Related
I have a directive twice on a page, but it keeps overwriting itself.
Meaning, the dialogId gets overwritten by the next instance of example-dialog in the template instead of keeping their own dialogIds.
angular.module('directives')
.directive('exampleDialog', ["$rootScope", "$timeout", "ngDialog", "$compile", '$templateRequest', function ($rootScope, $timeout, ngDialog, $compile, $templateRequest) {
return {
templateUrl: "/dialog.component.html",
transclude: {
button: '?dialogButton',
title: '?dialogTitle',
body: '?dialogBody',
footer: '?dialogFooter'
},
replace: true,
link: function (scope, el, attrs, ctrl, transclude) {
var dialogId = scope.blah.id; // gets overwritten - so when scope.open() gets called, the last instance ID gets used for both
scope.open = function(){
console.log(dialogId) // prints the same for both directives instead of the unique dialogId.
}
},
controller: function ($scope) {
}
}
}]);
With the following HTML:
<example-dialog>
<dialog-button>
ExampleButton1
</dialog-button>
<dialog-title ng-non-bindable>Title1</dialog-title>
<dialog-body ng-non-bindable>
<div ng-include="'template1.tpl.html'"></div>
</dialog-body>
<dialog-footer ng-non-bindable>
</dialog-footer>
</example-dialog>
<example-dialog>
<dialog-button>
ExampleButton2
</dialog-button>
<dialog-title ng-non-bindable>Title2</dialog-title>
<dialog-body ng-non-bindable>
<div ng-include="'template2.tpl.html'"></div>
</dialog-body>
<dialog-footer ng-non-bindable>
</dialog-footer>
</example-dialog>
How can I get them to save their own references while still inheriting their parents' scope?
EDIT
Someone recommended that I use scope: true which is supposed to create classic prototypal inheritance.
However, When I try that - open() from the <dialog-button> tansclusion point doesn't work now, along with any other bindings in the template.
You should isolate the scope of your directive. by adding scope:{} in your return statement.
By doing this your directive will create its own controlled scope and you will not be able to get any value from your parent scope(Basically no conflicts from parent scope).. To access value from parent controller/scope you will need to pass them explicitly.
To complet the previous answer, you can see in angular official doc ( here ) that :
The scope property can be false, true, or an object:
false (default): No scope will be created for the directive. The
directive will use its parent's scope.
true: A new child scope that prototypically inherits from its parent
will be created for the directive's element. If multiple directives on
the same element request a new scope, only one new scope is created.
{...} (an object hash): A new "isolate" scope is created for the
directive's template. The 'isolate' scope differs from normal scope in
that it does not prototypically inherit from its parent scope. This is
useful when creating reusable components, which should not
accidentally read or modify data in the parent scope. Note that an
isolate scope directive without a template or templateUrl will not
apply the isolate scope to its children elements.
Edit Like #itamar mentioned in his comment :
When I use scope:true it seems that it does keep the id in the directive (checked with going to the dom element and printing the scope). However, open() from the tansclusion point doesn't work now, along with any other bindings in the template.
The answer (from angularjs doc ) is :
The 'isolate' scope object hash defines a set of local scope properties derived from attributes on the directive's element. These local properties are useful for aliasing values for templates. The keys in the object hash map to the name of the property on the isolate scope; the values define how the property is bound to the parent scope, via matching attributes on the directive's element:
# or #attr - bind a local scope property to the value of DOM attribute.
= or =attr - set up a bidirectional binding between a local scope property and an expression passed via the attribute attr. The expression is evaluated in the context of the parent scope.
< or < attr - set up a one-way (one-directional) binding between a local scope property and an expression passed via the attribute attr. The expression is evaluated in the context of the parent scope. If no attr name is specified then the attribute name is assumed to be the same as the local name.
& or &attr - provides a way to execute an expression in the context of the parent scope. If no attr name is specified then the attribute name is assumed to be the same as the local name.
I've read the AngularJS documentation on the topic carefully, and then fiddled around with a directive. Here's the fiddle.
And here are some relevant snippets:
From the HTML:
<pane bi-title="title" title="{{title}}">{{text}}</pane>
From the pane directive:
scope: { biTitle: '=', title: '#', bar: '=' },
There are several things I don't get:
Why do I have to use "{{title}}" with '#' and "title" with '='?
Can I also access the parent scope directly, without decorating my element with an attribute?
The documentation says "Often it's desirable to pass data from the isolated scope via expression and to the parent scope", but that seems to work fine with bidirectional binding too. Why would the expression route be better?
I found another fiddle that shows the expression solution too: http://jsfiddle.net/maxisam/QrCXh/
Why do I have to use "{{title}}" with '#' and "title" with '='?
# binds a local/directive scope property to the evaluated value of the DOM attribute. If you use title=title1 or title="title1", the value of DOM attribute "title" is simply the string title1. If you use title="{{title}}", the value of the DOM attribute "title" is the interpolated value of {{title}}, hence the string will be whatever parent scope property "title" is currently set to. Since attribute values are always strings, you will always end up with a string value for this property in the directive's scope when using #.
= binds a local/directive scope property to a parent scope property. So with =, you use the parent model/scope property name as the value of the DOM attribute. You can't use {{}}s with =.
With #, you can do things like title="{{title}} and then some" -- {{title}} is interpolated, then the string "and them some" is concatenated with it. The final concatenated string is what the local/directive scope property gets. (You can't do this with =, only #.)
With #, you will need to use attr.$observe('title', function(value) { ... }) if you need to use the value in your link(ing) function. E.g., if(scope.title == "...") won't work like you expect. Note that this means you can only access this attribute asynchronously.
