I have Visual Studio 2010 and my computer have 4 cpu cores.
In a c# project when I'm in "Design" mode on a Form and I... select a control...go to its property page...change its text and hit Enter, then it takes a lot of time cause VS uses only 1 cpu core for the recalculation. It takes about 20 sec to change a button text. Can I configure VS to use all 4 CPU cores?
From your comments, no you can not use more than one thread to make the UI update itself quicker.
However 20 seconds to update 200 controls is extremely slow, that is 100 ms per control! I would recommend running a code profiler on your code so you can see what is actually causing the slowness when you update some text and fixing that part of the program.
Related
I am currently running Icinga1 to monitor around ~6000 services.
On the Icinga dashboard, I see that the average check time is ~ 300 s, which means some of my checks are running slow. Unfortunately , because there are 6000 checks I don't have a way to figure out all the checks that are running for more than a sec.
Is there a way to figure out the checks which run for more than a certain duration(say 5 sec) either from the classic UI or from the logs.
Try the wiki - performance tuning with Icinga1 is a big topic over there.
https://wiki.icinga.org/display/howtos/Identify+long+lasting+checks
I figured out that it using the icinga.cfg you can write host and service check performance data to files in custom formats.
Documentation for host performance data
Documentation for service performance data
You can also setup pnp4nagios to read this info and convert it into graphical reports.
You can consider using "crontab" to make the checks on different times to lower the use of the system.
Read more about crontab here - http://www.adminschoice.com/crontab-quick-reference
Stumped here. Posted a similar question before. We have a pretty large WPF app that on some machines runs great, but on others, all of a sudden, one of the CPU cores gets pinned at 100% (just one core) and the app freezes. It usually seems to happen when showing a context menu or a combobox drop-down (i.e. Popup controls) which is why we can't debug this since no user code is executing at that time. It's driving us crazy because again, on most machines it runs fine, but on a few, it freezes.
The odd thing is when we run it in a VM, it runs great there too! Crazy! Not sure what's causing this, or more importantly, where to even begin to look because as I said, no user code is running.
This happens on only about 10% of our machines, but it consistently happens on those machines. All are clean (i.e. relatively fresh OS installs, no crazy apps, etc.) and mostly identical machines spec-wise: similar CPUs, similar RAM, same video drivers and service packs.
So as I stated in the title, can anyone suggest possible reasons why a WPF app would pin the CPU and lock the app on some computers but not others? We're just stumped!
Found it!! Turns out there's a bug in .NET 4.0 regarding UI Automation and the changes MS introduced. Here's the info, and the fix! (Note: Even if you call MS, they will send you a link, but it's always a broken link. I managed to track this down manually.)
Note: Their article talks about a specific case that causes this behavior, but if you google around, you'll see tons of issues around hangs related to those DLLs. The latest is they're promising a fix in the .NET 4.5 runtime (from a MS post on this issue.)
Here's the KB article...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2484841/en-us
...and here is the actual hotfix.
http://archive.msdn.microsoft.com/KB2484841/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=5583
Crappy video driver? Pull two machines - one where it happens, one where not, and start analyzing differences. Could be hardware defects, bad video drivers, anything in that area. WPF uses the GPU to render if one is there.
Since you seem quite to lack options, i would advice to make a new project with just most basic ComboBox in the Window, doing almost nothing. This should work (check :-) ). Then you add features one by one in the ComboBox and test, for instance when you add command, start with empty one. Do this until it 'breaks'. So you know which feature is the culprit.
You didn t say if all was working with software rendering.
I've been developing a WPF interface for the past year, and this week I've noticed I can no longer open the interface within Visual Studio 2010 without it hanging indefinitely. I'm wondering why this has just started happening. I've checked through the SQL settings for the data bindings and everything seems fine. Does anyone know of any of other options I have? I can't seem to cancel this endless loading.
I assume you have tired to reboot? For me sometimes a compile that usually takes 10 seconds will take minutes. I reboot and it works fine for a couple days or a couple hours. SP1 helped.
Finally I've found the solution. One of my datagrids was attached to a DataSet which return a list of log records. Now as the system went through testing the long grew, making the sql query take longer and longer to return. I noticed this by running the JetBrains dotTrace tool on the application, and profiled the startup sequence, this identified the SQL query which was causing the delay.
I have a standalone WPF application running on .NET 3.5. Every so often, the display simply freezes up for several seconds. This is most noticeable on screens where something is being updated often. Here is a video showing the problem.
While the display is frozen, the interface remains responsive (video).
I've come across some other posts with similar problems who attributed it to a SW/HW rendering issue. To be safe, I disabled HW rendering altogether, but still have the problem.
I ran a file monitor during the freezes to see if there is some extraordinary file access or activity going on, but nothing is out of the ordinary.
