char t;
int nombre2;
} struct1;
typedef struct {
char t;
int nombre;
int nombre2;
} struct2;
This "fake" struct will be use to write on the stack by dereferencing a structvoid* variable.
// Size must be bigger than every struct*
typedef struct {
int i[10];
} structvoid;
The main function.
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
// Variables to store the two functions and their arguments.
void * functions[2];
structvoid * data[2];
void *func1 = (void *)&test1;
void *func2 = (void *)&test2;
void (*functionPtrc)(structurevoid);
// Definition of the argument of the first function test1
struct1 data1;
data1.nombre = 15;
data1.t = 'c';
data1.nombre2 = 30;
// and storing data.
void *datac = malloc (sizeof (structvoid));
memcpy(datac, &data1, sizeof (struct1));
data[0] = (structvoid*)datac;
functions[0] = func1;
// Same thing with function 2.
struct2 data2;
data2.t = 'a';
data2.nombre = 5;
data2.nombre2 = 10;
datac = malloc (sizeof (structvoid));
memcpy(datac, &data2, sizeof (struct2));
data[1] = (structvoid*)datac;
functions[1] = func2;
// Get the pointer to the first function (test1);
functionPtrc = functions[0];
// All the hack is here. By dereferencing the data, this will write on the stack all arguments need by the test1 function.
functionPtrc(*data[0]);
functionPtrc = functions[1];
functionPtrc(*data[1]);
// To check the result.
test1 (data1.nombre, data1.t, data1.nombre2);
test2 (data2.t, data2.nombre, data2.nombre2);
return 0;
}
EDIT
Here a new version of the program by calling function via the calling convention. I only wrote the new lines. The problem of this method is I can only store data inside a "void *" field. If I increase the size of structvoid, I got garbage behaviors.
// Structure that memories each argument
typedef struct {
void *i[1];
} structvoid;
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
// Variables to store the two functions and their arguments.
void * functions[2];
structvoid * data[2];
void *func1 = (void *)&test1;
// Let's start with a maximum of 5 arguments
void (*functionPtrc)(structurevoid, structurevoid, structurevoid, structurevoid, structurevoid);
// Definition of the argument of the first function test1
struct1 data1;
data1.nombre = 15;
data1.t = 'c';
data1.nombre2 = 30;
// and storing data.
structvoid *datac = malloc (sizeof (structvoid)*5);
memcpy(&datac[0], &data1.nombre, sizeof (data1.nombre));
memcpy(&datac[1], &data1.t, sizeof (data1.t));
memcpy(&datac[2], &data1.nombre2, sizeof (data1.nombre2));
data[0] = datac;
functions[0] = func1;
// Get the pointer to the first function (test1);
functionPtrc = functions[0];
// Call the function with the arguments. The unused argument will be ignored.
functionPtrc(data[0][0], data[0][1], data[0][2], data[0][3], data[0][4]);
}