You don't need to use $observe() if you are only using the value in a template. E.g., template: '<div>{{title}}</div>'.
With =, you don't need to use $observe.
Can I also access the parent scope directly, without decorating my element with an attribute?
Yes, but only if you don't use an isolate scope. Remove this line from your directive
scope: { ... }
and then your directive will not create a new scope. It will use the parent scope. You can then access all of the parent scope properties directly.
The documentation says "Often it's desirable to pass data from the isolated scope via an expression and to the parent scope", but that seems to work fine with bidirectional binding too. Why would the expression route be better?
Yes, bidirectional binding allows the local/directive scope and the parent scope to share data. "Expression binding" allows the directive to call an expression (or function) defined by a DOM attribute -- and you can also pass data as arguments to the expression or function. So, if you don't need to share data with the parent -- you just want to call a function defined in the parent scope -- you can use the & syntax.
See also
Lukas's isolated scope blog post (covers #, =, &)
dnc253's explanation of # and =
my blog-like answer about scopes -- the directives section (way at the bottom, just before the Summary section) has a picture of an isolate scope and its parent scope -- the directive scope uses # for one property and = for another
What is the difference between & vs # and = in angularJS
There are a lot of great answers here, but I would like to offer my perspective on the differences between #, =, and & binding that proved useful for me.
All three bindings are ways of passing data from your parent scope to your directive's isolated scope through the element's attributes:
# binding is for passing strings.
These strings support {{}} expressions for interpolated values.
For example:
. The interpolated expression is evaluated against
directive's parent scope.
= binding is for two-way model binding. The model in parent scope
is linked to the model in the directive's isolated scope. Changes to
one model affects the other, and vice versa.
& binding is for passing a method into your directive's scope so that
it can be called within your directive. The method is pre-bound to
the directive's parent scope, and supports arguments. For example if the method is hello(name) in parent scope, then in
order to execute the method from inside your directive, you must
call $scope.hello({name:'world'})
I find that it's easier to remember these differences by referring to the scope bindings by a shorter description:
# Attribute string binding
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding
The symbols also make it clearer as to what the scope variable represents inside of your directive's implementation:
# string
= model
& method
In order of usefulness (for me anyways):
=
#
&
The = means bi-directional binding, so a reference to a variable to the parent scope. This means, when you change the variable in the directive, it will be changed in the parent scope as well.
# means the variable will be copied (cloned) into the directive.
As far as I know, <pane bi-title="{{title}}" title="{{title}}">{{text}}</pane> should work too. bi-title will receive the parent scope variable value, which can be changed in the directive.
If you need to change several variables in the parent scope, you could execute a function on the parent scope from within the directive (or pass data via a service).
If you would like to see more how this work with a live example. http://jsfiddle.net/juanmendez/k6chmnch/
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.controller("myController", function ($scope) {
$scope.title = "binding";
});
app.directive("jmFind", function () {
return {
replace: true,
restrict: 'C',
transclude: true,
scope: {
title1: "=",
title2: "#"
},
template: "<div><p>{{title1}} {{title2}}</p></div>"
};
});
# get as string
This does not create any bindings whatsoever. You're simply getting the word you passed in as a string
= 2 way binding
changes made from the controller will be reflected in the reference held by the directive, and vice-versa
& This behaves a bit differently, because the scope gets a function that returns the object that was passed in. I'm assuming this was necessary to make it work. The fiddle should make this clear.
After calling this getter function, the resulting object behaves as follows:
if a function was passed: then the function is executed in the parent (controller) closure when called
if a non-function was passed in: simply get a local copy of the object that has no bindings
This fiddle should demonstrate how they work. Pay special attention to the scope functions with get... in the name to hopefully better understand what I mean about &
There are three ways scope can be added in the directive:
Parent scope: This is the default scope inheritance.
The directive and its parent(controller/directive inside which it lies) scope is same.
So any changes made to the scope variables inside directive are reflected in the parent controller as well. You don't need to specify this as it is the default.
Child scope: directive creates a child scope which inherits from the parent scope if you specify the scope variable of the directive as true.
Here, if you change the scope variables inside directive, it won't reflect in the parent scope, but if you change the property of a scope variable, that is reflected in the parent scope, as you actually modified the scope variable of the parent.
Example,
app.directive("myDirective", function(){
return {
restrict: "EA",
scope: true,
link: function(element, scope, attrs){
scope.somvar = "new value"; //doesnot reflect in the parent scope
scope.someObj.someProp = "new value"; //reflects as someObj is of parent, we modified that but did not override.
}
};
});
Isolated scope: This is used when you want to create the scope that does not inherit from the controller scope.
This happens when you are creating plugins as this makes the directive generic since it can be placed in any HTML and does not gets affected by its parent scope.
Now, if you don't want any interaction with the parent scope, then you can just specify scope as an empty object. like,
scope: {} //this does not interact with the parent scope in any way
Mostly this is not the case as we need some interaction with the parent scope, so we want some of the values/ changes to pass through.
For this reason, we use:
1. "#" ( Text binding / one-way binding )
2. "=" ( Direct model binding / two-way binding )
3. "&" ( Behaviour binding / Method binding )
# means that the changes from the controller scope will be reflected in the directive scope but if you modify the value in the directive scope, the controller scope variable will not get affected.
# always expects the mapped attribute to be an expression. This is very important; because to make the “#” prefix work, we need to wrap the attribute value inside {{}}.
= is bidirectional so if you change the variable in directive scope, the controller scope variable gets affected as well
& is used to bind controller scope method so that if needed we can call it from the directive
The advantage here is that the name of the variable need not be same in controller scope and directive scope.