Final note: The target platform is a small touch-screen panel PC without much memory or horsepower (512 MB). I only see this issue on the target, never on my development PC, which has much more in the way of resources.
UPDATE
I thought I had fixed the issue by removing some animation code, but it did not work. I am still encountering the problem and I'm at the end of my rope.
Here's some more things I've tried:
Upgraded to .NET 4.0. Same behavior.
Added debug code to all methods that may be invoked via DispatcherTimer (which are called on the UI thread) to make sure none of them are holding up the UI.
I'm really stumped here and have added a bounty. As I mentioned, the problem only occurs on the target PC (link).
I tend to suspect either .NET GC or the OS swapfile when this kind of behavior shows up.
For the former, you could try the .NET performance counters to monitor for suspect activity.
If the device has a swap file, you can disable it and see if the behavior changes.
As others have said, a profiler (or some what of isolating what condition is inducing the delay - even just attaching and breaking the debugger when it occurs) would be a good way to get more information.
Did you tried to profile the application on the tested system? Using a memory and/or performance profiler?
You could get some good informations out of this type of test : some .Net profilers
And here's one for WPF : WPF profiler from microsoft
The culprit was the following method call:
new HwndSource(new HwndSourceParameters());
This was added to my application because it patched a memory leak problem in .NET 3.5. This work-around can be found here. If I remove this call, the rendering issues go away.
I took out the call and fixed the memory leak in another way (removing storyboard animation and using code behind instead)
I'm working on a rather large classic asp / SQL Server application.
A new version was rolled out a few months ago with a lot of new features, and I must have a very nasty bug somewhere : some very basic pages randomly take a very long time to execute.
A few clues :
It isn't the database : when I run the query profiler, it doesn't detect any long running query
When I launch IIS Diagnostic tools, reqviewer shows that the request is in state "processing"
This can happen on ANY page
I can't reproduce it easily, it's completely random.
To have an idea of "a very long time" : this morning I had a page take more than 5 minutes to execute, when it normaly should be returned to the client in less than 100 ms.
The application can handle rather large upload and download of files (up to 2 gb in size). This is also handled with a classic asp script, using SoftArtisan FileUp. Don't think it can cause the problem though, we've had these uploads for quite a while now.
I've had the problem on two separate servers (in two separate locations, with different sets of data). One is running the application with good ol' SQL Server 2000 and the other runs SQL Server 2005. The web server is IIS 6 in both cases.
Any idea what the problem is or on how to solve that kind of problem ?
Thanks.
Sebastien
Edit :
The problem came from memory fragmentation. Some asp pages were used to download files from the server. File sizes could go from a few kb to more than 2 gb. These variations in size induced memory fragmentation. The asp pages could also take quite some time to execute (the time for the user to download the pages minus what is put in cache at IIS's level), which is not really standard for server pages that should execute quickly.
This is what I did to improve things :
Put all the download logic in a single asp page with session turned off
That allowed me to put that asp page in a specific pool that could be recycled every so often (download would now disturb the rest of the application no more)
Turn on LFH (Low Fragmention Heap), which is not by default on Windows 2003, in order to reduce memory fragmentation
References for LFH :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366750(v=vs.85).aspx
Link (there is a dll there that you can use to turn on LFH, but the article is in French. You'll have to learn our beautiful language now!)
I noticed the same thing on a classic ASP + ajax application that I worked on. Using Timer, I timed the page load to be 153 milliseconds but in the firebug waterfall chart it randomly says 3.5 seconds. The Timer output is on the response and the waterfall chart claims that it's Firefox waiting for a response from the server. Because the waterfall chart also shows the response, I can compare the waterfall chart to the timer and there's a huge discrepancy 'every so often'
Can you establish whether this is a problem for all pages or a common subset of pages?
If a subset examine what these pages have in common, for example they all use a specific COM dll, that other pages don't.
Does this problem affect multiple clients or just a few?
IOW is there an issue with a specific browser OS version.
Is this public or intranet?
Can you reproduce the problem from a client you own?
Is there any chance there are some full-text search queries going on SQL Server?
Because if so, and if SQL Server has no access to internet, it may cause a 45-second delay every few hours or so when it tries to check the certifications (though this does not apply to SQL Server 2000).
For a detailed explanation of what I'm referring to, read this.
Are any other apps running on your web server? If so, is your problematic in the same app pool as any of them? If so, try creating a dedicated app pool for it. Maybe one of the other apps is having a problem and is adversely affecting yours.
One thing to watch out for is if you have server side debugging turned on in IIS, the web server will run in single threaded mode.
So if you try to load a page, and someone else has hit that url at the same time, you will be queued up behind them. It will seem like pages take a long time to load, but its simply because the server is doling out page requests in a single file line and sometimes you aren't at the front of the line.
You may have turned this on for debugging and forgot to turn it off for production.