Example, the directive scope has a variable "dirVar" which syncs with variable "contVar" of the controller scope. This gives a lot of power and generalization to the directive as one controller can sync with variable v1 while another controller using the same directive can ask dirVar to sync with variable v2.
Below is the example of usage:
The directive and controller are:
var app = angular.module("app", []);
app.controller("MainCtrl", function( $scope ){
$scope.name = "Harry";
$scope.color = "#333333";
$scope.reverseName = function(){
$scope.name = $scope.name.split("").reverse().join("");
};
$scope.randomColor = function(){
$scope.color = '#'+Math.floor(Math.random()*16777215).toString(16);
};
});
app.directive("myDirective", function(){
return {
restrict: "EA",
scope: {
name: "#",
color: "=",
reverse: "&"
},
link: function(element, scope, attrs){
//do something like
$scope.reverse();
//calling the controllers function
}
};
});
And the html(note the differnce for # and =):
<div my-directive
class="directive"
name="{{name}}"
reverse="reverseName()"
color="color" >
</div>
Here is a link to the blog which describes it nicely.
Simply we can use:-
# :- for String values for one way Data binding. in one way data binding you can only pass scope value to directive
= :- for object value for two way data binding. in two way data binding you can change the scope value in directive as well as in html also.
& :- for methods and functions.
EDIT
In our Component definition for Angular version 1.5 And above
there are four different type of bindings:
= Two-way data binding :- if we change the value,it automatically update
< one way binding :- when we just want to read a parameter from a parent scope and not update it.
# this is for String Parameters
& this is for Callbacks in case your component needs to output something to its parent scope
I created a little HTML file that contains Angular code demonstrating the differences between them:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Angular</title>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="myCtrl as VM">
<a my-dir
attr1="VM.sayHi('Juan')" <!-- scope: "=" -->
attr2="VM.sayHi('Juan')" <!-- scope: "#" -->
attr3="VM.sayHi('Juan')" <!-- scope: "&" -->
></a>
</div>
<script>
angular.module("myApp", [])
.controller("myCtrl", [function(){
var vm = this;
vm.sayHi = function(name){
return ("Hey there, " + name);
}
}])
.directive("myDir", [function(){
return {
scope: {
attr1: "=",
attr2: "#",
attr3: "&"
},
link: function(scope){
console.log(scope.attr1); // =, logs "Hey there, Juan"
console.log(scope.attr2); // #, logs "VM.sayHi('Juan')"
console.log(scope.attr3); // &, logs "function (a){return h(c,a)}"
console.log(scope.attr3()); // &, logs "Hey there, Juan"
}
}
}]);
</script>
</body>
</html>
This question has been already beaten to death, but I'll share this anyway in case someone else out there is struggling with the horrible mess that is AngularJS scopes. This will cover =, <, #, & and ::. The full write up can be found here.
= establishes a two way binding. Changing the property in the parent will result in change in the child, and vice versa.
< establishes a one way binding, parent to child. Changing the property in the parent will result in change in the child, but changing the child property will not affect the parent property.
# will assign to the child property the string value of the tag attribute. If the attribute contains an expression, the child property updates whenever the expression evaluates to a different string. For example:
<child-component description="The movie title is {{$ctrl.movie.title}}" />
bindings: {
description: '#',
}
Here, the description property in the child scope will be the current value of the expression "The movie title is {{$ctrl.movie.title}}", where movie is an object in the parent scope.
& is a bit tricky, and in fact there seems to be no compelling reason to ever use it. It allows you to evaluate an expression in the parent scope, substituting parameters with variables from the child scope. An example (plunk):
<child-component
foo = "myVar + $ctrl.parentVar + myOtherVar"
</child-component>
angular.module('heroApp').component('childComponent', {
template: "<div>{{ $ctrl.parentFoo({myVar:5, myOtherVar:'xyz'}) }}</div>",
bindings: {
parentFoo: '&foo'
}
});
Given parentVar=10, the expression parentFoo({myVar:5, myOtherVar:'xyz'}) will evaluate to 5 + 10 + 'xyz' and the component will render as:
<div>15xyz</div>
When would you ever want to use this convoluted functionality? & is often used by people to pass to the child scope a callback function in the parent scope. In reality, however, the same effect can be achieved by using '<' to pass the function, which is more straightforward and avoids the awkward curly braces syntax to pass parameters ({myVar:5, myOtherVar:'xyz'}). Consider:
Callback using &:
<child-component parent-foo="$ctrl.foo(bar)"/>
angular.module('heroApp').component('childComponent', {
template: '<button ng-click="$ctrl.parentFoo({bar:'xyz'})">Call foo in parent</button>',
bindings: {
parentFoo: '&'
}
});
Callback using <:
<child-component parent-foo="$ctrl.foo"/>
angular.module('heroApp').component('childComponent', {
template: '<button ng-click="$ctrl.parentFoo('xyz')">Call foo in parent</button>',
bindings: {
parentFoo: '<'
}
});
Note that objects (and arrays) are passed by reference to the child scope, not copied. What this means is that even if it's a one-way binding, you are working with the same object in both the parent and the child scope.
To see the different prefixes in action, open this plunk.
One-time binding(initialization) using ::
[Official docs]
Later versions of AngularJS introduce the option to have a one-time binding, where the child scope property is updated only once. This improves performance by eliminating the need to watch the parent property. The syntax is different from above; to declare a one-time binding, you add :: in front of the expression in the component tag:
<child-component
tagline = "::$ctrl.tagline">
</child-component>
This will propagate the value of tagline to the child scope without establishing a one-way or two-way binding. Note: if tagline is initially undefined in the parent scope, angular will watch it until it changes and then make a one-time update of the corresponding property in the child scope.
Summary
The table below shows how the prefixes work depending on whether the property is an object, array, string, etc.
The = way is 2-way binding, which lets you to have live changes inside your directive. When someone changes that variable out of directive, you will have that changed data inside your directive, but # way is not two-ways binding. It works like Text. You bind once, and you will have only its value.
To get it more clearly, you can use this great article:
AngularJS Directive Scope '#' and '='
# local scope property is used to access string values that are defined outside the directive.
= In cases where you need to create a two-way binding between the outer scope and the directive’s isolate scope you can use the = character.
& local scope property allows the consumer of a directive to pass in a function that the directive can invoke.
Kindly check the below link which gives you clear understanding with examples.I found it really very useful so thought of sharing it.
http://weblogs.asp.net/dwahlin/creating-custom-angularjs-directives-part-2-isolate-scope
Even when the scope is local, as in your example, you may access the parent scope through the property $parent. Assume in the code below, that title is defined on the parent scope. You may then access title as $parent.title:
link : function(scope) { console.log(scope.$parent.title) },
template : "the parent has the title {{$parent.title}}"
However in most cases the same effect is better obtained using attributes.
An example of where I found the "&" notation, which is used "to pass data from the isolated scope via an expression and to the parent scope", useful (and a two-way databinding could not be used) was in a directive for rendering a special datastructure inside an ng-repeat.
<render data = "record" deleteFunction = "dataList.splice($index,1)" ng-repeat = "record in dataList" > </render>
One part of the rendering was a delete button and here it was useful to attach a deletefunction from the outside scope via &. Inside the render-directive it looks like
scope : { data = "=", deleteFunction = "&"},
template : "... <button ng-click = "deleteFunction()"></button>"
2-way databinding i.e. data = "=" can not be used as the delete function would run on every $digest cycle, which is not good, as the record is then immediately deleted and never rendered.
I implemented all the possible options in a fiddle.
It deals with all the options:
scope:{
name:'&'
},
scope:{
name:'='
},
scope:{
name:'#'
},
scope:{
},
scope:true,
https://jsfiddle.net/rishulmatta/v7xf2ujm
the main difference between them is just
# Attribute string binding
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding
# and = see other answers.
One gotcha about &
TL;DR;
& gets expression (not only function like in examples in other answers) from a parent, and sets it as a function in the directive, that calls the expression. And this function has the ability to replace any variable (even function name) of expression, by passing an object with the variables.
explained
& is an expression reference, that means if you pass something like
<myDirective expr="x==y"></myDirective>
in the directive this expr will be a function, that calls the expression, like:
function expr(){return x == y}.
so in directive's html <button ng-click="expr()"></button> will call the expression. In js of the directive just $scope.expr() will call the expression too.
The expression will be called with $scope.x and $scope.y of the parent.
You have the ability to override the parameters!
If you set them by call, e.g. <button ng-click="expr({x:5})"></button>
then the expression will be called with your parameter x and parent's parameter y.
You can override both.
Now you know, why <button ng-click="functionFromParent({x:5})"></button> works.
Because it just calls the expression of parent (e.g. <myDirective functionFromParent="function1(x)"></myDirective>) and replaces possible values with your specified parameters, in this case x.
it could be:
<myDirective functionFromParent="function1(x) + 5"></myDirective>
or
<myDirective functionFromParent="function1(x) + z"></myDirective>
with child call:
<button ng-click="functionFromParent({x:5, z: 4})"></button>.
or even with function replacement:
<button ng-click="functionFromParent({function1: myfn, x:5, z: 4})"></button>.
it just an expression, does not matter if it is a function, or many functions, or just comparison. And you can replace any variable of this expression.
Examples:
directive template vs called code:
parent has defined $scope.x, $scope.y:
parent template: <myDirective expr="x==y"></myDirective>
<button ng-click="expr()"></button> calls $scope.x==$scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x: 5})"></button> calls 5 == $scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x:5, y:6})"></button> calls 5 == 6
parent has defined $scope.function1, $scope.x, $scope.y:
parent template: <myDirective expr="function1(x) + y"></myDirective>
<button ng-click="expr()"></button> calls $scope.function1($scope.x) + $scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x: 5})"></button> calls $scope.function1(5) + $scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x:5, y:6})"></button> calls $scope.function1(5) + 6
directive has $scope.myFn as function:
<button ng-click="expr({function1: myFn, x:5, y:6})"></button> calls $scope.myFn(5) + 6
Why do I have to use "{{title}}" with '#' and "title" with '='?
When you use {{title}} , only the parent scope value will be passed to directive view and evaluated. This is limited to one way, meaning that change will not be reflected in parent scope. You can use '=' when you want to reflect the changes done in child directive to parent scope also. This is two way.
Can I also access the parent scope directly, without decorating my
element with an attribute?
When directive has scope attribute in it ( scope : {} ), then you no longer will be able to access parent scope directly. But still it is possible to access it via scope.$parent etc. If you remove scope from directive, it can be accessed directly.
The documentation says "Often it's desirable to pass data from the
isolated scope via an expression and to the parent scope", but that
seems to work fine with bidirectional binding too. Why would the
expression route be better?
It depends based on context. If you want to call an expression or function with data, you use & and if you want share data , you can use biderectional way using '='
You can find the differences between multiple ways of passing data to directive at below link:
AngularJS – Isolated Scopes – # vs = vs &
http://www.codeforeach.com/angularjs/angularjs-isolated-scopes-vs-vs
# Attribute string binding (one way)
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding
# binds a local/directive scope property to the evaluated value of the DOM attribute.
= binds a local/directive scope property to a parent scope property.
& binding is for passing a method into your directive's scope so that it can be called within your directive.
# Attribute string binding
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding
I have directive in which I have scope mentioned as :
return {
restrict: 'AE',
transclude: true,
scope: {
model: '=',
menu: '='
},}
so my question is apart from model and menu variables what all variables are accessible to me? Does Isolated scope inherits parent scope variables ?
If I don't want to use isolated scope then what could be done where I can set these two variables in directives and inherits all variables from parent scope ?
Thank you.
If I understood correctly, what you want to achieve is a new scope inheriting all the parent stuff. That is easy to do.
By default a directive uses the parent scope, but you can do two different things:
scope: {} // Isolated scope
or:
scope: true // new scope inheriting from parent
So with the later, you will have all the parent scope has but you can set new stuff there and the parent won't know. Example:
http://plnkr.co/edit/oL5ALPvkEzkiXSuOSNnE?p=preview
I hope this is what you asked for.
EDIT: I edited the plunker. The idea with new scopes that inherits from others is:
If parent has a primitive like name the child will inherit it, but if you do something like:
childScope.name = ".." you are not modifying the parent name, you are shadowing it, AKA creating a new name that will hide the parent name. this means that the parent will never know if the child modified the name.
foo is something created in the new child scope, that means that the parent will never know.
user is not a primitive, it is an object and when the child modifies its name, it is not shadowing the entire user, it is just modifying its value:
childScope.user.name = "Fox"
This is getting the user reference and modifying its value, is not modifying the entire user, so you are not shadowing it. If you do:
childScope.user = { name: 'Foo' };
Then you're creating an entire user, AKA you're creating a new reference so that will shadow the parent user and the parent-child relationship of that object will end.
This is what we call the dot rule.
If the scope property of the directive definition is set to an { /* object hash */ } an isolated scope is created for your directive. If you set the scope property to true a new scope is generated that inherits from the parent scope.
See this plunker for a demo on directive scope behaviour.
If you don't want to isolate the scope but do want to pass argument to the directive you can use the $observe method of the attributes service.
function linkingFn(scope, elm, attrs, ctrl) {
// get the attribute value
console.log(attrs.ngModel);
// change the attribute
attrs.$set('ngModel', 'new value');
// observe changes to interpolated attribute
attrs.$observe('ngModel', function(value) {
console.log('ngModel has changed value to ' + value);
});
}
Creating a two way binding without an isolated scope can be done with the $parse service.
when you set scope like this, it's an isolated scope, and as its name says, it doesn't inherit any property from parent scope.
However, you can directly define variable on the scope, in the directive link method, like this:
.directive('someDirective', function(){
return {
restrict: 'C',
link: function(scope, element, attrs){
scope.newVariable = "newVariable"
}
}
}
it adds newVariable to your scope.Hope it helps~
More info on directive can be seen here, http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive. There is a section with the name Creating a Directive that Manipulates the DOM
Can anyone explain whats the difference between accessing directive attribute from the scope as in :
scope: { someVar: '=' }
vs
link: function (scope, elem, attr, ctrl) {
attr.someVar
}
It seems somehow both accomplish the same thing.
From the AngularJS ng.$compile docs:
= or =attr - set up bi-directional binding between a local scope property and the parent scope property of name defined via the value of the attr attribute... Any changes to parentModel will be reflected in localModel and any changes in localModel will reflect in parentModel.
In other words, this creates a watch on the attribute, causing changes to the model in either the parent scope or the directive scope to be reflected in the other.
Referencing the attribute merely returns a string. Thus if you had a directive foo and your HTML looked like
<foo some-var="bar"></foo>
In your link function, attr.someVar would be the string literal "bar". You can evaluate bar in the scope by calling scope.$eval(attr.someVar) (or scope.$parent.$eval(attr.someVar) if the directive has an isolate scope) at any time, but it is not done for you.
I've read the AngularJS documentation on the topic carefully, and then fiddled around with a directive. Here's the fiddle.
And here are some relevant snippets:
From the HTML:
<pane bi-title="title" title="{{title}}">{{text}}</pane>
From the pane directive:
scope: { biTitle: '=', title: '#', bar: '=' },
There are several things I don't get:
Why do I have to use "{{title}}" with '#' and "title" with '='?
Can I also access the parent scope directly, without decorating my element with an attribute?
The documentation says "Often it's desirable to pass data from the isolated scope via expression and to the parent scope", but that seems to work fine with bidirectional binding too. Why would the expression route be better?
I found another fiddle that shows the expression solution too: http://jsfiddle.net/maxisam/QrCXh/
Why do I have to use "{{title}}" with '#' and "title" with '='?
# binds a local/directive scope property to the evaluated value of the DOM attribute. If you use title=title1 or title="title1", the value of DOM attribute "title" is simply the string title1. If you use title="{{title}}", the value of the DOM attribute "title" is the interpolated value of {{title}}, hence the string will be whatever parent scope property "title" is currently set to. Since attribute values are always strings, you will always end up with a string value for this property in the directive's scope when using #.
= binds a local/directive scope property to a parent scope property. So with =, you use the parent model/scope property name as the value of the DOM attribute. You can't use {{}}s with =.
With #, you can do things like title="{{title}} and then some" -- {{title}} is interpolated, then the string "and them some" is concatenated with it. The final concatenated string is what the local/directive scope property gets. (You can't do this with =, only #.)
With #, you will need to use attr.$observe('title', function(value) { ... }) if you need to use the value in your link(ing) function. E.g., if(scope.title == "...") won't work like you expect. Note that this means you can only access this attribute asynchronously.
You don't need to use $observe() if you are only using the value in a template. E.g., template: '<div>{{title}}</div>'.
With =, you don't need to use $observe.
Can I also access the parent scope directly, without decorating my element with an attribute?
Yes, but only if you don't use an isolate scope. Remove this line from your directive
scope: { ... }
and then your directive will not create a new scope. It will use the parent scope. You can then access all of the parent scope properties directly.
The documentation says "Often it's desirable to pass data from the isolated scope via an expression and to the parent scope", but that seems to work fine with bidirectional binding too. Why would the expression route be better?
Yes, bidirectional binding allows the local/directive scope and the parent scope to share data. "Expression binding" allows the directive to call an expression (or function) defined by a DOM attribute -- and you can also pass data as arguments to the expression or function. So, if you don't need to share data with the parent -- you just want to call a function defined in the parent scope -- you can use the & syntax.
See also
Lukas's isolated scope blog post (covers #, =, &)
dnc253's explanation of # and =
my blog-like answer about scopes -- the directives section (way at the bottom, just before the Summary section) has a picture of an isolate scope and its parent scope -- the directive scope uses # for one property and = for another
What is the difference between & vs # and = in angularJS
There are a lot of great answers here, but I would like to offer my perspective on the differences between #, =, and & binding that proved useful for me.
All three bindings are ways of passing data from your parent scope to your directive's isolated scope through the element's attributes:
# binding is for passing strings.
These strings support {{}} expressions for interpolated values.
For example:
. The interpolated expression is evaluated against
directive's parent scope.
= binding is for two-way model binding. The model in parent scope
is linked to the model in the directive's isolated scope. Changes to
one model affects the other, and vice versa.
& binding is for passing a method into your directive's scope so that
it can be called within your directive. The method is pre-bound to
the directive's parent scope, and supports arguments. For example if the method is hello(name) in parent scope, then in
order to execute the method from inside your directive, you must
call $scope.hello({name:'world'})
I find that it's easier to remember these differences by referring to the scope bindings by a shorter description:
# Attribute string binding
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding
The symbols also make it clearer as to what the scope variable represents inside of your directive's implementation:
# string
= model
& method
In order of usefulness (for me anyways):
=
#
&
The = means bi-directional binding, so a reference to a variable to the parent scope. This means, when you change the variable in the directive, it will be changed in the parent scope as well.
# means the variable will be copied (cloned) into the directive.
As far as I know, <pane bi-title="{{title}}" title="{{title}}">{{text}}</pane> should work too. bi-title will receive the parent scope variable value, which can be changed in the directive.
If you need to change several variables in the parent scope, you could execute a function on the parent scope from within the directive (or pass data via a service).
If you would like to see more how this work with a live example. http://jsfiddle.net/juanmendez/k6chmnch/
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.controller("myController", function ($scope) {
$scope.title = "binding";
});
app.directive("jmFind", function () {
return {
replace: true,
restrict: 'C',
transclude: true,
scope: {
title1: "=",
title2: "#"
},
template: "<div><p>{{title1}} {{title2}}</p></div>"
};
});
# get as string
This does not create any bindings whatsoever. You're simply getting the word you passed in as a string
= 2 way binding
changes made from the controller will be reflected in the reference held by the directive, and vice-versa
& This behaves a bit differently, because the scope gets a function that returns the object that was passed in. I'm assuming this was necessary to make it work. The fiddle should make this clear.
After calling this getter function, the resulting object behaves as follows:
if a function was passed: then the function is executed in the parent (controller) closure when called
if a non-function was passed in: simply get a local copy of the object that has no bindings
This fiddle should demonstrate how they work. Pay special attention to the scope functions with get... in the name to hopefully better understand what I mean about &
There are three ways scope can be added in the directive:
Parent scope: This is the default scope inheritance.
The directive and its parent(controller/directive inside which it lies) scope is same.
So any changes made to the scope variables inside directive are reflected in the parent controller as well. You don't need to specify this as it is the default.
Child scope: directive creates a child scope which inherits from the parent scope if you specify the scope variable of the directive as true.
Here, if you change the scope variables inside directive, it won't reflect in the parent scope, but if you change the property of a scope variable, that is reflected in the parent scope, as you actually modified the scope variable of the parent.
Example,
app.directive("myDirective", function(){
return {
restrict: "EA",
scope: true,
link: function(element, scope, attrs){
scope.somvar = "new value"; //doesnot reflect in the parent scope
scope.someObj.someProp = "new value"; //reflects as someObj is of parent, we modified that but did not override.
}
};
});
Isolated scope: This is used when you want to create the scope that does not inherit from the controller scope.
This happens when you are creating plugins as this makes the directive generic since it can be placed in any HTML and does not gets affected by its parent scope.
Now, if you don't want any interaction with the parent scope, then you can just specify scope as an empty object. like,
scope: {} //this does not interact with the parent scope in any way
Mostly this is not the case as we need some interaction with the parent scope, so we want some of the values/ changes to pass through.
For this reason, we use:
1. "#" ( Text binding / one-way binding )
2. "=" ( Direct model binding / two-way binding )
3. "&" ( Behaviour binding / Method binding )
# means that the changes from the controller scope will be reflected in the directive scope but if you modify the value in the directive scope, the controller scope variable will not get affected.
# always expects the mapped attribute to be an expression. This is very important; because to make the “#” prefix work, we need to wrap the attribute value inside {{}}.
= is bidirectional so if you change the variable in directive scope, the controller scope variable gets affected as well
& is used to bind controller scope method so that if needed we can call it from the directive
The advantage here is that the name of the variable need not be same in controller scope and directive scope.
Example, the directive scope has a variable "dirVar" which syncs with variable "contVar" of the controller scope. This gives a lot of power and generalization to the directive as one controller can sync with variable v1 while another controller using the same directive can ask dirVar to sync with variable v2.
Below is the example of usage:
The directive and controller are:
var app = angular.module("app", []);
app.controller("MainCtrl", function( $scope ){
$scope.name = "Harry";
$scope.color = "#333333";
$scope.reverseName = function(){
$scope.name = $scope.name.split("").reverse().join("");
};
$scope.randomColor = function(){
$scope.color = '#'+Math.floor(Math.random()*16777215).toString(16);
};
});
app.directive("myDirective", function(){
return {
restrict: "EA",
scope: {
name: "#",
color: "=",
reverse: "&"
},
link: function(element, scope, attrs){
//do something like
$scope.reverse();
//calling the controllers function
}
};
});
And the html(note the differnce for # and =):
<div my-directive
class="directive"
name="{{name}}"
reverse="reverseName()"
color="color" >
</div>
Here is a link to the blog which describes it nicely.
Simply we can use:-
# :- for String values for one way Data binding. in one way data binding you can only pass scope value to directive
= :- for object value for two way data binding. in two way data binding you can change the scope value in directive as well as in html also.
& :- for methods and functions.
EDIT
In our Component definition for Angular version 1.5 And above
there are four different type of bindings:
= Two-way data binding :- if we change the value,it automatically update
< one way binding :- when we just want to read a parameter from a parent scope and not update it.
# this is for String Parameters
& this is for Callbacks in case your component needs to output something to its parent scope
I created a little HTML file that contains Angular code demonstrating the differences between them:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Angular</title>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="myCtrl as VM">
<a my-dir
attr1="VM.sayHi('Juan')" <!-- scope: "=" -->
attr2="VM.sayHi('Juan')" <!-- scope: "#" -->
attr3="VM.sayHi('Juan')" <!-- scope: "&" -->
></a>
</div>
<script>
angular.module("myApp", [])
.controller("myCtrl", [function(){
var vm = this;
vm.sayHi = function(name){
return ("Hey there, " + name);
}
}])
.directive("myDir", [function(){
return {
scope: {
attr1: "=",
attr2: "#",
attr3: "&"
},
link: function(scope){
console.log(scope.attr1); // =, logs "Hey there, Juan"
console.log(scope.attr2); // #, logs "VM.sayHi('Juan')"
console.log(scope.attr3); // &, logs "function (a){return h(c,a)}"
console.log(scope.attr3()); // &, logs "Hey there, Juan"
}
}
}]);
</script>
</body>
</html>
This question has been already beaten to death, but I'll share this anyway in case someone else out there is struggling with the horrible mess that is AngularJS scopes. This will cover =, <, #, & and ::. The full write up can be found here.
= establishes a two way binding. Changing the property in the parent will result in change in the child, and vice versa.
< establishes a one way binding, parent to child. Changing the property in the parent will result in change in the child, but changing the child property will not affect the parent property.
# will assign to the child property the string value of the tag attribute. If the attribute contains an expression, the child property updates whenever the expression evaluates to a different string. For example:
<child-component description="The movie title is {{$ctrl.movie.title}}" />
bindings: {
description: '#',
}
Here, the description property in the child scope will be the current value of the expression "The movie title is {{$ctrl.movie.title}}", where movie is an object in the parent scope.
& is a bit tricky, and in fact there seems to be no compelling reason to ever use it. It allows you to evaluate an expression in the parent scope, substituting parameters with variables from the child scope. An example (plunk):
<child-component
foo = "myVar + $ctrl.parentVar + myOtherVar"
</child-component>
angular.module('heroApp').component('childComponent', {
template: "<div>{{ $ctrl.parentFoo({myVar:5, myOtherVar:'xyz'}) }}</div>",
bindings: {
parentFoo: '&foo'
}
});
Given parentVar=10, the expression parentFoo({myVar:5, myOtherVar:'xyz'}) will evaluate to 5 + 10 + 'xyz' and the component will render as:
<div>15xyz</div>
When would you ever want to use this convoluted functionality? & is often used by people to pass to the child scope a callback function in the parent scope. In reality, however, the same effect can be achieved by using '<' to pass the function, which is more straightforward and avoids the awkward curly braces syntax to pass parameters ({myVar:5, myOtherVar:'xyz'}). Consider:
Callback using &:
<child-component parent-foo="$ctrl.foo(bar)"/>
angular.module('heroApp').component('childComponent', {
template: '<button ng-click="$ctrl.parentFoo({bar:'xyz'})">Call foo in parent</button>',
bindings: {
parentFoo: '&'
}
});
Callback using <:
<child-component parent-foo="$ctrl.foo"/>
angular.module('heroApp').component('childComponent', {
template: '<button ng-click="$ctrl.parentFoo('xyz')">Call foo in parent</button>',
bindings: {
parentFoo: '<'
}
});
Note that objects (and arrays) are passed by reference to the child scope, not copied. What this means is that even if it's a one-way binding, you are working with the same object in both the parent and the child scope.
To see the different prefixes in action, open this plunk.
One-time binding(initialization) using ::
[Official docs]
Later versions of AngularJS introduce the option to have a one-time binding, where the child scope property is updated only once. This improves performance by eliminating the need to watch the parent property. The syntax is different from above; to declare a one-time binding, you add :: in front of the expression in the component tag:
<child-component
tagline = "::$ctrl.tagline">
</child-component>
This will propagate the value of tagline to the child scope without establishing a one-way or two-way binding. Note: if tagline is initially undefined in the parent scope, angular will watch it until it changes and then make a one-time update of the corresponding property in the child scope.
Summary
The table below shows how the prefixes work depending on whether the property is an object, array, string, etc.
The = way is 2-way binding, which lets you to have live changes inside your directive. When someone changes that variable out of directive, you will have that changed data inside your directive, but # way is not two-ways binding. It works like Text. You bind once, and you will have only its value.
To get it more clearly, you can use this great article:
AngularJS Directive Scope '#' and '='
# local scope property is used to access string values that are defined outside the directive.
= In cases where you need to create a two-way binding between the outer scope and the directive’s isolate scope you can use the = character.
& local scope property allows the consumer of a directive to pass in a function that the directive can invoke.
Kindly check the below link which gives you clear understanding with examples.I found it really very useful so thought of sharing it.
http://weblogs.asp.net/dwahlin/creating-custom-angularjs-directives-part-2-isolate-scope
Even when the scope is local, as in your example, you may access the parent scope through the property $parent. Assume in the code below, that title is defined on the parent scope. You may then access title as $parent.title:
link : function(scope) { console.log(scope.$parent.title) },
template : "the parent has the title {{$parent.title}}"
However in most cases the same effect is better obtained using attributes.
An example of where I found the "&" notation, which is used "to pass data from the isolated scope via an expression and to the parent scope", useful (and a two-way databinding could not be used) was in a directive for rendering a special datastructure inside an ng-repeat.
<render data = "record" deleteFunction = "dataList.splice($index,1)" ng-repeat = "record in dataList" > </render>
One part of the rendering was a delete button and here it was useful to attach a deletefunction from the outside scope via &. Inside the render-directive it looks like
scope : { data = "=", deleteFunction = "&"},
template : "... <button ng-click = "deleteFunction()"></button>"
2-way databinding i.e. data = "=" can not be used as the delete function would run on every $digest cycle, which is not good, as the record is then immediately deleted and never rendered.
I implemented all the possible options in a fiddle.
It deals with all the options:
scope:{
name:'&'
},
scope:{
name:'='
},
scope:{
name:'#'
},
scope:{
},
scope:true,
https://jsfiddle.net/rishulmatta/v7xf2ujm
the main difference between them is just
# Attribute string binding
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding
# and = see other answers.
One gotcha about &
TL;DR;
& gets expression (not only function like in examples in other answers) from a parent, and sets it as a function in the directive, that calls the expression. And this function has the ability to replace any variable (even function name) of expression, by passing an object with the variables.
explained
& is an expression reference, that means if you pass something like
<myDirective expr="x==y"></myDirective>
in the directive this expr will be a function, that calls the expression, like:
function expr(){return x == y}.
so in directive's html <button ng-click="expr()"></button> will call the expression. In js of the directive just $scope.expr() will call the expression too.
The expression will be called with $scope.x and $scope.y of the parent.
You have the ability to override the parameters!
If you set them by call, e.g. <button ng-click="expr({x:5})"></button>
then the expression will be called with your parameter x and parent's parameter y.
You can override both.
Now you know, why <button ng-click="functionFromParent({x:5})"></button> works.
Because it just calls the expression of parent (e.g. <myDirective functionFromParent="function1(x)"></myDirective>) and replaces possible values with your specified parameters, in this case x.
it could be:
<myDirective functionFromParent="function1(x) + 5"></myDirective>
or
<myDirective functionFromParent="function1(x) + z"></myDirective>
with child call:
<button ng-click="functionFromParent({x:5, z: 4})"></button>.
or even with function replacement:
<button ng-click="functionFromParent({function1: myfn, x:5, z: 4})"></button>.
it just an expression, does not matter if it is a function, or many functions, or just comparison. And you can replace any variable of this expression.
Examples:
directive template vs called code:
parent has defined $scope.x, $scope.y:
parent template: <myDirective expr="x==y"></myDirective>
<button ng-click="expr()"></button> calls $scope.x==$scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x: 5})"></button> calls 5 == $scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x:5, y:6})"></button> calls 5 == 6
parent has defined $scope.function1, $scope.x, $scope.y:
parent template: <myDirective expr="function1(x) + y"></myDirective>
<button ng-click="expr()"></button> calls $scope.function1($scope.x) + $scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x: 5})"></button> calls $scope.function1(5) + $scope.y
<button ng-click="expr({x:5, y:6})"></button> calls $scope.function1(5) + 6
directive has $scope.myFn as function:
<button ng-click="expr({function1: myFn, x:5, y:6})"></button> calls $scope.myFn(5) + 6
Why do I have to use "{{title}}" with '#' and "title" with '='?
When you use {{title}} , only the parent scope value will be passed to directive view and evaluated. This is limited to one way, meaning that change will not be reflected in parent scope. You can use '=' when you want to reflect the changes done in child directive to parent scope also. This is two way.
Can I also access the parent scope directly, without decorating my
element with an attribute?
When directive has scope attribute in it ( scope : {} ), then you no longer will be able to access parent scope directly. But still it is possible to access it via scope.$parent etc. If you remove scope from directive, it can be accessed directly.
The documentation says "Often it's desirable to pass data from the
isolated scope via an expression and to the parent scope", but that
seems to work fine with bidirectional binding too. Why would the
expression route be better?
It depends based on context. If you want to call an expression or function with data, you use & and if you want share data , you can use biderectional way using '='
You can find the differences between multiple ways of passing data to directive at below link:
AngularJS – Isolated Scopes – # vs = vs &
http://www.codeforeach.com/angularjs/angularjs-isolated-scopes-vs-vs
# Attribute string binding (one way)
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding
# binds a local/directive scope property to the evaluated value of the DOM attribute.
= binds a local/directive scope property to a parent scope property.
& binding is for passing a method into your directive's scope so that it can be called within your directive.
# Attribute string binding
= Two-way model binding
& Callback method binding